Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1749 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2296 days | 76% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3227 days | 42% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3244 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3261 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3281 days | 39% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3297 days | 39% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3311 days | 39% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3549 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3549 days | 30% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3554 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3564 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3570 days | 29% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3583 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3585 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3604 days | 28% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3605 days | 28% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3619 days | 27% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3649 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3666 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 4007 days | 13% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4274 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4277 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4279 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4279 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4318 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4333 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4640 days | 18% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4646 days | 18% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4646 days | 18% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4647 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4675 days | 18% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4675 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4678 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4678 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4679 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4697 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4730 days | 18% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4749 days | 18% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4760 days | 18% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4768 days | 18% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 5003 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5023 days | 18% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5031 days | 18% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5032 days | 18% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5032 days | 18% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5032 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5036 days | 18% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5038 days | 18% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5042 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5045 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5046 days | 18% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5048 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5050 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5050 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5053 days | 18% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5057 days | 18% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5060 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5078 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5096 days | 18% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5136 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5139 days | 18% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5157 days | 18% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5360 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5376 days | 18% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5384 days | 18% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5385 days | 18% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5387 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5387 days | 18% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5389 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5392 days | 18% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5396 days | 18% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5396 days | 18% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5399 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5400 days | 18% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5403 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5403 days | 18% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5407 days | 18% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5408 days | 18% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5409 days | 18% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5409 days | 18% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5415 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5415 days | 18% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5416 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5417 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5417 days | 18% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5418 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5420 days | 18% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5423 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5425 days | 18% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5427 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5427 days | 18% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5429 days | 18% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5492 days | 18% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5522 days | 18% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5553 days | 18% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5645 days | 18% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5701 days | 18% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5714 days | 18% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5736 days | 18% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5748 days | 18% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5749 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5753 days | 18% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5754 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5767 days | 18% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5768 days | 18% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5773 days | 18% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5777 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5788 days | 18% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5795 days | 18% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5801 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5804 days | 18% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5826 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5826 days | 18% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5841 days | 18% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5841 days | 18% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5842 days | 18% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5845 days | 18% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5850 days | 18% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5855 days | 18% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5857 days | 18% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5857 days | 18% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5859 days | 18% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5861 days | 18% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5865 days | 18% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5865 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5868 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5869 days | 18% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5883 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5887 days | 18% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5902 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5948 days | 18% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5970 days | 18% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5983 days | 18% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6010 days | 18% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6101 days | 18% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6102 days | 18% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6103 days | 18% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6104 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6106 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6117 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6117 days | 18% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6119 days | 18% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6119 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6125 days | 18% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6127 days | 18% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6128 days | 18% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6128 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6132 days | 18% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6132 days | 18% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6133 days | 18% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6134 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6135 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6135 days | 18% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6138 days | 18% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6140 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6143 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6144 days | 18% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6146 days | 18% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6150 days | 18% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6152 days | 18% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6159 days | 18% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6164 days | 18% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6165 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6166 days | 18% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6166 days | 18% |
| John | 9/10 | 6171 days | 18% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6174 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6175 days | 18% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6181 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6182 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6186 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6188 days | 18% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6191 days | 18% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6204 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6210 days | 18% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6215 days | 18% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6220 days | 18% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6220 days | 18% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6224 days | 18% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6230 days | 18% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6236 days | 18% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6240 days | 18% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6257 days | 18% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6266 days | 18% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6268 days | 18% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6275 days | 18% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6276 days | 18% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6283 days | 18% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6299 days | 18% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6299 days | 18% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6312 days | 18% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6320 days | 18% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6337 days | 18% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6350 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6354 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6473 days | 18% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6481 days | 18% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6484 days | 18% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6498 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6513 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6515 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6520 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6537 days | 18% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6576 days | 18% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6579 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6582 days | 18% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6586 days | 18% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6836 days | 18% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6838 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6845 days | 18% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6866 days | 18% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6866 days | 18% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6867 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6871 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6878 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6879 days | 18% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6879 days | 18% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.