Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
103 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 106 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 33 |
|
32% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.15% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 85.15% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
54 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 54 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
85.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 85.19% and is based on 54 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver Muenster | 10/10 | 189 days | 100% |
| Heiko Millhahn | 10/10 | 217 days | 99% |
| Emily | 9/10 | 279 days | 97% |
| René Burkhard | 9/10 | 309 days | 96% |
| Laura (UK) | 10/10 | 462 days | 90% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 554 days | 83% |
| Sof | 8/10 | 582 days | 81% |
| Nadia | 8/10 | 705 days | 72% |
| Maud Jabouley | 10/10 | 858 days | 59% |
| AR | 7/10 | 888 days | 52% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 979 days | 47% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 2258 days | 4% |
| COUSTEIX Guy | 9/10 | 2258 days | 4% |
| California caravan first time | 8/10 | 2409 days | 4% |
| Su | 9/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Brian Palmer | 8/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2897 days | 3% |
| Ingrid Peters | 8/10 | 2897 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 8/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
| Lene Hendel | 8/10 | 3156 days | 2% |
| Shira LA | 9/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| sarah garlough | 6/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Anna Holloway | 9/10 | 3274 days | 2% |
| CARMERS | 10/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Jon Veitch | 9/10 | 3444 days | 2% |
| Joan Robinson | 8/10 | 3463 days | 2% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3524 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 6/10 | 3534 days | 1% |
| Stuart Morgan | 8/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
| Shane Mun | 10/10 | 3683 days | 1% |
| Catherine Davison | 9/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
| Elaine Carter | 10/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Phillippa McLernon | 8/10 | 3852 days | 1% |
| Alan Field | 8/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
| Chester Martin | 10/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
| John Chilcote | 9/10 | 4134 days | 0% |
| Stephanie | 9/10 | 4151 days | 0% |
| Christian Jenny | 10/10 | 4154 days | 0% |
| Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 4208 days | 0% |
| Philippe Lopez | 8/10 | 4240 days | 0% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 7/10 | 4265 days | 0% |
| Lea Karl | 10/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
| Jurgen Moors | 6/10 | 4301 days | 0% |
| David Krasner | 10/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
| John Treasure | 6/10 | 4600 days | 1% |
| 1246km | 7/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
| Craig Jones | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
| Reinier Timmer | 8/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
| Michal | 8/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
| Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
| Wouter Trumpie | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
| Marian | 6/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Adam Hassan | 8/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 8/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Liz Marquart Scholtz | 8/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
| Julia Ramseier | 10/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Megan Child | 9/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| Ruben Kunze | 1/10 | 5292 days | 0% |
| Be Groen | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
| Patricia Fearon | 10/10 | 5314 days | 1% |
| Hans Erik Munch | 8/10 | 5329 days | 1% |
| Sarah and Soren | 9/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
| Alice Bastiman | 9/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Schroeder | 8/10 | 5656 days | 1% |
| Leanne Shepherd | 8/10 | 5660 days | 1% |
| lyndavid | 9/10 | 5668 days | 1% |
| Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5672 days | 1% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 10/10 | 5676 days | 1% |
| Walter Peters | 10/10 | 5680 days | 1% |
| Annie Pennington | 10/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Phillips | 8/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Jansen | 9/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
| Angela | 10/10 | 5684 days | 1% |
| Philipp Rau | 9/10 | 5687 days | 1% |
| Eva Stauderova | 10/10 | 5687 days | 1% |
| G R Vangerven | 9/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
| Igor Filart | 9/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
| T Chapman | 7/10 | 5691 days | 1% |
| De Blaeij | 8/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Michelle Booty | 8/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
| Mikeminch | 8/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
| bqueen_111 | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
| BigSis | 8/10 | 5880 days | 1% |
| Silke Seemann | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Lamb | 9/10 | 6060 days | 1% |
| mariekef | 7/10 | 6107 days | 1% |
| hofstetterf | 9/10 | 6121 days | 1% |
| Anayara Diaz Torres | 6/10 | 6134 days | 1% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 4/10 | 6134 days | 1% |
| Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 6146 days | 1% |
| ulrichk | 10/10 | 6240 days | 1% |
| michellew | 9/10 | 6315 days | 1% |
| GemmaC | 8/10 | 6356 days | 1% |
| neeltjec | 9/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| desl | 9/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| Martien van Brakel | 9/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| Viktoria Stoffel | 10/10 | 6374 days | 1% |
| DavidMurray | 10/10 | 6401 days | 1% |
| RichardE | 8/10 | 6402 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.30% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 89 days. However the Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rotorua Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 169 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 166 | -2.26% |
| 167 | -2.27% |
| 168 | -2.28% |
| 169 | -2.30% |
| 170 | -2.31% |
| 171 | -2.32% |
| 172 | -2.34% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.21% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.