Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fullers Bay of Islands.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Fullers Bay of Islands
Valid Reviews
50 Valid Reviews
The Fullers Bay of Islands experience has a total of 50 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
24% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay of Islands valid reviews is 73.40% and is based on 50 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 50 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay of Islands face-to-face reviews is 73.70% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
75.59%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kati Behrendt | 6/10 | 2910 days | 87% |
| Antonia Ellenrieder | 10/10 | 2932 days | 100% |
| Luca Herzig | 9/10 | 3262 days | 76% |
| Anna-Lisa Funk | 8/10 | 3304 days | 72% |
| Jade Cownley | 9/10 | 3626 days | 50% |
| Jonas Nielsen | 7/10 | 3984 days | 24% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4005 days | 23% |
| Anna | 5/10 | 4008 days | 17% |
| Lea Roser | 9/10 | 4329 days | 1% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4437 days | 33% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4437 days | 33% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4438 days | 31% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 8/10 | 4438 days | 33% |
| Trevor & Sheila Redman | 10/10 | 4713 days | 34% |
| Graham Platt | 8/10 | 4717 days | 33% |
| Meagan Bradder | 7/10 | 4782 days | 31% |
| Nick Selzler | 7/10 | 4782 days | 31% |
| S Tucker | 7/10 | 4788 days | 31% |
| Fabienne Indergand | 9/10 | 4803 days | 33% |
| Sillmann | 9/10 | 4805 days | 33% |
| Jack van den Nieuwendyk | 6/10 | 4810 days | 29% |
| Noah Stegmann | 6/10 | 5054 days | 29% |
| Gillian Powell | 8/10 | 5075 days | 33% |
| Sanne | 6/10 | 5078 days | 29% |
| Pieter | 3/10 | 5079 days | 17% |
| Jorgen vahl Rasmussen | 9/10 | 5095 days | 33% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 5539 days | 33% |
| elisabethk | 9/10 | 5658 days | 33% |
| Lars | 7/10 | 5790 days | 31% |
| Nick | 9/10 | 5790 days | 33% |
| Otto | 5/10 | 5793 days | 25% |
| Ella | 5/10 | 5796 days | 25% |
| Ed | 5/10 | 5796 days | 25% |
| Joosten | 8/10 | 5804 days | 33% |
| IM | 5/10 | 5805 days | 25% |
| Jows | 9/10 | 5805 days | 33% |
| Rick Rissewijck | 5/10 | 5813 days | 25% |
| KonterR | 7/10 | 5814 days | 31% |
| Rona | 4/10 | 5824 days | 21% |
| Thamar | 7/10 | 5830 days | 31% |
| Jordi | 6/10 | 5894 days | 29% |
| Gayle | 8/10 | 5930 days | 33% |
| Clare | 7/10 | 5940 days | 31% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6154 days | 33% |
| Stephen | 7/10 | 6164 days | 31% |
| Amanda | 9/10 | 6171 days | 33% |
| Stuart Weavers | 7/10 | 6250 days | 31% |
| Denise Nick | 7/10 | 6512 days | 31% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 6551 days | 33% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fullers Bay of Islands experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.10% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the Fullers Bay of Islands experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fullers Bay of Islands experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.04% |
| 198 | -4.06% |
| 199 | -4.08% |
| 200 | -4.10% |
| 201 | -4.12% |
| 202 | -4.14% |
| 203 | -4.16% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
6.21% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.