Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1916 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2463 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3394 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3411 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3428 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3448 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3464 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3478 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3716 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3716 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3721 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3731 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3737 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3750 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3752 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3770 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3772 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3786 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3816 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3833 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4174 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4441 days | 13% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4444 days | 13% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4446 days | 12% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4446 days | 10% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4485 days | 14% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4500 days | 13% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4514 days | 13% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4807 days | 14% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4813 days | 13% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4813 days | 13% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4814 days | 6% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4842 days | 13% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4842 days | 13% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4845 days | 13% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4845 days | 13% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4846 days | 12% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4864 days | 13% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4897 days | 14% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4916 days | 13% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4927 days | 13% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4935 days | 14% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5170 days | 13% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5190 days | 13% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5198 days | 14% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5199 days | 14% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5199 days | 14% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5199 days | 13% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5203 days | 13% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5203 days | 13% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5203 days | 13% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5205 days | 14% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5209 days | 13% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5212 days | 13% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5213 days | 14% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5215 days | 13% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5217 days | 13% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5217 days | 13% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5220 days | 13% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5224 days | 13% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5227 days | 12% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5245 days | 12% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5263 days | 13% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5303 days | 13% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5306 days | 13% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5324 days | 14% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5527 days | 13% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5543 days | 13% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5551 days | 14% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5552 days | 13% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5554 days | 13% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5554 days | 13% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5556 days | 13% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5559 days | 13% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5563 days | 13% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5563 days | 13% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5566 days | 13% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5567 days | 14% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5570 days | 13% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5570 days | 13% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5574 days | 13% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5575 days | 13% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5576 days | 13% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5576 days | 13% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5582 days | 10% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5582 days | 14% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5583 days | 13% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5584 days | 12% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5584 days | 13% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5585 days | 12% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5587 days | 13% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5590 days | 13% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5592 days | 14% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5594 days | 13% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5594 days | 13% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5596 days | 14% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5659 days | 14% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5689 days | 14% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5720 days | 14% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5812 days | 13% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5868 days | 13% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5881 days | 14% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5903 days | 14% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5915 days | 14% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5916 days | 12% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5920 days | 13% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5921 days | 13% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5934 days | 13% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5935 days | 14% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5940 days | 13% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5944 days | 12% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5955 days | 13% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5962 days | 13% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5968 days | 12% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5971 days | 14% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5993 days | 8% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5993 days | 13% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 6008 days | 14% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 6008 days | 13% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 6009 days | 13% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 6012 days | 14% |
| martint | 10/10 | 6017 days | 14% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 6022 days | 13% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 6024 days | 14% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 6024 days | 14% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 6026 days | 14% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 6028 days | 14% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6032 days | 13% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6032 days | 13% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6035 days | 13% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6036 days | 13% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6050 days | 13% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6054 days | 13% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6069 days | 13% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6115 days | 14% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6137 days | 13% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6150 days | 13% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6177 days | 14% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6268 days | 14% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6269 days | 13% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6269 days | 14% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6270 days | 13% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6272 days | 10% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6284 days | 13% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6284 days | 14% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6286 days | 13% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6286 days | 13% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6291 days | 13% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6293 days | 13% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6294 days | 13% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6294 days | 13% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6299 days | 14% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6299 days | 13% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6299 days | 14% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6300 days | 13% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6302 days | 13% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6302 days | 13% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6304 days | 14% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6306 days | 13% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6309 days | 13% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6311 days | 13% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6313 days | 13% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6316 days | 14% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6318 days | 13% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6318 days | 13% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6325 days | 14% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6330 days | 13% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6331 days | 13% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6332 days | 14% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6332 days | 14% |
| John | 9/10 | 6337 days | 13% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6340 days | 13% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6341 days | 13% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6348 days | 13% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6349 days | 13% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6352 days | 13% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6354 days | 14% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6358 days | 13% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6371 days | 10% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6377 days | 14% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6381 days | 14% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6386 days | 14% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6386 days | 13% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6390 days | 14% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6396 days | 14% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6402 days | 14% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6406 days | 14% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6424 days | 13% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6433 days | 13% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6435 days | 13% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6441 days | 14% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6442 days | 14% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6450 days | 14% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6465 days | 14% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6465 days | 13% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6478 days | 13% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6486 days | 14% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6503 days | 13% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6516 days | 13% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6520 days | 13% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6640 days | 14% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6648 days | 14% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6651 days | 13% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6665 days | 13% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6680 days | 12% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6682 days | 13% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6687 days | 13% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6704 days | 14% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6743 days | 14% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6746 days | 13% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6749 days | 13% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6753 days | 13% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 7003 days | 14% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 7005 days | 13% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 7012 days | 14% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7033 days | 14% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7033 days | 14% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7034 days | 8% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7038 days | 8% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7045 days | 13% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7046 days | 13% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7046 days | 13% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.49% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 104 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.45% |
| 198 | -2.47% |
| 199 | -2.48% |
| 200 | -2.49% |
| 201 | -2.50% |
| 202 | -2.52% |
| 203 | -2.53% |
| … | … |
1.50% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.