Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
96 Valid Reviews
The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 41 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
85.83% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.83% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
22 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
41% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.18% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Wiemer | 10/10 | 190 days | 100% |
| Ruth | 10/10 | 221 days | 99% |
| Jorgelina | 10/10 | 251 days | 98% |
| cirefice bernard | 9/10 | 251 days | 97% |
| EUNJI | 10/10 | 282 days | 97% |
| John Mitchell | 10/10 | 496 days | 88% |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 524 days | 86% |
| Doug | 10/10 | 524 days | 86% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 555 days | 84% |
| Bruce Ross | 10/10 | 555 days | 84% |
| Jojo&Skoko | 10/10 | 555 days | 84% |
| Franklin | 10/10 | 586 days | 82% |
| Annette McGrath | 7/10 | 616 days | 74% |
| TravelingVan | 10/10 | 647 days | 78% |
| Shenay | 10/10 | 677 days | 75% |
| Sheryl Watson | 9/10 | 830 days | 61% |
| Sally Gillespie | 10/10 | 861 days | 59% |
| Christopher Parker | 10/10 | 861 days | 59% |
| Mike C | 10/10 | 861 days | 59% |
| Ginny | 10/10 | 890 days | 56% |
| velvetmayhem | 9/10 | 921 days | 52% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 921 days | 52% |
| Heledd | 9/10 | 921 days | 52% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 921 days | 53% |
| Wendy | 8/10 | 952 days | 48% |
| Steve Collins | 8/10 | 952 days | 48% |
| Pauline | 10/10 | 952 days | 49% |
| George | 10/10 | 1013 days | 43% |
| Chelsea | 10/10 | 1013 days | 43% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 1013 days | 43% |
| Maria Fidler | 9/10 | 1013 days | 43% |
| Mae | 10/10 | 1166 days | 30% |
| Corrina Smith | 10/10 | 1166 days | 30% |
| Riley | 10/10 | 1227 days | 26% |
| Kate Fairhall | 10/10 | 1255 days | 24% |
| Karen Gilchrist | 10/10 | 1255 days | 24% |
| Dannie | 7/10 | 1286 days | 20% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 1286 days | 21% |
| Jamieson Kohe | 10/10 | 1317 days | 20% |
| K Arnold | 1/10 | 1439 days | 5% |
| Emma | 9/10 | 1957 days | 4% |
| Amber | 9/10 | 1985 days | 4% |
| Jay W | 8/10 | 2169 days | 4% |
| Lena L. | 10/10 | 2322 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2382 days | 4% |
| Georgie | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Mirandah | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2747 days | 3% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Philip Page | 8/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Sandra Day | 1/10 | 3053 days | 1% |
| Wolfgang Sulzer | 5/10 | 3363 days | 1% |
| Andrea Aschenbrenner | 10/10 | 3378 days | 2% |
| Kathy Miller | 9/10 | 3405 days | 1% |
| Johanna Dorner | 9/10 | 3432 days | 2% |
| Annalena Harmeyer | 10/10 | 3442 days | 2% |
| Z H | 1/10 | 3445 days | 0% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 3476 days | 1% |
| Tracy Ivory | 4/10 | 3507 days | 1% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 3514 days | 1% |
| Ivan Wee | 8/10 | 3542 days | 1% |
| Ulrich Rix | 8/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Ives van Neck | 7/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
| Bianca Nielsen | 10/10 | 3811 days | 1% |
| Philippa and Adam | 6/10 | 3815 days | 1% |
| Manu Hume | 9/10 | 3820 days | 1% |
| Singapore Sling | 6/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Tom H | 10/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Nicki Rehn | 10/10 | 4165 days | 0% |
| Tim Porter | 9/10 | 4209 days | 0% |
| Helene Andersen | 9/10 | 4509 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 9/10 | 4514 days | 0% |
| Antton Vappula | 9/10 | 4532 days | 0% |
| Michael Turek | 9/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Tanje Norton | 10/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Sugar Price | 7/10 | 4542 days | 1% |
| Florian Carli | 9/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| Orla Hughes | 9/10 | 4582 days | 0% |
| Abby Rescr | 7/10 | 4879 days | 0% |
| Frederick Dean | 9/10 | 4879 days | 0% |
| Helen Dean | 9/10 | 4879 days | 0% |
| Joey Mertzig | 9/10 | 4896 days | 0% |
| Henry Howard | 10/10 | 4938 days | 1% |
| Jaap & Susanne | 7/10 | 5253 days | 0% |
| Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 9/10 | 5260 days | 0% |
| Heini | 8/10 | 5272 days | 0% |
| Fran Williams | 8/10 | 5590 days | 0% |
| Winskowsky | 3/10 | 5612 days | 0% |
| Kuno Eugster | 7/10 | 5618 days | 0% |
| Marleen Meyers | 8/10 | 5621 days | 0% |
| Bob Warne | 7/10 | 5621 days | 0% |
| Irene and Thib Schneider | 6/10 | 5626 days | 0% |
| Patrick Hugener | 8/10 | 5634 days | 0% |
| mikestep | 8/10 | 6309 days | 0% |
| davidne | 8/10 | 6309 days | 0% |
| David_H | 6/10 | 6368 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.78% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rapahoe Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 178 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 175 | -1.75% |
| 176 | -1.76% |
| 177 | -1.77% |
| 178 | -1.78% |
| 179 | -1.79% |
| 180 | -1.80% |
| 181 | -1.81% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.56% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.