Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Usave Car and Truck Rentals.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Usave Car and Truck Rentals

Valid Reviews

53 Valid Reviews

The Usave Car and Truck Rentals experience has a total of 59 reviews. There are 53 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
32%
9/10 8
15%
8/10 5
9%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 2
4%
3/10 3
6%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 15
28%

61.89% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Usave Car and Truck Rentals valid reviews is 61.89% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

7 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
29%
9/10 1
14%
8/10 1
14%
7/10 1
14%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
14%
4/10 1
14%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

75.71% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Usave Car and Truck Rentals face-to-face reviews is 75.71% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

45.90%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Raphael 1/10 491 days 100%
Jolz 1/10 735 days 80%
Had 1/10 1648 days 7%
sharon mike 4/10 1799 days 9%
Martine BACH 10/10 2074 days 12%
Martin 1/10 2165 days 5%
Alberto 10/10 2499 days 10%
Christian 8/10 2591 days 9%
Eric 1/10 2652 days 3%
Keith Powell 9/10 2683 days 9%
Matias 2/10 2805 days 4%
Lisa 9/10 2836 days 8%
Clint Siggins 10/10 2956 days 8%
Tana FARRELL 10/10 3079 days 7%
T-a T 10/10 3079 days 7%
vanessa kelly 10/10 3079 days 7%
Shelley Gunther 10/10 3140 days 6%
Iain Steven 10/10 3140 days 6%
Peter 10/10 3170 days 6%
pbutterworth 1/10 3201 days 2%
Toby Eadie 1/10 3229 days 2%
Mia H 10/10 3260 days 6%
Matt Bridge 1/10 3260 days 2%
Clif Shaw 10/10 3260 days 6%
Olga Vogel 9/10 3277 days 4%
Murray Coombridge 8/10 3535 days 4%
Nathan Raymond 8/10 3566 days 4%
J F 10/10 3626 days 4%
Raj S 1/10 3657 days 1%
Toralf Richter 3/10 3687 days 2%
Stuart Lloyd 9/10 3840 days 3%
Shirley Jobsis 9/10 3853 days 2%
vera mokaraka 9/10 3871 days 2%
Anne Choose not to say 1/10 3932 days 1%
Alexandra 9/10 3991 days 2%
Meli Makalio 10/10 3991 days 2%
Debbie Chambers 8/10 4083 days 1%
Isabella Chichirua 10/10 4083 days 1%
sam denyer 1/10 4175 days 0%
Asha Masr 1/10 4387 days 1%
MIke Chesney 1/10 4448 days 1%
Tinkerbell 10/10 4721 days 2%
IllTakeYouToCourt 1/10 4721 days 1%
shard 3/10 4752 days 1%
jessicaelaine 3/10 4752 days 1%
Melissa Smith 1/10 4752 days 1%
Chad Johnson 8/10 5036 days 1%
Michael Charleston 4/10 5050 days 1%
EdS 9/10 5148 days 2%
Janice OConnor 10/10 5376 days 2%
Diane Gedye 5/10 5415 days 1%
Maria Fahlander 10/10 6482 days 2%
Thorsten Kabelitz 7/10 6482 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Usave Car and Truck Rentals experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-7.07% Adjustment

Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.

What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 42 days. The Usave Car and Truck Rentals experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:

Recent Reviews Adjustment
0 -3.00%
1 -2.63%
2 -1.50%
3 -0.38%
4 -0.00%

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Usave Car and Truck Rentals experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.01%
198 -4.03%
199 -4.05%
200 -4.07%
201 -4.09%
202 -4.11%
203 -4.13%

Balancing Adjustment

29.65% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

68%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.