Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 84 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.43% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
70% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 89.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.87%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marit | 8/10 | 79 days | 100% |
| Ka Gill | 10/10 | 293 days | 97% |
| Evelína | 10/10 | 382 days | 94% |
| Cam an | 10/10 | 444 days | 91% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 444 days | 90% |
| Nalu | 9/10 | 779 days | 66% |
| Yann Le Guyadec | 9/10 | 840 days | 60% |
| Joel Ross | 9/10 | 1085 days | 36% |
| Laura | 6/10 | 1085 days | 32% |
| iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk | 10/10 | 1085 days | 37% |
| Cameron Hunter | 10/10 | 1113 days | 34% |
| Carina | 10/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 1205 days | 27% |
| Kirsty Speers | 7/10 | 1205 days | 25% |
| Clinton dela Cruz | 10/10 | 1478 days | 12% |
| Alex | 7/10 | 1693 days | 5% |
| Belhambra | 10/10 | 1843 days | 5% |
| Just a guy | 10/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
| Kristell | 9/10 | 2209 days | 4% |
| Adam | 8/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
| Izzy | 8/10 | 2301 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2362 days | 4% |
| Soph | 7/10 | 2362 days | 3% |
| Scooper | 8/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Melissa Rodrigues | 9/10 | 2546 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2546 days | 3% |
| Jess | 1/10 | 2574 days | 1% |
| Tash & Laura | 9/10 | 2574 days | 3% |
| Melz | 10/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Pim Brackenie | 7/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| john hambly | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Chelsea | 8/10 | 2727 days | 3% |
| Inez Cavallaro | 10/10 | 2727 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 2911 days | 2% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2911 days | 2% |
| Andreas Fuchs | 10/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
| Stephanie Starbuck | 6/10 | 2979 days | 2% |
| Silvia Martin | 8/10 | 3016 days | 2% |
| Montana McLeod | 10/10 | 3143 days | 2% |
| Matt Robbins | 9/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
| Josh Styx | 8/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3237 days | 2% |
| Richard Webb | 9/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Richard Webb | 9/10 | 3314 days | 1% |
| Mark van Beers | 9/10 | 3343 days | 2% |
| Danny Josa Parrott | 10/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
| Shelly Stanchuk | 9/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| Toby Walters | 10/10 | 3488 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 10/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 8/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Heather Scoltock | 4/10 | 3666 days | 0% |
| Gregor Hohn | 9/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| Brandy Brooks | 10/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| Guy Cozen | 10/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Kresten Skak | 9/10 | 3734 days | 1% |
| Bertrand Delacour | 9/10 | 3747 days | 1% |
| Amanda Kuen | 8/10 | 3754 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 8/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 9/10 | 3793 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Huber | 9/10 | 3826 days | 1% |
| Harriet Bramley | 9/10 | 3842 days | 1% |
| Anita and Wilbur | 10/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Will Waine | 10/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| Chris Read | 5/10 | 3923 days | 0% |
| Michael Ricketts | 9/10 | 4016 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 9/10 | 4093 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Kindler | 10/10 | 4094 days | 0% |
| Grant Pease | 10/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
| Sina Leidig | 10/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
| Jacqui V | 9/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 7/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Sonja | 7/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Lotte Uneken | 8/10 | 4839 days | 0% |
| phudgb | 6/10 | 4857 days | 0% |
| Chris Sylvia | 8/10 | 5095 days | 0% |
| Andrea Bircher | 9/10 | 5116 days | 0% |
| John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 5202 days | 0% |
| Steve Read | 9/10 | 5461 days | 0% |
| Chris White | 9/10 | 5475 days | 0% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 9/10 | 5476 days | 0% |
| shirleyduncan | 10/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
| nosey | 9/10 | 5619 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 43 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 40 | -0.83% |
| 41 | -0.85% |
| 42 | -0.87% |
| 43 | -0.89% |
| 44 | -0.91% |
| 45 | -0.93% |
| 46 | -0.95% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.