Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
102 Valid Reviews
The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 106 reviews. There are 102 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 102 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 51 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 91.67% and is based on 102 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
13 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 102 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
54% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 88.46% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
94.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anja | 10/10 | 272 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 9/10 | 578 days | 84% |
| Marilyn Miller | 10/10 | 606 days | 83% |
| Stefan Lee | 9/10 | 790 days | 67% |
| Stu | 10/10 | 821 days | 64% |
| Morgane | 9/10 | 851 days | 61% |
| Roger Clark | 9/10 | 972 days | 48% |
| Kurt | 10/10 | 1278 days | 23% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1309 days | 21% |
| Anne Hiske | 10/10 | 1337 days | 19% |
| Kellie | 9/10 | 1490 days | 12% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 1582 days | 9% |
| Jo Pullar | 10/10 | 1674 days | 7% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 1733 days | 6% |
| Tyler | 7/10 | 1764 days | 5% |
| Peri | 10/10 | 2008 days | 5% |
| Tayler | 8/10 | 2039 days | 5% |
| Richard ChCh NZ | 7/10 | 2067 days | 4% |
| Paul Thomas | 10/10 | 2098 days | 5% |
| Edy @#$ | 10/10 | 2190 days | 4% |
| Sara | 9/10 | 2220 days | 4% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 2220 days | 4% |
| Swiny101 | 10/10 | 2220 days | 4% |
| Robo | 9/10 | 2251 days | 4% |
| Evans Family | 10/10 | 2282 days | 4% |
| Michael Northam | 10/10 | 2433 days | 4% |
| Wendy | 10/10 | 2433 days | 4% |
| Dave Kitson | 9/10 | 2433 days | 4% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| N&A | 5/10 | 2495 days | 3% |
| Dean | 10/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
| Traveller | 10/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
| Jen Doherty | 9/10 | 2798 days | 3% |
| Paul Smith | 10/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Lizzie | 10/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Harrie | 10/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Stefan Beiner | 10/10 | 2890 days | 3% |
| Daphne H | 10/10 | 2951 days | 3% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2951 days | 3% |
| Teaghan | 10/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
| Phil Masters | 10/10 | 3103 days | 3% |
| Michael Stützle | 10/10 | 3104 days | 3% |
| Birte | 9/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Annette | 10/10 | 3135 days | 2% |
| Cindy Blignaut | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Leanne Taylor-Smith | 8/10 | 3213 days | 2% |
| Nora Tobies | 10/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
| Sandra Wilson-Ryke | 10/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Eline Stoutjesdijk | 8/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Leonie Scholten | 10/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3363 days | 2% |
| Jonathan Smith | 10/10 | 3487 days | 2% |
| Wayne Britton | 10/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
| Bert Tory | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
| Paul Smith | 10/10 | 3530 days | 2% |
| Paul Schleifenbaum | 10/10 | 3536 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 9/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 10/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Robert Hunt | 8/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Rima | 9/10 | 3620 days | 1% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 8/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
| Miraz Tastula | 10/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Graeme Herbert | 9/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3711 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Oliver | 10/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3812 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3833 days | 1% |
| Clare Backman | 8/10 | 3835 days | 1% |
| Elaine Carter | 9/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
| Volker Stroenisch | 10/10 | 3841 days | 1% |
| Ulrich Rix | 9/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 9/10 | 3897 days | 1% |
| Darma Bone | 9/10 | 3906 days | 1% |
| Ashley Shand | 10/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 7/10 | 3922 days | 1% |
| Ron Ozarka | 9/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| Fabien Metro | 8/10 | 4059 days | 1% |
| Benjamin Buehlmann | 5/10 | 4175 days | 0% |
| Heather Kingston | 7/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| chris young | 6/10 | 4443 days | 1% |
| Sarah Beyeler | 10/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| Kim Lavener | 10/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| Family Trip | 10/10 | 4596 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| KDS_Holiday | 7/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| Adrian Weidell | 9/10 | 5256 days | 1% |
| Markus Heummer | 9/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
| Fleur & Nils | 9/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
| Sashia | 9/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
| Chris & Susanna | 8/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 9/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
| Erik Folkersen | 8/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
| Julie Norton | 8/10 | 5662 days | 1% |
| Kari Tervo | 9/10 | 5684 days | 1% |
| GrantW | 10/10 | 5782 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Taya Cross | 10/10 | 6085 days | 1% |
| parker1 | 9/10 | 6131 days | 1% |
| Robert | 8/10 | 6438 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.25% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.20% |
| 198 | -3.22% |
| 199 | -3.23% |
| 200 | -3.25% |
| 201 | -3.27% |
| 202 | -3.28% |
| 203 | -3.30% |
| … | … |
0.80% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.