Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kiwi Motorhomes.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
159 Valid Reviews
The Kiwi Motorhomes experience has a total of 167 reviews. There are 159 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 8 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 159 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 159 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kiwi Motorhomes valid reviews is 96.98% and is based on 159 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Daniel Lewin||10/10||63 days||99.37||100%|
|jordi Llovera Bergó||10/10||94 days||98.6||99%|
|Stuart Lurc||10/10||94 days||98.6||99%|
|Niral Patel||10/10||94 days||98.6||99%|
|Claire Feeney||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Heather Jamieson||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Cathy Wilson||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Kim Parrish||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Jen Breuni||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Claes Justesen||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Fredrik L||10/10||123 days||97.6||98%|
|Yariv Rachmani||10/10||154 days||96.24||97%|
|James Stopford||10/10||154 days||96.24||97%|
|jesper smed hedegaard||10/10||154 days||96.24||97%|
|Jessica Butler||9/10||154 days||96.24||97%|
|Peter Mocko||10/10||154 days||96.24||97%|
|Janice Pool||10/10||185 days||94.58||95%|
|Sharon Gibbons||10/10||185 days||94.58||95%|
|Damian Hughes||10/10||185 days||94.58||95%|
|Malin Graas||10/10||185 days||94.58||95%|
|DAMIEN BENARD||10/10||215 days||92.68||93%|
|Dani & Matt||10/10||215 days||92.68||93%|
|cristina ordas||10/10||215 days||92.68||93%|
|Matthew Pan||10/10||276 days||87.93||88%|
|Trina Newbold||10/10||276 days||87.93||88%|
|Chala Chase||10/10||307 days||85.07||86%|
|Txell Soy||10/10||307 days||85.07||86%|
|Rokiah Adam||10/10||368 days||78.54||79%|
|Rick Fontaine||10/10||399 days||74.77||75%|
|enrique bekerle||10/10||399 days||74.77||75%|
|Francis T||10/10||399 days||74.77||75%|
|Michelle Williams||10/10||399 days||74.77||75%|
|SUE BOOKER||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Dusty Miller||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Josh P.||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Martin Arnold||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Mario Koenig||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Will Langdon||10/10||429 days||70.84||71%|
|Daniel Soares||9/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Kerry Morris & Barny Harper||10/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Kees en Jacqueline||10/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Kasey Hope||9/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Jonathan Tan||10/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Joanna Duncan||9/10||460 days||66.47||67%|
|Tuval Rabina||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|Adam Browne||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|Emily Petersen||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|Lisa McCullough||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|Simon Allam||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|ronald smael||10/10||488 days||62.26||63%|
|Gabriele Kiessling||10/10||519 days||57.32||58%|
|Marcus Vinicius Oliveira Andrade||10/10||519 days||57.32||58%|
|Caroline Langen||8/10||519 days||54.45||55%|
|Klaus Dieter Sowka||10/10||519 days||57.32||58%|
|Bo Chen||10/10||519 days||57.32||58%|
|Bernhard Baumann||10/10||519 days||57.32||58%|
|jay davies||9/10||550 days||52.07||52%|
|Hannah Yeong||10/10||550 days||52.07||52%|
|Phil Kramer||9/10||550 days||52.07||52%|
|Susie Jacob||10/10||580 days||47.03||47%|
|Armond Philmon||10/10||580 days||47.03||47%|
|Marek Piasta||10/10||580 days||47.03||47%|
|Carol Warrington||7/10||611 days||38.33||39%|
|Sharon O'neill||9/10||611 days||42.12||42%|
|Joao Almeida||8/10||672 days||31.69||32%|
|jasper billings||10/10||703 days||29.35||30%|
|Ray and Jan Charles||9/10||764 days||22.36||23%|
|jenny goh||10/10||764 days||22.36||23%|
|Belinda Morgan||9/10||794 days||19.36||19%|
|Karl Cundall||10/10||794 days||19.36||19%|
|Kim and Ron Tito||9/10||794 days||19.36||19%|
|Vanessa Lonsdale||10/10||794 days||19.36||19%|
|Bryce McKeown||9/10||794 days||19.36||19%|
|Terence Withers||8/10||825 days||15.72||16%|
|ELISE THOLLET||10/10||825 days||16.55||17%|
|Cheryl & Michael Miller||10/10||825 days||16.55||17%|
|Joel Sayre||10/10||853 days||14.28||14%|
|Tanya Duncan||10/10||884 days||12.05||12%|
|Douglas Anderson||8/10||884 days||11.45||12%|
|CATHRYN MCGRATH||10/10||915 days||10.13||10%|
|Wouter Dillien||10/10||915 days||10.13||10%|
|Jason Witheld||10/10||945 days||8.57||9%|
|Jessica Eggleston||10/10||945 days||8.57||9%|
|Tina Mcm||9/10||1006 days||6.26||6%|
|Ian Hutton||9/10||1037 days||5.53||6%|
|Steve Brennan||9/10||1068 days||5.12||5%|
|Zac James||10/10||1068 days||5.12||5%|
|Luke Bingle||10/10||1068 days||5.12||5%|
|Gareth Hale||8/10||1098 days||4.74||5%|
|Janiel Ternura||10/10||1129 days||4.93||5%|
|Michael Spicer||10/10||1129 days||4.93||5%|
|GARRY and MARIA Steele||10/10||1159 days||4.87||5%|
|Achim Schafer||10/10||1159 days||4.87||5%|
|Robert Darby||10/10||1249 days||4.7||5%|
|David Hocde||10/10||1249 days||4.7||5%|
|Lisa & Eric Brüggemann||10/10||1249 days||4.7||5%|
|Linda Stans||10/10||1280 days||4.64||5%|
|Maria Steele||10/10||1310 days||4.58||5%|
|Jaroslaw Lukasik||10/10||1310 days||4.58||5%|
|Andy Shilladay||10/10||1310 days||4.58||5%|
|Robyn Greening||10/10||1341 days||4.52||5%|
|Barbara Halberg||8/10||1524 days||3.95||4%|
|Sam Kydd||9/10||1555 days||4.1||4%|
|Jim Gifford||10/10||1555 days||4.1||4%|
|Josephine Chesby||9/10||1584 days||4.04||4%|
|Charlotte Stanbury||10/10||1584 days||4.04||4%|
|gerry white||10/10||1584 days||4.04||4%|
|Jeremy Bird||10/10||1615 days||3.98||4%|
|Margaret Hackett||9/10||1615 days||3.98||4%|
|Ty Birkett||10/10||1646 days||3.92||4%|
|Christopher Claes||10/10||1676 days||3.86||4%|
|Annette Vartha||10/10||1707 days||3.8||4%|
|Lee Spinks||9/10||1890 days||3.44||3%|
|Liz Charles||10/10||1890 days||3.44||3%|
|Louise C||10/10||1921 days||3.38||3%|
|David Spriggs||10/10||1921 days||3.38||3%|
|Heinrich Ballhaus||10/10||1949 days||3.33||3%|
|Jennifer Greenholt||10/10||1980 days||3.27||3%|
|Jayson Herewini||9/10||1980 days||3.27||3%|
|Michael Michael and Claudia||10/10||1980 days||3.27||3%|
|Fiona Whyte||10/10||1980 days||3.27||3%|
|Chris & Anne||10/10||2102 days||3.03||3%|
|Craig Dunphy||10/10||2345 days||2.55||3%|
|Eric T.||10/10||2376 days||2.49||3%|
|bren Herbert||10/10||2437 days||2.37||2%|
|Johan Sundstrom||10/10||2710 days||1.84||2%|
|Peter Aston||8/10||4473 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kiwi Motorhomes experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 108 days. However the Kiwi Motorhomes experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kiwi Motorhomes experience has been adjusted for 40 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.