Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
103 Valid Reviews
The Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 105 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 80.10% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
67 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 67 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 81.34% and is based on 67 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Ralph Gleek||10/10||173 days||100%|
|Shar-ron & Jim||10/10||326 days||87%|
|Clare & Gerry||10/10||876 days||13%|
|helen reeve||10/10||1027 days||6%|
|Bex & Jake||8/10||1180 days||5%|
|Tammy Schein||9/10||1360 days||4%|
|Chanelle Weller||6/10||1564 days||3%|
|Scott McGee||1/10||1633 days||3%|
|Jean marc Daubenfeld||9/10||2027 days||3%|
|Matthew Hallowell||7/10||2028 days||3%|
|Caro G||9/10||2097 days||3%|
|Manuela Opprecht||10/10||2376 days||2%|
|Fay Young||5/10||2395 days||2%|
|Leah Stewart||9/10||2401 days||2%|
|G & W||5/10||2669 days||1%|
|Sybille Willenbrock||10/10||2724 days||2%|
|Wouter Bosch||9/10||2743 days||2%|
|Aude Moulin||9/10||2743 days||2%|
|The Germans from Australiia||9/10||2761 days||2%|
|Roy Driehuis||7/10||2763 days||1%|
|Henrik Joshua||9/10||2822 days||1%|
|Elise Robson||6/10||2975 days||1%|
|Fernando Martin||8/10||3074 days||1%|
|Michael Nolan||6/10||3095 days||1%|
|Roeland Driessen||8/10||3126 days||1%|
|William Notcutt||3/10||3126 days||1%|
|Fred and Carin||6/10||3146 days||1%|
|Matt Kelley||8/10||3441 days||0%|
|Eric Lombaard||8/10||3444 days||0%|
|Beat Kindler||10/10||3444 days||0%|
|Jim Addicott||10/10||3445 days||0%|
|Jurg Pfaendler||8/10||3449 days||0%|
|Paul & Michelle Harmer||7/10||3454 days||0%|
|Des & Ann Bidwell||10/10||3456 days||0%|
|Barrie Corless||5/10||3460 days||0%|
|Mike & April Prince||7/10||3474 days||0%|
|John Jacobs||9/10||3489 days||0%|
|Les and Carole Savins||8/10||3529 days||0%|
|Rob O'Neill||10/10||3769 days||1%|
|Richard Dudfield||9/10||3784 days||1%|
|Wayne Forrow||8/10||3788 days||1%|
|Fasto Maserati||10/10||3788 days||1%|
|Bill Cutler||9/10||3788 days||1%|
|Marilyn Buboltz||9/10||3790 days||1%|
|Rob Hitsert||9/10||3790 days||1%|
|Jennifer Sunderland||6/10||3800 days||1%|
|Bucher Weruer||8/10||3802 days||1%|
|Derek McLoughlin||9/10||3805 days||1%|
|Manfred & Gabi||9/10||3809 days||1%|
|Peter Aerborg||9/10||4099 days||1%|
|Jvjm Family||8/10||4151 days||1%|
|Ian Watson||10/10||4164 days||1%|
|Harmann Volker||9/10||4185 days||1%|
|R Gilge||8/10||4187 days||1%|
|Iris W||8/10||4197 days||1%|
|Samantha Piekuta||9/10||4200 days||1%|
|Omar Frenchy||8/10||4200 days||1%|
|Jennifer Templeton||4/10||4208 days||1%|
|Flavia Mionelli||10/10||4265 days||1%|
|Johannes & Jopke Fokkema||8/10||4517 days||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Greymouth Seaside TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 143 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.