Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1521 days | 100% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2068 days | 41% |
Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 2999 days | 23% |
Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3016 days | 22% |
Monique | 10/10 | 3033 days | 22% |
Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3053 days | 21% |
Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3069 days | 21% |
Danny | 10/10 | 3083 days | 21% |
Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3321 days | 16% |
Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3321 days | 16% |
Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3326 days | 16% |
Navina | 7/10 | 3336 days | 14% |
Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3342 days | 15% |
Alex | 10/10 | 3355 days | 15% |
Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3357 days | 14% |
Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3376 days | 15% |
Dorothy | 10/10 | 3377 days | 15% |
Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3391 days | 14% |
Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3421 days | 14% |
KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3438 days | 14% |
Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3779 days | 7% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4046 days | 1% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 4049 days | 1% |
Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
Ennico | 10/10 | 4090 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4105 days | 0% |
Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4412 days | 5% |
Rainer | 9/10 | 4418 days | 5% |
Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4418 days | 5% |
Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4419 days | 2% |
Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4447 days | 5% |
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4447 days | 5% |
Raquel | 8/10 | 4450 days | 5% |
Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4450 days | 5% |
Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4451 days | 4% |
Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4469 days | 5% |
Matthew H | 10/10 | 4502 days | 5% |
M Natterser | 9/10 | 4521 days | 5% |
Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4532 days | 5% |
Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4540 days | 5% |
Anna | 8/10 | 4775 days | 5% |
Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 4795 days | 5% |
Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 4803 days | 5% |
Richard Rite | 10/10 | 4804 days | 5% |
Alex Ross | 10/10 | 4804 days | 5% |
Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 4804 days | 5% |
sidcupjon | 9/10 | 4808 days | 5% |
kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 4808 days | 5% |
Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 4808 days | 5% |
Erik | 10/10 | 4810 days | 5% |
Brasier | 8/10 | 4814 days | 5% |
Harald | 8/10 | 4817 days | 5% |
Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 4818 days | 5% |
Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 4820 days | 5% |
Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 4822 days | 5% |
Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 4822 days | 5% |
Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 4825 days | 5% |
John Hughes | 9/10 | 4829 days | 5% |
Louis Smit | 7/10 | 4832 days | 4% |
Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 4850 days | 4% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4868 days | 5% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 4908 days | 5% |
Josh | 9/10 | 4911 days | 5% |
jule | 10/10 | 4929 days | 5% |
Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5132 days | 5% |
David Taylor | 9/10 | 5148 days | 5% |
Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5156 days | 5% |
Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5157 days | 5% |
Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5159 days | 5% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5159 days | 5% |
Jacob | 8/10 | 5161 days | 5% |
Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5164 days | 5% |
Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5168 days | 5% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5168 days | 5% |
Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5171 days | 5% |
E C Frans | 10/10 | 5172 days | 5% |
Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5175 days | 5% |
Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5175 days | 5% |
Cesar | 9/10 | 5179 days | 5% |
Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5180 days | 5% |
Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5181 days | 5% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5181 days | 5% |
Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5187 days | 4% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5187 days | 5% |
John Brand | 8/10 | 5188 days | 5% |
Andy | 7/10 | 5189 days | 4% |
Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5189 days | 5% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5190 days | 4% |
Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5192 days | 5% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5195 days | 5% |
Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5197 days | 5% |
Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5199 days | 5% |
Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5199 days | 5% |
Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5201 days | 5% |
mmallen | 10/10 | 5264 days | 5% |
alku83 | 10/10 | 5294 days | 5% |
KAA | 10/10 | 5325 days | 5% |
penz | 9/10 | 5417 days | 5% |
koster | 9/10 | 5473 days | 5% |
BelindaT | 10/10 | 5486 days | 5% |
nuwee | 10/10 | 5508 days | 5% |
Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5520 days | 5% |
Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5521 days | 4% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5525 days | 5% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5526 days | 5% |
hughesW | 9/10 | 5539 days | 5% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5540 days | 5% |
Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5545 days | 5% |
M Sicard | 7/10 | 5549 days | 4% |
John Helle | 9/10 | 5560 days | 5% |
Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5567 days | 5% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5573 days | 4% |
Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5576 days | 5% |
Arran J | 5/10 | 5598 days | 3% |
Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5598 days | 5% |
csziegler | 10/10 | 5613 days | 5% |
katharinatum | 9/10 | 5613 days | 5% |
marcol | 9/10 | 5614 days | 5% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5617 days | 5% |
martint | 10/10 | 5622 days | 5% |
koellner | 9/10 | 5627 days | 5% |
The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5629 days | 5% |
alasiac | 10/10 | 5629 days | 5% |
Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5631 days | 5% |
kencook | 10/10 | 5633 days | 5% |
Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5637 days | 5% |
Deede K | 8/10 | 5637 days | 5% |
Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5640 days | 5% |
Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5641 days | 5% |
Tillener | 8/10 | 5655 days | 5% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5659 days | 5% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5674 days | 5% |
waters811 | 10/10 | 5720 days | 5% |
alanvn | 9/10 | 5742 days | 5% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5755 days | 5% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5782 days | 5% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5873 days | 5% |
Sally477 | 9/10 | 5874 days | 5% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5875 days | 5% |
KjellR | 8/10 | 5876 days | 5% |
Ronny | 6/10 | 5877 days | 4% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5889 days | 5% |
MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 5889 days | 5% |
NatasjaV | 9/10 | 5891 days | 5% |
JimmyK | 8/10 | 5891 days | 5% |
Joery | 9/10 | 5897 days | 5% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 5899 days | 5% |
robix | 9/10 | 5899 days | 5% |
Lynn White | 8/10 | 5900 days | 5% |
Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 5904 days | 5% |
amyd | 9/10 | 5904 days | 5% |
Tolsten | 10/10 | 5905 days | 5% |
Kelly | 8/10 | 5906 days | 5% |
Steven | 8/10 | 5907 days | 5% |
CarleyJ | 9/10 | 5907 days | 5% |
Sabine | 10/10 | 5910 days | 5% |
Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 5912 days | 5% |
henriettalee | 8/10 | 5915 days | 5% |
IreneF | 9/10 | 5916 days | 5% |
FeliciaY | 9/10 | 5918 days | 5% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 5922 days | 5% |
Carly | 9/10 | 5924 days | 5% |
Conway | 9/10 | 5924 days | 5% |
niall stephenson | 10/10 | 5930 days | 5% |
Camilia | 9/10 | 5935 days | 5% |
De Kievit | 8/10 | 5937 days | 5% |
Klalis | 10/10 | 5938 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5938 days | 5% |
John | 9/10 | 5943 days | 5% |
Foost | 8/10 | 5945 days | 5% |
Rosa | 9/10 | 5947 days | 5% |
LeaciaS | 8/10 | 5953 days | 5% |
PhillS | 8/10 | 5954 days | 5% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 5958 days | 5% |
Ofer | 10/10 | 5960 days | 5% |
BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 5963 days | 5% |
JulianeH | 6/10 | 5976 days | 4% |
Priyanka | 10/10 | 5982 days | 5% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 5987 days | 5% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5992 days | 5% |
Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 5992 days | 5% |
Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 5996 days | 5% |
Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6001 days | 5% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 6008 days | 5% |
Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6012 days | 5% |
angusb | 9/10 | 6029 days | 5% |
Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6038 days | 5% |
Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6040 days | 5% |
Jessie | 10/10 | 6047 days | 5% |
Emilie | 10/10 | 6048 days | 5% |
HollyB | 10/10 | 6055 days | 5% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6071 days | 5% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 6071 days | 5% |
Michaela | 9/10 | 6084 days | 5% |
Katerina | 10/10 | 6092 days | 5% |
Gray | 9/10 | 6109 days | 5% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6122 days | 5% |
Christine | 8/10 | 6125 days | 5% |
Toby | 10/10 | 6245 days | 5% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 6253 days | 5% |
Stewart | 9/10 | 6256 days | 5% |
Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6270 days | 5% |
Jody | 7/10 | 6285 days | 4% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6287 days | 5% |
Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6292 days | 5% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 6309 days | 5% |
Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6348 days | 5% |
Lena | 8/10 | 6351 days | 5% |
Edwin | 9/10 | 6354 days | 5% |
caroline | 9/10 | 6358 days | 5% |
Stevenson | 10/10 | 6608 days | 5% |
Anita | 8/10 | 6610 days | 5% |
Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6617 days | 5% |
Berke | 10/10 | 6638 days | 5% |
Madeleine | 10/10 | 6638 days | 5% |
Rogier | 5/10 | 6639 days | 3% |
Wendy | 5/10 | 6643 days | 3% |
Sonja | 8/10 | 6650 days | 5% |
Hennielene | 9/10 | 6651 days | 5% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6651 days | 5% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.14% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 77 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.09% |
198 | -3.10% |
199 | -3.12% |
200 | -3.14% |
201 | -3.15% |
202 | -3.17% |
203 | -3.18% |
… | … |
1.55% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.