Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.22%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 2078 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2625 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3556 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3573 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3590 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3610 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3626 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3640 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3878 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3878 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3883 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3893 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3899 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3912 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3914 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3933 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3934 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3948 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3978 days | 16% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3995 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4603 days | 20% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4606 days | 20% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4608 days | 19% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4608 days | 18% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4647 days | 21% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4662 days | 20% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4676 days | 20% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4969 days | 21% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4975 days | 20% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4975 days | 20% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4976 days | 13% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 5004 days | 20% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 5004 days | 20% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 5007 days | 20% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 5007 days | 20% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 5008 days | 19% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 5026 days | 20% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 5059 days | 21% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 5078 days | 20% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 5089 days | 20% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 5097 days | 21% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5332 days | 20% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5352 days | 20% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5360 days | 21% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5361 days | 21% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5361 days | 21% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5361 days | 20% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5365 days | 20% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5365 days | 20% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5365 days | 20% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5367 days | 21% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5371 days | 20% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5374 days | 20% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5375 days | 21% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5377 days | 20% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5379 days | 20% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5379 days | 20% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5382 days | 20% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5386 days | 20% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5389 days | 19% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5407 days | 19% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5425 days | 20% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5465 days | 20% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5468 days | 20% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5486 days | 21% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5689 days | 20% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5705 days | 20% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5713 days | 21% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5714 days | 20% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5716 days | 20% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5716 days | 20% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5718 days | 20% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5721 days | 20% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5725 days | 20% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5725 days | 20% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5728 days | 20% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5729 days | 21% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5732 days | 20% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5732 days | 20% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5736 days | 20% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5737 days | 20% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5738 days | 20% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5738 days | 20% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5744 days | 18% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5744 days | 21% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5745 days | 20% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5746 days | 19% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5746 days | 20% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5747 days | 19% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5749 days | 20% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5752 days | 20% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5754 days | 21% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5756 days | 20% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5756 days | 20% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5758 days | 21% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5821 days | 21% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5851 days | 21% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5882 days | 21% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5974 days | 20% |
| koster | 9/10 | 6030 days | 20% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 6043 days | 21% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 6065 days | 21% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 6077 days | 21% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 6078 days | 19% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 6082 days | 20% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 6083 days | 20% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 6096 days | 20% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 6097 days | 21% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6102 days | 20% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6106 days | 19% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6117 days | 20% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6124 days | 20% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6130 days | 19% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6133 days | 21% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6155 days | 15% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6155 days | 20% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6170 days | 21% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6170 days | 20% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6171 days | 20% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6174 days | 21% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6179 days | 21% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6184 days | 20% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6186 days | 21% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6186 days | 21% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6188 days | 21% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6190 days | 21% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6194 days | 20% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6194 days | 20% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6197 days | 20% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6198 days | 20% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6212 days | 20% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6216 days | 20% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6231 days | 20% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6277 days | 21% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6299 days | 20% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6312 days | 20% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6339 days | 21% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6430 days | 21% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6431 days | 20% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6432 days | 21% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6432 days | 20% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6434 days | 18% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6446 days | 20% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6446 days | 21% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6448 days | 20% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6448 days | 20% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6454 days | 20% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6455 days | 20% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6456 days | 20% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6457 days | 20% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6461 days | 21% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6461 days | 20% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6462 days | 21% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6462 days | 20% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6464 days | 20% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6464 days | 20% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6467 days | 21% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6469 days | 20% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6471 days | 20% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6473 days | 20% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6475 days | 20% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6478 days | 21% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6481 days | 20% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6481 days | 20% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6487 days | 21% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6492 days | 20% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6494 days | 20% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6495 days | 21% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6495 days | 21% |
| John | 9/10 | 6499 days | 20% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6502 days | 20% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6503 days | 20% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6510 days | 20% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6511 days | 20% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6515 days | 20% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6516 days | 21% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6520 days | 20% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6533 days | 18% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6539 days | 21% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6543 days | 21% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6548 days | 21% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6549 days | 20% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6552 days | 21% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6558 days | 21% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6565 days | 21% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6569 days | 21% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6586 days | 20% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6595 days | 20% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6597 days | 20% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6604 days | 21% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6605 days | 21% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6612 days | 21% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6627 days | 21% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6628 days | 20% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6641 days | 20% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6648 days | 21% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6666 days | 20% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6678 days | 20% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6682 days | 20% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6802 days | 21% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6810 days | 21% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6813 days | 20% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6827 days | 20% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6842 days | 19% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6844 days | 20% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6849 days | 20% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6866 days | 21% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6905 days | 21% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6908 days | 20% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6911 days | 20% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6915 days | 20% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7165 days | 21% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7167 days | 20% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7174 days | 21% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7195 days | 21% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7195 days | 21% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7196 days | 15% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7200 days | 15% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7207 days | 20% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7208 days | 20% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7208 days | 20% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.94% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.88% |
| 198 | -3.90% |
| 199 | -3.92% |
| 200 | -3.94% |
| 201 | -3.96% |
| 202 | -3.98% |
| 203 | -4.00% |
| … | … |
1.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.