G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tane Mahuta Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tane Mahuta Walk
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Tane Mahuta Walk experience has a total of 84 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 19 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tane Mahuta Walk valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
76 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 76 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 28 |
|
37% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tane Mahuta Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.53% and is based on 76 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.98%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2443 days | 100% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2991 days | 70% |
| Lucile | 9/10 | 3482 days | 42% |
| Simon Hall | 8/10 | 3515 days | 40% |
| Mario Schaeffer | 9/10 | 3517 days | 40% |
| Erna Muller | 8/10 | 3523 days | 40% |
| Kristina Nunoz | 8/10 | 3527 days | 39% |
| Wendy Steer | 9/10 | 3564 days | 38% |
| Hannes | 7/10 | 3819 days | 22% |
| Sylvie Smets | 8/10 | 3820 days | 24% |
| Jamie Serieux | 8/10 | 3827 days | 23% |
| Luala F | 8/10 | 3831 days | 23% |
| Birthe | 8/10 | 3835 days | 23% |
| Michael Regensburger | 7/10 | 3842 days | 21% |
| Paul and Astrid | 10/10 | 3856 days | 22% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 10/10 | 3863 days | 22% |
| Tina Rust | 10/10 | 3863 days | 22% |
| Fabian | 6/10 | 3868 days | 18% |
| Josef Biller | 10/10 | 3868 days | 22% |
| Stella and Merle | 8/10 | 3880 days | 20% |
| Christine Schtenker | 8/10 | 3880 days | 20% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 10/10 | 3882 days | 21% |
| Mikkel Pallesen | 6/10 | 3884 days | 17% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3885 days | 20% |
| Tom Theuer | 10/10 | 3893 days | 20% |
| Paul McDermott | 10/10 | 3937 days | 18% |
| Celia Nowak | 9/10 | 4243 days | 1% |
| Ives van der Sluijs | 8/10 | 4257 days | 0% |
| Mattias | 7/10 | 4546 days | 20% |
| Christina | 7/10 | 4557 days | 20% |
| Fenna Newmann | 8/10 | 4582 days | 21% |
| Sara Berton | 10/10 | 4584 days | 21% |
| Maxime Ripoche | 10/10 | 4584 days | 21% |
| Ruth Watkin | 7/10 | 4599 days | 20% |
| Dan Lawson | 10/10 | 4615 days | 21% |
| Jeremy | 10/10 | 4665 days | 21% |
| Loesje | 6/10 | 4999 days | 18% |
| Ingrid | 9/10 | 5012 days | 21% |
| Stephan Olivier | 10/10 | 5034 days | 21% |
| Stephan Olivier | 10/10 | 5034 days | 21% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 8/10 | 5035 days | 21% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 8/10 | 5035 days | 21% |
| Verest | 9/10 | 5046 days | 21% |
| Jaqi_Gary | 9/10 | 5060 days | 21% |
| KDS_Holiday | 10/10 | 5091 days | 21% |
| Keegan Jansen | 8/10 | 5300 days | 21% |
| Mike Breele | 9/10 | 5305 days | 21% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5309 days | 21% |
| Anglea de Smit | 8/10 | 5316 days | 21% |
| Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 5316 days | 21% |
| Frans | 9/10 | 5317 days | 21% |
| Marjolein Hartsuiker | 10/10 | 5320 days | 21% |
| Fleur & Nils | 8/10 | 5327 days | 21% |
| Anika | 8/10 | 5333 days | 21% |
| Janet | 8/10 | 5334 days | 21% |
| bosha22 | 10/10 | 5365 days | 21% |
| Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 5412 days | 21% |
| Derek | 10/10 | 5651 days | 21% |
| De Groot | 9/10 | 5655 days | 21% |
| Henrick Lund | 10/10 | 5658 days | 21% |
| Kari Tervo | 9/10 | 5663 days | 21% |
| Monica | 10/10 | 5667 days | 21% |
| Jan Vlasblom | 8/10 | 5679 days | 21% |
| Faucon | 7/10 | 5686 days | 20% |
| Derek Dean | 9/10 | 5691 days | 21% |
| Jarob Brezigar | 8/10 | 5692 days | 21% |
| ersinger | 7/10 | 6005 days | 20% |
| Alan & Lorna | 8/10 | 6029 days | 21% |
| Gerhard Kronen | 8/10 | 6033 days | 21% |
| jongejan | 9/10 | 6042 days | 21% |
| Josy | 10/10 | 6056 days | 21% |
| Ake Erlandsson | 9/10 | 6060 days | 21% |
| Matthias & Johannes | 8/10 | 6062 days | 21% |
| balthes | 9/10 | 6109 days | 21% |
| biene | 10/10 | 6110 days | 21% |
| braunweiler | 8/10 | 6115 days | 21% |
| nadinef | 8/10 | 6118 days | 21% |
| andres | 9/10 | 6118 days | 21% |
| Anne Ford | 7/10 | 6128 days | 20% |
| Artur D | 8/10 | 6128 days | 21% |
| Andrew Lonsdale | 6/10 | 6354 days | 18% |
| neeltjec | 9/10 | 6370 days | 21% |
| LaurensD | 9/10 | 6370 days | 21% |
| LuukKarin | 8/10 | 6372 days | 21% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tane Mahuta Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.46% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.