Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
103 Valid Reviews
The Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 104 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 83.50% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
73 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 73 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 73 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 85.34% and is based on 73 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mrs Lounis||10/10||125 days||97.52||100%|
|David Wilson||9/10||339 days||81.79||84%|
|Jessica Belanger||1/10||793 days||14.2||15%|
|Tina and Terry||8/10||793 days||18.48||19%|
|Leanne Taylor-Smith||5/10||843 days||12.2||13%|
|Al Black||9/10||1042 days||5.45||6%|
|Donna Maclay||1/10||1158 days||3.56||4%|
|estelle D||10/10||1220 days||4.76||5%|
|Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015||6/10||1647 days||3.25||3%|
|James Webster||6/10||1845 days||2.93||3%|
|Jacques Dumas||9/10||1861 days||3.5||4%|
|Sue Hempstead||8/10||1896 days||3.26||3%|
|Sarah Munnings||10/10||1981 days||3.27||3%|
|Chris Mitchell||9/10||2254 days||2.73||3%|
|Jake Bell||3/10||2285 days||2.06||2%|
|Helene & Peter||8/10||2346 days||2.42||2%|
|Hanneke P||8/10||2650 days||1.86||2%|
|Michelle Chambers||9/10||2650 days||1.96||2%|
|Pamela Moresby||10/10||2650 days||1.96||2%|
|Andreas Garbin||10/10||2669 days||1.92||2%|
|Lauret Stulemeyer||8/10||2669 days||1.82||2%|
|Steve Douthwaite||10/10||2670 days||1.92||2%|
|Milena Heinrich||10/10||2687 days||1.88||2%|
|Tuedi Muggli||10/10||2953 days||1.36||1%|
|Michael Jefferies||9/10||2959 days||1.35||1%|
|Paul & Jayne Smith||8/10||2966 days||1.27||1%|
|Nigel Horrocks||9/10||2966 days||1.34||1%|
|Frans Roebroek||9/10||2967 days||1.34||1%|
|R E Webb||9/10||2968 days||1.33||1%|
|Jacques Duyvestijn||9/10||2969 days||1.33||1%|
|Farid Juillot||8/10||2970 days||1.26||1%|
|Kim Thorsted||7/10||2979 days||1.19||1%|
|Ole Klothrop||9/10||2979 days||1.31||1%|
|Dick van Doorn||8/10||2984 days||1.24||1%|
|Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir||6/10||2984 days||1.08||1%|
|Manuela Zimmerti||5/10||3048 days||0.95||1%|
|Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch||8/10||3054 days||1.11||1%|
|Ross Cooke||10/10||3054 days||1.17||1%|
|Philip Gierke||8/10||3296 days||0.66||1%|
|Florian Miller||10/10||3305 days||0.68||1%|
|Nicola Thackray||10/10||3309 days||0.67||1%|
|Barry Digby||10/10||3309 days||0.67||1%|
|Juergen Ruppen||10/10||3316 days||0.65||1%|
|Edgar & Marilyn Berry||9/10||3318 days||0.65||1%|
|Fam de Kruyf||7/10||3319 days||0.59||1%|
|Pat MacDonald||10/10||3337 days||0.61||1%|
|Roel Wesstra||9/10||3342 days||0.6||1%|
|Patrick Decoster||8/10||3343 days||0.57||1%|
|Dan Aldridge||8/10||3343 days||0.57||1%|
|Jarob Brezigar||8/10||3343 days||0.57||1%|
|Andy & Louise Dutton||10/10||3674 days||0.0||0%|
|Tony Masters||8/10||3675 days||0.0||0%|
|Alan & Lorna||8/10||3680 days||0.0||0%|
|Mark and Natasha UK||9/10||3689 days||0.0||0%|
|John Harrison||8/10||3694 days||0.0||0%|
|Alan Howe||9/10||3707 days||0.0||0%|
|Bryan Keddie||9/10||3711 days||0.0||0%|
|Greg Gerritz||7/10||3714 days||0.0||0%|
|Mervyn Simmonds||9/10||3715 days||0.0||0%|
|Bo Moenstead||9/10||3724 days||0.0||0%|
|Douglas Kirby||8/10||3728 days||0.0||0%|
|H Simpson||9/10||3781 days||0.0||0%|
|Antje & Sascha Häusler||9/10||3781 days||0.0||0%|
|Aart Van Nooy||7/10||3784 days||0.0||0%|
|Helen Pet||9/10||3785 days||0.0||0%|
|Richard Kesteleyn||4/10||3785 days||0.0||0%|
|Jeanette Larsen||9/10||3789 days||0.0||0%|
|Ietje van Beers||10/10||3838 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Blue Lake TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 104 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.