G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Opunake Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 13 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 108 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 71 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 23 |
|
11% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.19% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.43% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.87%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Carla | 10/10 | 416 days | 100% |
Graeme | 9/10 | 447 days | 97% |
Bec | 10/10 | 691 days | 81% |
W Sanders | 10/10 | 812 days | 69% |
jason walsh | 8/10 | 873 days | 61% |
Rachel | 9/10 | 903 days | 59% |
Mark | 8/10 | 903 days | 58% |
Esther | 9/10 | 934 days | 55% |
Jim & Ann | 9/10 | 934 days | 55% |
Michael Dean McNaught | 3/10 | 934 days | 30% |
steve | 9/10 | 995 days | 49% |
Kore | 10/10 | 1026 days | 46% |
Dianne Sutton | 10/10 | 1026 days | 46% |
Des Barker | 9/10 | 1056 days | 43% |
Yolanda Chu | 10/10 | 1115 days | 37% |
Vicki T | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Leon C | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Dawn Sparrow | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Fleur Devonshire | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Doris Burke | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Adelaide Burgess | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Gonzalez | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Katherine Paltridge | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Annie | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Tracey | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Jordan | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Ashley | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Craig Hanover | 10/10 | 1146 days | 35% |
Frank and Heather Eustace | 9/10 | 1146 days | 34% |
Jakeman-Sili Family | 9/10 | 1177 days | 32% |
Geoff H | 9/10 | 1177 days | 32% |
Trish Bartlett | 10/10 | 1238 days | 27% |
sherry kemp | 9/10 | 1330 days | 21% |
Kellie | 9/10 | 1330 days | 21% |
Bruce Dear | 8/10 | 1360 days | 19% |
Alex | 10/10 | 1360 days | 19% |
Grant Koedyk | 9/10 | 1360 days | 19% |
Oliver | 9/10 | 1391 days | 17% |
Maria | 9/10 | 1421 days | 16% |
Keagan | 8/10 | 1421 days | 16% |
John Reardon | 9/10 | 1452 days | 14% |
lorraine pratt | 9/10 | 1452 days | 14% |
Vanessa Were | 9/10 | 1452 days | 14% |
Kate | 10/10 | 1452 days | 14% |
Judy Zieltjes | 10/10 | 1480 days | 13% |
Angie | 9/10 | 1480 days | 13% |
Keri | 10/10 | 1480 days | 13% |
Shelly | 10/10 | 1480 days | 13% |
Michelle | 9/10 | 1480 days | 13% |
Amanda | 8/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Adrian Whistler | 9/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Craig and Tracy Bailey | 9/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Towers family | 10/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Kirikizzie | 9/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Clare | 10/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Charlotte | 10/10 | 1511 days | 12% |
Seanna | 9/10 | 1542 days | 11% |
Lydia | 10/10 | 1542 days | 11% |
Josie Reid | 10/10 | 1542 days | 11% |
David Sopp | 10/10 | 1572 days | 10% |
Tairongo Hauwaho | 10/10 | 1572 days | 10% |
Mandy | 10/10 | 1572 days | 10% |
Nelson | 10/10 | 1572 days | 10% |
Lindsay Berquist | 9/10 | 1603 days | 9% |
Sandy Crutch | 8/10 | 1603 days | 8% |
Gareth O’Brien | 10/10 | 1603 days | 9% |
Jean Reverdy | 10/10 | 1603 days | 9% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1633 days | 8% |
Janice & Jim Waller | 10/10 | 1633 days | 8% |
Gary Ashton | 10/10 | 1633 days | 8% |
Emily | 10/10 | 1695 days | 7% |
Elaine Wilson | 9/10 | 1695 days | 7% |
Anna | 9/10 | 1756 days | 6% |
Ithri Araoune | 10/10 | 1756 days | 6% |
Noel & Ruby Thompson | 9/10 | 1817 days | 5% |
Kristie Mason | 10/10 | 1817 days | 6% |
Jill Mackay | 10/10 | 1817 days | 6% |
Lea File | 10/10 | 1817 days | 6% |
Jo Maree Sansom | 10/10 | 1846 days | 5% |
Julie | 10/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
School buddies | 10/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
Dudley | 9/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
SW | 8/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
megan | 8/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Shelley Juddd | 10/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Carla | 10/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Linda Lamprecht | 9/10 | 1969 days | 5% |
Craig | 9/10 | 2091 days | 5% |
Jill | 9/10 | 2122 days | 5% |
Elizabeth Evans | 10/10 | 2152 days | 5% |
James | 10/10 | 2152 days | 5% |
Kim Nott | 10/10 | 2152 days | 5% |
Kieley | 10/10 | 2183 days | 5% |
J Hornby | 10/10 | 2183 days | 5% |
james | 10/10 | 2183 days | 5% |
Christine (solo traveller) | 10/10 | 2211 days | 5% |
Linda Belcher | 9/10 | 2211 days | 5% |
Aaron Cox | 10/10 | 2211 days | 5% |
audrey young | 10/10 | 2211 days | 5% |
Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 2211 days | 5% |
Jaime | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Marea | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Jeremy Hapeta | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Matt Moorby | 8/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Teresa homan | 7/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
James Richardson | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
J Pascoe | 8/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Michelle | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Neville Lester | 9/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
AlanT | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Andy | 9/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
fiona close | 9/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Michelle | 10/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Annika Eckelt | 9/10 | 2242 days | 5% |
Barbara | 10/10 | 2273 days | 5% |
Hope Fletcher | 9/10 | 2273 days | 5% |
Andre Bezuidenhout | 9/10 | 2273 days | 5% |
Carleen | 10/10 | 2273 days | 5% |
Mel | 10/10 | 2273 days | 5% |
K Small | 4/10 | 2303 days | 3% |
Hope | 9/10 | 2426 days | 4% |
Jenny Saywood | 9/10 | 2456 days | 4% |
Aaron | 9/10 | 2456 days | 4% |
Taranaki Caravan Club | 9/10 | 2456 days | 4% |
Peter | 10/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
Carrol Govan | 10/10 | 2487 days | 4% |
Moana Olliver | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
B Olliver | 8/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
J Ross | 8/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
Damian. | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
Aaron Hine | 9/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
G Bingham | 8/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
Carina Meares | 10/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
Judy Black | 9/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
Greg Morris | 9/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
Elle C | 9/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
Leeanne Railton | 10/10 | 2576 days | 4% |
Keith Salway | 9/10 | 2587 days | 2% |
Eve Ford | 10/10 | 2606 days | 4% |
Maree Rush | 10/10 | 2606 days | 4% |
maryKB | 9/10 | 2637 days | 4% |
Jye Hurrell | 8/10 | 2664 days | 4% |
Neville Lester | 9/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
Chris Cameron | 10/10 | 2667 days | 4% |
Diana Evers | 2/10 | 2688 days | 2% |
Wayne Stokes | 10/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
Kim Deam | 9/10 | 2940 days | 3% |
Annmarie Siciliano | 10/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
Arnita Hunt | 9/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
David Coyle | 10/10 | 2992 days | 3% |
Catherine tempero | 8/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
Rima | 10/10 | 3024 days | 3% |
Penny Hopkins | 10/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
Scott Walden | 10/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
Sam McDonnell | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
Lisa Ison | 8/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
Donna Katene | 10/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
Rachel Greenland | 10/10 | 3368 days | 2% |
Anja Niechziol | 10/10 | 3398 days | 2% |
Leslie Turner | 8/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
Robyn Weideman | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
Geraldine | 9/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 3640 days | 2% |
peter bird | 10/10 | 3643 days | 2% |
Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 3643 days | 2% |
ana welham | 8/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Rachel Worrall | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Bryan Mainwaring | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Charlie Te Awhe | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Nina Helmling | 9/10 | 4012 days | 0% |
Michael Turek | 10/10 | 4068 days | 1% |
mr burns | 5/10 | 4068 days | 1% |
dominique raccah | 5/10 | 4099 days | 0% |
J B | 4/10 | 4099 days | 0% |
Glen Cameron | 10/10 | 4221 days | 0% |
Henk_Huurnink | 9/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
Megan | 10/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
kim sowman | 9/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
Sophia Hume | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
SarahC | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
WendyTimarac | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
opunakecampers | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
Rachael Thony | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
Rachael Webb | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
Bob2000 | 9/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
lindamoore | 10/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
pst | 10/10 | 4494 days | 1% |
Fredmmcain12 | 10/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
TravelNZ | 10/10 | 4525 days | 1% |
Moni01 | 3/10 | 4708 days | 1% |
Lars | 8/10 | 4748 days | 1% |
Lee Lloyd | 8/10 | 4749 days | 1% |
AlisonBrett | 9/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
PaxJanssen | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
tonyleiman | 10/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Scheler | 10/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
rebb | 9/10 | 5105 days | 1% |
Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5105 days | 1% |
patra374 | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Puravida | 9/10 | 5195 days | 1% |
Ralph | 10/10 | 5467 days | 1% |
Katharina | 10/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Annemiek and Rianne | 10/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
pedawrds | 10/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
thomash | 10/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5568 days | 1% |
Shane and Kate Wilkinson | 9/10 | 5582 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.14% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.08% |
198 | -4.10% |
199 | -4.12% |
200 | -4.14% |
201 | -4.16% |
202 | -4.19% |
203 | -4.21% |
… | … |
1.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.