G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fox Glacier Lodge.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Fox Glacier Lodge
Valid Reviews
90 Valid Reviews
The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has a total of 90 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 90 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 15 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fox Glacier Lodge valid reviews is 79.33% and is based on 90 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
7 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 90 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
43% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
14% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
71.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fox Glacier Lodge face-to-face reviews is 71.43% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
78.29%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freya Rose Eld | 6/10 | 141 days | 87% |
| Jan | 5/10 | 172 days | 76% |
| Emily | 4/10 | 172 days | 65% |
| Annemee | 10/10 | 172 days | 100% |
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 200 days | 99% |
| Ailsa McIntosh | 4/10 | 231 days | 64% |
| EUNJI | 6/10 | 323 days | 82% |
| Eline | 10/10 | 537 days | 85% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 565 days | 83% |
| Lynda k | 7/10 | 596 days | 75% |
| Sophie | 5/10 | 596 days | 62% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 596 days | 81% |
| Lisa B | 9/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 871 days | 57% |
| Jamie | 8/10 | 962 days | 47% |
| MK | 3/10 | 962 days | 26% |
| Kristina | 9/10 | 993 days | 45% |
| Brie | 8/10 | 993 days | 44% |
| Nick | 6/10 | 993 days | 39% |
| Kelsie | 10/10 | 1115 days | 34% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 1115 days | 34% |
| HIMANSHU CHAUDHARY | 9/10 | 1146 days | 31% |
| Ryli West | 9/10 | 1237 days | 25% |
| 小B | 8/10 | 1237 days | 25% |
| Magali | 9/10 | 1296 days | 21% |
| Gary | 7/10 | 1296 days | 20% |
| Charlotte Houël | 7/10 | 1327 days | 18% |
| Dirk Heinrich | 10/10 | 1327 days | 19% |
| Kendra | 9/10 | 1358 days | 17% |
| Yuvin | 10/10 | 1449 days | 13% |
| Alec | 8/10 | 1692 days | 6% |
| Gayle | 10/10 | 1937 days | 5% |
| ZMad | 6/10 | 2088 days | 4% |
| Paula | 10/10 | 2118 days | 4% |
| Gail | 10/10 | 2149 days | 4% |
| Lausgrott from Germany | 5/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Taylor | 7/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Vin | 10/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Joe | 7/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
| Maxime | 9/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
| Tac | 7/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
| Anwang | 7/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
| Clem | 10/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 6/10 | 2941 days | 2% |
| Sue | 8/10 | 2972 days | 3% |
| Joseph | 7/10 | 3002 days | 2% |
| Derek Gillard | 6/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
| Nora Tobies | 6/10 | 3189 days | 2% |
| Edwin Bos | 7/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
| David | 3/10 | 3198 days | 0% |
| Tammy Schein | 8/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3252 days | 2% |
| Rebekah Watene | 10/10 | 3284 days | 2% |
| Sophie Holroyd | 10/10 | 3303 days | 2% |
| Chloe Watson | 8/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Janet Pentelow | 8/10 | 3420 days | 2% |
| Cathy Mead | 9/10 | 3451 days | 2% |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 3465 days | 2% |
| Alan Brown | 7/10 | 3487 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3507 days | 2% |
| David Coyle | 10/10 | 3538 days | 2% |
| Andrew Altman | 10/10 | 3583 days | 1% |
| Michelle Klein | 10/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Tanya Davies | 8/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
| Peter Barker | 10/10 | 3802 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
| David Johnson | 10/10 | 3817 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 6/10 | 3827 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3846 days | 1% |
| Felicity Fay | 7/10 | 3852 days | 0% |
| David From Switzerland | 9/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Wout van Dijk | 7/10 | 3940 days | 1% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3949 days | 1% |
| Yvonne Wu | 10/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 7/10 | 4237 days | 0% |
| Hol. M. | 3/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| Michele | 6/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Niamh Duane | 7/10 | 4538 days | 0% |
| J Weston | 6/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 8/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 7/10 | 4615 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 9/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 8/10 | 4889 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 8/10 | 5279 days | 0% |
| Laura Diepeveen | 8/10 | 5290 days | 0% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| damaca | 9/10 | 5467 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.58% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 109 days. However the Fox Glacier Lodge experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fox Glacier Lodge experience has been adjusted for 133 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 130 | -1.55% |
| 131 | -1.56% |
| 132 | -1.57% |
| 133 | -1.58% |
| 134 | -1.59% |
| 135 | -1.61% |
| 136 | -1.62% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
4.02% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.