Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.05%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1373 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 1920 days | 29% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2851 days | 18% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 2868 days | 17% |
Monique | 10/10 | 2885 days | 17% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 2905 days | 17% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 2921 days | 17% |
Danny | 10/10 | 2935 days | 17% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3173 days | 14% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3173 days | 14% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3178 days | 14% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3188 days | 13% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3194 days | 14% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3207 days | 14% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3209 days | 13% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3228 days | 13% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3229 days | 13% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3243 days | 13% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3273 days | 13% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3290 days | 13% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3631 days | 9% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 3898 days | 5% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 3901 days | 5% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 3903 days | 5% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 3903 days | 5% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 3942 days | 5% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 3957 days | 5% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 3971 days | 5% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4264 days | 1% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4270 days | 1% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4270 days | 1% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4271 days | 1% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4299 days | 1% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4299 days | 1% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4302 days | 1% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4302 days | 1% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4303 days | 1% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4321 days | 1% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4384 days | 6% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4392 days | 6% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4627 days | 6% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4647 days | 6% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4655 days | 6% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4656 days | 6% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4656 days | 6% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4656 days | 6% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4662 days | 6% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4666 days | 6% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4669 days | 6% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4670 days | 6% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4672 days | 6% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4674 days | 6% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4674 days | 6% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4677 days | 6% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4681 days | 6% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4684 days | 6% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4702 days | 6% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4720 days | 6% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4760 days | 6% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4763 days | 6% |
jule | 10/10 | 4781 days | 6% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 4984 days | 6% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 5000 days | 6% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5008 days | 6% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5009 days | 6% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5011 days | 6% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5011 days | 6% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 5013 days | 6% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5016 days | 6% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5020 days | 6% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5020 days | 6% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5023 days | 6% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5024 days | 6% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5027 days | 6% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5027 days | 6% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5031 days | 6% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5032 days | 6% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5033 days | 6% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5033 days | 6% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5039 days | 5% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5039 days | 6% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5040 days | 6% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5041 days | 6% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5041 days | 6% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5042 days | 6% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5044 days | 6% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5047 days | 6% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5049 days | 6% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5051 days | 6% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5051 days | 6% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5053 days | 6% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5116 days | 6% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5146 days | 6% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5177 days | 6% |
penz | 9/10 | 5269 days | 6% |
koster | 9/10 | 5325 days | 6% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5338 days | 6% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5360 days | 6% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5372 days | 6% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5373 days | 6% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5377 days | 6% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5378 days | 6% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5391 days | 6% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5392 days | 6% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5397 days | 6% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5401 days | 6% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5412 days | 6% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5419 days | 6% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5425 days | 6% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5428 days | 6% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5450 days | 4% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5450 days | 6% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5465 days | 6% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5465 days | 6% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5466 days | 6% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5469 days | 6% |
martint | 10/10 | 5474 days | 6% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5479 days | 6% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5481 days | 6% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5483 days | 6% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5485 days | 6% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5489 days | 6% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5489 days | 6% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5492 days | 6% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5493 days | 6% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5507 days | 6% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5511 days | 6% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5526 days | 6% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5572 days | 6% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5594 days | 6% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5607 days | 6% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5634 days | 6% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5725 days | 6% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5726 days | 6% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5727 days | 6% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5727 days | 6% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5729 days | 5% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5741 days | 6% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5741 days | 6% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5743 days | 6% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5743 days | 6% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5749 days | 6% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5750 days | 6% |
robix | 9/10 | 5751 days | 6% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5752 days | 6% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5756 days | 6% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5756 days | 6% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5757 days | 6% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5758 days | 6% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5759 days | 6% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5759 days | 6% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5764 days | 6% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5766 days | 6% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5768 days | 6% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5770 days | 6% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5773 days | 6% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5776 days | 6% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5776 days | 6% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5782 days | 6% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5787 days | 6% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5789 days | 6% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5790 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5790 days | 6% |
John | 9/10 | 5794 days | 6% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5797 days | 6% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5798 days | 6% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5805 days | 6% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5806 days | 6% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5810 days | 6% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5811 days | 6% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5815 days | 6% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5828 days | 5% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5834 days | 6% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5838 days | 6% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5843 days | 6% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5844 days | 6% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5847 days | 6% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 5853 days | 6% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5860 days | 6% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 5864 days | 6% |
angusb | 9/10 | 5881 days | 6% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 5890 days | 6% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 5892 days | 6% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 5899 days | 6% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 5900 days | 6% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 5907 days | 6% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5922 days | 6% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 5923 days | 6% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 5936 days | 6% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 5944 days | 6% |
Gray | 9/10 | 5961 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5974 days | 6% |
Christine | 8/10 | 5977 days | 6% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6097 days | 6% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6105 days | 6% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6108 days | 6% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6122 days | 6% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6137 days | 6% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6139 days | 6% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6144 days | 6% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6161 days | 6% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6200 days | 6% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6203 days | 6% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6206 days | 6% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6210 days | 6% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6460 days | 6% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6462 days | 6% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6469 days | 6% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6490 days | 6% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6490 days | 6% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6491 days | 4% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6495 days | 4% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6502 days | 6% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6503 days | 6% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6503 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.01% |
198 | -4.03% |
199 | -4.05% |
200 | -4.07% |
201 | -4.09% |
202 | -4.11% |
203 | -4.13% |
… | … |
1.64% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.