G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation
Valid Reviews
94 Valid Reviews
The Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation experience has a total of 96 reviews. There are 94 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation valid reviews is 85.53% and is based on 94 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
34 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 94 valid reviews, the experience has 34 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
6% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation face-to-face reviews is 84.12% and is based on 34 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.68%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bob and Lydia | 10/10 | 140 days | 100% |
| Fredrik | 9/10 | 352 days | 93% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 413 days | 89% |
| Cath | 10/10 | 444 days | 90% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 566 days | 83% |
| Kay | 9/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 627 days | 77% |
| Wil | 8/10 | 779 days | 65% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1024 days | 42% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 1024 days | 41% |
| MWON | 10/10 | 1083 days | 37% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1083 days | 36% |
| JD Toussaint Raven | 10/10 | 1083 days | 37% |
| Hanna | 10/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Kendra | 8/10 | 1114 days | 33% |
| Corrine | 10/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Scott Lindique | 8/10 | 1448 days | 13% |
| Wai wai | 10/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
| Jaq | 1/10 | 2119 days | 2% |
| Joel | 10/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Nicl | 10/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Lausgrott from Germany | 10/10 | 2332 days | 4% |
| Marinette Kegels | 10/10 | 2513 days | 4% |
| Australia | 2/10 | 2605 days | 2% |
| H. Shela | 9/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Teb | 10/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Monique Keeper | 10/10 | 3022 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 7/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 7/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Tearlach | 10/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| David Coyle | 8/10 | 3294 days | 2% |
| Sarah Groginsky | 10/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Tanya Davies | 9/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Jamie Fry | 10/10 | 3528 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hallowell | 9/10 | 3637 days | 1% |
| B McNally | 9/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
| Valerie Wee | 6/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
| Wout van Dijk | 7/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Jade Duncan | 7/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3768 days | 1% |
| Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Chris Robertson | 8/10 | 3967 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 10/10 | 3993 days | 1% |
| Lorcan Lennon | 8/10 | 4047 days | 0% |
| John K | 8/10 | 4066 days | 1% |
| SUE COLEMAN | 8/10 | 4066 days | 1% |
| techno69 | 9/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
| Fabian Rodriguez | 7/10 | 4219 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
| Andrea Sole | 6/10 | 4286 days | 0% |
| Sandra Frischmann | 10/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Laura Metz | 9/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
| Hubertus Thost | 10/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
| Julie Robinson | 7/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Anouck Roudet | 9/10 | 4332 days | 0% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Tony Graham | 9/10 | 4615 days | 1% |
| M Morgan | 9/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| Sixflipflops | 7/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| Bertiethebus | 9/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
| Andrew K | 9/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
| Abee and Suess | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
| Hans Duerst | 9/10 | 5047 days | 1% |
| Nick & Adele Waller | 9/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
| Sabine & Stefan | 4/10 | 5054 days | 0% |
| Dugald McCallum | 10/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
| polzeath | 9/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
| Melanie Wood | 6/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
| Weez18 | 8/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| Sarah and Uli Glas | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Fran Williams | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Dennis McKrearty | 7/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Bette Eh | 10/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
| alcatrazz | 9/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| Rene Jakel | 10/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Kasia Robshaw | 8/10 | 5411 days | 1% |
| Edwards | 7/10 | 5414 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 10/10 | 5588 days | 1% |
| Martina Pankova | 4/10 | 5747 days | 0% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 9/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
| David B | 8/10 | 5767 days | 1% |
| Bert Tonwen | 7/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
| Armand | 7/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| martinab | 10/10 | 5846 days | 1% |
| Myriauy Rito | 9/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
| Dan Mair | 9/10 | 5873 days | 1% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 5923 days | 1% |
| JoR | 9/10 | 6094 days | 1% |
| JonK | 9/10 | 6094 days | 1% |
| Jana | 10/10 | 6148 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.41% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Shining Star Beachfront Accommodation experience has been adjusted for 119 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 116 | -2.35% |
| 117 | -2.37% |
| 118 | -2.39% |
| 119 | -2.41% |
| 120 | -2.43% |
| 121 | -2.45% |
| 122 | -2.47% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.25% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.