G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1857 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2403 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3335 days | 35% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3352 days | 33% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3369 days | 33% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3389 days | 31% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3405 days | 31% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3419 days | 31% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3657 days | 20% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3657 days | 20% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3662 days | 20% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3672 days | 18% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3678 days | 19% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3691 days | 19% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3693 days | 17% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3711 days | 18% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3713 days | 18% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3727 days | 17% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3757 days | 15% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3774 days | 15% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4115 days | 0% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4382 days | 11% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4385 days | 11% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4387 days | 9% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4387 days | 8% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4426 days | 11% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4441 days | 11% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4455 days | 11% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4748 days | 11% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4754 days | 11% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4754 days | 11% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4755 days | 3% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4783 days | 11% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4783 days | 11% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4786 days | 11% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4786 days | 11% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4787 days | 9% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4805 days | 11% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4838 days | 11% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4857 days | 11% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4868 days | 11% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4876 days | 11% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5110 days | 11% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5131 days | 11% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5139 days | 11% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5140 days | 11% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5140 days | 11% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5140 days | 11% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5144 days | 11% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5144 days | 11% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5144 days | 11% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5146 days | 11% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5150 days | 11% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5153 days | 11% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5154 days | 11% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5156 days | 11% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5158 days | 11% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5158 days | 11% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5161 days | 11% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5165 days | 11% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5168 days | 9% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5186 days | 9% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5204 days | 11% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5244 days | 11% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5247 days | 11% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5265 days | 11% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5467 days | 11% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5484 days | 11% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5492 days | 11% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5493 days | 11% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5495 days | 11% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5495 days | 11% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5497 days | 11% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5500 days | 11% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5504 days | 11% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5504 days | 11% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5507 days | 11% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5508 days | 11% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5511 days | 11% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5511 days | 11% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5515 days | 11% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5516 days | 11% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5517 days | 11% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5517 days | 11% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5523 days | 8% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5523 days | 11% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5524 days | 11% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5525 days | 9% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5525 days | 11% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5526 days | 9% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5528 days | 11% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5531 days | 11% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5533 days | 11% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5535 days | 11% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5535 days | 11% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5537 days | 11% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5600 days | 11% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5630 days | 11% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5661 days | 11% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5752 days | 11% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5808 days | 11% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5821 days | 11% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5844 days | 11% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5856 days | 11% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5857 days | 9% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5861 days | 11% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5862 days | 11% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5875 days | 11% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5876 days | 11% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5881 days | 11% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5885 days | 9% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5896 days | 11% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5903 days | 11% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5909 days | 9% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5912 days | 11% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5934 days | 6% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5934 days | 11% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5949 days | 11% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5949 days | 11% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5950 days | 11% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5953 days | 11% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5958 days | 11% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5963 days | 11% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5965 days | 11% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5965 days | 11% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5967 days | 11% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5969 days | 11% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5973 days | 11% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5973 days | 11% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5976 days | 11% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5977 days | 11% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5991 days | 11% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5995 days | 11% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 6010 days | 11% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 6055 days | 11% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 6077 days | 11% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 6090 days | 11% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6117 days | 11% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6209 days | 11% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6209 days | 11% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6210 days | 11% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6211 days | 11% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6213 days | 8% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6225 days | 11% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6225 days | 11% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6227 days | 11% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6227 days | 11% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6232 days | 11% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6234 days | 11% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6235 days | 11% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6235 days | 11% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6240 days | 11% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6240 days | 11% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6240 days | 11% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6241 days | 11% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6243 days | 11% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6243 days | 11% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6245 days | 11% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6247 days | 11% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6250 days | 11% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6252 days | 11% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6254 days | 11% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6257 days | 11% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6259 days | 11% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6259 days | 11% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6266 days | 11% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6271 days | 11% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6272 days | 11% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6273 days | 11% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6273 days | 11% |
| John | 9/10 | 6278 days | 11% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6281 days | 11% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6282 days | 11% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6289 days | 11% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6290 days | 11% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6293 days | 11% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6295 days | 11% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6299 days | 11% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6312 days | 8% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6317 days | 11% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6322 days | 11% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6327 days | 11% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6327 days | 11% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6331 days | 11% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6337 days | 11% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6343 days | 11% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6347 days | 11% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6365 days | 11% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6373 days | 11% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6375 days | 11% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6382 days | 11% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6383 days | 11% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6391 days | 11% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6406 days | 11% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6406 days | 11% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6419 days | 11% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6427 days | 11% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6444 days | 11% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6457 days | 11% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6461 days | 11% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6581 days | 11% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6589 days | 11% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6592 days | 11% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6606 days | 11% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6621 days | 9% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6623 days | 11% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6628 days | 11% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6645 days | 11% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6684 days | 11% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6687 days | 11% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6690 days | 11% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6694 days | 11% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6943 days | 11% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6945 days | 11% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6952 days | 11% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6974 days | 11% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6974 days | 11% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6975 days | 6% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6979 days | 6% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6986 days | 11% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6987 days | 11% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6987 days | 11% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.74% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.68% |
| 198 | -3.70% |
| 199 | -3.72% |
| 200 | -3.74% |
| 201 | -3.76% |
| 202 | -3.77% |
| 203 | -3.79% |
| … | … |
1.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.