Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Scotties Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
107 Valid Reviews
The Scotties Rental Cars experience has a total of 123 reviews. There are 107 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 16 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 107 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 107 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Scotties Rental Cars valid reviews is 68.41% and is based on 107 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Awesome Starters||8/10||117 days||92.94||96%|
|Peter Kohler||10/10||147 days||96.58||100%|
|Wolf G||10/10||178 days||94.98||98%|
|Bruno Bomitali||10/10||206 days||93.28||97%|
|Nit Zys||10/10||206 days||93.28||97%|
|Maria L.||1/10||237 days||66.5||69%|
|Diego D||2/10||237 days||68.32||71%|
|Doris, Hamburg||10/10||237 days||91.1||94%|
|Nik B||9/10||390 days||75.9||79%|
|Jakobus Crane||10/10||390 days||75.9||79%|
|George Thomas||10/10||421 days||71.91||74%|
|John Coulter||8/10||421 days||68.32||71%|
|Didier Charot||10/10||421 days||71.91||74%|
|Gerard Mackle||8/10||421 days||68.32||71%|
|P Douglas||1/10||421 days||52.5||54%|
|Suzy Loscin||10/10||421 days||71.91||74%|
|Harry de Melmanche||10/10||451 days||67.77||70%|
|Max Williamson||10/10||451 days||67.77||70%|
|J Freighter||9/10||451 days||67.77||70%|
|Aaron Westhuizen||10/10||451 days||67.77||70%|
|Mark B||10/10||451 days||67.77||70%|
|M Arbuckle||9/10||482 days||63.19||65%|
|Amelia M||1/10||512 days||42.68||44%|
|James Maddly||10/10||512 days||58.46||61%|
|Zhen Ni||10/10||543 days||53.28||55%|
|KP Sumner||10/10||543 days||53.28||55%|
|Kevin D||10/10||543 days||53.28||55%|
|Daniel Skiffington||1/10||570 days||35.53||37%|
|Laurie MacKenzie||10/10||571 days||48.51||50%|
|D Freeman||10/10||571 days||48.51||50%|
|Christine RUTHERFORD||1/10||571 days||35.41||37%|
|Rhonda Rose||1/10||632 days||28.45||29%|
|Ian Beaton||1/10||693 days||22.34||23%|
|Ian Shere||10/10||754 days||23.43||24%|
|david song||1/10||785 days||14.77||15%|
|Joe Millman||1/10||815 days||12.72||13%|
|Jonathan Farries||1/10||815 days||12.72||13%|
|Kevin Sullivan||1/10||876 days||9.2||10%|
|Suzanne Perigo||10/10||876 days||12.6||13%|
|Gerald Till||1/10||907 days||7.74||8%|
|Bob Pricer||10/10||907 days||10.6||11%|
|Janet Lee||1/10||907 days||7.74||8%|
|Amira Rashid||1/10||935 days||6.61||7%|
|Yadu Prabhakar||1/10||966 days||5.58||6%|
|Stephen Campbell||8/10||966 days||7.26||8%|
|Sharron Wetere||1/10||966 days||5.58||6%|
|Antony Kinsey||1/10||966 days||5.58||6%|
|Martin Guhn||1/10||967 days||5.55||6%|
|Kevin Hodgson||10/10||997 days||6.52||7%|
|An G||9/10||1058 days||5.22||5%|
|Sam Cartwright||10/10||1119 days||4.96||5%|
|Barry Codlin||9/10||1180 days||4.87||5%|
|Priscilla Gagliano||1/10||1273 days||3.45||4%|
|Richard Kensington||10/10||1332 days||4.64||5%|
|KP Sumner||9/10||1332 days||4.64||5%|
|Stephen Jeffress||10/10||1332 days||4.64||5%|
|Loyann Loyann||10/10||1364 days||4.59||5%|
|Ron Eastwall||10/10||1393 days||4.55||5%|
|Susan Gadsby||10/10||1394 days||4.54||5%|
|John Waddy||9/10||1424 days||4.5||5%|
|Peter Rigby||10/10||1454 days||4.45||5%|
|Roderick Jones||9/10||1455 days||4.45||5%|
|Pierce Power||10/10||1485 days||4.41||5%|
|Rob Blair||10/10||1486 days||4.4||5%|
|Robert Pollock||9/10||1516 days||4.36||5%|
|P Lundin||10/10||1516 days||4.36||5%|
|P Wilson||10/10||1516 days||4.36||5%|
|CD Ash||1/10||1638 days||3.05||3%|
|Steven Thompson||10/10||1697 days||4.08||4%|
|Graham Dolan||10/10||1697 days||4.08||4%|
|nadine williams||9/10||1697 days||4.08||4%|
|Jenny Tebbutt||9/10||1697 days||4.08||4%|
|Paul K||1/10||1758 days||2.91||3%|
|Sophiana B||10/10||1789 days||3.94||4%|
|Zak Ruffin||8/10||1882 days||3.61||4%|
|Jeremy Goodwin||10/10||2031 days||3.58||4%|
|Serge Steiner||9/10||2062 days||3.53||4%|
|Sophie Faulkner||10/10||2063 days||3.53||4%|
|Wilf Healy||10/10||2094 days||3.48||4%|
|Ron Maurice||9/10||2216 days||3.29||3%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Scotties Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner. There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days.
The Scotties Rental Cars experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Scotties Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 80 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.