Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
59 Valid Reviews
The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 59 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
88.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 88.14% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 88.42% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
85.55%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quetzacol | 10/10 | 80 days | 100% |
| Samuel Dällenbach | 5/10 | 659 days | 58% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 8/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| Silke | 10/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| Suzz | 8/10 | 1268 days | 22% |
| Fer&And | 10/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Ryan | 10/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Kristina Russo | 9/10 | 3192 days | 2% |
| Jonzie NZ | 8/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Elaine Carter | 10/10 | 3556 days | 1% |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 8/10 | 3577 days | 1% |
| Brandy Brooks | 10/10 | 3645 days | 1% |
| Louise Tulp | 10/10 | 3711 days | 1% |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 9/10 | 3916 days | 1% |
| Oliver Powles | 8/10 | 4045 days | 1% |
| Ted Cole | 9/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| Neil & Christine | 10/10 | 4705 days | 1% |
| Andrew Wemmer | 8/10 | 4765 days | 1% |
| Joan and Colin Price | 9/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
| Brigitte van Leeuwen-ud Meys | 8/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
| wfouracre | 10/10 | 4828 days | 1% |
| Goran Backlund | 10/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
| Helmut Schmid | 10/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| D van Dongen | 9/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Richard Harvey | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Lotte Zwail | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| R E Webb | 9/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
| Walter & Heidi Baumann | 8/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Petra | 10/10 | 5066 days | 1% |
| J Knol | 8/10 | 5097 days | 1% |
| Tuibaby22 | 1/10 | 5102 days | 0% |
| Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch | 8/10 | 5140 days | 1% |
| Chantal Wendel | 9/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Margaret Lally | 8/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Michael Orme | 9/10 | 5398 days | 1% |
| Kees Stigter | 9/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| TraceyE | 10/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Annie Pennington | 10/10 | 5423 days | 1% |
| Sarah Ewing | 10/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
| De Blaeij | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
| Grant | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 5700 days | 1% |
| Michele Prevost | 8/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
| Rik | 9/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| Mark and Natasha UK | 9/10 | 5775 days | 1% |
| Faller | 10/10 | 5796 days | 1% |
| barts | 8/10 | 5847 days | 1% |
| stephenst | 9/10 | 5847 days | 1% |
| mvano | 8/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
| Hans Barth | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| marleen451 | 9/10 | 5893 days | 1% |
| Tracy & Peter Cassidy | 8/10 | 5902 days | 1% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| wanganuilover | 10/10 | 6107 days | 1% |
| rosil | 10/10 | 6107 days | 1% |
| Martina Bumiller | 10/10 | 6112 days | 1% |
| Brigette Guikens | 10/10 | 6128 days | 1% |
| ZimmermannA | 10/10 | 6148 days | 1% |
| Mike | 3/10 | 6152 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.41% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 70 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 67 | -1.35% |
| 68 | -1.37% |
| 69 | -1.39% |
| 70 | -1.41% |
| 71 | -1.44% |
| 72 | -1.46% |
| 73 | -1.48% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.