Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cave Stream Scenic Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Cave Stream Scenic Reserve

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Cave Stream Scenic Reserve experience has a total of 62 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 10 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 39
75%
9/10 10
19%
8/10 3
6%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

96.92% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cave Stream Scenic Reserve valid reviews is 96.92% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

37 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 52 valid reviews, the experience has 37 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
70%
9/10 8
22%
8/10 3
8%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

96.22% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cave Stream Scenic Reserve face-to-face reviews is 96.22% and is based on 37 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

99.41%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cymen Crick 10/10 40 days 100%
Chris 10/10 130 days 99%
Kdoe 10/10 1167 days 29%
Pete 10/10 2109 days 4%
Justin 10/10 2262 days 4%
Joan Dangerfield 10/10 2718 days 3%
Bob the genious 10/10 2993 days 2%
Wilhelm Wiechel 9/10 3097 days 2%
Emma Philpott 10/10 3344 days 2%
Frank Ryan 10/10 3373 days 2%
Car R 10/10 3385 days 2%
Kolar 10/10 3407 days 1%
Stuart Gange 9/10 3440 days 1%
Huon 10/10 3696 days 1%
Cecile 9/10 3696 days 1%
Jari Kahelin 10/10 3703 days 1%
Floriane Desnoyer 10/10 3705 days 1%
Elodie Bardolle 8/10 3732 days 1%
Yarden Oliva 10/10 3744 days 1%
Jan Penicka 10/10 3749 days 1%
Kim S 10/10 3935 days 0%
Chris 10/10 4079 days 0%
Tarillon Family 8/10 4079 days 0%
Sue Strebe 8/10 4107 days 0%
Oliver Andres 10/10 4163 days 0%
Helen Olsson 10/10 4430 days 1%
Simeon W 10/10 4436 days 1%
Philip Schumann 10/10 4450 days 1%
Jonas Hessel 10/10 4451 days 1%
Igor 10/10 4454 days 1%
Ann Winter 10/10 4472 days 1%
Phillip 10/10 4472 days 1%
Jason MacLeod 10/10 4482 days 1%
Debora Grusler 10/10 4483 days 1%
Lisbeth Sorum 10/10 4489 days 1%
Cameron Tarbotton 10/10 4489 days 1%
Katharina 10/10 4806 days 1%
Fabian 10/10 4806 days 1%
Eric 9/10 4824 days 1%
Rogier Ramaker 9/10 4824 days 1%
Melvin Groenhof 9/10 4824 days 1%
Roeland Driessen 10/10 4878 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5151 days 1%
Rachel_Flowers 10/10 5275 days 1%
D Patterson 10/10 5305 days 1%
Sophie Burge 9/10 5527 days 1%
Ann-Kathrin Auditor 10/10 5544 days 1%
Lenore Dejong 10/10 5552 days 1%
Paap 9/10 5555 days 1%
Tim Pfahlert 9/10 5566 days 1%
Daniela Seibel 10/10 5570 days 1%
Rissa W 9/10 6674 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cave Stream Scenic Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

99%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.