Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
84 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 84 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park valid reviews is 74.64% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 79.78% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Julianne McKie||8/10||283 days||82.94||83%|
|frans van schie||7/10||344 days||73.94||74%|
|Boguslaw MAKIELLO||6/10||845 days||12.37||12%|
|The Weathersons||6/10||875 days||10.52||11%|
|Ronald Daigneault||6/10||945 days||7.11||7%|
|Lucy Winfield||6/10||1088 days||4.16||4%|
|Susan Boyton||8/10||1149 days||4.65||5%|
|Elena Rusalen||7/10||1200 days||4.36||4%|
|Victoria Lee||3/10||1232 days||3.64||4%|
|Bram de Vries||4/10||1251 days||3.71||4%|
|Alba Mateos||9/10||1285 days||4.63||5%|
|Philippa and Adam||6/10||1585 days||3.35||3%|
|Sunja Abbe||10/10||1595 days||4.02||4%|
|Staffan Johansson||4/10||1603 days||3.16||3%|
|Jane Louise Stokes||3/10||1606 days||3.08||3%|
|Travis Gregory||1/10||1714 days||2.77||3%|
|Sarah Gurney||7/10||1719 days||3.44||3%|
|Emmy Poole||5/10||1756 days||3.0||3%|
|Kirsty Longland||8/10||1774 days||3.49||3%|
|Fabien Metro||9/10||1801 days||3.62||4%|
|Elka Keijzer||9/10||1896 days||3.43||3%|
|Bjorn Privat||2/10||2017 days||2.4||2%|
|Sidney Stokkers||7/10||2108 days||2.75||3%|
|Paul Wood||7/10||2413 days||2.2||2%|
|Steven Wood||8/10||2504 days||2.13||2%|
|K & F||7/10||2688 days||1.71||2%|
|William Notcutt||6/10||2747 days||1.47||1%|
|Martin Thomas||6/10||2770 days||1.43||1%|
|Julia Ramseier||6/10||2790 days||1.4||1%|
|Heiner Reinecke||9/10||3045 days||1.18||1%|
|Sebastian Hol||9/10||3049 days||1.18||1%|
|Tamara McVey||9/10||3065 days||1.14||1%|
|Susie Christensen||9/10||3068 days||1.14||1%|
|David & Mary-Jane Ryder||9/10||3156 days||0.97||1%|
|Tony & Rachel||10/10||3158 days||0.96||1%|
|Alberto Redner||10/10||3160 days||0.96||1%|
|Karin & Bastiaan||8/10||3383 days||0.5||0%|
|Nick van de Belt||9/10||3396 days||0.5||0%|
|Kris Gijbels||9/10||3397 days||0.5||0%|
|Andreas Blessing||8/10||3399 days||0.47||0%|
|De Groot||7/10||3403 days||0.44||0%|
|S and A Koehue||10/10||3419 days||0.45||0%|
|Canille Lechat||9/10||3436 days||0.42||0%|
|Simon Vallis||8/10||3438 days||0.39||0%|
|Sue & Graham Mullin||4/10||3442 days||0.32||0%|
|Katrin & Mark||9/10||3447 days||0.4||0%|
|M and H Lunn||8/10||3793 days||0.0||0%|
|Hennie Neeleman||8/10||3886 days||0.0||0%|
|Pieter Neeleman||8/10||3886 days||0.0||0%|
|Karen Fisher||4/10||3900 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rotorua Thermal Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 30 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.