Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 109 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 78.17% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
72 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 104 valid reviews, the experience has 72 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 79.17% and is based on 72 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Emma & Tom||10/10||204 days||93.41||100%|
|H. Shela||9/10||386 days||76.39||82%|
|The Weathersons||8/10||613 days||39.72||42%|
|Jill McGrath||8/10||623 days||38.29||41%|
|Shira LA||8/10||628 days||37.58||40%|
|Geoff Steele||8/10||780 days||19.69||21%|
|Andy Kubic||4/10||971 days||5.87||6%|
|Adam Emily||9/10||1014 days||6.04||6%|
|estelle D||7/10||1054 days||4.79||5%|
|S E||1/10||1084 days||3.66||4%|
|Pep Elo||1/10||1084 days||3.66||4%|
|Chloe Cox||8/10||1205 days||4.57||5%|
|Julia Redecke||10/10||1310 days||4.63||5%|
|Jean marc Daubenfeld||10/10||1386 days||4.5||5%|
|Matthew Hallowell||4/10||1387 days||3.56||4%|
|Sarah Paddington||9/10||1568 days||4.19||4%|
|Olivier Joubert||6/10||1650 days||3.36||3%|
|Vincent S.||8/10||1695 days||3.77||4%|
|holidaymad from Solihull||5/10||1754 days||3.14||3%|
|Gianpiero Rodari||10/10||1815 days||3.77||4%|
|Michael Bird||8/10||1908 days||3.43||3%|
|Ara Moore-Tuwhangai||10/10||2000 days||3.45||3%|
|Tiit Pullerits||9/10||2076 days||3.32||3%|
|Marion Busch||7/10||2076 days||3.02||3%|
|Nigel & Annie Dale||7/10||2181 days||2.86||3%|
|Mike Edwards||3/10||2501 days||2.0||2%|
|Steve and Therese Dunne||9/10||2528 days||2.55||3%|
|gareth williams||8/10||2577 days||2.34||2%|
|E Wolfger||10/10||2783 days||2.11||2%|
|Michael & Janet||8/10||2801 days||1.97||2%|
|Patrick Grant||8/10||2801 days||1.97||2%|
|David & Sue Lokkerbol||7/10||2806 days||1.88||2%|
|Jurg Pfaendler||7/10||2808 days||1.88||2%|
|Steve Goodyear||8/10||2812 days||1.96||2%|
|Michael Charleston||10/10||2814 days||2.06||2%|
|Sabine Tippman||8/10||3143 days||1.42||1%|
|Robin Adair||7/10||3144 days||1.36||1%|
|Steve & Pearl Baker||8/10||3147 days||1.41||1%|
|Malcolm McLean||4/10||3147 days||1.17||1%|
|Chris & Anne Pearson||5/10||3151 days||1.2||1%|
|Stephen Jones||10/10||3157 days||1.47||1%|
|Daniela Borter||4/10||3158 days||1.16||1%|
|Becky Foley||5/10||3171 days||1.17||1%|
|Eduard Wikidal||9/10||3172 days||1.44||1%|
|Ross Hughes||7/10||3176 days||1.31||1%|
|Jackie Morris||7/10||3176 days||1.31||1%|
|Remco Smit||10/10||3181 days||1.43||1%|
|Fabrice Modin||9/10||3500 days||0.88||1%|
|maggie Webster||8/10||3508 days||0.82||1%|
|Chris el capitan||5/10||3527 days||0.68||0%|
|Wilbert Germ||10/10||3535 days||0.82||1%|
|Kevin and Teresa||8/10||3550 days||0.76||1%|
|Allan Bond||8/10||3556 days||0.75||1%|
|Wolfgang G||10/10||3556 days||0.79||1%|
|Peter Ritu||10/10||3556 days||0.79||1%|
|Peter Ortner||8/10||3559 days||0.74||1%|
|Catherine Clavel||8/10||3559 days||0.74||1%|
|Jeannot Robert||10/10||3560 days||0.78||1%|
|Richard Pearson||8/10||3560 days||0.74||1%|
|cees juffermans||8/10||3563 days||0.74||1%|
|Beute Jacob||9/10||3563 days||0.77||1%|
|Jakob Jurgen||10/10||3564 days||0.77||1%|
|Sandy Doodson||8/10||3564 days||0.73||1%|
|E.M. Prideaux||10/10||3564 days||0.77||1%|
|Lynette Sal||9/10||3566 days||0.77||1%|
|Johan Vaartjes||7/10||3566 days||0.7||1%|
|Sabine Locker||9/10||3566 days||0.77||1%|
|Stevens Frans||6/10||3567 days||0.64||0%|
|John Borneman||8/10||3567 days||0.73||1%|
|Torsten Gehrke||10/10||3567 days||0.77||1%|
|Greg Kennedy||10/10||3569 days||0.76||1%|
|Florian Knoepfel||9/10||3570 days||0.76||1%|
|Helen and Hans Walser||10/10||3570 days||0.76||1%|
|Barry Treve||9/10||3863 days||0.26||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Carters Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 192 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.