Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Driving Creek Railway & Potteries.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
92 Valid Reviews
The Driving Creek Railway & Potteries experience has a total of 93 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 31 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Driving Creek Railway & Potteries valid reviews is 85.11% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
81 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 81 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 81 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 27 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.06% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Driving Creek Railway & Potteries face-to-face reviews is 85.06% and is based on 81 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
86.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Webb | 10/10 | 3476 days | 100% |
| Colin George | 10/10 | 3526 days | 93% |
| Vanuxem | 3/10 | 3773 days | 22% |
| Camilla Geert | 5/10 | 3783 days | 39% |
| Manibod Vannaphone | 8/10 | 3800 days | 54% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3820 days | 53% |
| Frank | 8/10 | 3832 days | 50% |
| Tatiana Racheneau | 10/10 | 3846 days | 50% |
| Liz and Alan Weathers | 8/10 | 4206 days | 0% |
| Phil Bromby | 10/10 | 4531 days | 46% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 4534 days | 46% |
| Jonas Nielsen | 4/10 | 4540 days | 22% |
| Karel | 9/10 | 4550 days | 46% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 8/10 | 4899 days | 45% |
| Emmanuel Tedeschi | 7/10 | 4901 days | 42% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4971 days | 46% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4971 days | 46% |
| Marian | 8/10 | 4991 days | 45% |
| Jonathan Tuthill | 10/10 | 5249 days | 46% |
| Goran Backlund | 8/10 | 5249 days | 45% |
| Burkard Fabu | 10/10 | 5256 days | 46% |
| Susanne A | 10/10 | 5261 days | 46% |
| Peter Hart | 8/10 | 5261 days | 45% |
| Johann Maier | 10/10 | 5277 days | 46% |
| pamr | 10/10 | 5277 days | 46% |
| Colin Philpott | 9/10 | 5286 days | 46% |
| John Reynolds | 9/10 | 5288 days | 46% |
| R Laurysen | 7/10 | 5290 days | 42% |
| Mike1952 | 8/10 | 5293 days | 45% |
| Fred Saunders | 10/10 | 5319 days | 46% |
| Vbeirne | 9/10 | 5324 days | 46% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 5355 days | 42% |
| Andreas & Sonja | 8/10 | 5371 days | 45% |
| Anders Rathleff | 8/10 | 5371 days | 45% |
| R & M Willows | 10/10 | 5372 days | 46% |
| Schroeder | 9/10 | 5618 days | 46% |
| Jackie MacRostie | 9/10 | 5620 days | 46% |
| Krabbe | 8/10 | 5621 days | 45% |
| Diete Rokosch | 10/10 | 5631 days | 46% |
| Mirka Tinterova | 10/10 | 5632 days | 46% |
| J Blake | 9/10 | 5634 days | 46% |
| Pieter | 8/10 | 5635 days | 45% |
| George Lepple | 10/10 | 5988 days | 46% |
| Mr and Mrs Scott | 5/10 | 5995 days | 30% |
| Tony Killingray | 9/10 | 5998 days | 46% |
| Heike Pless | 10/10 | 6004 days | 46% |
| Ronja Op | 4/10 | 6019 days | 22% |
| Carol Dale | 9/10 | 6021 days | 46% |
| Carolina Gonzalez | 9/10 | 6021 days | 46% |
| Ines Diana | 10/10 | 6022 days | 46% |
| asiacritics | 8/10 | 6085 days | 45% |
| Anita de Boer | 9/10 | 6087 days | 46% |
| dirkdev | 9/10 | 6089 days | 46% |
| Bill Nash | 9/10 | 6089 days | 46% |
| rolandop | 8/10 | 6089 days | 45% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 6096 days | 46% |
| Karen & Ian | 10/10 | 6096 days | 46% |
| Hennie Neeleman | 9/10 | 6097 days | 46% |
| Pieter Neeleman | 8/10 | 6097 days | 45% |
| Mareike G | 7/10 | 6097 days | 42% |
| Josie Boyle | 5/10 | 6257 days | 30% |
| Katy Boyle | 5/10 | 6257 days | 30% |
| joyceb | 10/10 | 6284 days | 46% |
| Charles Lyne | 9/10 | 6299 days | 46% |
| BouterG | 7/10 | 6325 days | 42% |
| Kaye | 10/10 | 6329 days | 46% |
| caroldarren | 10/10 | 6329 days | 46% |
| JanL | 10/10 | 6329 days | 46% |
| LandR | 10/10 | 6330 days | 46% |
| JaneM | 9/10 | 6336 days | 46% |
| Erik | 8/10 | 6352 days | 45% |
| Grimm | 9/10 | 6353 days | 46% |
| Darren Main | 10/10 | 6360 days | 46% |
| RichardE | 9/10 | 6364 days | 46% |
| CarolF | 10/10 | 6364 days | 46% |
| Ian S | 7/10 | 6379 days | 42% |
| Rona | 8/10 | 6380 days | 45% |
| Nanno | 8/10 | 6380 days | 45% |
| Miranda | 7/10 | 6406 days | 42% |
| Kirsten | 8/10 | 6442 days | 45% |
| olland | 8/10 | 6450 days | 45% |
| carl_fagan | 10/10 | 6604 days | 46% |
| Anne and Derek | 8/10 | 6721 days | 45% |
| Andria Davis | 9/10 | 6722 days | 46% |
| Richard Steward | 10/10 | 6726 days | 46% |
| Marc Hertogs | 7/10 | 6745 days | 42% |
| Seldam | 6/10 | 6777 days | 37% |
| Monika | 8/10 | 6804 days | 45% |
| Rietveld | 9/10 | 7087 days | 46% |
| beesom | 8/10 | 7095 days | 45% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 7107 days | 45% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 7107 days | 45% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Driving Creek Railway & Potteries experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.08% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Driving Creek Railway & Potteries experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Driving Creek Railway & Potteries experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.05% |
| 198 | -2.06% |
| 199 | -2.07% |
| 200 | -2.08% |
| 201 | -2.09% |
| 202 | -2.11% |
| 203 | -2.12% |
| … | … |
1.96% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.