Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
101 Valid Reviews
The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 105 reviews. There are 101 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 50 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.58% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 91.58% and is based on 101 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
13 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 101 valid reviews, the experience has 13 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 13 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
54% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.46% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 88.46% and is based on 13 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
94.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debbie | 9/10 | 278 days | 100% |
| Marilyn Miller | 10/10 | 306 days | 100% |
| Stefan Lee | 9/10 | 490 days | 90% |
| Stu | 10/10 | 521 days | 89% |
| Morgane | 9/10 | 551 days | 86% |
| Roger Clark | 9/10 | 672 days | 78% |
| Kurt | 10/10 | 978 days | 48% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 1009 days | 45% |
| Anne Hiske | 10/10 | 1037 days | 43% |
| Kellie | 9/10 | 1190 days | 29% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 1282 days | 23% |
| Jo Pullar | 10/10 | 1374 days | 17% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 1433 days | 14% |
| Tyler | 7/10 | 1464 days | 12% |
| Peri | 10/10 | 1708 days | 6% |
| Tayler | 8/10 | 1739 days | 6% |
| Richard ChCh NZ | 7/10 | 1767 days | 5% |
| Paul Thomas | 10/10 | 1798 days | 5% |
| Edy @#$ | 10/10 | 1890 days | 5% |
| Sara | 9/10 | 1920 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1920 days | 5% |
| Swiny101 | 10/10 | 1920 days | 5% |
| Robo | 9/10 | 1951 days | 5% |
| Evans Family | 10/10 | 1982 days | 5% |
| Michael Northam | 10/10 | 2133 days | 5% |
| Wendy | 10/10 | 2133 days | 5% |
| Dave Kitson | 9/10 | 2133 days | 5% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 2164 days | 5% |
| N&A | 5/10 | 2195 days | 3% |
| Dean | 10/10 | 2256 days | 4% |
| Traveller | 10/10 | 2498 days | 4% |
| Jen Doherty | 9/10 | 2498 days | 4% |
| Paul Smith | 10/10 | 2529 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 2529 days | 4% |
| Lizzie | 10/10 | 2590 days | 4% |
| Harrie | 10/10 | 2590 days | 4% |
| Stefan Beiner | 10/10 | 2590 days | 4% |
| Daphne H | 10/10 | 2651 days | 4% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2651 days | 4% |
| Teaghan | 10/10 | 2743 days | 3% |
| Phil Masters | 10/10 | 2804 days | 3% |
| Michael Stützle | 10/10 | 2804 days | 3% |
| Birte | 9/10 | 2835 days | 3% |
| Annette | 10/10 | 2835 days | 3% |
| Cindy Blignaut | 10/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| Leanne Taylor-Smith | 8/10 | 2913 days | 3% |
| Nora Tobies | 10/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
| Sandra Wilson-Ryke | 10/10 | 2965 days | 3% |
| Eline Stoutjesdijk | 8/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
| Leonie Scholten | 10/10 | 3035 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3063 days | 3% |
| Jonathan Smith | 10/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| Wayne Britton | 10/10 | 3192 days | 2% |
| Bert Tory | 10/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
| Paul Smith | 10/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
| Paul Schleifenbaum | 10/10 | 3236 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 9/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 10/10 | 3288 days | 2% |
| Robert Hunt | 8/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Rima | 9/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 8/10 | 3332 days | 2% |
| Miraz Tastula | 10/10 | 3360 days | 2% |
| Graeme Herbert | 9/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3412 days | 2% |
| Stephanie Oliver | 10/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3534 days | 2% |
| Clare Backman | 8/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Elaine Carter | 9/10 | 3540 days | 2% |
| Volker Stroenisch | 10/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Ulrich Rix | 9/10 | 3565 days | 2% |
| Bill Milburn | 9/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Darma Bone | 9/10 | 3606 days | 2% |
| Ashley Shand | 10/10 | 3607 days | 2% |
| Chris Brasell | 7/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Ron Ozarka | 9/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Fabien Metro | 8/10 | 3759 days | 1% |
| Benjamin Buehlmann | 5/10 | 3875 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 7/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
| chris young | 6/10 | 4143 days | 0% |
| Sarah Beyeler | 10/10 | 4295 days | 0% |
| Kim Lavener | 10/10 | 4295 days | 0% |
| Family Trip | 10/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| catherine welsh | 9/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4600 days | 1% |
| KDS_Holiday | 7/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
| Adrian Weidell | 9/10 | 4956 days | 1% |
| Markus Heummer | 9/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Fleur & Nils | 9/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Sashia | 9/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
| Chris & Susanna | 8/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 9/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
| Erik Folkersen | 8/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Julie Norton | 8/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Kari Tervo | 9/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
| GrantW | 10/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5543 days | 1% |
| Taya Cross | 10/10 | 5785 days | 1% |
| parker1 | 9/10 | 5831 days | 1% |
| Robert | 8/10 | 6138 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Ahipara Top 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
0.98% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.