Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
54 Valid Reviews
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has a total of 57 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
56% |
| 9/10 | 19 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park valid reviews is 93.89% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
61% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 95.00% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.86%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ian and Sharon | 10/10 | 20 days | 99.94 | 100% | |
| Colin | 9/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Renee | 9/10 | 295 days | 86.21 | 86% | |
| Christin | 10/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| Joanne | 9/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| Caitlin | 10/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 80% | |
| Rob | 10/10 | 354 days | 80.14 | 80% | |
| Bailey Dunne | 9/10 | 691 days | 30.86 | 31% | |
| Don G | 10/10 | 749 days | 23.97 | 24% | |
| Jack James | 7/10 | 777 days | 19.13 | 19% | |
| Antonio Rovira | 10/10 | 779 days | 20.82 | 21% | |
| Gary Prescot | 10/10 | 844 days | 14.98 | 15% | |
| Jane | 10/10 | 966 days | 7.64 | 8% | |
| P Poiraa | 9/10 | 1062 days | 5.17 | 5% | |
| Ulla Strand | 10/10 | 1066 days | 5.13 | 5% | |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 1114 days | 4.52 | 5% | |
| paul danniels | 10/10 | 1114 days | 4.96 | 5% | |
| Kate | 10/10 | 1346 days | 4.51 | 5% | |
| Pamela Hoffman | 7/10 | 1362 days | 4.07 | 4% | |
| Paul Smith | 9/10 | 1429 days | 4.35 | 4% | |
| Jeff Young | 9/10 | 1481 days | 4.24 | 4% | |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 1520 days | 3.96 | 4% | |
| Sebastian Bade | 10/10 | 1534 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| D J 13 | 9/10 | 1725 days | 3.77 | 4% | |
| Sally Smith | 10/10 | 1725 days | 3.77 | 4% | |
| Jeni | 10/10 | 1755 days | 3.71 | 4% | |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 9/10 | 1787 days | 3.65 | 4% | |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 1814 days | 3.59 | 4% | |
| Tom | 10/10 | 2115 days |  |
3.0 | 3% |
| Brita Topp | 10/10 | 2152 days | 2.93 | 3% | |
| Anna Lutey | 10/10 | 2180 days | 2.88 | 3% | |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 2242 days | 2.76 | 3% | |
| Ut & Sacha | 10/10 | 2303 days | 2.64 | 3% | |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 2333 days | 2.58 | 3% | |
| I & K Urquhart | 9/10 | 2364 days | 2.52 | 3% | |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 2502 days | |
2.25 | 2% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 2502 days | |
2.25 | 2% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 2502 days | |
2.25 | 2% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 2517 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| C Schaap | 10/10 | 2618 days | |
2.02 | 2% |
| Richard Spandonk | 10/10 | 2899 days | |
1.47 | 1% |
| Balonno | 10/10 | 2942 days | 1.39 | 1% | |
| Stephen Hunt | 7/10 | 3213 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 3234 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| Antoine Van Hoovled | 10/10 | 3238 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 10/10 | 3239 days | |
0.8 | 1% |
| Tom Hill | 10/10 | 3271 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Marcia & Bruce | 9/10 | 3603 days | |
0.09 | 0% |
| John Mathers | 9/10 | 3622 days | |
0.05 | 0% |
| Marshall | 9/10 | 3705 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| brianp | 10/10 | 3819 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ginekek | 9/10 | 3947 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| VincentD | 9/10 | 3981 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Max | 10/10 | 3989 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Catlins Newhaven Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 2 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 0 | -0.00% |
| 1 | -0.02% |
| 2 | -0.04% |
| 3 | -0.06% |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| 5 | -0.10% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.