Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.23%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 2058 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2605 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3536 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3553 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3570 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3590 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3606 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3620 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3858 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3858 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3863 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3873 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3879 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3892 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3894 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3912 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3914 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3928 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3958 days | 16% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3975 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4583 days | 19% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4586 days | 20% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4588 days | 18% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4588 days | 17% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4627 days | 20% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4642 days | 20% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4656 days | 19% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4949 days | 20% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4955 days | 20% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4955 days | 20% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4956 days | 12% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4984 days | 20% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4984 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4987 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4987 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4988 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 5006 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 5039 days | 20% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 5058 days | 20% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 5069 days | 20% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 5077 days | 20% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5312 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5332 days | 20% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5340 days | 20% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5341 days | 20% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5341 days | 20% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5341 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5345 days | 20% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5345 days | 20% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5345 days | 20% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5347 days | 20% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5351 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5354 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5355 days | 20% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5357 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5359 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5359 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5362 days | 20% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5366 days | 20% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5369 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5387 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5405 days | 20% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5445 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5448 days | 20% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5466 days | 20% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5669 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5685 days | 20% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5693 days | 20% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5694 days | 20% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5696 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5696 days | 20% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5698 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5701 days | 20% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5705 days | 20% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5705 days | 20% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5708 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5709 days | 20% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5712 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5712 days | 20% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5716 days | 20% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5717 days | 20% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5718 days | 20% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5718 days | 20% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5724 days | 17% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5724 days | 20% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5725 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5726 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5726 days | 20% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5727 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5729 days | 20% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5732 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5734 days | 20% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5736 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5736 days | 20% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5738 days | 20% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5801 days | 20% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5831 days | 20% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5862 days | 20% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5954 days | 20% |
| koster | 9/10 | 6010 days | 20% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 6023 days | 20% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 6045 days | 20% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 6057 days | 20% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 6058 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 6062 days | 20% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 6063 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 6076 days | 20% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 6077 days | 20% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 6082 days | 20% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 6086 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 6097 days | 20% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 6104 days | 20% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 6110 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 6113 days | 20% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 6135 days | 14% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 6135 days | 20% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6150 days | 20% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6150 days | 20% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6151 days | 20% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6154 days | 20% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6159 days | 20% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6164 days | 20% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6166 days | 20% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6166 days | 20% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6168 days | 20% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6170 days | 20% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6174 days | 20% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6174 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6177 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6178 days | 20% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6192 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6196 days | 20% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6211 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6257 days | 20% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6279 days | 20% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6292 days | 20% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6319 days | 20% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6410 days | 20% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6411 days | 20% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6412 days | 20% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6412 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6414 days | 17% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6426 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6426 days | 20% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6428 days | 20% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6428 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6433 days | 20% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6435 days | 20% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6436 days | 20% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6436 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6441 days | 20% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6441 days | 20% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6441 days | 20% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6442 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6444 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6444 days | 20% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6446 days | 20% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6448 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6451 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6453 days | 20% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6455 days | 20% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6458 days | 20% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6460 days | 20% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6460 days | 20% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6467 days | 20% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6472 days | 20% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6474 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6474 days | 20% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6474 days | 20% |
| John | 9/10 | 6479 days | 20% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6482 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6483 days | 20% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6490 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6491 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6494 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6496 days | 20% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6500 days | 20% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6513 days | 17% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6519 days | 20% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6523 days | 20% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6528 days | 20% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6528 days | 20% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6532 days | 20% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6538 days | 20% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6544 days | 20% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6548 days | 20% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6566 days | 20% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6575 days | 20% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6577 days | 20% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6583 days | 20% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6584 days | 20% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6592 days | 20% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6607 days | 20% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6608 days | 20% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6620 days | 20% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6628 days | 20% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6645 days | 20% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6658 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6662 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6782 days | 20% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6790 days | 20% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6793 days | 20% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6807 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6822 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6824 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6829 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6846 days | 20% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6885 days | 20% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6888 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6891 days | 20% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6895 days | 20% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7145 days | 20% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7147 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7154 days | 20% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7175 days | 20% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7175 days | 20% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7176 days | 14% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7180 days | 14% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7187 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7188 days | 20% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7188 days | 20% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.64% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.59% |
| 198 | -3.60% |
| 199 | -3.62% |
| 200 | -3.64% |
| 201 | -3.66% |
| 202 | -3.68% |
| 203 | -3.70% |
| … | … |
1.71% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.