G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mitre Peak Cruises.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
222 Valid Reviews
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 222 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 222 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 73 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 76 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.51% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises valid reviews is 88.51% and is based on 222 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
180 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 222 valid reviews, the experience has 180 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 51 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mitre Peak Cruises face-to-face reviews is 87.17% and is based on 180 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.48%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| helen keenleyside | 10/10 | 1740 days | 100% |
| Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2287 days | 75% |
| Patrick and Valerie | 10/10 | 3218 days | 41% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 8/10 | 3235 days | 40% |
| Monique | 10/10 | 3252 days | 40% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 8/10 | 3272 days | 38% |
| Sandra Reynders | 9/10 | 3288 days | 38% |
| Danny | 10/10 | 3302 days | 38% |
| Marion Geillon | 9/10 | 3540 days | 29% |
| Jason Smith | 10/10 | 3540 days | 29% |
| Anne Bouwman | 8/10 | 3545 days | 29% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3555 days | 27% |
| Rachel Denham | 9/10 | 3561 days | 28% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 3574 days | 28% |
| Eileen Klinkmuller | 7/10 | 3576 days | 26% |
| Pieter-Jan V | 10/10 | 3594 days | 27% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 3596 days | 27% |
| Marcus and Claudia | 8/10 | 3610 days | 26% |
| Monika Dippel | 8/10 | 3640 days | 25% |
| KapaOPango | 10/10 | 3657 days | 25% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 9/10 | 3998 days | 12% |
| Jan-Peter Stripp | 8/10 | 4265 days | 3% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4268 days | 3% |
| Penny Lee | 7/10 | 4270 days | 2% |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 6/10 | 4270 days | 2% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 4309 days | 1% |
| Becky Davis | 9/10 | 4324 days | 1% |
| Wouter Bosch | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Grantygrant | 10/10 | 4631 days | 17% |
| Rainer | 9/10 | 4637 days | 17% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 9/10 | 4637 days | 17% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 4/10 | 4638 days | 11% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4666 days | 17% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4666 days | 17% |
| Raquel | 8/10 | 4669 days | 17% |
| Fernando Martin | 8/10 | 4669 days | 17% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4670 days | 16% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 4688 days | 17% |
| Matthew H | 10/10 | 4721 days | 17% |
| M Natterser | 9/10 | 4740 days | 17% |
| Andreas and Christine and Nora Busch | 9/10 | 4751 days | 17% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 10/10 | 4759 days | 17% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 4994 days | 17% |
| Sally Gordie | 9/10 | 5014 days | 17% |
| Armin Boehmer | 10/10 | 5022 days | 17% |
| Richard Rite | 10/10 | 5023 days | 17% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5023 days | 17% |
| Martin Guillaume | 8/10 | 5023 days | 17% |
| sidcupjon | 9/10 | 5027 days | 17% |
| kiwifrenchy | 9/10 | 5027 days | 17% |
| Jill Boruff | 9/10 | 5027 days | 17% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5029 days | 17% |
| Brasier | 8/10 | 5033 days | 17% |
| Harald | 8/10 | 5036 days | 17% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5037 days | 17% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5039 days | 17% |
| Erik Poirer | 8/10 | 5041 days | 17% |
| Mary Mitchell | 8/10 | 5041 days | 17% |
| Aoife Lillis | 9/10 | 5044 days | 17% |
| John Hughes | 9/10 | 5048 days | 17% |
| Louis Smit | 7/10 | 5051 days | 16% |
| Jackie & Ray | 7/10 | 5069 days | 16% |
| CMJ | 9/10 | 5087 days | 17% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 5127 days | 17% |
| Josh | 9/10 | 5130 days | 17% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5148 days | 17% |
| Res Kormann | 8/10 | 5351 days | 17% |
| David Taylor | 9/10 | 5367 days | 17% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 10/10 | 5375 days | 17% |
| Helen Evans | 9/10 | 5376 days | 17% |
| Mark Vass | 8/10 | 5378 days | 17% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 5378 days | 17% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5380 days | 17% |
| Kornelia Kirf | 9/10 | 5383 days | 17% |
| Gerstmann | 9/10 | 5387 days | 17% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 5387 days | 17% |
| Mannebach & Siejert | 8/10 | 5390 days | 17% |
| E C Frans | 10/10 | 5391 days | 17% |
| Daniela Borter | 8/10 | 5394 days | 17% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 9/10 | 5394 days | 17% |
| Cesar | 9/10 | 5398 days | 17% |
| Hartmut Tonner | 9/10 | 5399 days | 17% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 9/10 | 5400 days | 17% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5400 days | 17% |
| Manuela Manns | 6/10 | 5406 days | 15% |
| Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5406 days | 17% |
| John Brand | 8/10 | 5407 days | 17% |
| Andy | 7/10 | 5408 days | 16% |
| Jues Lueg | 9/10 | 5408 days | 17% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5409 days | 16% |
| Ruben and Jetske | 9/10 | 5411 days | 17% |
| Barbara | 8/10 | 5414 days | 17% |
| Sue Haward | 10/10 | 5416 days | 17% |
| Wijnhoven | 8/10 | 5418 days | 17% |
| Barbara Koegel | 9/10 | 5418 days | 17% |
| Madlen & Inna | 10/10 | 5420 days | 17% |
| mmallen | 10/10 | 5483 days | 17% |
| alku83 | 10/10 | 5513 days | 17% |
| KAA | 10/10 | 5544 days | 17% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5636 days | 17% |
| koster | 9/10 | 5692 days | 17% |
| BelindaT | 10/10 | 5705 days | 17% |
| nuwee | 10/10 | 5727 days | 17% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5739 days | 17% |
| Jesper Sch | 7/10 | 5740 days | 16% |
| Polil | 9/10 | 5744 days | 17% |
| Matthias & Ceristiane | 8/10 | 5745 days | 17% |
| hughesW | 9/10 | 5758 days | 17% |
| Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5759 days | 17% |
| Hans Suess | 9/10 | 5764 days | 17% |
| M Sicard | 7/10 | 5768 days | 16% |
| John Helle | 9/10 | 5779 days | 17% |
| Thomas Stopp | 9/10 | 5786 days | 17% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 7/10 | 5792 days | 16% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5795 days | 17% |
| Arran J | 5/10 | 5817 days | 13% |
| Stephen O'Connor | 9/10 | 5817 days | 17% |
| csziegler | 10/10 | 5832 days | 17% |
| katharinatum | 9/10 | 5832 days | 17% |
| marcol | 9/10 | 5833 days | 17% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 5836 days | 17% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5841 days | 17% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 5846 days | 17% |
| The_Chaplins | 10/10 | 5848 days | 17% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5848 days | 17% |
| Melanie Bielefeld | 10/10 | 5850 days | 17% |
| kencook | 10/10 | 5852 days | 17% |
| Mark Jenkins | 9/10 | 5856 days | 17% |
| Deede K | 8/10 | 5856 days | 17% |
| Louis Duhaime | 8/10 | 5859 days | 17% |
| Eimear Doyle | 9/10 | 5860 days | 17% |
| Tillener | 8/10 | 5874 days | 17% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 5878 days | 17% |
| Francesca | 8/10 | 5893 days | 17% |
| waters811 | 10/10 | 5939 days | 17% |
| alanvn | 9/10 | 5961 days | 17% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 5974 days | 17% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6001 days | 17% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6092 days | 17% |
| Sally477 | 9/10 | 6093 days | 17% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 6093 days | 17% |
| KjellR | 8/10 | 6094 days | 17% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6096 days | 15% |
| Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 6108 days | 17% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6108 days | 17% |
| NatasjaV | 9/10 | 6110 days | 17% |
| JimmyK | 8/10 | 6110 days | 17% |
| Joery | 9/10 | 6115 days | 17% |
| Stefanie | 9/10 | 6117 days | 17% |
| robix | 9/10 | 6118 days | 17% |
| Lynn White | 8/10 | 6118 days | 17% |
| Melissa Gillespie | 10/10 | 6123 days | 17% |
| amyd | 9/10 | 6123 days | 17% |
| Tolsten | 10/10 | 6123 days | 17% |
| Kelly | 8/10 | 6124 days | 17% |
| Steven | 8/10 | 6126 days | 17% |
| CarleyJ | 9/10 | 6126 days | 17% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6128 days | 17% |
| Eileen Harris | 8/10 | 6130 days | 17% |
| henriettalee | 8/10 | 6133 days | 17% |
| IreneF | 9/10 | 6135 days | 17% |
| FeliciaY | 9/10 | 6137 days | 17% |
| Kristin | 10/10 | 6140 days | 17% |
| Carly | 9/10 | 6142 days | 17% |
| Conway | 9/10 | 6142 days | 17% |
| niall stephenson | 10/10 | 6149 days | 17% |
| Camilia | 9/10 | 6154 days | 17% |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 6155 days | 17% |
| Klalis | 10/10 | 6156 days | 17% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6156 days | 17% |
| John | 9/10 | 6161 days | 17% |
| Foost | 8/10 | 6164 days | 17% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 6165 days | 17% |
| LeaciaS | 8/10 | 6172 days | 17% |
| PhillS | 8/10 | 6173 days | 17% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 6176 days | 17% |
| Ofer | 10/10 | 6178 days | 17% |
| BenjaminAustralia | 9/10 | 6182 days | 17% |
| JulianeH | 6/10 | 6195 days | 15% |
| Priyanka | 10/10 | 6201 days | 17% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 6205 days | 17% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6210 days | 17% |
| Brian Spinks | 9/10 | 6210 days | 17% |
| Alex Olzheim | 10/10 | 6214 days | 17% |
| Susie Wang | 10/10 | 6220 days | 17% |
| Mathew | 10/10 | 6226 days | 17% |
| Rebecca Kenning | 10/10 | 6230 days | 17% |
| angusb | 9/10 | 6248 days | 17% |
| Stuart Gross | 9/10 | 6257 days | 17% |
| Hans van der Linden | 9/10 | 6259 days | 17% |
| Jessie | 10/10 | 6265 days | 17% |
| Emilie | 10/10 | 6266 days | 17% |
| HollyB | 10/10 | 6274 days | 17% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6289 days | 17% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 6289 days | 17% |
| Michaela | 9/10 | 6302 days | 17% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 6310 days | 17% |
| Gray | 9/10 | 6327 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6340 days | 17% |
| Christine | 8/10 | 6344 days | 17% |
| Toby | 10/10 | 6464 days | 17% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 6472 days | 17% |
| Stewart | 9/10 | 6475 days | 17% |
| Emily Houston | 8/10 | 6489 days | 17% |
| Jody | 7/10 | 6504 days | 16% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6506 days | 17% |
| Nathan Perkins | 8/10 | 6511 days | 17% |
| Melissa | 10/10 | 6528 days | 17% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6567 days | 17% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6570 days | 17% |
| Edwin | 9/10 | 6573 days | 17% |
| caroline | 9/10 | 6577 days | 17% |
| Stevenson | 10/10 | 6827 days | 17% |
| Anita | 8/10 | 6829 days | 17% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6836 days | 17% |
| Berke | 10/10 | 6857 days | 17% |
| Madeleine | 10/10 | 6857 days | 17% |
| Rogier | 5/10 | 6858 days | 13% |
| Wendy | 5/10 | 6862 days | 13% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6869 days | 17% |
| Hennielene | 9/10 | 6870 days | 17% |
| Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6870 days | 17% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Mitre Peak Cruises experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mitre Peak Cruises experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
1.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.