Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
95 Valid Reviews
The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 97 reviews. There are 95 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
42% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
85.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.68% and is based on 95 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
22 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 95 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
41% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.18% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.02%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth | 10/10 | 40 days | 100% |
| Jorgelina | 10/10 | 70 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 9/10 | 70 days | 99% |
| EUNJI | 10/10 | 101 days | 100% |
| John Mitchell | 10/10 | 315 days | 94% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 343 days | 93% |
| Doug | 10/10 | 343 days | 93% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 374 days | 92% |
| Bruce Ross | 10/10 | 374 days | 92% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 10/10 | 374 days | 92% |
| Franklin | 10/10 | 405 days | 91% |
| Annette McGrath | 7/10 | 435 days | 83% |
| TravelingVan | 10/10 | 466 days | 88% |
| Shenay | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
| Sheryl Watson | 9/10 | 649 days | 75% |
| Sally Gillespie | 10/10 | 680 days | 74% |
| Christopher Parker | 10/10 | 680 days | 74% |
| Mike C | 10/10 | 680 days | 74% |
| Ginny | 10/10 | 709 days | 71% |
| velvetmayhem | 9/10 | 740 days | 68% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 740 days | 68% |
| Heledd | 9/10 | 740 days | 68% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 740 days | 69% |
| Wendy | 8/10 | 771 days | 65% |
| Steve Collins | 8/10 | 771 days | 65% |
| Pauline | 10/10 | 771 days | 66% |
| George | 10/10 | 832 days | 61% |
| Chelsea | 10/10 | 832 days | 61% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 832 days | 60% |
| Maria Fidler | 9/10 | 832 days | 60% |
| Mae | 10/10 | 985 days | 45% |
| Corrina Smith | 10/10 | 985 days | 45% |
| Riley | 10/10 | 1046 days | 40% |
| Kate Fairhall | 10/10 | 1074 days | 37% |
| Karen Gilchrist | 10/10 | 1074 days | 37% |
| Dannie | 7/10 | 1105 days | 32% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 1105 days | 34% |
| Jamieson Kohe | 10/10 | 1136 days | 32% |
| K Arnold | 1/10 | 1258 days | 9% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1776 days | 5% |
| Amber | 9/10 | 1804 days | 5% |
| Jay W | 8/10 | 1988 days | 5% |
| Lena L. | 10/10 | 2141 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Georgie | 10/10 | 2476 days | 4% |
| Mirandah | 8/10 | 2507 days | 4% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2566 days | 4% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Philip Page | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Sandra Day | 1/10 | 2872 days | 1% |
| Wolfgang Sulzer | 5/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
| Andrea Aschenbrenner | 10/10 | 3197 days | 2% |
| Kathy Miller | 9/10 | 3224 days | 2% |
| Johanna Dorner | 9/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Annalena Harmeyer | 10/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
| Z H | 1/10 | 3265 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Tracy Ivory | 4/10 | 3327 days | 1% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 3333 days | 2% |
| Ivan Wee | 8/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
| Ulrich Rix | 8/10 | 3602 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 7/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
| Bianca Nielsen | 10/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
| Philippa and Adam | 6/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
| Manu Hume | 9/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
| Singapore Sling | 6/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Tom H | 10/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| Nicki Rehn | 10/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
| Tim Porter | 9/10 | 4028 days | 1% |
| Helene Andersen | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 9/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Antton Vappula | 9/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
| Michael Turek | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Tanje Norton | 10/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Sugar Price | 7/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Florian Carli | 9/10 | 4392 days | 1% |
| Orla Hughes | 9/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 7/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
| Frederick Dean | 9/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 9/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
| Joey Mertzig | 9/10 | 4715 days | 1% |
| Henry Howard | 10/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
| Jaap & Susanne | 7/10 | 5072 days | 1% |
| Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 9/10 | 5079 days | 1% |
| Heini | 8/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| Fran Williams | 8/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Winskowsky | 3/10 | 5431 days | 0% |
| Kuno Eugster | 7/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
| Marleen Meyers | 8/10 | 5440 days | 1% |
| Bob Warne | 7/10 | 5440 days | 1% |
| Irene and Thib Schneider | 6/10 | 5445 days | 1% |
| Patrick Hugener | 8/10 | 5453 days | 1% |
| mikestep | 8/10 | 6128 days | 1% |
| davidne | 8/10 | 6128 days | 1% |
| David_H | 6/10 | 6187 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.24% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 12 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 9 | -0.18% |
| 10 | -0.20% |
| 11 | -0.22% |
| 12 | -0.24% |
| 13 | -0.26% |
| 14 | -0.28% |
| 15 | -0.30% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.45% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.