Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1836 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2383 days | 78% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3314 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3331 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3348 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3368 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3384 days | 38% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3398 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3636 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3636 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3641 days | 28% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3651 days | 26% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3657 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3670 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3672 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3691 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3692 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3706 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3736 days | 24% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3753 days | 24% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4094 days | 11% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4405 days | 20% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4420 days | 20% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4434 days | 19% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4727 days | 20% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4733 days | 20% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4733 days | 20% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4734 days | 13% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4762 days | 20% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4762 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4765 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4765 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4766 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4784 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4817 days | 20% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4836 days | 20% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4847 days | 20% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4855 days | 20% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5090 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5110 days | 20% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5118 days | 20% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5119 days | 20% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5119 days | 20% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5119 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5123 days | 20% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5123 days | 20% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5123 days | 20% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5125 days | 20% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5129 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5132 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5133 days | 20% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5135 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5137 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5137 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5140 days | 20% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5144 days | 20% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5147 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5165 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5183 days | 20% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5223 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5226 days | 20% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5244 days | 20% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5447 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5463 days | 20% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5471 days | 20% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5472 days | 20% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5474 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5474 days | 20% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5476 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5479 days | 20% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5483 days | 20% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5483 days | 20% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5486 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5487 days | 20% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5490 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5490 days | 20% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5494 days | 20% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5495 days | 20% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5496 days | 20% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5496 days | 20% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5502 days | 17% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5502 days | 20% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5503 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5504 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5504 days | 20% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5505 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5507 days | 20% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5510 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5512 days | 20% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5514 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5514 days | 20% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5516 days | 20% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5579 days | 20% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5609 days | 20% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5640 days | 20% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5732 days | 20% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5788 days | 20% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5801 days | 20% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5823 days | 20% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5835 days | 20% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5836 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5840 days | 20% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5841 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5854 days | 20% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5855 days | 20% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5860 days | 20% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5864 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5875 days | 20% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5882 days | 20% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5888 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5891 days | 20% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5913 days | 15% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5913 days | 20% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5928 days | 20% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5928 days | 20% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5929 days | 20% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5932 days | 20% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5937 days | 20% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5942 days | 20% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5944 days | 20% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5944 days | 20% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5946 days | 20% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5948 days | 20% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5952 days | 20% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5952 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5955 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5956 days | 20% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5970 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5974 days | 20% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5989 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6035 days | 20% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6057 days | 20% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6070 days | 20% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6097 days | 20% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6188 days | 20% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6189 days | 20% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6190 days | 20% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6190 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6192 days | 17% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6204 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6204 days | 20% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6206 days | 20% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6206 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6211 days | 20% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6213 days | 20% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6214 days | 20% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6214 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6219 days | 20% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6219 days | 20% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6219 days | 20% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6220 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6222 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6222 days | 20% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6224 days | 20% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6227 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6229 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6231 days | 20% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6233 days | 20% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6236 days | 20% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6239 days | 20% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6239 days | 20% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6245 days | 20% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6250 days | 20% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6252 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6253 days | 20% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6253 days | 20% |
| John | 9/10 | 6257 days | 20% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6260 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6261 days | 20% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6268 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6269 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6273 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6274 days | 20% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6278 days | 20% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6291 days | 17% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6297 days | 20% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6301 days | 20% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6306 days | 20% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6307 days | 20% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6310 days | 20% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6316 days | 20% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6322 days | 20% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6326 days | 20% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6344 days | 20% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6353 days | 20% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6355 days | 20% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6362 days | 20% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6363 days | 20% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6370 days | 20% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6385 days | 20% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6386 days | 20% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6399 days | 20% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6406 days | 20% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6424 days | 20% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6436 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6440 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6560 days | 20% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6568 days | 20% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6571 days | 20% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6585 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6600 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6602 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6607 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6624 days | 20% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6663 days | 20% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6666 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6669 days | 20% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6673 days | 20% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6923 days | 20% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6925 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6932 days | 20% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6953 days | 20% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6953 days | 20% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6954 days | 15% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6958 days | 15% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6965 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6966 days | 20% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6966 days | 20% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.97% |
| 198 | -3.99% |
| 199 | -4.01% |
| 200 | -4.03% |
| 201 | -4.05% |
| 202 | -4.07% |
| 203 | -4.09% |
| … | … |
1.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.