Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Opunake Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Opunake Beach Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
115 Valid Reviews
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 127 reviews. There are 115 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 12 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 115 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.96% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 90.96% and is based on 115 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 115 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.43% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.60%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| james | 10/10 | 26 days | 99.89 | 100% | |
| Christine (solo traveller) | 10/10 | 54 days | 99.54 | 100% | |
| Linda Belcher | 9/10 | 54 days | 99.54 | 100% | |
| Aaron Cox | 10/10 | 54 days | 99.54 | 100% | |
| audrey young | 10/10 | 54 days | 99.54 | 100% | |
| Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 54 days | 99.54 | 100% | |
| Jaime | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Marea | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Jeremy Hapeta | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Matt Moorby | 8/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Teresa homan | 7/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| James Richardson | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| J Pascoe | 8/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Neville Lester | 9/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| AlanT | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Andy | 9/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| fiona close | 9/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Annika Eckelt | 9/10 | 85 days | 98.86 | 99% | |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 116 days | 97.87 | 98% | |
| Hope Fletcher | 9/10 | 116 days | 97.87 | 98% | |
| Andre Bezuidenhout | 9/10 | 116 days | 97.87 | 98% | |
| Carleen | 10/10 | 116 days | 97.87 | 98% | |
| Mel | 10/10 | 116 days | 97.87 | 98% | |
| K Small | 4/10 | 146 days | 89.86 | 90% | |
| Hope | 9/10 | 268 days | 88.62 | 88% | |
| Jenny Saywood | 9/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| Taranaki Caravan Club | 9/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| Peter | 10/10 | 329 days | 82.85 | 83% | |
| Carrol Govan | 10/10 | 329 days | 82.85 | 83% | |
| Moana Olliver | 10/10 | 360 days | 79.46 | 79% | |
| B Olliver | 8/10 | 360 days | 79.46 | 79% | |
| J Ross | 8/10 | 360 days | 79.46 | 79% | |
| Damian. | 10/10 | 360 days | 79.46 | 79% | |
| Aaron Hine | 9/10 | 391 days | 75.77 | 75% | |
| G Bingham | 8/10 | 391 days | 75.77 | 75% | |
| Carina Meares | 10/10 | 391 days | 75.77 | 75% | |
| Judy Black | 9/10 | 391 days | 75.77 | 75% | |
| Greg Morris | 9/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 72% | |
| Elle C | 9/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 72% | |
| Leeanne Railton | 10/10 | 419 days | 72.18 | 72% | |
| Keith Salway | 9/10 | 430 days |  |
84.84 | 85% |
| Eve Ford | 10/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 67% | |
| Maree Rush | 10/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 67% | |
| maryKB | 9/10 | 480 days | 63.49 | 63% | |
| Jye Hurrell | 8/10 | 507 days | 59.27 | 58% | |
| Neville Lester | 9/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 58% | |
| Chris Cameron | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 58% | |
| Diana Evers | 2/10 | 531 days | 48.68 | 48% | |
| Wayne Stokes | 10/10 | 633 days | 38.82 | 38% | |
| Kim Deam | 9/10 | 783 days | 20.43 | 19% | |
| Annmarie Siciliano | 10/10 | 814 days | 17.51 | 16% | |
| Arnita Hunt | 9/10 | 814 days | 17.51 | 16% | |
| David Coyle | 10/10 | 835 days | 15.71 | 14% | |
| Catherine tempero | 8/10 | 845 days | 14.9 | 13% | |
| Rima | 10/10 | 867 days | 13.24 | 11% | |
| Penny Hopkins | 10/10 | 1180 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Scott Walden | 10/10 | 1180 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 1180 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Sam McDonnell | 10/10 | 1181 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Lisa Ison | 8/10 | 1181 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Donna Katene | 10/10 | 1181 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Rachel Greenland | 10/10 | 1211 days | 4.84 | 3% | |
| Anja Niechziol | 10/10 | 1241 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Leslie Turner | 8/10 | 1272 days | 4.76 | 3% | |
| Robyn Weideman | 10/10 | 1455 days | 4.51 | 2% | |
| Geraldine | 9/10 | 1455 days | 4.51 | 2% | |
| Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 1483 days | 4.47 | 2% | |
| peter bird | 10/10 | 1486 days | 4.46 | 2% | |
| Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 1486 days | 4.46 | 2% | |
| ana welham | 8/10 | 1545 days | 4.38 | 2% | |
| Rachel Worrall | 10/10 | 1545 days | 4.38 | 2% | |
| Bryan Mainwaring | 10/10 | 1545 days | 4.38 | 2% | |
| Charlie Te Awhe | 10/10 | 1545 days | 4.38 | 2% | |
| Nina Helmling | 9/10 | 1855 days | |
4.75 | 3% |
| Michael Turek | 10/10 | 1911 days | 3.88 | 2% | |
| mr burns | 5/10 | 1911 days | 3.88 | 2% | |
| dominique raccah | 5/10 | 1942 days | 3.84 | 2% | |
| J B | 4/10 | 1942 days | 3.57 | 1% | |
| Glen Cameron | 10/10 | 2063 days | 3.67 | 2% | |
| Henk_Huurnink | 9/10 | 2217 days | 3.46 | 1% | |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2217 days | 3.46 | 1% | |
| kim sowman | 9/10 | 2245 days | 3.42 | 1% | |
| Sophia Hume | 10/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| SarahC | 9/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| WendyTimarac | 10/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| opunakecampers | 10/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| Rachael Thony | 10/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| Rachael Webb | 10/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| Bob2000 | 9/10 | 2276 days | 3.38 | 1% | |
| lindamoore | 10/10 | 2307 days | 3.34 | 1% | |
| pst | 10/10 | 2337 days | 3.3 | 1% | |
| Fredmmcain12 | 10/10 | 2368 days | 3.26 | 1% | |
| TravelNZ | 10/10 | 2368 days | 3.26 | 1% | |
| Moni01 | 3/10 | 2551 days | 2.73 | 1% | |
| Lars | 8/10 | 2591 days | |
3.54 | 1% |
| Lee Lloyd | 8/10 | 2592 days | |
3.54 | 1% |
| AlisonBrett | 9/10 | 2611 days | 2.92 | 1% | |
| PaxJanssen | 9/10 | 2642 days | 2.88 | 1% | |
| tonyleiman | 10/10 | 2642 days | 2.88 | 1% | |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 2947 days | |
2.96 | 1% |
| rebb | 9/10 | 2948 days | 2.46 | 0% | |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 2948 days | |
2.95 | 1% |
| patra374 | 9/10 | 2976 days | 2.42 | 0% | |
| Puravida | 9/10 | 3038 days | 2.34 | 0% | |
| Ralph | 10/10 | 3310 days | |
2.36 | 0% |
| Katharina | 10/10 | 3316 days | |
2.35 | 0% |
| Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 3321 days | |
2.34 | 0% |
| Annemiek and Rianne | 10/10 | 3354 days | |
2.29 | 0% |
| pedawrds | 10/10 | 3392 days | |
2.22 | 0% |
| thomash | 10/10 | 3397 days | |
2.22 | 0% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 3411 days | |
2.19 | 0% |
| Shane and Kate Wilkinson | 9/10 | 3425 days | |
2.17 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Opunake Beach Holiday Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.