Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Opunake Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Opunake Beach Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
198 Valid Reviews
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 198 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 13 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 198 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 104 |
|
53% |
| 9/10 | 66 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.53% and is based on 198 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 198 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.43% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.29%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kore | 10/10 | 21 days | 100% |
| Des Barker | 9/10 | 51 days | 100% |
| Yolanda Chu | 10/10 | 110 days | 98% |
| Vicki T | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Leon C | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Dawn Sparrow | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Fleur Devonshire | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Doris Burke | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Adelaide Burgess | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Gonzalez | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Katherine Paltridge | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Annie | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Tracey | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Jordan | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Ashley | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Craig Hanover | 10/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Frank and Heather Eustace | 9/10 | 141 days | 97% |
| Jakeman-Sili Family | 9/10 | 172 days | 95% |
| Geoff H | 9/10 | 172 days | 95% |
| Trish Bartlett | 10/10 | 233 days | 91% |
| sherry kemp | 9/10 | 325 days | 83% |
| Kellie | 9/10 | 325 days | 83% |
| Bruce Dear | 8/10 | 355 days | 76% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 355 days | 80% |
| Grant Koedyk | 9/10 | 355 days | 80% |
| Oliver | 9/10 | 386 days | 76% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 416 days | 73% |
| Keagan | 8/10 | 416 days | 69% |
| John Reardon | 9/10 | 447 days | 68% |
| lorraine pratt | 9/10 | 447 days | 68% |
| Vanessa Were | 9/10 | 447 days | 68% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 447 days | 68% |
| Judy Zieltjes | 10/10 | 475 days | 64% |
| Angie | 9/10 | 475 days | 64% |
| Keri | 10/10 | 475 days | 64% |
| Shelly | 10/10 | 475 days | 64% |
| Michelle | 9/10 | 475 days | 64% |
| Amanda | 8/10 | 506 days | 56% |
| Adrian Whistler | 9/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Craig and Tracy Bailey | 9/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Towers family | 10/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Kirikizzie | 9/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Clare | 10/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 506 days | 59% |
| Seanna | 9/10 | 537 days | 54% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 537 days | 54% |
| Josie Reid | 10/10 | 537 days | 54% |
| David Sopp | 10/10 | 567 days | 49% |
| Tairongo Hauwaho | 10/10 | 567 days | 49% |
| Mandy | 10/10 | 567 days | 49% |
| Nelson | 10/10 | 567 days | 49% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 9/10 | 598 days | 44% |
| Sandy Crutch | 8/10 | 598 days | 42% |
| Gareth O’Brien | 10/10 | 598 days | 44% |
| Jean Reverdy | 10/10 | 598 days | 44% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 628 days | 39% |
| Janice & Jim Waller | 10/10 | 628 days | 39% |
| Gary Ashton | 10/10 | 628 days | 39% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 690 days | 31% |
| Elaine Wilson | 9/10 | 690 days | 31% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 751 days | 24% |
| Ithri Araoune | 10/10 | 751 days | 24% |
| Noel & Ruby Thompson | 9/10 | 812 days | 17% |
| Kristie Mason | 10/10 | 812 days | 17% |
| Jill Mackay | 10/10 | 812 days | 17% |
| Lea File | 10/10 | 812 days | 17% |
| Jo Maree Sansom | 10/10 | 841 days | 15% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 872 days | 13% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 872 days | 13% |
| School buddies | 10/10 | 872 days | 13% |
| Dudley | 9/10 | 872 days | 13% |
| SW | 8/10 | 872 days | 12% |
| megan | 8/10 | 903 days | 10% |
| Shelley Juddd | 10/10 | 903 days | 11% |
| Carla | 10/10 | 903 days | 11% |
| Linda Lamprecht | 9/10 | 964 days | 7% |
| Craig | 9/10 | 1086 days | 5% |
| Jill | 9/10 | 1117 days | 5% |
| Elizabeth Evans | 10/10 | 1147 days | 5% |
| James | 10/10 | 1147 days | 5% |
| Kim Nott | 10/10 | 1147 days | 5% |
| Kieley | 10/10 | 1178 days | 5% |
| J Hornby | 10/10 | 1178 days | 5% |
| james | 10/10 | 1178 days | 5% |
| Christine (solo traveller) | 10/10 | 1206 days | 5% |
| Linda Belcher | 9/10 | 1206 days | 5% |
| Aaron Cox | 10/10 | 1206 days | 5% |
| audrey young | 10/10 | 1206 days | 5% |
| Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 1206 days | 5% |
| Jaime | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Marea | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Jeremy Hapeta | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Matt Moorby | 8/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Teresa homan | 7/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| James Richardson | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| J Pascoe | 8/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Neville Lester | 9/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| AlanT | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Andy | 9/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| fiona close | 9/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Annika Eckelt | 9/10 | 1237 days | 4% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 1268 days | 4% |
| Hope Fletcher | 9/10 | 1268 days | 4% |
| Andre Bezuidenhout | 9/10 | 1268 days | 4% |
| Carleen | 10/10 | 1268 days | 4% |
| Mel | 10/10 | 1268 days | 4% |
| K Small | 4/10 | 1298 days | 3% |
| Hope | 9/10 | 1421 days | 4% |
| Jenny Saywood | 9/10 | 1451 days | 4% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 1451 days | 4% |
| Taranaki Caravan Club | 9/10 | 1451 days | 4% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 1481 days | 4% |
| Carrol Govan | 10/10 | 1482 days | 4% |
| Moana Olliver | 10/10 | 1512 days | 4% |
| B Olliver | 8/10 | 1512 days | 4% |
| J Ross | 8/10 | 1512 days | 4% |
| Damian. | 10/10 | 1512 days | 4% |
| Aaron Hine | 9/10 | 1543 days | 4% |
| G Bingham | 8/10 | 1543 days | 4% |
| Carina Meares | 10/10 | 1543 days | 4% |
| Judy Black | 9/10 | 1543 days | 4% |
| Greg Morris | 9/10 | 1570 days | 4% |
| Elle C | 9/10 | 1570 days | 4% |
| Leeanne Railton | 10/10 | 1571 days | 4% |
| Keith Salway | 9/10 | 1582 days | 2% |
| Eve Ford | 10/10 | 1601 days | 4% |
| Maree Rush | 10/10 | 1601 days | 4% |
| maryKB | 9/10 | 1632 days | 4% |
| Jye Hurrell | 8/10 | 1659 days | 3% |
| Neville Lester | 9/10 | 1662 days | 4% |
| Chris Cameron | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4% |
| Diana Evers | 2/10 | 1683 days | 3% |
| Wayne Stokes | 10/10 | 1785 days | 3% |
| Kim Deam | 9/10 | 1935 days | 3% |
| Annmarie Siciliano | 10/10 | 1966 days | 3% |
| Arnita Hunt | 9/10 | 1966 days | 3% |
| David Coyle | 10/10 | 1987 days | 3% |
| Catherine tempero | 8/10 | 1997 days | 3% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 2019 days | 3% |
| Penny Hopkins | 10/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
| Scott Walden | 10/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
| Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
| Sam McDonnell | 10/10 | 2333 days | 2% |
| Lisa Ison | 8/10 | 2333 days | 2% |
| Donna Katene | 10/10 | 2333 days | 2% |
| Rachel Greenland | 10/10 | 2363 days | 2% |
| Anja Niechziol | 10/10 | 2393 days | 2% |
| Leslie Turner | 8/10 | 2424 days | 2% |
| Robyn Weideman | 10/10 | 2607 days | 2% |
| Geraldine | 9/10 | 2607 days | 2% |
| Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 2635 days | 2% |
| peter bird | 10/10 | 2638 days | 2% |
| Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 2638 days | 2% |
| ana welham | 8/10 | 2697 days | 2% |
| Rachel Worrall | 10/10 | 2697 days | 2% |
| Bryan Mainwaring | 10/10 | 2697 days | 2% |
| Charlie Te Awhe | 10/10 | 2697 days | 2% |
| Nina Helmling | 9/10 | 3007 days | 1% |
| Michael Turek | 10/10 | 3063 days | 1% |
| mr burns | 5/10 | 3063 days | 1% |
| dominique raccah | 5/10 | 3094 days | 1% |
| J B | 4/10 | 3094 days | 1% |
| Glen Cameron | 10/10 | 3216 days | 1% |
| Henk_Huurnink | 9/10 | 3369 days | 0% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 3369 days | 0% |
| kim sowman | 9/10 | 3397 days | 0% |
| Sophia Hume | 10/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| SarahC | 9/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| WendyTimarac | 10/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| opunakecampers | 10/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| Rachael Thony | 10/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| Rachael Webb | 10/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| Bob2000 | 9/10 | 3428 days | 0% |
| lindamoore | 10/10 | 3459 days | 0% |
| pst | 10/10 | 3489 days | 0% |
| Fredmmcain12 | 10/10 | 3520 days | 0% |
| TravelNZ | 10/10 | 3520 days | 0% |
| Moni01 | 3/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 3743 days | 0% |
| Lee Lloyd | 8/10 | 3744 days | 0% |
| AlisonBrett | 9/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| PaxJanssen | 9/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| tonyleiman | 10/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 4099 days | 0% |
| rebb | 9/10 | 4100 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| patra374 | 9/10 | 4128 days | 1% |
| Puravida | 9/10 | 4190 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 10/10 | 4462 days | 0% |
| Katharina | 10/10 | 4468 days | 0% |
| Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 4473 days | 0% |
| Annemiek and Rianne | 10/10 | 4506 days | 0% |
| pedawrds | 10/10 | 4544 days | 0% |
| thomash | 10/10 | 4549 days | 0% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 4563 days | 0% |
| Shane and Kate Wilkinson | 9/10 | 4577 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 97 days. However the Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 4 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 1 | -0.01% |
| 2 | -0.03% |
| 3 | -0.04% |
| 4 | -0.05% |
| 5 | -0.07% |
| 6 | -0.08% |
| 7 | -0.09% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.