Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jucy Cruise Milford Sound.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
205 Valid Reviews
The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has a total of 209 reviews. There are 205 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 205 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 11 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound valid reviews is 84.93% and is based on 205 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
178 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 205 valid reviews, the experience has 178 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 178 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 46 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 44 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound face-to-face reviews is 83.60% and is based on 178 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
86.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca, Colin & Leo | 10/10 | 2940 days | 100% |
| Michael Gooch | 10/10 | 3121 days | 87% |
| Rebekka Doliva | 10/10 | 3190 days | 82% |
| Jayni L'Azou | 10/10 | 3228 days | 79% |
| Ludovic Bonneau | 10/10 | 3434 days | 65% |
| Roland Eggli | 10/10 | 3436 days | 64% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 3450 days | 62% |
| Alexander Scheibl | 7/10 | 3451 days | 59% |
| Jaroslav Kacmar | 10/10 | 3472 days | 62% |
| Gena Bond | 8/10 | 3495 days | 59% |
| Taylor Doolittle | 10/10 | 3495 days | 60% |
| Barbara Hirsch | 7/10 | 3505 days | 55% |
| Jack Halligan | 9/10 | 3508 days | 59% |
| Sam Howard | 10/10 | 3508 days | 59% |
| Kosia | 10/10 | 3543 days | 57% |
| Navina | 10/10 | 3548 days | 56% |
| HAFEZ AMRI SANUSI | 8/10 | 3548 days | 55% |
| Joanne Woo | 8/10 | 3578 days | 53% |
| Viki Kent | 10/10 | 3584 days | 54% |
| Ross D | 9/10 | 3584 days | 53% |
| Azhar Adlan | 10/10 | 3585 days | 54% |
| Anne | 9/10 | 3596 days | 52% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 9/10 | 3694 days | 45% |
| Rabiah Abdullah | 10/10 | 3792 days | 39% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 10/10 | 3798 days | 38% |
| Annika Pauly | 6/10 | 3803 days | 32% |
| Caroline Shaw | 8/10 | 3809 days | 37% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 3809 days | 35% |
| Bjoern | 6/10 | 3809 days | 32% |
| Sonya Grimm | 8/10 | 3809 days | 37% |
| Milan Maiwald | 6/10 | 3810 days | 32% |
| Lisa Fenzl | 10/10 | 3812 days | 37% |
| Afiya Levy | 10/10 | 3812 days | 37% |
| gonzalo caldiz | 9/10 | 3813 days | 37% |
| Lærke Hagelskjær | 10/10 | 3816 days | 37% |
| Juan Viscegle | 10/10 | 3817 days | 37% |
| Jonathan Foskett | 9/10 | 3819 days | 37% |
| Helen Hazelwood | 9/10 | 3819 days | 37% |
| Ruby Reynolds | 9/10 | 3819 days | 37% |
| Aaron Gunning | 10/10 | 3827 days | 36% |
| Liwen | 3/10 | 3827 days | 18% |
| Verena Konetzhi | 7/10 | 3830 days | 33% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 3834 days | 35% |
| Kim-Lara | 9/10 | 3842 days | 35% |
| Alyssa Wyer | 10/10 | 3860 days | 34% |
| Simon Striegel | 10/10 | 3861 days | 34% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 3869 days | 33% |
| Anais Touri | 10/10 | 3872 days | 33% |
| Matt and Louise | 7/10 | 3878 days | 30% |
| Daniel Hill | 9/10 | 3879 days | 32% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3883 days | 32% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3888 days | 31% |
| SATOKO OSONO | 8/10 | 3895 days | 31% |
| Diego Pablos | 7/10 | 3903 days | 29% |
| Pierre and Alexandra | 9/10 | 3911 days | 30% |
| Mark Van Wijk | 10/10 | 3975 days | 26% |
| David McIntosh | 9/10 | 4225 days | 8% |
| Lukas, Anne and Malte | 9/10 | 4281 days | 4% |
| Logan Leduc | 10/10 | 4286 days | 4% |
| Hubert Schmid | 8/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 8/10 | 4520 days | 33% |
| isabel Zander | 8/10 | 4523 days | 33% |
| Calvin Becker | 7/10 | 4523 days | 31% |
| Patricia Revel | 10/10 | 4525 days | 33% |
| Jacques Revel | 8/10 | 4525 days | 33% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 4527 days | 31% |
| Claudia Hillebrand | 8/10 | 4528 days | 33% |
| Audrey Le Bourthe | 10/10 | 4533 days | 33% |
| Stefan Glock | 8/10 | 4538 days | 33% |
| Andreas Liebe | 9/10 | 4538 days | 33% |
| Jana Rutkowski | 8/10 | 4541 days | 33% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 7/10 | 4551 days | 31% |
| Tomas Shairi | 5/10 | 4551 days | 25% |
| Agathe Dupuis | 7/10 | 4552 days | 31% |
| Florent Bouillon | 7/10 | 4552 days | 31% |
| Lena Hanhart | 6/10 | 4552 days | 28% |
| Jonas Hessel | 8/10 | 4552 days | 33% |
| Lena Wacker | 10/10 | 4566 days | 33% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 8/10 | 4572 days | 33% |
| Anna Guzewiez | 8/10 | 4574 days | 33% |
| Carina Borho | 9/10 | 4589 days | 33% |
| Lena Jensen | 9/10 | 4590 days | 33% |
| Jesper Andersen | 9/10 | 4590 days | 33% |
| Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 4590 days | 33% |
| Henry Thiel | 9/10 | 4595 days | 33% |
| Christina Habranke | 9/10 | 4595 days | 33% |
| Claire Lieval | 5/10 | 4602 days | 25% |
| Nora Zeitz | 5/10 | 4613 days | 25% |
| Marc Greeve | 6/10 | 4622 days | 28% |
| Yvonne Horpershoeh | 7/10 | 4622 days | 31% |
| Ron Williams | 9/10 | 4735 days | 33% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4905 days | 33% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4905 days | 33% |
| Cervenka Jaroslav | 9/10 | 4912 days | 33% |
| Jitka Zenahlikova | 9/10 | 4912 days | 33% |
| Billy Koichopolos | 10/10 | 4913 days | 33% |
| Gina Lisi | 10/10 | 4913 days | 33% |
| Katey Justice | 8/10 | 4915 days | 33% |
| Andrew Grimes | 9/10 | 4915 days | 33% |
| Lynda Quartay | 9/10 | 4915 days | 33% |
| Douglas Walker | 7/10 | 4915 days | 31% |
| Kariuua S | 7/10 | 4917 days | 31% |
| Nicolas Bessiere | 7/10 | 4917 days | 31% |
| Renate | 7/10 | 4923 days | 31% |
| Erik Muchembled | 8/10 | 4924 days | 33% |
| Eric | 8/10 | 4925 days | 33% |
| Rogier Ramaker | 9/10 | 4925 days | 33% |
| Melvin Groenhof | 8/10 | 4925 days | 33% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 9/10 | 4926 days | 33% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 10/10 | 4927 days | 33% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 8/10 | 4927 days | 33% |
| Sara Omary | 8/10 | 4930 days | 33% |
| Tim Sautter | 9/10 | 4933 days | 33% |
| Francis Runge | 8/10 | 4934 days | 33% |
| Bill and Noreen | 9/10 | 4946 days | 33% |
| Kevin Desjandino | 10/10 | 4997 days | 33% |
| Abby Rushmer | 8/10 | 5009 days | 33% |
| Benedicte and Mathilde Colas | 8/10 | 5013 days | 33% |
| Jenben | 10/10 | 5040 days | 33% |
| Loesje | 8/10 | 5071 days | 33% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5269 days | 33% |
| Andreas Schacke | 7/10 | 5270 days | 31% |
| Barbara Berkhout | 9/10 | 5270 days | 33% |
| David Williams | 9/10 | 5273 days | 33% |
| Delore | 5/10 | 5278 days | 25% |
| Sabrina Germany | 10/10 | 5280 days | 33% |
| Maxine Gilman | 10/10 | 5280 days | 33% |
| Peter & Kate Carmichael | 9/10 | 5296 days | 33% |
| Tom Pratt | 6/10 | 5297 days | 28% |
| Ken | 10/10 | 5298 days | 33% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5299 days | 33% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 9/10 | 5299 days | 33% |
| Diane Moss | 8/10 | 5299 days | 33% |
| R Straathof | 6/10 | 5301 days | 28% |
| Jonathan Philp | 7/10 | 5306 days | 31% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5312 days | 33% |
| Lesley | 8/10 | 5345 days | 33% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 8/10 | 5377 days | 33% |
| Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch | 8/10 | 5383 days | 33% |
| Thomas Klebensberger | 10/10 | 5615 days | 33% |
| Ken Talan | 10/10 | 5615 days | 33% |
| Sean Brownell | 7/10 | 5620 days | 31% |
| Mariette Salden | 9/10 | 5624 days | 33% |
| Ed Piotrowski | 7/10 | 5628 days | 31% |
| Prideaux | 6/10 | 5630 days | 28% |
| Bill Mclennan | 10/10 | 5633 days | 33% |
| Sophia Kelly | 8/10 | 5635 days | 33% |
| Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5638 days | 33% |
| Oppenoorth | 9/10 | 5639 days | 33% |
| Mark Walker | 9/10 | 5639 days | 33% |
| T Lipscombe | 6/10 | 5643 days | 28% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 5644 days | 33% |
| Michael Long | 8/10 | 5644 days | 33% |
| Javier Munoz | 7/10 | 5644 days | 31% |
| Birga | 10/10 | 5648 days | 33% |
| Jerry & Floon | 8/10 | 5649 days | 33% |
| Jessica Vogels | 6/10 | 5649 days | 28% |
| Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 5650 days | 33% |
| Elise van Haastert | 9/10 | 5650 days | 33% |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 5656 days | 33% |
| Carolin Moberg | 9/10 | 5656 days | 33% |
| Flueckiger | 10/10 | 5660 days | 33% |
| Marleen Meyers | 8/10 | 5662 days | 33% |
| Dieter Uhlmann | 6/10 | 5662 days | 28% |
| Sabrina Sari | 7/10 | 5664 days | 31% |
| Claudia Vermeer | 7/10 | 5665 days | 31% |
| Irene and Thib Schneider | 10/10 | 5667 days | 33% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 5674 days | 33% |
| Bronwyn Mewett | 9/10 | 5679 days | 33% |
| Morgan892 | 10/10 | 5771 days | 33% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5802 days | 33% |
| imbeachy | 10/10 | 5831 days | 33% |
| Trisha | 10/10 | 5862 days | 33% |
| Meg & Steve | 7/10 | 5948 days | 31% |
| rinusm | 8/10 | 5951 days | 33% |
| steveE | 9/10 | 5954 days | 33% |
| Jess | 10/10 | 5990 days | 33% |
| Inbar Yizhar Barnea | 10/10 | 6004 days | 33% |
| Peter G | 8/10 | 6010 days | 33% |
| Chris Helms | 7/10 | 6010 days | 31% |
| Jamie | 8/10 | 6036 days | 33% |
| Schygulla | 8/10 | 6036 days | 33% |
| margaret Klawitter | 10/10 | 6037 days | 33% |
| kate | 10/10 | 6041 days | 33% |
| Jules | 7/10 | 6041 days | 31% |
| Frances Hay | 8/10 | 6043 days | 33% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 6100 days | 33% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 6167 days | 33% |
| Andrea | 8/10 | 6269 days | 33% |
| jessica | 7/10 | 6270 days | 31% |
| KimC | 8/10 | 6337 days | 33% |
| Denys | 7/10 | 6354 days | 31% |
| JohannaB | 10/10 | 6369 days | 33% |
| ChristineM | 10/10 | 6383 days | 33% |
| SiegfriedL | 9/10 | 6405 days | 33% |
| johanna | 9/10 | 6423 days | 33% |
| MissTraveller2009 | 10/10 | 6471 days | 33% |
| jack | 8/10 | 6471 days | 33% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 6543 days | 33% |
| Thomas Bachmann | 9/10 | 6598 days | 33% |
| Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6734 days | 33% |
| Alison Street | 7/10 | 6749 days | 31% |
| Jurgen Westphal | 8/10 | 6750 days | 33% |
| John Howlett | 8/10 | 6766 days | 33% |
| Davinia | 8/10 | 6825 days | 33% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 110 days. However the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.33% |
| 198 | -2.34% |
| 199 | -2.35% |
| 200 | -2.36% |
| 201 | -2.37% |
| 202 | -2.39% |
| 203 | -2.40% |
| … | … |
2.07% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.