Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
72 Valid Reviews
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has a total of 78 reviews. There are 72 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
56% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park valid reviews is 93.33% and is based on 72 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 72 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
61% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 95.00% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henk Slot | 10/10 | 191 days | 100% |
| Pierre MATHE | 9/10 | 250 days | 98% |
| Clement | 9/10 | 250 days | 98% |
| Debyron | 7/10 | 615 days | 74% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 707 days | 73% |
| Alyssa Campese | 10/10 | 921 days | 53% |
| Allison Ngo | 7/10 | 1042 days | 38% |
| Genevieve | 10/10 | 1042 days | 41% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 1042 days | 40% |
| Narelle and Alan | 10/10 | 1073 days | 38% |
| Jo | 9/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Dr.A | 10/10 | 2017 days | 4% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 2076 days | 4% |
| Tori | 10/10 | 2107 days | 4% |
| Anna Swain | 10/10 | 2290 days | 4% |
| Ian and Sharon | 10/10 | 2442 days | 4% |
| Tom Z. | 9/10 | 2442 days | 4% |
| Ian and Sharon | 10/10 | 2442 days | 4% |
| Colin | 9/10 | 2564 days | 3% |
| Renee | 9/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Christin | 10/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 9/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Caitlin | 10/10 | 2776 days | 3% |
| Rob | 10/10 | 2776 days | 3% |
| Bailey Dunne | 9/10 | 3113 days | 2% |
| Don G | 10/10 | 3172 days | 2% |
| Jack James | 7/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
| Antonio Rovira | 10/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Gary Prescot | 10/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Jane | 10/10 | 3388 days | 2% |
| P Poiraa | 9/10 | 3484 days | 1% |
| Ulla Strand | 10/10 | 3488 days | 2% |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 3537 days | 1% |
| paul danniels | 10/10 | 3537 days | 1% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 3768 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 7/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| Paul Smith | 9/10 | 3851 days | 1% |
| Jeff Young | 9/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Bade | 10/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
| D J 13 | 9/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Jeni | 10/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 9/10 | 4209 days | 0% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4237 days | 0% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
| Brita Topp | 10/10 | 4574 days | 1% |
| Anna Lutey | 10/10 | 4602 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
| Ut & Sacha | 10/10 | 4725 days | 1% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
| I & K Urquhart | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 4924 days | 1% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 4939 days | 1% |
| C Schaap | 10/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| Richard Spandonk | 10/10 | 5321 days | 1% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 5364 days | 1% |
| Stephen Hunt | 7/10 | 5635 days | 0% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 5656 days | 1% |
| Antoine Van Hoovled | 10/10 | 5660 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 10/10 | 5661 days | 1% |
| Tom Hill | 10/10 | 5693 days | 1% |
| Marcia & Bruce | 9/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| John Mathers | 9/10 | 6044 days | 1% |
| Marshall | 9/10 | 6127 days | 1% |
| brianp | 10/10 | 6241 days | 1% |
| ginekek | 9/10 | 6369 days | 1% |
| VincentD | 9/10 | 6403 days | 1% |
| Max | 10/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.33% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 86 days. However the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 169 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 166 | -2.29% |
| 167 | -2.31% |
| 168 | -2.32% |
| 169 | -2.33% |
| 170 | -2.35% |
| 171 | -2.36% |
| 172 | -2.38% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.15% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.