Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1976 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2523 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3454 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3471 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3488 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3508 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3524 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3538 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3776 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3776 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3781 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3791 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3797 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3810 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3812 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3831 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3832 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3846 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3876 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3893 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4234 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4501 days | 16% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4504 days | 16% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4506 days | 15% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4506 days | 13% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4545 days | 16% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4560 days | 16% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4574 days | 16% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4867 days | 16% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4873 days | 16% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4873 days | 16% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4874 days | 8% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4902 days | 16% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4902 days | 16% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4905 days | 16% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4905 days | 16% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4906 days | 15% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4924 days | 16% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4957 days | 16% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4976 days | 16% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4987 days | 16% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4995 days | 16% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5230 days | 16% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5250 days | 16% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5258 days | 16% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5259 days | 16% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5259 days | 16% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5259 days | 16% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5263 days | 16% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5263 days | 16% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5263 days | 16% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5265 days | 16% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5269 days | 16% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5272 days | 16% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5273 days | 16% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5275 days | 16% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5277 days | 16% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5277 days | 16% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5280 days | 16% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5284 days | 16% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5287 days | 15% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5305 days | 15% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5323 days | 16% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5363 days | 16% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5366 days | 16% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5384 days | 16% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5587 days | 16% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5603 days | 16% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5611 days | 16% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5612 days | 16% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5614 days | 16% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5614 days | 16% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5616 days | 16% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5619 days | 16% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5623 days | 16% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5623 days | 16% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5626 days | 16% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5627 days | 16% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5630 days | 16% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5630 days | 16% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5634 days | 16% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5635 days | 16% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5636 days | 16% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5636 days | 16% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5642 days | 13% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5642 days | 16% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5643 days | 16% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5644 days | 15% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5644 days | 16% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5645 days | 15% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5647 days | 16% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5650 days | 16% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5652 days | 16% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5654 days | 16% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5654 days | 16% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5656 days | 16% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5719 days | 16% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5749 days | 16% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5780 days | 16% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5872 days | 16% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5928 days | 16% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5941 days | 16% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5963 days | 16% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5975 days | 16% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5976 days | 15% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5980 days | 16% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5981 days | 16% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5994 days | 16% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5995 days | 16% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6000 days | 16% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6004 days | 15% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6015 days | 16% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6022 days | 16% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6028 days | 15% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6031 days | 16% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6053 days | 11% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6053 days | 16% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6068 days | 16% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6068 days | 16% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6069 days | 16% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6072 days | 16% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6077 days | 16% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6082 days | 16% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6084 days | 16% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6084 days | 16% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6086 days | 16% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6088 days | 16% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6092 days | 16% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6092 days | 16% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6095 days | 16% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6096 days | 16% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6110 days | 16% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6114 days | 16% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6129 days | 16% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6175 days | 16% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6197 days | 16% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6210 days | 16% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6237 days | 16% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6328 days | 16% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6329 days | 16% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6330 days | 16% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6331 days | 16% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6333 days | 13% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6344 days | 16% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6344 days | 16% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6346 days | 16% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6346 days | 16% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6352 days | 16% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6354 days | 16% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6355 days | 16% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6355 days | 16% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6359 days | 16% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6359 days | 16% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6360 days | 16% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6361 days | 16% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6362 days | 16% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6362 days | 16% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6365 days | 16% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6367 days | 16% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6370 days | 16% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6371 days | 16% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6373 days | 16% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6377 days | 16% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6379 days | 16% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6379 days | 16% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6386 days | 16% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6391 days | 16% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6392 days | 16% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6393 days | 16% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6393 days | 16% |
| John | 9/10 | 6398 days | 16% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6401 days | 16% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6402 days | 16% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6408 days | 16% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6409 days | 16% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6413 days | 16% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6415 days | 16% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6418 days | 16% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6431 days | 13% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6437 days | 16% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6442 days | 16% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6447 days | 16% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6447 days | 16% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6451 days | 16% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6457 days | 16% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6463 days | 16% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6467 days | 16% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6485 days | 16% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6493 days | 16% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6495 days | 16% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6502 days | 16% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6503 days | 16% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6510 days | 16% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6526 days | 16% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6526 days | 16% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6539 days | 16% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6547 days | 16% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6564 days | 16% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6577 days | 16% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6581 days | 16% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6700 days | 16% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6708 days | 16% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6711 days | 16% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6725 days | 16% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6740 days | 15% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6742 days | 16% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6747 days | 16% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6764 days | 16% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6803 days | 16% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6806 days | 16% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6809 days | 16% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6813 days | 16% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7063 days | 16% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7065 days | 16% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7072 days | 16% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7093 days | 16% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7093 days | 16% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7094 days | 11% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7098 days | 11% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7105 days | 16% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7106 days | 16% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7106 days | 16% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.08% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 124 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.04% |
| 198 | -2.05% |
| 199 | -2.06% |
| 200 | -2.08% |
| 201 | -2.09% |
| 202 | -2.10% |
| 203 | -2.11% |
| … | … |
1.43% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.