Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1815 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2362 days | 79% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3293 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3310 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3327 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3347 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3363 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3377 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3615 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3615 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3620 days | 28% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3630 days | 26% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3636 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3649 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3651 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3669 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3671 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3685 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3715 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3732 days | 24% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4073 days | 11% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4384 days | 19% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4399 days | 19% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4413 days | 19% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4706 days | 19% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4712 days | 19% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4712 days | 19% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4713 days | 12% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4741 days | 19% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4741 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4744 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4744 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4745 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4763 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4796 days | 19% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4815 days | 19% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4826 days | 19% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4834 days | 19% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5069 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5089 days | 19% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5097 days | 19% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5098 days | 19% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5098 days | 19% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5098 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5102 days | 19% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5102 days | 19% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5102 days | 19% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5104 days | 19% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5108 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5111 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5112 days | 19% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5114 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5116 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5116 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5119 days | 19% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5123 days | 19% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5126 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5144 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5162 days | 19% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5202 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5205 days | 19% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5223 days | 19% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5426 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5442 days | 19% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5450 days | 19% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5451 days | 19% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5453 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5453 days | 19% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5455 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5458 days | 19% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5462 days | 19% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5462 days | 19% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5465 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5466 days | 19% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5469 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5469 days | 19% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5473 days | 19% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5474 days | 19% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5475 days | 19% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5475 days | 19% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5481 days | 16% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5481 days | 19% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5482 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5483 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5483 days | 19% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5484 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5486 days | 19% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5489 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5491 days | 19% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5493 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5493 days | 19% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5495 days | 19% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5558 days | 19% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5588 days | 19% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5619 days | 19% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5711 days | 19% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5767 days | 19% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5780 days | 19% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5802 days | 19% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5814 days | 19% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5815 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5819 days | 19% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5820 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5833 days | 19% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5834 days | 19% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5839 days | 19% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5843 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5854 days | 19% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5861 days | 19% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5867 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5870 days | 19% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5892 days | 14% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5892 days | 19% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5907 days | 19% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5907 days | 19% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5908 days | 19% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5911 days | 19% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5916 days | 19% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5921 days | 19% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5923 days | 19% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5923 days | 19% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5925 days | 19% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5927 days | 19% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5931 days | 19% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5931 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5934 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5935 days | 19% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5949 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5953 days | 19% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5968 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6014 days | 19% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6036 days | 19% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6049 days | 19% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6076 days | 19% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6167 days | 19% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6168 days | 19% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6168 days | 19% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6169 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6171 days | 16% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6183 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6183 days | 19% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6185 days | 19% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6185 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6190 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6192 days | 19% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6193 days | 19% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6193 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6198 days | 19% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6198 days | 19% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6198 days | 19% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6199 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6201 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6201 days | 19% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6203 days | 19% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6205 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6208 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6210 days | 19% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6212 days | 19% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6215 days | 19% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6217 days | 19% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6217 days | 19% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6224 days | 19% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6229 days | 19% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6230 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6231 days | 19% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6231 days | 19% |
| John | 9/10 | 6236 days | 19% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6239 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6240 days | 19% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6247 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6248 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6251 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6253 days | 19% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6257 days | 19% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6270 days | 16% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6276 days | 19% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6280 days | 19% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6285 days | 19% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6285 days | 19% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6289 days | 19% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6295 days | 19% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6301 days | 19% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6305 days | 19% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6323 days | 19% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6332 days | 19% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6334 days | 19% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6340 days | 19% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6341 days | 19% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6349 days | 19% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6364 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6364 days | 19% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6377 days | 19% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6385 days | 19% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6402 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6415 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6419 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6539 days | 19% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6547 days | 19% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6550 days | 19% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6564 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6579 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6581 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6586 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6603 days | 19% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6642 days | 19% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6645 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6648 days | 19% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6652 days | 19% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6902 days | 19% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6904 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6911 days | 19% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6932 days | 19% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6932 days | 19% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6933 days | 14% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6937 days | 14% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6944 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6945 days | 19% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6945 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.09% |
| 198 | -4.11% |
| 199 | -4.13% |
| 200 | -4.15% |
| 201 | -4.17% |
| 202 | -4.19% |
| 203 | -4.21% |
| … | … |
1.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.