Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1885 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2432 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3363 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3380 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3397 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3417 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3433 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3447 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3685 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3685 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3690 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3700 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3706 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3719 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3721 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3740 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3741 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3755 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3785 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3802 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4143 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4410 days | 12% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4413 days | 12% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4415 days | 11% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4415 days | 9% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4454 days | 12% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4469 days | 12% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4483 days | 12% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4776 days | 12% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4782 days | 12% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4782 days | 12% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4783 days | 4% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4811 days | 12% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4811 days | 12% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4814 days | 12% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4814 days | 12% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4815 days | 11% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4833 days | 12% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4866 days | 12% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4885 days | 12% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4896 days | 12% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4904 days | 12% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5139 days | 12% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5159 days | 12% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5167 days | 12% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5168 days | 12% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5168 days | 12% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5168 days | 12% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5172 days | 12% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5172 days | 12% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5172 days | 12% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5174 days | 12% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5178 days | 12% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5181 days | 12% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5182 days | 12% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5184 days | 12% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5186 days | 12% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5186 days | 12% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5189 days | 12% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5193 days | 12% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5196 days | 11% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5214 days | 11% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5232 days | 12% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5272 days | 12% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5275 days | 12% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5293 days | 12% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5496 days | 12% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5512 days | 12% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5520 days | 12% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5521 days | 12% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5523 days | 12% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5523 days | 12% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5525 days | 12% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5528 days | 12% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5532 days | 12% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5532 days | 12% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5535 days | 12% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5536 days | 12% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5539 days | 12% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5539 days | 12% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5543 days | 12% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5544 days | 12% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5545 days | 12% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5545 days | 12% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5551 days | 9% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5551 days | 12% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5552 days | 12% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5553 days | 11% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5553 days | 12% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5554 days | 11% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5556 days | 12% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5559 days | 12% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5561 days | 12% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5563 days | 12% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5563 days | 12% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5565 days | 12% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5628 days | 12% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5658 days | 12% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5689 days | 12% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5781 days | 12% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5837 days | 12% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5850 days | 12% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5872 days | 12% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5884 days | 12% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5885 days | 11% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5889 days | 12% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5890 days | 12% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5903 days | 12% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5904 days | 12% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5909 days | 12% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5913 days | 11% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5924 days | 12% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5931 days | 12% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5937 days | 11% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5940 days | 12% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5962 days | 7% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5962 days | 12% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5977 days | 12% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5977 days | 12% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5978 days | 12% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5981 days | 12% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5986 days | 12% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5991 days | 12% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5993 days | 12% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5993 days | 12% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5995 days | 12% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5997 days | 12% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 6001 days | 12% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 6001 days | 12% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 6004 days | 12% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 6005 days | 12% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 6019 days | 12% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6023 days | 12% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6038 days | 12% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6084 days | 12% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6106 days | 12% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6119 days | 12% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6146 days | 12% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6237 days | 12% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6238 days | 12% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6239 days | 12% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6239 days | 12% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6241 days | 9% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6253 days | 12% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6253 days | 12% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6255 days | 12% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6255 days | 12% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6261 days | 12% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6262 days | 12% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6263 days | 12% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6264 days | 12% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6268 days | 12% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6268 days | 12% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6269 days | 12% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6270 days | 12% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6271 days | 12% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6271 days | 12% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6274 days | 12% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6276 days | 12% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6278 days | 12% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6280 days | 12% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6282 days | 12% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6285 days | 12% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6288 days | 12% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6288 days | 12% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6294 days | 12% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6299 days | 12% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6301 days | 12% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6302 days | 12% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6302 days | 12% |
| John | 9/10 | 6306 days | 12% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6309 days | 12% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6310 days | 12% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6317 days | 12% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6318 days | 12% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6322 days | 12% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6323 days | 12% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6327 days | 12% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6340 days | 9% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6346 days | 12% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6350 days | 12% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6355 days | 12% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6356 days | 12% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6359 days | 12% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6365 days | 12% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6372 days | 12% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6376 days | 12% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6393 days | 12% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6402 days | 12% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6404 days | 12% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6411 days | 12% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6412 days | 12% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6419 days | 12% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6434 days | 12% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6435 days | 12% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6448 days | 12% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6456 days | 12% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6473 days | 12% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6485 days | 12% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6489 days | 12% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6609 days | 12% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6617 days | 12% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6620 days | 12% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6634 days | 12% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6649 days | 11% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6651 days | 12% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6656 days | 12% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6673 days | 12% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6712 days | 12% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6715 days | 12% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6718 days | 12% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6722 days | 12% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6972 days | 12% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6974 days | 12% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6981 days | 12% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 7002 days | 12% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 7002 days | 12% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 7003 days | 7% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 7007 days | 7% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 7014 days | 12% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 7015 days | 12% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 7015 days | 12% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.16% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 76 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.11% |
| 198 | -3.13% |
| 199 | -3.14% |
| 200 | -3.16% |
| 201 | -3.17% |
| 202 | -3.19% |
| 203 | -3.21% |
| … | … |
1.61% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.