Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tekapo Springs.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Tekapo Springs

Valid Reviews

44 Valid Reviews

The Tekapo Springs experience has a total of 44 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
16%
9/10 9
20%
8/10 12
27%
7/10 9
20%
6/10 6
14%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

79.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Tekapo Springs valid reviews is 79.77% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

37 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 37 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
19%
9/10 5
14%
8/10 9
24%
7/10 9
24%
6/10 6
16%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

78.65% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Tekapo Springs face-to-face reviews is 78.65% and is based on 37 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

79.29%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Leesa Teuber 8/10 889 days true 14.07 100%
Amy Smith 8/10 895 days true 13.61 96%
Nadja 7/10 932 days true 11.05 76%
Bob 7/10 940 days true 10.57 72%
Karlee Hormell 10/10 940 days true 10.57 72%
Jake Bullin 7/10 948 days true 10.11 68%
Megan Jurgensmeyer 10/10 973 days true 8.83 58%
Dita Vasquez 10/10 994 days true 7.94 51%
Afiya Levy 6/10 1199 days true 5.83 34%
Marie 7/10 1199 days true 5.83 34%
Timea Bagosi 8/10 1210 days 4.84 26%
SATOKO OSONO 6/10 1282 days true 5.69 33%
Audrey Le Bourthe 10/10 1920 days true 4.64 25%
Laure Cops 7/10 1926 days true 4.63 25%
Florent Bouillon 7/10 1939 days true 4.61 24%
Vanessa 6/10 1939 days true 4.61 24%
Oliver Blackmore 6/10 1941 days true 4.61 24%
Tobias Gehring 6/10 1961 days true 4.58 24%
balesdent 8/10 1998 days true 4.52 24%
Caren van Gastel 8/10 2002 days true 4.51 24%
Sixflipflops 9/10 2276 days 3.38 15%
Brandon Wells 8/10 2294 days true 4.03 20%
Waldo Andersen 9/10 2641 days 2.88 11%
Mary Hamilton 9/10 2793 days 2.67 9%
Becky Edney 10/10 3012 days true 2.85 10%
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs 9/10 3022 days true 2.83 10%
Hadas and Amichay Guter 8/10 3023 days true 2.83 10%
John Stokes 9/10 3026 days true 2.83 10%
Gert Vogelaers 8/10 3041 days true 2.8 10%
Doris Neuber 5/10 3065 days true 2.76 10%
Nuro 10/10 3144 days true 2.63 9%
aay451 8/10 3281 days 2.01 4%
Tsmith 9/10 3281 days 2.01 4%
Matthias & Ceristiane 9/10 3390 days true 2.23 5%
Peter G 6/10 3397 days true 2.22 5%
Chris Helms 7/10 3397 days true 2.22 5%
koellner 9/10 3491 days true 2.06 4%
Emma-Louise Vetriano 9/10 3503 days true 2.04 4%
Lindsay Brown 8/10 3503 days true 2.04 4%
eowyn2k 8/10 3523 days 1.67 1%
jjakkeren 7/10 3737 days true 1.66 1%
SteveB 10/10 3737 days true 1.66 1%
Dyan Aitken 8/10 3786 days true 1.58 0%
Foost 7/10 3799 days true 1.56 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tekapo Springs experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-7.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Tekapo Springs experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.

The Tekapo Springs experience has been adjusted for 364 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
361 -7.22%
362 -7.24%
363 -7.26%
364 -7.28%
365 -7.30%
366 -7.32%
367 -7.34%

Final Ranking Score

72%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.

Love Christchurch