G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tranz Alpine Train.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tranz Alpine Train
Valid Reviews
69 Valid Reviews
The Tranz Alpine Train experience has a total of 69 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 28 |
|
41% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
77.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tranz Alpine Train valid reviews is 77.54% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
63 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
43% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tranz Alpine Train face-to-face reviews is 78.25% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
58.19%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| R Lesnick (Washington DC) | 3/10 | 434 days | 100% |
| Steve Sopota | 4/10 | 2840 days | 4% |
| Fanny Hacquart | 5/10 | 3323 days | 3% |
| Jill Stebbing | 7/10 | 3591 days | 3% |
| Petru | 10/10 | 3642 days | 3% |
| Amadeus van Schie | 8/10 | 3674 days | 3% |
| Esther Itier | 7/10 | 3961 days | 2% |
| Thomas Neron | 7/10 | 3961 days | 2% |
| Clare Lambley | 8/10 | 4042 days | 1% |
| Eric Lambley | 5/10 | 4043 days | 1% |
| Ngaire Davies | 7/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Cindy Parson | 10/10 | 4666 days | 2% |
| Petra Blumberg | 8/10 | 4703 days | 2% |
| David and Sally Wallis | 8/10 | 4778 days | 2% |
| Steve and Therese Dunne | 8/10 | 4799 days | 2% |
| Michael & Janet | 9/10 | 5072 days | 2% |
| Michael & Rosemary Smith | 8/10 | 5077 days | 2% |
| Mike & April Prince | 8/10 | 5104 days | 2% |
| Warwick Ravell | 9/10 | 5170 days | 2% |
| Alita Smith | 2/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
| Graham Greentree | 9/10 | 5405 days | 2% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5418 days | 2% |
| Steve Pearce | 8/10 | 5432 days | 2% |
| Jenny & Barry Sleeman | 8/10 | 5449 days | 2% |
| David Glover | 10/10 | 5450 days | 2% |
| Grada Anderson | 10/10 | 5456 days | 2% |
| Rosey834 | 8/10 | 5487 days | 2% |
| Kerry Wood | 10/10 | 5795 days | 2% |
| David Valentine | 4/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| Sandra B | 8/10 | 5820 days | 2% |
| Gary Judd | 8/10 | 5820 days | 2% |
| carmenk | 8/10 | 5869 days | 2% |
| Wolfgang Dittrich | 8/10 | 5893 days | 2% |
| Simon Bartholomew | 6/10 | 5895 days | 2% |
| Sarah Smith | 7/10 | 5909 days | 2% |
| regw | 10/10 | 6003 days | 2% |
| nickm | 10/10 | 6082 days | 2% |
| Amy_B | 8/10 | 6115 days | 2% |
| Roy | 9/10 | 6131 days | 2% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 6136 days | 2% |
| Elise | 8/10 | 6177 days | 2% |
| Jordi | 8/10 | 6247 days | 2% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6248 days | 2% |
| David | 9/10 | 6252 days | 2% |
| Fothergill | 8/10 | 6333 days | 2% |
| Peddy | 7/10 | 6362 days | 2% |
| Ulrike | 10/10 | 6394 days | 2% |
| Helen | 6/10 | 6477 days | 2% |
| Anke | 5/10 | 6477 days | 2% |
| Olga | 4/10 | 6493 days | 1% |
| Aiko Nishimura | 8/10 | 6514 days | 2% |
| Kerstin Brantryd | 5/10 | 6514 days | 2% |
| Marian Mckinney | 9/10 | 6520 days | 2% |
| Greg & Lynette | 9/10 | 6520 days | 2% |
| Sally and David Wallis | 8/10 | 6527 days | 2% |
| Lisa Tame | 7/10 | 6528 days | 2% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 6539 days | 2% |
| Jim Curley | 6/10 | 6539 days | 2% |
| Kilsby | 10/10 | 6555 days | 2% |
| Lyn Saxon | 8/10 | 6612 days | 2% |
| Phillipa | 9/10 | 6837 days | 2% |
| Sue | 8/10 | 6845 days | 2% |
| Michael | 7/10 | 6845 days | 2% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6857 days | 2% |
| Fred | 8/10 | 6857 days | 2% |
| Cat | 9/10 | 6857 days | 2% |
| Sandra | 8/10 | 6864 days | 2% |
| Pam Rose | 8/10 | 6867 days | 2% |
| Kerry | 8/10 | 6902 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tranz Alpine Train experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Tranz Alpine Train experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tranz Alpine Train experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
18.70% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
73%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.