Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1996 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2543 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3474 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3491 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3508 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3528 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3544 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3558 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3796 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3796 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3801 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3811 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3817 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3830 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3832 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3850 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3852 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3866 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3896 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3913 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4254 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4521 days | 17% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4524 days | 17% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4526 days | 16% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4526 days | 14% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4565 days | 17% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4580 days | 17% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4594 days | 17% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4887 days | 17% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4893 days | 17% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4893 days | 17% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4894 days | 9% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4922 days | 17% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4922 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4925 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4925 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4926 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4944 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4977 days | 17% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4996 days | 17% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 5007 days | 17% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 5015 days | 17% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5250 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5270 days | 17% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5278 days | 17% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5279 days | 17% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5279 days | 17% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5279 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5283 days | 17% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5283 days | 17% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5283 days | 17% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5285 days | 17% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5289 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5292 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5293 days | 17% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5295 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5297 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5297 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5300 days | 17% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5304 days | 17% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5307 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5325 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5343 days | 17% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5383 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5386 days | 17% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5404 days | 17% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5607 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5623 days | 17% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5631 days | 17% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5632 days | 17% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5634 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5634 days | 17% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5636 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5639 days | 17% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5643 days | 17% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5643 days | 17% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5646 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5647 days | 17% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5650 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5650 days | 17% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5654 days | 17% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5655 days | 17% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5656 days | 17% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5656 days | 17% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5662 days | 14% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5662 days | 17% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5663 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5664 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5664 days | 17% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5665 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5667 days | 17% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5670 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5672 days | 17% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5674 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5674 days | 17% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5676 days | 17% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5739 days | 17% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5769 days | 17% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5800 days | 17% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5892 days | 17% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5948 days | 17% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5961 days | 17% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5983 days | 17% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5995 days | 17% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5996 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 6000 days | 17% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 6001 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 6014 days | 17% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 6015 days | 17% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6020 days | 17% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6024 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6035 days | 17% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6042 days | 17% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6048 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6051 days | 17% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6073 days | 12% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6073 days | 17% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6088 days | 17% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6088 days | 17% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6089 days | 17% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6092 days | 17% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6097 days | 17% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6102 days | 17% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6104 days | 17% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6104 days | 17% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6106 days | 17% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6108 days | 17% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6112 days | 17% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6112 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6115 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6116 days | 17% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6130 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6134 days | 17% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6149 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6195 days | 17% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6217 days | 17% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6230 days | 17% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6257 days | 17% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6348 days | 17% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6348 days | 17% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6349 days | 17% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6350 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6352 days | 14% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6364 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6364 days | 17% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6366 days | 17% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6366 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6371 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6373 days | 17% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6374 days | 17% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6374 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6379 days | 17% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6379 days | 17% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6379 days | 17% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6380 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6382 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6382 days | 17% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6384 days | 17% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6386 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6389 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6391 days | 17% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6393 days | 17% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6396 days | 17% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6398 days | 17% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6398 days | 17% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6405 days | 17% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6410 days | 17% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6411 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6412 days | 17% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6412 days | 17% |
| John | 9/10 | 6417 days | 17% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6420 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6421 days | 17% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6428 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6429 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6432 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6434 days | 17% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6438 days | 17% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6451 days | 14% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6457 days | 17% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6461 days | 17% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6466 days | 17% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6466 days | 17% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6470 days | 17% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6476 days | 17% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6482 days | 17% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6486 days | 17% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6504 days | 17% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6512 days | 17% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6514 days | 17% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6521 days | 17% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6522 days | 17% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6530 days | 17% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6545 days | 17% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6545 days | 17% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6558 days | 17% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6566 days | 17% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6583 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6596 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6600 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6720 days | 17% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6728 days | 17% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6731 days | 17% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6745 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6760 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6762 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6767 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6784 days | 17% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6823 days | 17% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6826 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6829 days | 17% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6833 days | 17% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7083 days | 17% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7085 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7092 days | 17% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7113 days | 17% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7113 days | 17% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7114 days | 12% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7118 days | 12% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7125 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7126 days | 17% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7126 days | 17% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.35% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 111 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.31% |
| 198 | -2.32% |
| 199 | -2.33% |
| 200 | -2.35% |
| 201 | -2.36% |
| 202 | -2.37% |
| 203 | -2.38% |
| … | … |
1.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.