Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Swimming with Dolphins.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Swimming with Dolphins

Valid Reviews

60 Valid Reviews

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has a total of 61 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
38%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 12
20%
7/10 10
17%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins valid reviews is 86.67% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

53 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 60 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 9
17%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 85.66% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.23%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Isabel 4/10 3171 days 65%
Alix 10/10 3174 days 100%
Claire 10/10 3174 days 100%
Lena 7/10 3214 days 90%
Stefano 8/10 3241 days 93%
Ivan Dupont 7/10 3245 days 88%
Max Backelandt 7/10 3914 days 36%
Marie Toulemonde 8/10 3914 days 38%
Annika Marz 7/10 3927 days 35%
Julian Zeissler 7/10 3927 days 35%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 3932 days 34%
Barbara 10/10 3950 days 36%
Mark and Eefie 9/10 4375 days 0%
Nigel Leighton 10/10 4378 days 0%
Laura Diepeveen 8/10 4670 days 41%
Stam 8/10 4676 days 41%
cpope 10/10 4725 days 42%
Naomi Kosteaman 9/10 5035 days 42%
Samuel Prechel 9/10 5051 days 42%
Niels Van Welsenes 10/10 5059 days 42%
salsnz 10/10 5335 days 42%
Jvjm Family 6/10 5384 days 36%
Sinjc Grude 8/10 5421 days 41%
Rachel & Barak 9/10 5422 days 42%
Jeremy & Sarah Rind 10/10 5423 days 42%
Andreas Sterki 8/10 5494 days 41%
Gina Swindells 10/10 5497 days 42%
bogaard 9/10 5612 days 42%
Amy_B 10/10 5718 days 42%
NancyB 9/10 5718 days 42%
TraceyM 8/10 5718 days 41%
DanielGermany 6/10 5723 days 36%
AndreaT 10/10 5726 days 42%
Sue Green 10/10 5730 days 42%
Greg18 7/10 5730 days 39%
DavidJ 8/10 5736 days 41%
Stolz 10/10 5753 days 42%
LindaV 7/10 5764 days 39%
Ian 10/10 5778 days 42%
HelenUK 8/10 5780 days 41%
enthusejohn 10/10 5780 days 42%
Camilla E 9/10 5785 days 42%
Zoe Summers 10/10 5942 days 42%
Benjamin Throk 9/10 6109 days 42%
Marion 10/10 6110 days 42%
Maria Fahlander 7/10 6120 days 39%
Ellie 10/10 6123 days 42%
Sanne 8/10 6123 days 41%
Claire Masling 8/10 6130 days 41%
Sally and David Wallis 9/10 6130 days 42%
Jody 9/10 6142 days 42%
Eliase 7/10 6144 days 39%
Vicki Cook 9/10 6157 days 42%
Carola Haaparinne 10/10 6158 days 42%
Wayne Best 10/10 6166 days 42%
Martin Wright 10/10 6178 days 42%
Floren 9/10 6219 days 42%
Sebastian 8/10 6448 days 41%
Tracy 10/10 6493 days 42%
Jacobien 10/10 6500 days 42%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Swimming with Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.07% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Swimming with Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.01%
198 -4.03%
199 -4.05%
200 -4.07%
201 -4.09%
202 -4.11%
203 -4.13%

Balancing Adjustment

2.44% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.