G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harrisons Cape Runner.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Harrisons Cape Runner
Valid Reviews
61 Valid Reviews
The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has a total of 61 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.61% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harrisons Cape Runner valid reviews is 83.61% and is based on 61 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 61 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harrisons Cape Runner face-to-face reviews is 81.52% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.23%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete | 10/10 | 979 days | 100% |
| Kevin Heslin | 10/10 | 1587 days | 18% |
| Leith Carter | 9/10 | 1740 days | 11% |
| Ruth Vickers | 10/10 | 1830 days | 11% |
| Debbie | 10/10 | 2257 days | 9% |
| Marta | 9/10 | 2440 days | 8% |
| Denis Sydney Allen | 10/10 | 2836 days | 6% |
| kerri taniwha | 10/10 | 2895 days | 6% |
| Jane Simmons | 10/10 | 3474 days | 4% |
| Yoomm | 10/10 | 3560 days | 3% |
| Patrick Veber | 9/10 | 3586 days | 3% |
| Franziska Hohmann | 10/10 | 3609 days | 3% |
| Marieke Feyteres | 9/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
| van Linda Werner | 8/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
| Laurene | 7/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Guillaume | 8/10 | 4321 days | 0% |
| Janina Hoffmann | 7/10 | 4657 days | 2% |
| Samuel Fritscher | 6/10 | 4657 days | 2% |
| Tanja Rudolf | 9/10 | 4740 days | 2% |
| Frederick Neilsen | 9/10 | 4764 days | 2% |
| Burkard Fabu | 10/10 | 5019 days | 2% |
| Chris Sylvia | 8/10 | 5020 days | 2% |
| Lucy Wilde | 3/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Trevor & Sheila Redman | 10/10 | 5032 days | 2% |
| Clare Cade | 10/10 | 5038 days | 2% |
| Barry Baily | 10/10 | 5040 days | 2% |
| Ralf Glaser | 9/10 | 5044 days | 2% |
| Andy_C | 4/10 | 5087 days | 1% |
| Herman Plasman | 9/10 | 5133 days | 2% |
| Fran & Roger | 7/10 | 5135 days | 2% |
| Carlosb | 4/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
| Karin & Bastiaan | 10/10 | 5357 days | 2% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5363 days | 2% |
| Christian Pflegi | 8/10 | 5381 days | 2% |
| Brian | 8/10 | 5396 days | 2% |
| AlliK | 10/10 | 5697 days | 2% |
| Pam Know | 9/10 | 5753 days | 2% |
| Lynn Tichauer | 9/10 | 5769 days | 2% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5780 days | 2% |
| Werner Swiss | 6/10 | 5808 days | 2% |
| willemrn | 8/10 | 5833 days | 2% |
| Tim Beuzeval | 8/10 | 5855 days | 2% |
| billdee | 10/10 | 5970 days | 2% |
| miniappleses | 9/10 | 5970 days | 2% |
| Christine Dadd | 8/10 | 6080 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 8/10 | 6088 days | 2% |
| KathM | 10/10 | 6109 days | 2% |
| Elinor Wajngot | 5/10 | 6114 days | 1% |
| Hannes Ockerman | 5/10 | 6115 days | 1% |
| NatakeC | 5/10 | 6126 days | 1% |
| Annika | 7/10 | 6157 days | 2% |
| Danielle | 8/10 | 6157 days | 2% |
| Rob | 8/10 | 6165 days | 2% |
| Alan | 5/10 | 6171 days | 1% |
| Wilbur | 10/10 | 6171 days | 2% |
| Trine | 9/10 | 6211 days | 2% |
| Hannes | 9/10 | 6214 days | 2% |
| Carina Korn | 10/10 | 6308 days | 2% |
| Yumi | 10/10 | 6485 days | 2% |
| Amanda McCaig | 10/10 | 6488 days | 2% |
| Hanna | 7/10 | 6870 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Harrisons Cape Runner experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harrisons Cape Runner experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.