Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.23%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 2038 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2585 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3516 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3533 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3550 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3570 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3586 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3600 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3838 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3838 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3843 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3853 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3859 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3872 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3874 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3892 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3894 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3908 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3938 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3955 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4563 days | 18% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4566 days | 19% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4568 days | 17% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4568 days | 16% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4607 days | 19% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4622 days | 19% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4636 days | 18% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4929 days | 19% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4935 days | 19% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4935 days | 19% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4936 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4964 days | 19% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4964 days | 18% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4967 days | 18% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4967 days | 18% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4968 days | 17% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4986 days | 18% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 5019 days | 19% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 5038 days | 19% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 5049 days | 19% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 5057 days | 19% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5292 days | 18% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5312 days | 19% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5320 days | 19% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5321 days | 19% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5321 days | 19% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5321 days | 18% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5325 days | 19% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5325 days | 19% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5325 days | 19% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5327 days | 19% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5331 days | 18% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5334 days | 18% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5335 days | 19% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5337 days | 18% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5339 days | 18% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5339 days | 18% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5342 days | 19% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5346 days | 19% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5349 days | 17% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5367 days | 17% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5385 days | 19% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5425 days | 18% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5428 days | 19% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5446 days | 19% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5649 days | 18% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5665 days | 19% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5673 days | 19% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5674 days | 19% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5676 days | 18% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5676 days | 19% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5678 days | 18% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5681 days | 19% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5685 days | 19% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5685 days | 19% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5688 days | 18% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5689 days | 19% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5692 days | 18% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5692 days | 19% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5696 days | 19% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5697 days | 19% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5698 days | 19% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5698 days | 19% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5704 days | 16% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5704 days | 19% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5705 days | 18% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5706 days | 17% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5706 days | 19% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5707 days | 17% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5709 days | 19% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5712 days | 18% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5714 days | 19% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5716 days | 18% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5716 days | 19% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5718 days | 19% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5781 days | 19% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5811 days | 19% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5842 days | 19% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5934 days | 19% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5990 days | 19% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 6003 days | 19% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 6025 days | 19% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 6037 days | 19% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 6038 days | 17% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 6042 days | 19% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 6043 days | 18% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 6056 days | 19% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 6057 days | 19% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6062 days | 19% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6066 days | 17% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6077 days | 19% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6084 days | 19% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6090 days | 17% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6093 days | 19% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6115 days | 14% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6115 days | 19% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6130 days | 19% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6130 days | 19% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6131 days | 19% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6134 days | 19% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6139 days | 19% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6144 days | 19% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6146 days | 19% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6146 days | 19% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6148 days | 19% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6150 days | 19% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6154 days | 19% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6154 days | 18% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6157 days | 18% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6158 days | 19% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6172 days | 18% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6176 days | 19% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6191 days | 18% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6237 days | 19% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6259 days | 19% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6272 days | 19% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6299 days | 19% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6390 days | 19% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6391 days | 19% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6391 days | 19% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6392 days | 18% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6394 days | 16% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6406 days | 18% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6406 days | 19% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6408 days | 19% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6408 days | 18% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6413 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6415 days | 19% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6416 days | 19% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6416 days | 18% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6421 days | 19% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6421 days | 19% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6421 days | 19% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6422 days | 18% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6424 days | 18% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6424 days | 19% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6426 days | 19% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6428 days | 18% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6431 days | 18% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6433 days | 19% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6435 days | 19% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6438 days | 19% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6440 days | 19% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6440 days | 19% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6447 days | 19% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6452 days | 19% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6453 days | 18% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6454 days | 19% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6454 days | 19% |
| John | 9/10 | 6459 days | 19% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6462 days | 18% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6463 days | 19% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6470 days | 18% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6471 days | 18% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6474 days | 18% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6476 days | 19% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6480 days | 19% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6493 days | 16% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6499 days | 19% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6503 days | 19% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6508 days | 19% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6508 days | 19% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6512 days | 19% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6518 days | 19% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6524 days | 19% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6528 days | 19% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6546 days | 19% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6554 days | 19% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6557 days | 19% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6563 days | 19% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6564 days | 19% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6572 days | 19% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6587 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6587 days | 19% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6600 days | 19% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6608 days | 19% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6625 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6638 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6642 days | 18% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6762 days | 19% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6770 days | 19% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6773 days | 19% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6787 days | 18% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6802 days | 17% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6804 days | 18% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6809 days | 18% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6826 days | 19% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6865 days | 19% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6868 days | 18% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6871 days | 19% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6875 days | 19% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7125 days | 19% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7127 days | 18% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7134 days | 19% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7155 days | 19% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7155 days | 19% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7156 days | 14% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7160 days | 14% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7167 days | 18% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7168 days | 19% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7168 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.23% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.18% |
| 198 | -3.20% |
| 199 | -3.21% |
| 200 | -3.23% |
| 201 | -3.25% |
| 202 | -3.26% |
| 203 | -3.28% |
| … | … |
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.