Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fox Glacier Lodge.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Fox Glacier Lodge
Valid Reviews
89 Valid Reviews
The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has a total of 89 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 89 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 15 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fox Glacier Lodge valid reviews is 79.55% and is based on 89 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
7 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 89 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
43% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
14% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
71.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fox Glacier Lodge face-to-face reviews is 71.43% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
79.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 5/10 | 32 days | 76% |
| Emily | 4/10 | 32 days | 65% |
| Annemee | 10/10 | 32 days | 100% |
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 60 days | 100% |
| Ailsa McIntosh | 4/10 | 91 days | 65% |
| EUNJI | 6/10 | 183 days | 85% |
| Eline | 10/10 | 397 days | 91% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 425 days | 90% |
| Lynda k | 7/10 | 456 days | 82% |
| Sophie | 5/10 | 456 days | 67% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 456 days | 88% |
| Lisa B | 9/10 | 487 days | 86% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 731 days | 68% |
| Jamie | 8/10 | 822 days | 60% |
| MK | 3/10 | 822 days | 33% |
| Kristina | 9/10 | 853 days | 58% |
| Brie | 8/10 | 853 days | 57% |
| Nick | 6/10 | 853 days | 50% |
| Kelsie | 10/10 | 975 days | 46% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 975 days | 46% |
| HIMANSHU CHAUDHARY | 9/10 | 1006 days | 43% |
| Ryli West | 9/10 | 1097 days | 35% |
| 小B | 8/10 | 1097 days | 34% |
| Magali | 9/10 | 1156 days | 30% |
| Gary | 7/10 | 1156 days | 28% |
| Charlotte Houël | 7/10 | 1187 days | 26% |
| Dirk Heinrich | 10/10 | 1187 days | 28% |
| Kendra | 9/10 | 1218 days | 26% |
| Yuvin | 10/10 | 1309 days | 20% |
| Alec | 8/10 | 1552 days | 9% |
| Gayle | 10/10 | 1797 days | 5% |
| ZMad | 6/10 | 1948 days | 4% |
| Paula | 10/10 | 1978 days | 4% |
| Gail | 10/10 | 2009 days | 4% |
| Lausgrott from Germany | 5/10 | 2436 days | 3% |
| Taylor | 7/10 | 2558 days | 3% |
| Vin | 10/10 | 2558 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
| Joe | 7/10 | 2648 days | 3% |
| Maxime | 9/10 | 2648 days | 3% |
| Tac | 7/10 | 2648 days | 3% |
| Anwang | 7/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
| Clem | 10/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 6/10 | 2801 days | 2% |
| Sue | 8/10 | 2832 days | 3% |
| Joseph | 7/10 | 2862 days | 3% |
| Derek Gillard | 6/10 | 3012 days | 2% |
| Nora Tobies | 6/10 | 3049 days | 2% |
| Edwin Bos | 7/10 | 3054 days | 2% |
| David | 3/10 | 3058 days | 0% |
| Tammy Schein | 8/10 | 3073 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 3085 days | 2% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Rebekah Watene | 10/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Sophie Holroyd | 10/10 | 3163 days | 2% |
| Chloe Watson | 8/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
| Janet Pentelow | 8/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Cathy Mead | 9/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 3346 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| David Coyle | 10/10 | 3398 days | 2% |
| Andrew Altman | 10/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Michelle Klein | 10/10 | 3469 days | 2% |
| Tanya Davies | 8/10 | 3469 days | 1% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3512 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| David Johnson | 10/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 6/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3706 days | 1% |
| Felicity Fay | 7/10 | 3712 days | 0% |
| David From Switzerland | 9/10 | 3764 days | 1% |
| Wout van Dijk | 7/10 | 3800 days | 1% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Wu | 10/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 7/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
| Hol. M. | 3/10 | 4139 days | 0% |
| Michele | 6/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
| Niamh Duane | 7/10 | 4398 days | 0% |
| J Weston | 6/10 | 4443 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 8/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 7/10 | 4475 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 9/10 | 4566 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 8/10 | 4749 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 8/10 | 5139 days | 0% |
| Laura Diepeveen | 8/10 | 5150 days | 0% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5169 days | 0% |
| damaca | 9/10 | 5327 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Fox Glacier Lodge experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has been adjusted for 15 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 12 | -0.22% |
| 13 | -0.24% |
| 14 | -0.26% |
| 15 | -0.28% |
| 16 | -0.30% |
| 17 | -0.32% |
| 18 | -0.33% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.15% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.