Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Spring Creek Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Spring Creek Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
63 Valid Reviews
The Spring Creek Holiday Park experience has a total of 67 reviews. There are 63 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
11% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
21% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
72.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Spring Creek Holiday Park valid reviews is 72.54% and is based on 63 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 63 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
67.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Spring Creek Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 67.78% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
75.69%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nancylynn Opiola | 2/10 | 38 days | 46% |
| Ailsa McIntosh | 10/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Amy Shoemake | 8/10 | 1196 days | 27% |
| Phil | 2/10 | 1410 days | 7% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1622 days | 7% |
| Louise | 9/10 | 1836 days | 5% |
| Ying | 9/10 | 1956 days | 4% |
| Joe Johnson | 6/10 | 1987 days | 4% |
| Kay | 7/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 8/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2201 days | 3% |
| Ian & Wendy | 10/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
| Pierre-Yves | 5/10 | 2230 days | 3% |
| Richard & Chris, UK | 9/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Mrs Lounis | 8/10 | 2292 days | 4% |
| Rose | 4/10 | 2414 days | 2% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 2506 days | 3% |
| Lorraine | 8/10 | 2567 days | 3% |
| Keelin | 9/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| ian kennedy | 7/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Fer&And | 7/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
| Bex & Jake | 8/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
| Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
| Peter Edmead | 10/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Taryn | 10/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Fulvio Poncini | 9/10 | 2960 days | 2% |
| Lene Hendel | 8/10 | 2977 days | 2% |
| Aisling Burke | 8/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
| Amy Smith | 4/10 | 3345 days | 1% |
| Saskia Ruttor | 9/10 | 3399 days | 2% |
| Becky and James | 7/10 | 3457 days | 1% |
| Kerri-anne Brough | 4/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| W Donovan | 8/10 | 3607 days | 1% |
| Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3621 days | 1% |
| Gay Taaffe | 9/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Helena Bond | 7/10 | 3661 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Fabian Börger | 7/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Philippa and Adam | 7/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Phillippa McLernon | 7/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| John Jones | 6/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Brian Higgins | 8/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Samantha Heim | 6/10 | 3734 days | 0% |
| Harriet Bramley | 7/10 | 3863 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 7/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Harriet MacMillan | 8/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
| Zac_Sophie | 1/10 | 4028 days | 0% |
| Kim Frey | 8/10 | 4082 days | 0% |
| Viki Ziemba | 7/10 | 4111 days | 0% |
| Andy Cummins | 4/10 | 4745 days | 0% |
| Doug Digstravel | 9/10 | 4817 days | 1% |
| Cmi | 4/10 | 4878 days | 0% |
| Inge & Erik | 8/10 | 5133 days | 0% |
| Peter Field | 7/10 | 5134 days | 0% |
| Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 5224 days | 0% |
| harvey717 | 4/10 | 5548 days | 0% |
| Tony B | 7/10 | 5835 days | 0% |
| Birgit Farwig | 8/10 | 5835 days | 0% |
| GemmaC | 6/10 | 6177 days | 0% |
| Kiwi | 6/10 | 6178 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Spring Creek Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.60% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Spring Creek Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Spring Creek Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 30 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 27 | -0.54% |
| 28 | -0.56% |
| 29 | -0.58% |
| 30 | -0.60% |
| 31 | -0.62% |
| 32 | -0.64% |
| 33 | -0.67% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
4.61% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.