Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
72 Valid Reviews
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has a total of 78 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
56% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park valid reviews is 93.33% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 72 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
61% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 95.00% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henk Slot | 10/10 | 131 days | 100% |
| Pierre MATHE | 9/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Clement | 9/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Debyron | 7/10 | 555 days | 77% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 647 days | 77% |
| Alyssa Campese | 10/10 | 861 days | 58% |
| Allison Ngo | 7/10 | 982 days | 43% |
| Genevieve | 10/10 | 982 days | 46% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 982 days | 45% |
| Narelle and Alan | 10/10 | 1013 days | 43% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 1286 days | 21% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1286 days | 21% |
| Dr.A | 10/10 | 1957 days | 4% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 2016 days | 4% |
| Tori | 10/10 | 2047 days | 4% |
| Anna Swain | 10/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
| Ian and Sharon | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
| Tom Z. | 9/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
| Ian and Sharon | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
| Colin | 9/10 | 2504 days | 3% |
| Renee | 9/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Christin | 10/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 9/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Caitlin | 10/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| Bailey Dunne | 9/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Don G | 10/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Jack James | 7/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
| Antonio Rovira | 10/10 | 3141 days | 2% |
| Gary Prescot | 10/10 | 3206 days | 2% |
| Jane | 10/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
| P Poiraa | 9/10 | 3424 days | 1% |
| Ulla Strand | 10/10 | 3428 days | 1% |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 3477 days | 1% |
| paul danniels | 10/10 | 3477 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3708 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 7/10 | 3724 days | 1% |
| Paul Smith | 9/10 | 3791 days | 1% |
| Jeff Young | 9/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3882 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Bade | 10/10 | 3896 days | 1% |
| D J 13 | 9/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
| Jeni | 10/10 | 4118 days | 0% |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 9/10 | 4149 days | 0% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4177 days | 0% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 4477 days | 0% |
| Brita Topp | 10/10 | 4514 days | 1% |
| Anna Lutey | 10/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4604 days | 1% |
| Ut & Sacha | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4695 days | 1% |
| I & K Urquhart | 9/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4864 days | 0% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4864 days | 0% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 4864 days | 0% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 10/10 | 4980 days | 0% |
| Richard Spandonk | 10/10 | 5261 days | 0% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 5304 days | 1% |
| Stephen Hunt | 7/10 | 5575 days | 0% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 5596 days | 0% |
| Antoine Van Hoovled | 10/10 | 5600 days | 0% |
| Tim Laurent | 10/10 | 5601 days | 0% |
| Tom Hill | 10/10 | 5633 days | 0% |
| Marcia & Bruce | 9/10 | 5965 days | 0% |
| John Mathers | 9/10 | 5984 days | 0% |
| Marshall | 9/10 | 6067 days | 0% |
| brianp | 10/10 | 6181 days | 0% |
| ginekek | 9/10 | 6309 days | 0% |
| VincentD | 9/10 | 6343 days | 0% |
| Max | 10/10 | 6351 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 109 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 106 | -1.06% |
| 107 | -1.07% |
| 108 | -1.08% |
| 109 | -1.09% |
| 110 | -1.10% |
| 111 | -1.11% |
| 112 | -1.12% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.98% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.