G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1755 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2302 days | 77% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3233 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3250 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3267 days | 41% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3287 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3303 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3317 days | 39% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3555 days | 30% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3555 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3560 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3570 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3576 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3589 days | 29% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3591 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3609 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3611 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3625 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3655 days | 26% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3672 days | 26% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4013 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4280 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4283 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4285 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4285 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4339 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4646 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4652 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4652 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4653 days | 12% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4681 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4681 days | 18% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4684 days | 18% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4684 days | 18% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4685 days | 17% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4703 days | 18% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4736 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4755 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4766 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4774 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5009 days | 18% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5029 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5037 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5038 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5038 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5038 days | 18% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5042 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5042 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5042 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5044 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5048 days | 18% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5051 days | 18% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5052 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5054 days | 18% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5056 days | 18% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5056 days | 18% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5059 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5063 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5066 days | 17% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5084 days | 17% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5102 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5142 days | 18% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5145 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5163 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5366 days | 18% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5382 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5390 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5391 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5393 days | 18% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5393 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5395 days | 18% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5398 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5402 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5402 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5405 days | 18% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5406 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5409 days | 18% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5409 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5413 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5414 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5415 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5415 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5421 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5421 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5422 days | 18% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5423 days | 17% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5423 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5424 days | 17% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5426 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5429 days | 18% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5431 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5433 days | 18% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5433 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5435 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5498 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5528 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5559 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5651 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5707 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5720 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5742 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5754 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5755 days | 17% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5759 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5760 days | 18% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5773 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5774 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5779 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5783 days | 17% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5794 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5801 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5807 days | 17% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5810 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5832 days | 14% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5832 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5847 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5847 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5848 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5851 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5856 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5861 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5863 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5863 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5865 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5867 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5871 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5871 days | 18% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5874 days | 18% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5875 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5889 days | 18% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5893 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5908 days | 18% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5954 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5976 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5989 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6016 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6107 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6107 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6108 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6109 days | 18% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6111 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6123 days | 18% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6123 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6130 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6132 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6139 days | 18% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6141 days | 18% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6141 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6143 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6145 days | 18% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6148 days | 18% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6150 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6155 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6157 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6157 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6164 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6169 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6170 days | 18% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6171 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6171 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6176 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6179 days | 18% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6180 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6187 days | 18% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6188 days | 18% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6191 days | 18% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6193 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6197 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6210 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6216 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6220 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6225 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6225 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6229 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6235 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6241 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6245 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6263 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6271 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6273 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6280 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6281 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6289 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6304 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6304 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6317 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6325 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6342 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6355 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6359 days | 18% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6479 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6487 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6490 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6504 days | 18% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6519 days | 17% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6521 days | 18% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6526 days | 18% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6543 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6582 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6585 days | 18% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6588 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6592 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6842 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6844 days | 18% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6851 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6872 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6872 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6873 days | 14% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6877 days | 14% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6884 days | 18% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6885 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6885 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.98% |
| 198 | -4.00% |
| 199 | -4.02% |
| 200 | -4.04% |
| 201 | -4.06% |
| 202 | -4.08% |
| 203 | -4.10% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.