Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Picton Campervan Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Picton Campervan Park
Valid Reviews
53 Valid Reviews
The Picton Campervan Park experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 53 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
26% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
80.75% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Picton Campervan Park valid reviews is 80.75% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
36% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Picton Campervan Park face-to-face reviews is 79.29% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin and Marie Scholing | 10/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Andreas Neumann | 10/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Jim Tikalsky | 7/10 | 192 days | 92% |
| Col and Sandie | 9/10 | 315 days | 94% |
| Rachael | 7/10 | 406 days | 85% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
| Phil | 3/10 | 1957 days | 3% |
| Sue Atkinson | 8/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
| GM | 7/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| Norman | 10/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2994 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 8/10 | 3022 days | 3% |
| Peter Rafferty | 1/10 | 3030 days | 1% |
| Anika Wellen | 7/10 | 3038 days | 2% |
| Jake Woolgar | 8/10 | 3047 days | 2% |
| Johannes Bauerle | 10/10 | 3054 days | 3% |
| Mat G | 9/10 | 3114 days | 2% |
| Gary Wu | 10/10 | 3227 days | 2% |
| Susan Boyton | 9/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Julia Kurtz | 10/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3407 days | 2% |
| David Coyle | 10/10 | 3438 days | 2% |
| Herma Betten | 9/10 | 3466 days | 2% |
| Daphne H | 9/10 | 3533 days | 2% |
| Julia Clark | 10/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| Paul Smith | 7/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| Alan Rouse | 10/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
| Matthew Hallowell | 8/10 | 3781 days | 1% |
| Helen B | 7/10 | 3807 days | 1% |
| Alison Cary | 9/10 | 3844 days | 1% |
| Paul Frost | 8/10 | 3856 days | 1% |
| Nick Johnstone | 8/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 7/10 | 4149 days | 0% |
| David Cowling | 8/10 | 4241 days | 0% |
| ilove totravel | 6/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 7/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 10/10 | 4698 days | 1% |
| Sandra and Thomas | 7/10 | 4898 days | 1% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 4912 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 9/10 | 5191 days | 1% |
| Chris | 7/10 | 5196 days | 1% |
| Janet | 7/10 | 5214 days | 1% |
| Verhahr | 7/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
| Jacob Nube | 7/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| LandJ | 7/10 | 5551 days | 1% |
| Steve Pearce | 6/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| Belony | 9/10 | 5566 days | 1% |
| Alan & Gill Geach | 8/10 | 5573 days | 1% |
| J G Groeneveld | 9/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
| Ivo Braakhuis | 9/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| Paul & Lois Somerville | 9/10 | 6018 days | 1% |
| Frank | 9/10 | 6293 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Picton Campervan Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.08% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 88 days. However the Picton Campervan Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Picton Campervan Park experience has been adjusted for 75 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 72 | -1.03% |
| 73 | -1.05% |
| 74 | -1.06% |
| 75 | -1.08% |
| 76 | -1.09% |
| 77 | -1.10% |
| 78 | -1.12% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.