Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
235 Valid Reviews
The Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 246 reviews. There are 235 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 11 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 235 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 135 |
|
57% |
| 9/10 | 65 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
92.85% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.85% and is based on 235 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
70 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 235 valid reviews, the experience has 70 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 92.00% and is based on 70 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.86%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David | 9/10 | 115 days | 97.9 | 100% | |
| Kelly | 9/10 | 115 days | 97.9 | 100% | |
| Luci | 1/10 | 207 days | 68.04 | 69% | |
| Colin Anderson | 10/10 | 207 days | 93.21 | 95% | |
| Ashleigh Lim | 7/10 | 207 days | 84.82 | 87% | |
| Robert Adler | 9/10 | 207 days | 93.21 | 95% | |
| Cam and Jem | 10/10 | 207 days | 93.21 | 95% | |
| Ju | 9/10 | 236 days | 91.17 | 93% | |
| Liz Wade | 9/10 | 267 days | 88.7 | 91% | |
| Leon | 9/10 | 267 days | 88.7 | 91% | |
| Will37 | 8/10 | 267 days | 84.27 | 86% | |
| Tanja Rombey | 10/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 88% | |
| Elise Cook | 10/10 | 328 days | 82.95 | 85% | |
| Rob G | 10/10 | 328 days | 82.95 | 85% | |
| Slaven Clan | 10/10 | 359 days | 79.58 | 81% | |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 359 days | 79.58 | 81% | |
| Jenn | 10/10 | 389 days | 76.02 | 78% | |
| Andrew Hammond | 9/10 | 389 days | 76.02 | 78% | |
| Allegra | 10/10 | 512 days | 58.46 | 60% | |
| Blazey’s | 10/10 | 601 days | 43.67 | 45% | |
| Maretta | 10/10 | 693 days | 30.61 | 31% | |
| Marieke | 7/10 | 693 days | 27.85 | 28% | |
| Macker | 9/10 | 693 days | 30.61 | 31% | |
| Rob Mellor | 10/10 | 724 days | 26.81 | 27% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 724 days | 26.81 | 27% | |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 754 days | 23.43 | 24% | |
| Scooper | 9/10 | 754 days | 23.43 | 24% | |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 816 days | 17.33 | 18% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 816 days | 17.33 | 18% | |
| J. Chiao | 10/10 | 877 days | 12.53 | 13% | |
| Alexandrah Swann | 9/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Candy | 9/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Manoch Poungraya | 10/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Wendy | 8/10 | 907 days | 10.07 | 10% | |
| S Becker | 9/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Matt | 9/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| PATRICIA S PARKIN | 9/10 | 938 days | 8.91 | 9% | |
| Steve Pickard | 10/10 | 938 days | 8.91 | 9% | |
| Michael Bichlmeier | 3/10 | 941 days | 6.74 | 7% | |
| Nick Cartmell | 8/10 | 971 days |  |
7.06 | 7% |
| Claire Hodges | 10/10 | 976 days | 7.24 | 7% | |
| Eversons | 8/10 | 997 days | 6.2 | 6% | |
| Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 1038 days | 5.51 | 6% | |
| Joe Barnett | 10/10 | 1041 days | 5.46 | 6% | |
| Keith Roberts | 10/10 | 1058 days | 5.22 | 5% | |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 1069 days | 5.11 | 5% | |
| Alyssa Tunley | 9/10 | 1072 days | 5.08 | 5% | |
| Vanessa Stubbs | 9/10 | 1115 days | 4.96 | 5% | |
| CARMERS | 10/10 | 1119 days | 4.95 | 5% | |
| Anthony Brooker | 9/10 | 1129 days | 4.93 | 5% | |
| Isabel See | 10/10 | 1152 days | 4.89 | 5% | |
| Viola Cube | 5/10 | 1166 days | 3.94 | 4% | |
| Jonas Heidger | 5/10 | 1187 days | 3.9 | 4% | |
| Kirk Lyons | 10/10 | 1196 days | 4.8 | 5% | |
| Malai Berg | 10/10 | 1204 days | 4.79 | 5% | |
| Teo Hong Wei | 10/10 | 1218 days | 4.76 | 5% | |
| Eileen | 10/10 | 1233 days | 4.73 | 5% | |
| Brett King | 9/10 | 1242 days | 4.71 | 5% | |
| Errol Iaich | 10/10 | 1244 days | 4.71 | 5% | |
| Kimmo Kiiski | 10/10 | 1247 days | 4.7 | 5% | |
| Janet Pentelow | 10/10 | 1264 days | 4.67 | 5% | |
| Artemis | 10/10 | 1268 days | 4.66 | 5% | |
| Cissy Wei | 10/10 | 1272 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Laura Kudo | 10/10 | 1283 days | 4.63 | 5% | |
| Michael Eugster | 10/10 | 1303 days | 4.59 | 5% | |
| Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 1309 days | 4.58 | 5% | |
| Jesse Kruithoed | 9/10 | 1312 days | 4.58 | 5% | |
| John Ginty | 10/10 | 1313 days | 4.57 | 5% | |
| Rosanna Leeming | 10/10 | 1318 days | 4.56 | 5% | |
| Colin Roberts | 8/10 | 1322 days | 4.33 | 4% | |
| Stephanie Hesketh | 10/10 | 1331 days | 4.54 | 5% | |
| Suzanne Richmond | 9/10 | 1362 days | 4.48 | 5% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 6/10 | 1379 days | |
3.69 | 4% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 1399 days | 4.41 | 4% | |
| David Townsend | 10/10 | 1410 days | 4.38 | 4% | |
| Andrew Altman | 10/10 | 1424 days | 4.36 | 4% | |
| Sheryl Hicks | 9/10 | 1429 days | 4.35 | 4% | |
| Renee Hahnel | 10/10 | 1433 days | 4.34 | 4% | |
| James Campbell | 10/10 | 1438 days | 4.33 | 4% | |
| Mike Guest | 10/10 | 1442 days | 4.32 | 4% | |
| Chris | 7/10 | 1454 days | 3.91 | 4% | |
| Derek Drost | 8/10 | 1458 days | 4.08 | 4% | |
| Will Hughes | 10/10 | 1512 days | 4.18 | 4% | |
| Mikael Torres | 10/10 | 1516 days | 4.18 | 4% | |
| Shay | 10/10 | 1546 days | 4.12 | 4% | |
| Belinda Clarke | 10/10 | 1581 days | 4.05 | 4% | |
| Ian anderton | 10/10 | 1583 days | 4.05 | 4% | |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1593 days | 4.03 | 4% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 10/10 | 1600 days | 4.01 | 4% | |
| Erin Polcyn Sailer | 8/10 | 1617 days | 3.78 | 4% | |
| Max | 10/10 | 1646 days | 3.92 | 4% | |
| Nina Grimaldi | 10/10 | 1728 days | 3.76 | 4% | |
| David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 1746 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 1763 days | 3.36 | 3% | |
| Julie | 10/10 | 1789 days | 3.64 | 4% | |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 1800 days | 3.62 | 4% | |
| Melissa Darlington | 10/10 | 1802 days | 3.62 | 4% | |
| Peter Schultz | 10/10 | 1840 days | 3.54 | 4% | |
| Tom Reber | 10/10 | 1868 days | 3.49 | 4% | |
| Andreas Knipper | 10/10 | 1874 days | 3.48 | 4% | |
| Rawiri johnston | 9/10 | 1942 days | 3.34 | 3% | |
| melissa heng | 9/10 | 2003 days | 3.22 | 3% | |
| Oliver Pester | 10/10 | 2017 days | 3.2 | 3% | |
| Heather Kingston | 10/10 | 2034 days | 3.16 | 3% | |
| Mike Gornall | 10/10 | 2034 days | 3.16 | 3% | |
| Vincent S. | 9/10 | 2062 days | 3.11 | 3% | |
| Jess Rose | 10/10 | 2062 days | 3.11 | 3% | |
| Constantin D | 10/10 | 2074 days | 3.08 | 3% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 2077 days | 3.08 | 3% | |
| Einar Glommes | 10/10 | 2083 days | 3.07 | 3% | |
| Chris Coomber | 10/10 | 2085 days | 3.06 | 3% | |
| Manuela | 10/10 | 2120 days | |
2.99 | 3% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 2120 days | |
2.99 | 3% |
| Fanny DeBon | 10/10 | 2122 days | |
2.99 | 3% |
| Lorcan Lennon | 8/10 | 2135 days | |
2.82 | 3% |
| Hubert Schmid | 10/10 | 2178 days | |
2.88 | 3% |
| Charlee Jayne | 10/10 | 2246 days | 2.75 | 3% | |
| Fabian Rodriguez | 8/10 | 2307 days | 2.5 | 3% | |
| Nikolas Gut | 10/10 | 2366 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 2372 days | |
2.5 | 3% |
| Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 2414 days | |
2.3 | 2% |
| David Spindler | 9/10 | 2427 days | 2.39 | 2% | |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 2447 days | |
2.35 | 2% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 9/10 | 2450 days | |
2.35 | 2% |
| Susser | 9/10 | 2451 days | |
2.35 | 2% |
| corey young | 10/10 | 2458 days | 2.33 | 2% | |
| Rohan Kulatunga | 10/10 | 2458 days | 2.33 | 2% | |
| Mick Hanily | 10/10 | 2458 days | 2.33 | 2% | |
| Wendy Wilson | 9/10 | 2458 days | 2.33 | 2% | |
| Marc Greeve | 8/10 | 2466 days | |
2.2 | 2% |
| Philipp Haass | 10/10 | 2467 days | |
2.32 | 2% |
| Sally Mortensen | 8/10 | 2489 days | 2.16 | 2% | |
| Nicholas Ng | 5/10 | 2489 days | 1.84 | 2% | |
| Pokari | 8/10 | 2550 days | 2.05 | 2% | |
| Sandy Goh | 9/10 | 2550 days | 2.15 | 2% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 2550 days | 2.15 | 2% | |
| Team Kim&James | 10/10 | 2611 days | 2.03 | 2% | |
| AileenandTrent | 10/10 | 2611 days | 2.03 | 2% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 10/10 | 2611 days | 2.03 | 2% | |
| Andrew Spooner | 10/10 | 2642 days | 1.97 | 2% | |
| Elise Robson | 10/10 | 2672 days | 1.91 | 2% | |
| Sven Woelk | 8/10 | 2728 days | |
1.71 | 2% |
| Barbara Lee | 10/10 | 2733 days | 1.79 | 2% | |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 2733 days | 1.79 | 2% | |
| Raelene Vine | 8/10 | 2764 days | 1.65 | 2% | |
| Veronica and Jordi | 9/10 | 2783 days | |
1.7 | 2% |
| Michael Nolan | 10/10 | 2792 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| rvonroad | 10/10 | 2823 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2823 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| Moni Sangoi | 9/10 | 2823 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| brian barran | 10/10 | 2823 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| Christian | 8/10 | 2836 days | |
1.51 | 2% |
| Mike Edwards | 9/10 | 2839 days | |
1.59 | 2% |
| Margaret and Derek McNeil | 10/10 | 2839 days | |
1.59 | 2% |
| Nigel Leighton | 10/10 | 2842 days | |
1.58 | 2% |
| James Darren Tennant | 10/10 | 2866 days | |
1.53 | 2% |
| David | 9/10 | 2884 days | 1.5 | 2% | |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 2945 days | 1.38 | 1% | |
| MeganG | 8/10 | 3068 days | 1.08 | 1% | |
| ellisking13 | 10/10 | 3098 days | 1.08 | 1% | |
| Moni01 | 10/10 | 3098 days | 1.08 | 1% | |
| Spanspek | 10/10 | 3098 days | 1.08 | 1% | |
| Waldo Andersen | 9/10 | 3098 days | 1.08 | 1% | |
| Simon Rawlinson | 9/10 | 3110 days | |
1.06 | 1% |
| Norman UK | 8/10 | 3121 days | |
0.98 | 1% |
| Hilbert vanEssen | 9/10 | 3126 days | |
1.03 | 1% |
| Jaroslav Gajdos | 7/10 | 3132 days | |
0.92 | 1% |
| Siegfried Richter | 8/10 | 3139 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Domroes | 9/10 | 3150 days | |
0.98 | 1% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 3158 days | 0.96 | 1% | |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 3189 days | 0.9 | 1% | |
| dierikx | 4/10 | 3189 days | 0.71 | 1% | |
| polzeath | 9/10 | 3189 days | 0.9 | 1% | |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 3221 days | |
0.84 | 1% |
| Laura McCusker | 9/10 | 3236 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| techno69 | 10/10 | 3311 days | 0.66 | 1% | |
| edmondmenzies | 10/10 | 3373 days | 0.54 | 1% | |
| Reed Bell | 9/10 | 3434 days | 0.42 | 0% | |
| Rjay | 10/10 | 3434 days | 0.42 | 0% | |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 3453 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Lisa Milton | 10/10 | 3457 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| G Tulloch | 10/10 | 3458 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| camicb | 10/10 | 3464 days | 0.36 | 0% | |
| B_and_F_MN | 10/10 | 3464 days | 0.36 | 0% | |
| Sinloft | 10/10 | 3464 days | 0.36 | 0% | |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 3472 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 3472 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| John & Lorraine | 8/10 | 3474 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Peter Cade | 10/10 | 3478 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Frank & Ruth | 10/10 | 3479 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Richard Dudfield | 9/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Malcolm McLean | 9/10 | 3485 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Fabrizio Consolini | 9/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 3489 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Kai Eppink | 10/10 | 3493 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| LandJ | 7/10 | 3495 days | 0.28 | 0% | |
| Lenny Appel | 9/10 | 3496 days | |
0.3 | 0% |
| omlo | 10/10 | 3509 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| John Brand | 10/10 | 3509 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 8/10 | 3513 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Sue Haward | 9/10 | 3518 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Camper | 10/10 | 3646 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| johannaEmil | 10/10 | 3646 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| blue114 | 10/10 | 3676 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| MVGoldenDawn | 9/10 | 3676 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| nelliekaye | 9/10 | 3676 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Mary Van | 10/10 | 3676 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| jbchandler | 10/10 | 3799 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Stuart Smith | 10/10 | 3799 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Sue S | 9/10 | 3855 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paula Martinez | 10/10 | 3863 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris el capitan | 10/10 | 3865 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Glenn Williamson | 10/10 | 3881 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David Valentine | 9/10 | 3882 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lauren Roney | 10/10 | 3888 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Ann Grandchamp | 9/10 | 3902 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Brit_Chick | 10/10 | 3919 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| stacyg | 10/10 | 3919 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| niekv | 10/10 | 3935 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| martint | 10/10 | 3943 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris Bulman | 10/10 | 3961 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ruth Kinder | 10/10 | 4011 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| jank | 10/10 | 4041 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 4063 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MiepS | 9/10 | 4182 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 4184 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| RogerW | 10/10 | 4184 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 4212 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JimmyK | 9/10 | 4212 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gillian | 9/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| VincentD | 9/10 | 4228 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hetty | 9/10 | 4236 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Cate | 9/10 | 4236 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 4237 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| john west | 10/10 | 4262 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.37% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 71 days. However the Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Wanaka TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 87 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 84 | -1.32% |
| 85 | -1.33% |
| 86 | -1.35% |
| 87 | -1.37% |
| 88 | -1.38% |
| 89 | -1.40% |
| 90 | -1.41% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.