G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1816 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2363 days | 79% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3294 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3311 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3328 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3348 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3364 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3378 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3616 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3616 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3621 days | 28% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3631 days | 26% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3637 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3650 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3652 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3671 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3672 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3686 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3716 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3733 days | 24% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4074 days | 11% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4385 days | 19% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4400 days | 19% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4414 days | 19% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4707 days | 19% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4713 days | 19% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4713 days | 19% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4714 days | 12% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4742 days | 19% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4742 days | 19% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4745 days | 19% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4745 days | 19% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4746 days | 18% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4764 days | 19% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4797 days | 19% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4816 days | 19% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4827 days | 19% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4835 days | 19% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5070 days | 19% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5090 days | 19% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5098 days | 19% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5099 days | 19% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5099 days | 19% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5099 days | 19% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5103 days | 19% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5103 days | 19% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5103 days | 19% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5105 days | 19% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5109 days | 19% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5112 days | 19% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5113 days | 19% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5115 days | 19% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5117 days | 19% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5117 days | 19% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5120 days | 19% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5124 days | 19% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5127 days | 18% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5145 days | 18% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5163 days | 19% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5203 days | 19% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5206 days | 19% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5224 days | 19% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5427 days | 19% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5443 days | 19% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5451 days | 19% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5452 days | 19% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5454 days | 19% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5454 days | 19% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5456 days | 19% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5459 days | 19% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5463 days | 19% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5463 days | 19% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5466 days | 19% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5467 days | 19% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5470 days | 19% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5470 days | 19% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5474 days | 19% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5475 days | 19% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5476 days | 19% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5476 days | 19% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5482 days | 16% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5482 days | 19% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5483 days | 19% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5484 days | 18% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5484 days | 19% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5485 days | 18% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5487 days | 19% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5490 days | 19% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5492 days | 19% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5494 days | 19% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5494 days | 19% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5496 days | 19% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5559 days | 19% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5589 days | 19% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5620 days | 19% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5712 days | 19% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5768 days | 19% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5781 days | 19% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5803 days | 19% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5815 days | 19% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5816 days | 18% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5820 days | 19% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5821 days | 19% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5834 days | 19% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5835 days | 19% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5840 days | 19% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5844 days | 18% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5855 days | 19% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5862 days | 19% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5868 days | 18% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5871 days | 19% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5893 days | 14% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5893 days | 19% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5908 days | 19% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5908 days | 19% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5909 days | 19% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5912 days | 19% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5917 days | 19% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5922 days | 19% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5924 days | 19% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5924 days | 19% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5926 days | 19% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5928 days | 19% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5932 days | 19% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5932 days | 19% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5935 days | 19% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5936 days | 19% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5950 days | 19% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5954 days | 19% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5969 days | 19% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6015 days | 19% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6037 days | 19% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6050 days | 19% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6077 days | 19% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6168 days | 19% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6169 days | 19% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6170 days | 19% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6170 days | 19% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6172 days | 16% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6184 days | 19% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6184 days | 19% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6186 days | 19% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6186 days | 19% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6192 days | 19% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6193 days | 19% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6194 days | 19% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6195 days | 19% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6199 days | 19% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6199 days | 19% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6200 days | 19% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6201 days | 19% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6202 days | 19% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6202 days | 19% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6205 days | 19% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6207 days | 19% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6209 days | 19% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6211 days | 19% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6213 days | 19% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6216 days | 19% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6219 days | 19% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6219 days | 19% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6225 days | 19% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6230 days | 19% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6232 days | 19% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6233 days | 19% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6233 days | 19% |
| John | 9/10 | 6237 days | 19% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6240 days | 19% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6241 days | 19% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6248 days | 19% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6249 days | 19% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6253 days | 19% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6254 days | 19% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6258 days | 19% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6271 days | 16% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6277 days | 19% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6281 days | 19% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6286 days | 19% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6287 days | 19% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6290 days | 19% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6296 days | 19% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6303 days | 19% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6307 days | 19% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6324 days | 19% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6333 days | 19% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6335 days | 19% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6342 days | 19% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6343 days | 19% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6350 days | 19% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6365 days | 19% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6366 days | 19% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6379 days | 19% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6387 days | 19% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6404 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6416 days | 19% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6420 days | 19% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6540 days | 19% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6548 days | 19% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6551 days | 19% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6565 days | 19% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6580 days | 18% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6582 days | 19% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6587 days | 19% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6604 days | 19% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6643 days | 19% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6646 days | 19% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6649 days | 19% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6653 days | 19% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6903 days | 19% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6905 days | 19% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6912 days | 19% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6933 days | 19% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6933 days | 19% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6934 days | 14% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6938 days | 14% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6945 days | 19% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6946 days | 19% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6946 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.08% |
| 198 | -4.10% |
| 199 | -4.13% |
| 200 | -4.15% |
| 201 | -4.17% |
| 202 | -4.19% |
| 203 | -4.21% |
| … | … |
1.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.