Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 2017 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2564 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3495 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3512 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3529 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3549 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3565 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3579 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3817 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3817 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3822 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3832 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3838 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3851 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3853 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3872 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3873 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3887 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3917 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3934 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4275 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4542 days | 18% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4545 days | 18% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4547 days | 16% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4547 days | 15% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4586 days | 18% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4601 days | 18% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4615 days | 18% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4908 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4914 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4914 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4915 days | 10% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4943 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4943 days | 18% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4946 days | 18% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4946 days | 18% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4947 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4965 days | 18% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4998 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 5017 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 5028 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5271 days | 18% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5291 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5299 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5300 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5300 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5300 days | 18% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5304 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5304 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5304 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5306 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5310 days | 18% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5313 days | 18% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5314 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5316 days | 18% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5318 days | 18% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5318 days | 18% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5321 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5325 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5328 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5346 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5364 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5404 days | 18% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5407 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5425 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5628 days | 18% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5644 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5652 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5653 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5655 days | 18% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5655 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5657 days | 18% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5660 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5664 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5664 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5667 days | 18% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5668 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5671 days | 18% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5671 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5675 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5676 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5677 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5677 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5683 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5683 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5684 days | 18% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5685 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5685 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5686 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5688 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5691 days | 18% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5693 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5695 days | 18% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5695 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5697 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5760 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5790 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5821 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5913 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5969 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5982 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 6004 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 6016 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 6017 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 6021 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 6022 days | 18% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 6035 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 6036 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6041 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6045 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6056 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6063 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6069 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6072 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6094 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6094 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6109 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6109 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6110 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6113 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6118 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6123 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6127 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6129 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6136 days | 18% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6137 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6151 days | 18% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6155 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6170 days | 18% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6216 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6238 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6251 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6278 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6369 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6370 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6371 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6372 days | 18% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6373 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6385 days | 18% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6385 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6387 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6387 days | 18% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6393 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6395 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6395 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6396 days | 18% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6400 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6400 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6401 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6402 days | 18% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6403 days | 18% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6403 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6406 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6408 days | 18% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6411 days | 18% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6412 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6414 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6418 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6420 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6420 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6426 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6431 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6433 days | 18% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6434 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6434 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6439 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6442 days | 18% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6443 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6449 days | 18% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6450 days | 18% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6454 days | 18% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6456 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6459 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6472 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6478 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6483 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6488 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6488 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6492 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6497 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6504 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6508 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6525 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6534 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6536 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6543 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6544 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6551 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6567 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6567 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6580 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6588 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6605 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6618 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6621 days | 18% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6741 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6749 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6752 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6766 days | 18% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6781 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6783 days | 18% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6788 days | 18% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6805 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6844 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6847 days | 18% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6850 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6854 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7104 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7106 days | 18% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7113 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7134 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7134 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7135 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7139 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7146 days | 18% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7147 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7147 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.76% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 86 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.72% |
| 198 | -2.73% |
| 199 | -2.75% |
| 200 | -2.76% |
| 201 | -2.78% |
| 202 | -2.79% |
| 203 | -2.80% |
| … | … |
1.55% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.