Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1776 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2322 days | 78% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3254 days | 43% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3271 days | 41% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3288 days | 41% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3308 days | 40% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3324 days | 40% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3338 days | 40% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3576 days | 30% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3576 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3581 days | 30% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3591 days | 28% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3597 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3610 days | 29% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3612 days | 27% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3630 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3632 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3646 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3676 days | 26% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3693 days | 26% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4034 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4301 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4304 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4306 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4306 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4345 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4360 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4667 days | 19% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4673 days | 19% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4673 days | 19% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4674 days | 13% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4702 days | 19% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4702 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4705 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4705 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4706 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4724 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4757 days | 19% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4776 days | 19% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4787 days | 19% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4795 days | 19% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5029 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5050 days | 19% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5058 days | 19% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5059 days | 19% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5059 days | 19% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5059 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5063 days | 19% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5063 days | 19% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5063 days | 19% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5065 days | 19% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5069 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5072 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5073 days | 19% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5075 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5077 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5077 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5080 days | 19% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5084 days | 19% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5087 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5105 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5123 days | 19% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5163 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5166 days | 19% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5184 days | 19% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5386 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5403 days | 19% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5411 days | 19% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5412 days | 19% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5414 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5414 days | 19% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5416 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5419 days | 19% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5423 days | 19% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5423 days | 19% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5426 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5427 days | 19% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5430 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5430 days | 19% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5434 days | 19% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5435 days | 19% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5436 days | 19% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5436 days | 19% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5442 days | 17% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5442 days | 19% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5443 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5444 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5444 days | 19% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5445 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5447 days | 19% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5450 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5452 days | 19% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5454 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5454 days | 19% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5456 days | 19% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5519 days | 19% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5549 days | 19% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5580 days | 19% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5671 days | 19% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5727 days | 19% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5740 days | 19% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5763 days | 19% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5775 days | 19% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5776 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5780 days | 19% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5781 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5794 days | 19% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5795 days | 19% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5800 days | 19% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5804 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5815 days | 19% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5822 days | 19% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5828 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5831 days | 19% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5853 days | 15% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5853 days | 19% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5868 days | 19% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5868 days | 19% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5869 days | 19% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5872 days | 19% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5877 days | 19% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5882 days | 19% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5884 days | 19% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5884 days | 19% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5886 days | 19% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5888 days | 19% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5892 days | 19% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5892 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5895 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5896 days | 19% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5910 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5914 days | 19% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5929 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5974 days | 19% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5996 days | 19% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6009 days | 19% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6036 days | 19% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6128 days | 19% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6128 days | 19% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6129 days | 19% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6130 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6132 days | 17% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6144 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6144 days | 19% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6146 days | 19% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6146 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6151 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6153 days | 19% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6154 days | 19% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6154 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6159 days | 19% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6159 days | 19% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6159 days | 19% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6160 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6162 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6162 days | 19% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6164 days | 19% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6166 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6169 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6171 days | 19% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6173 days | 19% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6176 days | 19% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6178 days | 19% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6178 days | 19% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6185 days | 19% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6190 days | 19% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6191 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6192 days | 19% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6192 days | 19% |
| John | 9/10 | 6197 days | 19% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6200 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6201 days | 19% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6208 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6209 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6212 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6214 days | 19% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6218 days | 19% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6231 days | 17% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6236 days | 19% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6241 days | 19% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6246 days | 19% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6246 days | 19% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6250 days | 19% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6256 days | 19% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6262 days | 19% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6266 days | 19% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6284 days | 19% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6292 days | 19% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6294 days | 19% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6301 days | 19% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6302 days | 19% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6310 days | 19% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6325 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6325 days | 19% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6338 days | 19% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6346 days | 19% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6363 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6376 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6380 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6500 days | 19% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6508 days | 19% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6511 days | 19% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6525 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6540 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6542 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6547 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6564 days | 19% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6603 days | 19% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6606 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6609 days | 19% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6613 days | 19% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6862 days | 19% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6864 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6871 days | 19% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6893 days | 19% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6893 days | 19% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6894 days | 15% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6898 days | 15% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6905 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6906 days | 19% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6906 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.