Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
125 Valid Reviews
The Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 129 reviews. There are 125 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 125 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 62 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
89.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 89.36% and is based on 125 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 125 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 90.56% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.05%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angela | 8/10 | 257 days | 100% |
| Eddie | 5/10 | 288 days | 77% |
| Maria | 8/10 | 378 days | 95% |
| Alan and Anne | 10/10 | 439 days | 94% |
| DA - USA | 10/10 | 561 days | 87% |
| Tom | 9/10 | 713 days | 75% |
| Lana | 10/10 | 774 days | 70% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 866 days | 61% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 927 days | 54% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 927 days | 54% |
| Matt Olejniczak | 9/10 | 1019 days | 44% |
| Leigh | 9/10 | 1047 days | 41% |
| Annie | 10/10 | 1047 days | 42% |
| Pip | 10/10 | 1139 days | 34% |
| Frauke | 10/10 | 1170 days | 31% |
| Mike | 10/10 | 1231 days | 27% |
| Linda Brooking | 6/10 | 1412 days | 13% |
| Steffen Schopper | 10/10 | 1627 days | 8% |
| Trent | 10/10 | 1749 days | 6% |
| Crystal | 9/10 | 1900 days | 5% |
| Sandy | 9/10 | 1961 days | 5% |
| Tina Gahlot | 10/10 | 2083 days | 5% |
| Moritz | 8/10 | 2143 days | 5% |
| Caroline | 10/10 | 2143 days | 5% |
| Toni | 9/10 | 2143 days | 5% |
| Richard & Chris, UK | 9/10 | 2174 days | 5% |
| Bert | 8/10 | 2205 days | 4% |
| Nik | 8/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 6/10 | 2480 days | 3% |
| Clare & Gerry | 9/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
| Melissa Rodrigues | 10/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
| Wales | 7/10 | 2631 days | 3% |
| Patricio Vidal | 10/10 | 2723 days | 3% |
| Antje Burmeister | 10/10 | 2814 days | 3% |
| jofa972 | 7/10 | 2814 days | 3% |
| Spike Thorne | 9/10 | 2826 days | 3% |
| Steve Pickard | 9/10 | 2845 days | 3% |
| Helen Bond | 10/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| Mike Allen | 8/10 | 2891 days | 3% |
| Leanne Taylor-Smith | 6/10 | 2923 days | 3% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3123 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 3232 days | 2% |
| Stijn Mertens | 9/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| David Coyle | 9/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
| Tabea Probst | 9/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Jason Stalgis | 6/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
| Heather Peart | 10/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Cindy Lewis | 10/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
| Clare Backman | 8/10 | 3545 days | 2% |
| Thomas Gerhardy | 5/10 | 3553 days | 1% |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 7/10 | 3571 days | 2% |
| Susan Woods | 10/10 | 3575 days | 2% |
| Julia Rey | 10/10 | 3592 days | 2% |
| Heather Scoltock | 8/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Ron Mollica | 10/10 | 3635 days | 2% |
| jacky Taljaard | 10/10 | 3727 days | 1% |
| Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 3757 days | 1% |
| Nicky Hurst | 10/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
| Di Foxwell | 10/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 9/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Constantin D | 7/10 | 3973 days | 1% |
| Silke | 9/10 | 3982 days | 1% |
| Julie Jennings | 9/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
| Xan Northman | 6/10 | 4214 days | 0% |
| Family Trip | 8/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
| Daniel Garcia Dezgado | 10/10 | 4315 days | 0% |
| Jacqui V | 10/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| John Treasure | 10/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Mirjam B. | 8/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| gerard jongerius | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
| Sally02 | 8/10 | 4457 days | 1% |
| Humphrey | 10/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
| Val Kennedy | 7/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 8/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Allen | 3/10 | 4730 days | 1% |
| Wanda Boltman | 10/10 | 4761 days | 1% |
| SwissKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4883 days | 1% |
| RogerKennard | 10/10 | 4944 days | 1% |
| dandp | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
| KylieH | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
| Peaches | 1/10 | 5005 days | 0% |
| fredlee | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
| nonie | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
| A Ormsby | 9/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Kiwitraveller | 10/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| Jaroslav Gajdos | 8/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Monica | 10/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Mills | 9/10 | 5052 days | 1% |
| M Neuman | 7/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
| polzeath | 8/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
| JGANDER | 10/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
| TurnerClan | 10/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
| Tigermoth | 9/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
| cindyd | 10/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 8/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
| Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
| elise1987 | 10/10 | 5188 days | 1% |
| Ksam | 10/10 | 5188 days | 1% |
| sidecargranny | 10/10 | 5310 days | 1% |
| B_and_F_MN | 10/10 | 5371 days | 1% |
| Andreas Blessing | 7/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Eric & Liz McKean | 10/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
| Jason & Beth Berlin | 10/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Krabbe | 8/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| MirandaFan | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| BSA_Ashley | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Martin Hodgson | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Sue & Graham Mullin | 10/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
| Bekema | 9/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| HighlandLassie | 9/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| Hans De Bruin | 9/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| amber8311 | 10/10 | 5461 days | 1% |
| danthemanbasford | 10/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
| John Wekking | 10/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
| Pete | 9/10 | 5706 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5773 days | 1% |
| wannab | 9/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
| dirkdev | 9/10 | 5861 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 5861 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Miranda Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.64% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.