G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harrisons Cape Runner.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
61 Valid Reviews
The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has a total of 61 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.61% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harrisons Cape Runner valid reviews is 83.61% and is based on 61 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 61 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harrisons Cape Runner face-to-face reviews is 81.52% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.45%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete | 10/10 | 1055 days | 100% |
| Kevin Heslin | 10/10 | 1663 days | 17% |
| Leith Carter | 9/10 | 1816 days | 13% |
| Ruth Vickers | 10/10 | 1906 days | 12% |
| Debbie | 10/10 | 2333 days | 10% |
| Marta | 9/10 | 2516 days | 9% |
| Denis Sydney Allen | 10/10 | 2912 days | 7% |
| kerri taniwha | 10/10 | 2970 days | 7% |
| Jane Simmons | 10/10 | 3549 days | 4% |
| Yoomm | 10/10 | 3636 days | 4% |
| Patrick Veber | 9/10 | 3662 days | 4% |
| Franziska Hohmann | 10/10 | 3685 days | 3% |
| Marieke Feyteres | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| van Linda Werner | 8/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| Laurene | 7/10 | 4393 days | 2% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 4397 days | 3% |
| Janina Hoffmann | 7/10 | 4733 days | 2% |
| Samuel Fritscher | 6/10 | 4733 days | 2% |
| Tanja Rudolf | 9/10 | 4816 days | 3% |
| Frederick Neilsen | 9/10 | 4840 days | 3% |
| Burkard Fabu | 10/10 | 5095 days | 3% |
| Chris Sylvia | 8/10 | 5096 days | 3% |
| Lucy Wilde | 3/10 | 5106 days | 1% |
| Trevor & Sheila Redman | 10/10 | 5108 days | 3% |
| Clare Cade | 10/10 | 5114 days | 3% |
| Barry Baily | 10/10 | 5116 days | 3% |
| Ralf Glaser | 9/10 | 5120 days | 3% |
| Andy_C | 4/10 | 5163 days | 2% |
| Herman Plasman | 9/10 | 5209 days | 3% |
| Fran & Roger | 7/10 | 5211 days | 2% |
| Carlosb | 4/10 | 5224 days | 2% |
| Karin & Bastiaan | 10/10 | 5433 days | 3% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5439 days | 3% |
| Christian Pflegi | 8/10 | 5457 days | 3% |
| Brian | 8/10 | 5472 days | 3% |
| AlliK | 10/10 | 5773 days | 3% |
| Pam Know | 9/10 | 5829 days | 3% |
| Lynn Tichauer | 9/10 | 5845 days | 3% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5856 days | 3% |
| Werner Swiss | 6/10 | 5884 days | 2% |
| willemrn | 8/10 | 5909 days | 3% |
| Tim Beuzeval | 8/10 | 5931 days | 3% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 6046 days | 3% |
| miniappleses | 9/10 | 6046 days | 3% |
| Christine Dadd | 8/10 | 6156 days | 3% |
| Robert Wolf | 8/10 | 6164 days | 3% |
| KathM | 10/10 | 6184 days | 3% |
| Elinor Wajngot | 5/10 | 6190 days | 2% |
| Hannes Ockerman | 5/10 | 6191 days | 2% |
| NatakeC | 5/10 | 6202 days | 2% |
| Annika | 7/10 | 6232 days | 2% |
| Danielle | 8/10 | 6232 days | 3% |
| Rob | 8/10 | 6240 days | 3% |
| Alan | 5/10 | 6246 days | 2% |
| Wilbur | 10/10 | 6246 days | 3% |
| Trine | 9/10 | 6286 days | 3% |
| Hannes | 9/10 | 6289 days | 3% |
| Carina Korn | 10/10 | 6383 days | 3% |
| Yumi | 10/10 | 6561 days | 3% |
| Amanda McCaig | 10/10 | 6564 days | 3% |
| Hanna | 7/10 | 6946 days | 2% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Harrisons Cape Runner experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.08% |
| 198 | -4.10% |
| 199 | -4.13% |
| 200 | -4.15% |
| 201 | -4.17% |
| 202 | -4.19% |
| 203 | -4.21% |
| … | … |
1.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.