Hello there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Scotties Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
113 Valid Reviews
The Scotties Rental Cars experience has a total of 130 reviews. There are 113 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 17 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 113 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Scotties Rental Cars valid reviews is 67.70% and is based on 113 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|R Cookson||1/10||166 days||100%|
|Edmund Hillstone||10/10||712 days||40%|
|Catherine thompson||10/10||712 days||40%|
|Shayal Singh||10/10||712 days||40%|
|Awesome Starters||8/10||1201 days||6%|
|Peter Kohler||10/10||1231 days||6%|
|Wolf G||10/10||1262 days||6%|
|Bruno Bomitali||10/10||1290 days||6%|
|Nit Zys||10/10||1290 days||6%|
|Maria L.||1/10||1321 days||4%|
|Diego D||2/10||1321 days||4%|
|Doris, Hamburg||10/10||1321 days||6%|
|Nik B||9/10||1474 days||5%|
|Jakobus Crane||10/10||1474 days||5%|
|George Thomas||10/10||1505 days||5%|
|John Coulter||8/10||1505 days||5%|
|Didier Charot||10/10||1505 days||5%|
|Gerard Mackle||8/10||1505 days||5%|
|P Douglas||1/10||1505 days||4%|
|Suzy Loscin||10/10||1505 days||5%|
|Harry de Melmanche||10/10||1535 days||5%|
|Max Williamson||10/10||1535 days||5%|
|J Freighter||9/10||1535 days||5%|
|Aaron Westhuizen||10/10||1535 days||5%|
|Mark B||10/10||1535 days||5%|
|M Arbuckle||9/10||1566 days||5%|
|Amelia M||1/10||1596 days||4%|
|James Maddly||10/10||1596 days||5%|
|Zhen Ni||10/10||1627 days||5%|
|KP Sumner||10/10||1627 days||5%|
|Kevin D||10/10||1627 days||5%|
|Daniel Skiffington||1/10||1655 days||3%|
|Laurie MacKenzie||10/10||1655 days||5%|
|D Freeman||10/10||1655 days||5%|
|Christine RUTHERFORD||1/10||1655 days||3%|
|Rhonda Rose||1/10||1717 days||3%|
|Ian Beaton||1/10||1778 days||3%|
|Ian Shere||10/10||1839 days||4%|
|david song||1/10||1870 days||3%|
|Joe Millman||1/10||1900 days||3%|
|Jonathan Farries||1/10||1900 days||3%|
|Kevin Sullivan||1/10||1961 days||3%|
|Suzanne Perigo||10/10||1961 days||4%|
|Gerald Till||1/10||1992 days||3%|
|Bob Pricer||10/10||1992 days||4%|
|Janet Lee||1/10||1992 days||3%|
|Amira Rashid||1/10||2020 days||3%|
|Yadu Prabhakar||1/10||2051 days||3%|
|Stephen Campbell||8/10||2051 days||4%|
|Sharron Wetere||1/10||2051 days||3%|
|Antony Kinsey||1/10||2051 days||3%|
|Martin Guhn||1/10||2051 days||3%|
|Kevin Hodgson||10/10||2082 days||4%|
|An G||9/10||2143 days||4%|
|Sam Cartwright||10/10||2204 days||3%|
|Barry Codlin||9/10||2265 days||3%|
|Priscilla Gagliano||1/10||2357 days||2%|
|Richard Kensington||10/10||2417 days||3%|
|KP Sumner||9/10||2417 days||3%|
|Stephen Jeffress||10/10||2417 days||3%|
|Loyann Loyann||10/10||2448 days||3%|
|Ron Eastwall||10/10||2478 days||3%|
|Susan Gadsby||10/10||2478 days||3%|
|John Waddy||9/10||2509 days||3%|
|Peter Rigby||10/10||2539 days||2%|
|Roderick Jones||9/10||2539 days||2%|
|Pierce Power||10/10||2570 days||2%|
|Rob Blair||10/10||2570 days||2%|
|Robert Pollock||9/10||2601 days||2%|
|P Lundin||10/10||2601 days||2%|
|P Wilson||10/10||2601 days||2%|
|CD Ash||1/10||2723 days||1%|
|Steven Thompson||10/10||2782 days||2%|
|Graham Dolan||10/10||2782 days||2%|
|nadine williams||9/10||2782 days||2%|
|Jenny Tebbutt||9/10||2782 days||2%|
|Paul K||1/10||2843 days||1%|
|Sophiana B||10/10||2874 days||2%|
|Zak Ruffin||8/10||2966 days||1%|
|Jeremy Goodwin||10/10||3116 days||1%|
|Serge Steiner||9/10||3147 days||1%|
|Sophie Faulkner||10/10||3147 days||1%|
|Wilf Healy||10/10||3178 days||1%|
|Ron Maurice||9/10||3300 days||0%|
|Edmund Hillstone||10/10||5232 days||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Scotties Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 115 days. The Scotties Rental Cars experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Scotties Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 145 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.