Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Uretiti Beach Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Uretiti Beach Campsite

Valid Reviews

99 Valid Reviews

The Uretiti Beach Campsite experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 99 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 99 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 35
35%
9/10 30
30%
8/10 26
26%
7/10 4
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 2
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.69% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Uretiti Beach Campsite valid reviews is 88.69% and is based on 99 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

29 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 99 valid reviews, the experience has 29 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 29 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
31%
9/10 10
34%
8/10 9
31%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.62% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Uretiti Beach Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.62% and is based on 29 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.63%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Yolandi Thompson 8/10 48 days 100%
Carmen 7/10 140 days 94%
Nico 8/10 201 days 98%
Felicia 10/10 262 days 98%
Eline & Dave 7/10 293 days 90%
EZYLFE 9/10 321 days 95%
Eleanor 10/10 352 days 95%
Liliane Chassin 9/10 383 days 93%
Stephan Roeder 10/10 413 days 92%
Evelína 9/10 413 days 91%
Wilfried 8/10 413 days 90%
Milly Struthers 10/10 474 days 89%
Carter 9/10 474 days 88%
Rhea Y 10/10 474 days 89%
Morgane 9/10 505 days 86%
Max 10/10 658 days 77%
Femke 9/10 687 days 74%
Yorick 8/10 718 days 71%
Tinka 10/10 718 days 72%
james bucky 10/10 718 days 72%
wvdbos 8/10 993 days 45%
Brick 10/10 1114 days 35%
Ricardo. 5/10 1693 days 5%
James 9/10 1813 days 5%
Olivia 8/10 1813 days 5%
Jamie 10/10 1813 days 5%
Stefan Hohmann 8/10 2119 days 4%
Gareth 10/10 2148 days 4%
Reece Dillon 10/10 2240 days 4%
Ray Tombs 10/10 2424 days 4%
Nir 10/10 2454 days 4%
Jen Doherty 7/10 2513 days 3%
Antonia Vai 10/10 2544 days 4%
Jakob Simons 8/10 2605 days 3%
Pim Brackenie 7/10 2605 days 3%
Coco B. 10/10 2636 days 3%
Alan & Lorraine 8/10 2850 days 3%
Carolyn C 9/10 2906 days 3%
Margriet Geesink 9/10 2909 days 3%
Gary Milne 9/10 2988 days 3%
Michiel de Weerd 10/10 3186 days 2%
Maarten de Weerd 8/10 3186 days 2%
Nienke Best 9/10 3205 days 2%
Mike Robinson 10/10 3223 days 2%
Angela Dixon 9/10 3307 days 2%
Rebecca Green 8/10 3514 days 2%
Debbie 8/10 3609 days 1%
John-Jozef Proczka 9/10 3609 days 2%
Janneke Hekhuis 10/10 3620 days 2%
Julia Summa 9/10 3646 days 1%
Timo von Wirth 9/10 3692 days 1%
Jade Duncan 8/10 3723 days 1%
Corry Stucki 9/10 3723 days 1%
Alicia Munch 10/10 3726 days 1%
Jessica Krapp 9/10 3888 days 1%
andrew simpson 10/10 3912 days 1%
Tarillon Family 8/10 3936 days 1%
Laurie 8/10 3974 days 1%
Julia 9/10 3974 days 1%
Hauke Herdan 9/10 3998 days 1%
Christian Starke 8/10 4011 days 1%
Thomas Marte 10/10 4066 days 1%
Radek Ouhel 10/10 4066 days 1%
Lagarde 9/10 4278 days 0%
Pelletier 8/10 4278 days 0%
Andrew Potratz 10/10 4280 days 0%
Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com 6/10 4280 days 0%
Leonie Moeller 9/10 4289 days 0%
Greg Wilson 8/10 4311 days 0%
Hadler 10/10 4312 days 0%
Christine Helleiner 8/10 4312 days 0%
Felicitas 9/10 4312 days 0%
Kristina 8/10 4329 days 0%
Manuel Bach 8/10 4330 days 0%
Max Tetzlaff 9/10 4337 days 0%
Mike Leopard 10/10 4339 days 0%
Max Grabowski 9/10 4339 days 0%
Aitnan Melman 8/10 4372 days 0%
lisa taylor 9/10 4676 days 1%
Will and Taylor 8/10 4704 days 1%
Markus Frei 9/10 5027 days 1%
Richard Rite 10/10 5037 days 1%
Christina 10/10 5056 days 1%
Carla Mathieu 10/10 5060 days 1%
Anika 9/10 5069 days 1%
Mirando4ka 6/10 5070 days 1%
Elke & Charlotte 9/10 5152 days 1%
Thierry Meylan 8/10 5383 days 1%
Carolin 5/10 5406 days 1%
Christina Fischer 10/10 5430 days 1%
Puravida 10/10 5497 days 1%
Martin 8/10 5711 days 1%
Tanja Titze 10/10 5793 days 1%
annett 10/10 5847 days 1%
Frank de Voogd 9/10 5866 days 1%
Christy 8/10 5872 days 1%
Tim Beuzeval 9/10 5892 days 1%
lorah 10/10 5996 days 1%
Nadine 10/10 6152 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Uretiti Beach Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.