Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach
Valid Reviews
89 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 89 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 9 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 89 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 44 |
|
49% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach valid reviews is 91.35% and is based on 89 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 89 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
50% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
40% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach face-to-face reviews is 87.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dean & Prisca | 9/10 | 344 days | 100% |
| ANITA | 10/10 | 1047 days | 43% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 1047 days | 42% |
| Jono | 9/10 | 1075 days | 40% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1106 days | 37% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 1106 days | 37% |
| Abandon Normal IG/TT etc | 10/10 | 1351 days | 19% |
| Mike&Fe | 9/10 | 1440 days | 14% |
| Sharyn | 9/10 | 1440 days | 14% |
| MKS | 10/10 | 1746 days | 6% |
| Caravan Fever | 10/10 | 1777 days | 6% |
| SG | 9/10 | 1805 days | 5% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1867 days | 5% |
| Leonie | 10/10 | 1897 days | 5% |
| John & Amanda | 10/10 | 1928 days | 5% |
| Andrea and Carl | 10/10 | 1928 days | 5% |
| Flo and Ray | 10/10 | 1958 days | 5% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2142 days | 5% |
| Tom Z. | 8/10 | 2202 days | 4% |
| Clare & Gerry | 10/10 | 2477 days | 4% |
| Rocket | 9/10 | 2477 days | 4% |
| Davey | 10/10 | 2536 days | 4% |
| Andrea and Carl | 10/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| Andrew | 8/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 2598 days | 4% |
| Sunny | 10/10 | 2628 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2659 days | 4% |
| Pumpi Du | 10/10 | 2688 days | 4% |
| Yar Ni Ng | 7/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| Alex Beley | 10/10 | 2781 days | 3% |
| Esteban | 8/10 | 2842 days | 3% |
| Don McDonald | 3/10 | 2842 days | 2% |
| Gary Prescot | 8/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Nick Gifford | 7/10 | 3192 days | 2% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Geoff Hawthorn | 10/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
| Gene Diaz | 10/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
| Richard Houghton | 8/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Daphne H | 9/10 | 3412 days | 2% |
| Kevin Mayer | 9/10 | 3449 days | 2% |
| Daniel Fuell | 10/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3564 days | 2% |
| Theo van Greuningen | 8/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 3601 days | 2% |
| Johanna Kuch | 10/10 | 3604 days | 2% |
| Corina Sima | 8/10 | 3610 days | 2% |
| Hendrik Schulz-Jander | 8/10 | 3623 days | 2% |
| Richard Ashley | 10/10 | 3631 days | 2% |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3646 days | 2% |
| Ellen Schmitz | 10/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
| Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3678 days | 1% |
| Max Brunner | 10/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
| Richard Kirby | 10/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Steve and Debbie | 10/10 | 3750 days | 1% |
| Carmen | 8/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 6/10 | 4032 days | 1% |
| Clare Lambley | 8/10 | 4044 days | 0% |
| Eric Lambley | 9/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Claire Henderson | 9/10 | 4058 days | 1% |
| Bartlomiej Berger | 10/10 | 4064 days | 0% |
| Jen Stohler | 10/10 | 4150 days | 0% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 4273 days | 0% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Andrew Young | 8/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Sven Aebersold | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| kate messervy | 10/10 | 4393 days | 1% |
| Diane Fraser | 10/10 | 4393 days | 1% |
| Paul Wood | 9/10 | 4424 days | 1% |
| Sonja | 10/10 | 4424 days | 1% |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
| Juandflow | 10/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 10/10 | 4515 days | 1% |
| KoKi | 10/10 | 4515 days | 1% |
| Rebel Warren | 10/10 | 4546 days | 1% |
| delf tran | 10/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
| Sabine and Marc S | 10/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
| Julian_ont | 10/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Martin | 10/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Margaret and Derek McNeil | 9/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 10/10 | 4819 days | 1% |
| paulmiles | 9/10 | 4819 days | 1% |
| Kurt & Noemi Buhler | 8/10 | 5088 days | 1% |
| Jason Ritenour | 8/10 | 5246 days | 1% |
| Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 5423 days | 1% |
| Camilla Andersson | 9/10 | 5435 days | 1% |
| Brian Morris | 9/10 | 5804 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Moeraki Boulders Holiday Park @ Hamden Beach experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.10% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.