Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1936 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2483 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3414 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3431 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3448 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3468 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3484 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3498 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3736 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3736 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3741 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3751 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3757 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3770 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3772 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3791 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3792 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3806 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3836 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3853 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4194 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4461 days | 14% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4464 days | 14% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4466 days | 13% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4466 days | 11% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4505 days | 14% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4520 days | 14% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4534 days | 14% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4827 days | 14% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4833 days | 14% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4833 days | 14% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4834 days | 7% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4862 days | 14% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4862 days | 14% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4865 days | 14% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4865 days | 14% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4866 days | 13% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4884 days | 14% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4917 days | 14% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4936 days | 14% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4947 days | 14% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4955 days | 14% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5190 days | 14% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5210 days | 14% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5218 days | 14% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5219 days | 14% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5219 days | 14% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5219 days | 14% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5223 days | 14% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5223 days | 14% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5223 days | 14% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5225 days | 14% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5229 days | 14% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5232 days | 14% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5233 days | 14% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5235 days | 14% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5237 days | 14% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5237 days | 14% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5240 days | 14% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5244 days | 14% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5247 days | 13% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5265 days | 13% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5283 days | 14% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5323 days | 14% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5326 days | 14% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5344 days | 14% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5547 days | 14% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5563 days | 14% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5571 days | 14% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5572 days | 14% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5574 days | 14% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5574 days | 14% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5576 days | 14% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5579 days | 14% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5583 days | 14% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5583 days | 14% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5586 days | 14% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5587 days | 14% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5590 days | 14% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5590 days | 14% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5594 days | 14% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5595 days | 14% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5596 days | 14% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5596 days | 14% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5602 days | 11% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5602 days | 14% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5603 days | 14% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5604 days | 13% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5604 days | 14% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5605 days | 13% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5607 days | 14% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5610 days | 14% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5612 days | 14% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5614 days | 14% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5614 days | 14% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5616 days | 14% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5679 days | 14% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5709 days | 14% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5740 days | 14% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5832 days | 14% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5888 days | 14% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5901 days | 14% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5923 days | 14% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5935 days | 14% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5936 days | 13% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5940 days | 14% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5941 days | 14% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5954 days | 14% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5955 days | 14% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5960 days | 14% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5964 days | 13% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5975 days | 14% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5982 days | 14% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5988 days | 13% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5991 days | 14% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6013 days | 9% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6013 days | 14% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6028 days | 14% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6028 days | 14% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6029 days | 14% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6032 days | 14% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6037 days | 14% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6042 days | 14% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6044 days | 14% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6044 days | 14% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6046 days | 14% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6048 days | 14% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6052 days | 14% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6052 days | 14% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6055 days | 14% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6056 days | 14% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6070 days | 14% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6074 days | 14% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6089 days | 14% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6135 days | 14% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6157 days | 14% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6170 days | 14% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6197 days | 14% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6288 days | 14% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6289 days | 14% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6290 days | 14% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6290 days | 14% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6292 days | 11% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6304 days | 14% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6304 days | 14% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6306 days | 14% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6306 days | 14% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6311 days | 14% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6313 days | 14% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6314 days | 14% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6314 days | 14% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6319 days | 14% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6319 days | 14% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6319 days | 14% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6320 days | 14% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6322 days | 14% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6322 days | 14% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6325 days | 14% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6327 days | 14% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6329 days | 14% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6331 days | 14% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6333 days | 14% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6336 days | 14% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6339 days | 14% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6339 days | 14% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6345 days | 14% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6350 days | 14% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6352 days | 14% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6353 days | 14% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6353 days | 14% |
| John | 9/10 | 6357 days | 14% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6360 days | 14% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6361 days | 14% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6368 days | 14% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6369 days | 14% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6373 days | 14% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6374 days | 14% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6378 days | 14% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6391 days | 11% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6397 days | 14% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6401 days | 14% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6406 days | 14% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6407 days | 14% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6410 days | 14% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6416 days | 14% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6423 days | 14% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6426 days | 14% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6444 days | 14% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6453 days | 14% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6455 days | 14% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6462 days | 14% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6463 days | 14% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6470 days | 14% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6485 days | 14% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6486 days | 14% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6499 days | 14% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6506 days | 14% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6524 days | 14% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6536 days | 14% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6540 days | 14% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6660 days | 14% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6668 days | 14% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6671 days | 14% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6685 days | 14% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6700 days | 13% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6702 days | 14% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6707 days | 14% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6724 days | 14% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6763 days | 14% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6766 days | 14% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6769 days | 14% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6773 days | 14% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7023 days | 14% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7025 days | 14% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7032 days | 14% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7053 days | 14% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7053 days | 14% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7054 days | 9% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7058 days | 9% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7065 days | 14% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7066 days | 14% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7066 days | 14% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.16% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.13% |
| 198 | -2.14% |
| 199 | -2.15% |
| 200 | -2.16% |
| 201 | -2.17% |
| 202 | -2.19% |
| 203 | -2.20% |
| … | … |
1.44% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.