Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
97 Valid Reviews
The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 98 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.19% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 7 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Len Cons | 7/10 | 649 days | 96% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 680 days | 100% |
| Virginie | 7/10 | 709 days | 90% |
| Mikael Warner | 9/10 | 740 days | 92% |
| Rian Caccianiga | 7/10 | 801 days | 80% |
| Kelly | 9/10 | 832 days | 81% |
| Giani | 10/10 | 862 days | 78% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 1015 days | 58% |
| Mickey Smillie | 9/10 | 1074 days | 50% |
| Charles Vaughan | 10/10 | 1197 days | 37% |
| Fernando | 10/10 | 1258 days | 32% |
| Lunar Orbit | 9/10 | 1439 days | 18% |
| Anna Swain | 10/10 | 1623 days | 10% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1654 days | 9% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 1654 days | 9% |
| Marg Dale | 7/10 | 1654 days | 8% |
| Kerry | 10/10 | 1745 days | 7% |
| Chris Harding | 9/10 | 1776 days | 7% |
| Maree | 9/10 | 2049 days | 6% |
| Ian & Wendy | 10/10 | 2141 days | 6% |
| Alex Tikonoff | 9/10 | 2201 days | 6% |
| Ancient Uncle | 6/10 | 2293 days | 5% |
| D and I singh | 10/10 | 2385 days | 5% |
| Kate | 10/10 | 2446 days | 5% |
| Tam | 5/10 | 2507 days | 4% |
| Snips | 9/10 | 2597 days | 5% |
| Regina | 8/10 | 2597 days | 5% |
| Keilani | 10/10 | 2658 days | 4% |
| ian kennedy | 9/10 | 2658 days | 4% |
| Daphne H | 9/10 | 2688 days | 4% |
| Caity | 10/10 | 2780 days | 4% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2811 days | 4% |
| Emma Medina | 10/10 | 2897 days | 4% |
| Jim Bass | 9/10 | 2900 days | 4% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2986 days | 4% |
| Paul Smith | 7/10 | 3265 days | 3% |
| James Braithwaite | 9/10 | 3272 days | 3% |
| Saskia Ruttor | 9/10 | 3356 days | 3% |
| Mark Johnston | 9/10 | 3367 days | 3% |
| Stephanie Oliver | 7/10 | 3466 days | 2% |
| Jude and Chris | 10/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
| Justyna Blajerska | 5/10 | 3578 days | 2% |
| Sharon | 9/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
| Casa Tone | 9/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Julia Clearwater | 10/10 | 3645 days | 2% |
| Heather Peart | 10/10 | 3662 days | 2% |
| Sally Young | 10/10 | 3693 days | 2% |
| Norbert Dekker Kleijn | 8/10 | 3723 days | 2% |
| Denelle Coutts | 10/10 | 3773 days | 2% |
| Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 3784 days | 1% |
| J V Henare | 7/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 9/10 | 3905 days | 1% |
| Matt Betts | 8/10 | 3912 days | 1% |
| Colin Petherbridge | 8/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
| Dani Bummler | 2/10 | 4020 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4272 days | 0% |
| Dusty Miller | 9/10 | 4302 days | 0% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 4310 days | 0% |
| Andrew Luke | 9/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Jade Fleming | 7/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| David Wood | 9/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
| Shantell Hunter | 8/10 | 4576 days | 1% |
| Eddie | 8/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Schuster | 10/10 | 4711 days | 1% |
| Steven Wood | 8/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
| Hans | 10/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
| Claudia Mueller | 9/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
| Lotte Uneken | 10/10 | 4800 days | 1% |
| Helmut Schmid | 7/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
| Hanna_Malte | 9/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Romla | 7/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
| Ronald Veldman | 7/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
| Susie Christensen | 9/10 | 5078 days | 1% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 8/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Chris Ashton | 8/10 | 5423 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 10/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
| Shirley | 9/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| Berger | 8/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
| Chris White | 7/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
| Peter & Margo Boullin | 10/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
| Simon Vallis | 9/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5580 days | 1% |
| nosey | 8/10 | 5580 days | 1% |
| Bob Lenihan | 10/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Alan & Lorna | 8/10 | 5787 days | 1% |
| John N | 8/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Ivo Braakhuis | 8/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Regina Giger | 10/10 | 5819 days | 1% |
| Nick | 8/10 | 5821 days | 1% |
| Taya Cross | 9/10 | 5822 days | 1% |
| EA Anders | 9/10 | 5839 days | 1% |
| Werner Swiss | 10/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
| Dawn Campbell | 8/10 | 5853 days | 1% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| dirkdev | 8/10 | 5888 days | 1% |
| Ulyate | 7/10 | 5895 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Paihia TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.15% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.