Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1896 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2442 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3374 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3391 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3408 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3428 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3444 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3458 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3696 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3696 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3701 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3711 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3717 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3730 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3732 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3750 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3752 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3766 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3796 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3813 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4154 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4421 days | 12% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4424 days | 12% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4426 days | 11% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4426 days | 10% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4465 days | 13% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4480 days | 12% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4494 days | 12% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4787 days | 13% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4793 days | 12% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4793 days | 12% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4794 days | 5% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4822 days | 12% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4822 days | 12% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4825 days | 12% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4825 days | 12% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4826 days | 11% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4844 days | 12% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4877 days | 13% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4896 days | 12% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4907 days | 12% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4915 days | 13% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5149 days | 12% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5170 days | 12% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5178 days | 13% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5179 days | 13% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5179 days | 13% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5179 days | 12% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5183 days | 12% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5183 days | 12% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5183 days | 12% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5185 days | 13% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5189 days | 12% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5192 days | 12% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5193 days | 13% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5195 days | 12% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5197 days | 12% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5197 days | 12% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5200 days | 12% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5204 days | 12% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5207 days | 11% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5225 days | 11% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5243 days | 12% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5283 days | 12% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5286 days | 12% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5304 days | 13% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5506 days | 12% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5523 days | 12% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5531 days | 13% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5532 days | 12% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5534 days | 12% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5534 days | 12% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5536 days | 12% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5539 days | 12% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5543 days | 12% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5543 days | 12% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5546 days | 12% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5547 days | 13% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5550 days | 12% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5550 days | 12% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5554 days | 12% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5555 days | 12% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5556 days | 12% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5556 days | 12% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5562 days | 10% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5562 days | 13% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5563 days | 12% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5564 days | 11% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5564 days | 12% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5565 days | 11% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5567 days | 12% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5570 days | 12% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5572 days | 13% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5574 days | 12% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5574 days | 12% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5576 days | 13% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5639 days | 13% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5669 days | 13% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5700 days | 13% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5791 days | 12% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5847 days | 12% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5860 days | 13% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5883 days | 13% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5895 days | 13% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5896 days | 11% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5900 days | 12% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5901 days | 12% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5914 days | 12% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5915 days | 13% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5920 days | 12% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5924 days | 11% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5935 days | 12% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5942 days | 12% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5948 days | 11% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5951 days | 13% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5973 days | 7% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5973 days | 12% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5988 days | 13% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5988 days | 12% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5989 days | 12% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5992 days | 13% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5997 days | 13% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6002 days | 12% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6004 days | 13% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6004 days | 13% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6006 days | 13% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6008 days | 13% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6012 days | 12% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6012 days | 12% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6015 days | 12% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6016 days | 12% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6030 days | 12% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6034 days | 12% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6049 days | 12% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6094 days | 13% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6116 days | 12% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6129 days | 12% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6156 days | 13% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6248 days | 13% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6248 days | 12% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6249 days | 13% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6250 days | 12% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6252 days | 10% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6264 days | 12% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6264 days | 13% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6266 days | 12% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6266 days | 12% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6271 days | 12% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6273 days | 12% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6274 days | 12% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6274 days | 12% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6279 days | 13% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6279 days | 12% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6279 days | 13% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6280 days | 12% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6282 days | 12% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6282 days | 12% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6284 days | 13% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6286 days | 12% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6289 days | 12% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6291 days | 12% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6293 days | 12% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6296 days | 13% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6298 days | 12% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6298 days | 12% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6305 days | 13% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6310 days | 12% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6311 days | 12% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6312 days | 13% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6312 days | 13% |
| John | 9/10 | 6317 days | 12% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6320 days | 12% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6321 days | 12% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6328 days | 12% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6329 days | 12% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6332 days | 12% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6334 days | 13% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6338 days | 12% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6351 days | 10% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6356 days | 13% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6361 days | 13% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6366 days | 13% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6366 days | 12% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6370 days | 13% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6376 days | 13% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6382 days | 13% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6386 days | 13% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6404 days | 12% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6412 days | 12% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6414 days | 12% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6421 days | 13% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6422 days | 13% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6430 days | 13% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6445 days | 13% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6445 days | 12% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6458 days | 12% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6466 days | 13% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6483 days | 12% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6496 days | 12% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6500 days | 12% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6620 days | 13% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6628 days | 13% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6631 days | 12% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6645 days | 12% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6660 days | 11% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6662 days | 12% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6667 days | 12% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6684 days | 13% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6723 days | 13% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6726 days | 12% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6729 days | 12% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6733 days | 12% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6982 days | 13% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6984 days | 12% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6991 days | 13% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7013 days | 13% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7013 days | 13% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7014 days | 7% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7018 days | 7% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7025 days | 12% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7026 days | 12% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7026 days | 12% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.93% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 85 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.89% |
| 198 | -2.90% |
| 199 | -2.92% |
| 200 | -2.93% |
| 201 | -2.95% |
| 202 | -2.96% |
| 203 | -2.98% |
| … | … |
1.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.