G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
96 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 97 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 32 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
84.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 84.58% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
54 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 96 valid reviews, the experience has 54 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
85.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 85.19% and is based on 54 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia | 8/10 | 105 days | 100% |
| Maud Jabouley | 10/10 | 258 days | 99% |
| AR | 7/10 | 288 days | 91% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 379 days | 94% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1658 days | 6% |
| COUSTEIX Guy | 9/10 | 1658 days | 6% |
| California caravan first time | 8/10 | 1809 days | 5% |
| Su | 9/10 | 1871 days | 5% |
| Brian Palmer | 8/10 | 2205 days | 4% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
| Ingrid Peters | 8/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
| Eversons | 8/10 | 2539 days | 3% |
| Lene Hendel | 8/10 | 2556 days | 3% |
| Shira LA | 9/10 | 2570 days | 3% |
| sarah garlough | 6/10 | 2608 days | 3% |
| Anna Holloway | 9/10 | 2674 days | 3% |
| CARMERS | 10/10 | 2692 days | 3% |
| Jon Veitch | 9/10 | 2845 days | 3% |
| Joan Robinson | 8/10 | 2863 days | 3% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 2924 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 6/10 | 2935 days | 2% |
| Stuart Morgan | 8/10 | 3031 days | 2% |
| Shane Mun | 10/10 | 3083 days | 2% |
| Catherine Davison | 9/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
| Elaine Carter | 10/10 | 3216 days | 2% |
| Phillippa McLernon | 8/10 | 3252 days | 2% |
| Alan Field | 8/10 | 3362 days | 2% |
| Chester Martin | 10/10 | 3438 days | 1% |
| John Chilcote | 9/10 | 3534 days | 1% |
| Stephanie | 9/10 | 3551 days | 1% |
| Christian Jenny | 10/10 | 3554 days | 1% |
| Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
| Philippe Lopez | 8/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 7/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Lea Karl | 10/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
| Jurgen Moors | 6/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
| David Krasner | 10/10 | 3997 days | 0% |
| John Treasure | 6/10 | 4000 days | 0% |
| 1246km | 7/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| Craig Jones | 9/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| Reinier Timmer | 8/10 | 4409 days | 1% |
| Michal | 8/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Wouter Trumpie | 8/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| Marian | 6/10 | 4429 days | 0% |
| Adam Hassan | 8/10 | 4432 days | 1% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 4434 days | 1% |
| Liz Marquart Scholtz | 8/10 | 4438 days | 1% |
| Julia Ramseier | 10/10 | 4439 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 4439 days | 1% |
| Megan Child | 9/10 | 4444 days | 1% |
| Ruben Kunze | 1/10 | 4692 days | 0% |
| Be Groen | 8/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
| Patricia Fearon | 10/10 | 4714 days | 1% |
| Hans Erik Munch | 8/10 | 4729 days | 1% |
| Sarah and Soren | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
| Alice Bastiman | 9/10 | 5045 days | 1% |
| Schroeder | 8/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Leanne Shepherd | 8/10 | 5060 days | 1% |
| lyndavid | 9/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
| Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5072 days | 1% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 10/10 | 5076 days | 1% |
| Walter Peters | 10/10 | 5080 days | 1% |
| Annie Pennington | 10/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
| Phillips | 8/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
| Jansen | 9/10 | 5083 days | 1% |
| Angela | 10/10 | 5084 days | 1% |
| Philipp Rau | 9/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| G R Vangerven | 9/10 | 5089 days | 1% |
| Igor Filart | 9/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| T Chapman | 7/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| De Blaeij | 8/10 | 5094 days | 1% |
| Michelle Booty | 8/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
| Mikeminch | 8/10 | 5188 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| bqueen_111 | 10/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| BigSis | 8/10 | 5280 days | 1% |
| Silke Seemann | 10/10 | 5424 days | 1% |
| Lamb | 9/10 | 5460 days | 1% |
| mariekef | 7/10 | 5507 days | 1% |
| hofstetterf | 9/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
| Anayara Diaz Torres | 6/10 | 5534 days | 0% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 4/10 | 5534 days | 0% |
| Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5546 days | 1% |
| ulrichk | 10/10 | 5640 days | 1% |
| michellew | 9/10 | 5715 days | 1% |
| GemmaC | 8/10 | 5756 days | 1% |
| neeltjec | 9/10 | 5767 days | 1% |
| desl | 9/10 | 5767 days | 1% |
| Martien van Brakel | 9/10 | 5767 days | 1% |
| Viktoria Stoffel | 10/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| DavidMurray | 10/10 | 5801 days | 1% |
| RichardE | 8/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.53% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 45 days. However the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 75 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 72 | -1.47% |
| 73 | -1.49% |
| 74 | -1.51% |
| 75 | -1.53% |
| 76 | -1.55% |
| 77 | -1.57% |
| 78 | -1.59% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.