Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 84 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.43% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
70% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 89.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marit | 8/10 | 201 days | 100% |
| Ka Gill | 10/10 | 415 days | 94% |
| Evelína | 10/10 | 504 days | 89% |
| Cam an | 10/10 | 566 days | 85% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 566 days | 84% |
| Nalu | 9/10 | 901 days | 55% |
| Yann Le Guyadec | 9/10 | 962 days | 49% |
| Joel Ross | 9/10 | 1207 days | 28% |
| Laura | 6/10 | 1207 days | 24% |
| iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk | 10/10 | 1207 days | 28% |
| Cameron Hunter | 10/10 | 1235 days | 26% |
| Carina | 10/10 | 1266 days | 24% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1266 days | 23% |
| Daniel | 9/10 | 1327 days | 20% |
| Kirsty Speers | 7/10 | 1327 days | 18% |
| Clinton dela Cruz | 10/10 | 1600 days | 8% |
| Alex | 7/10 | 1815 days | 5% |
| Belhambra | 10/10 | 1965 days | 5% |
| Just a guy | 10/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| Kristell | 9/10 | 2331 days | 4% |
| Adam | 8/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
| Izzy | 8/10 | 2423 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2484 days | 4% |
| Soph | 7/10 | 2484 days | 3% |
| Scooper | 8/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Melissa Rodrigues | 9/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Jess | 1/10 | 2696 days | 1% |
| Tash & Laura | 9/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| Melz | 10/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
| Pim Brackenie | 7/10 | 2788 days | 3% |
| john hambly | 8/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 8/10 | 2819 days | 3% |
| Chelsea | 8/10 | 2849 days | 3% |
| Inez Cavallaro | 10/10 | 2849 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3033 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 3033 days | 3% |
| Andreas Fuchs | 10/10 | 3037 days | 3% |
| Stephanie Starbuck | 6/10 | 3101 days | 2% |
| Silvia Martin | 8/10 | 3138 days | 2% |
| Montana McLeod | 10/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Matt Robbins | 9/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
| Josh Styx | 8/10 | 3344 days | 2% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Richard Webb | 9/10 | 3421 days | 2% |
| Richard Webb | 9/10 | 3436 days | 1% |
| Mark van Beers | 9/10 | 3465 days | 2% |
| Danny Josa Parrott | 10/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
| Shelly Stanchuk | 9/10 | 3518 days | 2% |
| Toby Walters | 10/10 | 3610 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 10/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 8/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| Heather Scoltock | 4/10 | 3788 days | 1% |
| Gregor Hohn | 9/10 | 3827 days | 1% |
| Brandy Brooks | 10/10 | 3834 days | 1% |
| Guy Cozen | 10/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Kresten Skak | 9/10 | 3856 days | 1% |
| Bertrand Delacour | 9/10 | 3869 days | 1% |
| Amanda Kuen | 8/10 | 3876 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 8/10 | 3906 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 9/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Huber | 9/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
| Harriet Bramley | 9/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| Anita and Wilbur | 10/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Will Waine | 10/10 | 3976 days | 1% |
| Chris Read | 5/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Michael Ricketts | 9/10 | 4138 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 9/10 | 4215 days | 0% |
| Sebastian Kindler | 10/10 | 4216 days | 0% |
| Grant Pease | 10/10 | 4249 days | 0% |
| Sina Leidig | 10/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| Jacqui V | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 7/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Sonja | 7/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Lotte Uneken | 8/10 | 4961 days | 1% |
| phudgb | 6/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| Chris Sylvia | 8/10 | 5217 days | 1% |
| Andrea Bircher | 9/10 | 5238 days | 1% |
| John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 5324 days | 1% |
| Steve Read | 9/10 | 5583 days | 1% |
| Chris White | 9/10 | 5597 days | 1% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 9/10 | 5598 days | 1% |
| shirleyduncan | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
| nosey | 9/10 | 5741 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.76% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Affordable Willowhaven Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 164 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 161 | -1.73% |
| 162 | -1.74% |
| 163 | -1.75% |
| 164 | -1.76% |
| 165 | -1.77% |
| 166 | -1.79% |
| 167 | -1.80% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.