Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaiteriteri Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has a total of 173 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
153 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 153 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 85.29% and is based on 153 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Voland | 10/10 | 2201 days | 100% |
| Renault Margaux | 10/10 | 2230 days | 98% |
| Christian Chalupny | 10/10 | 2291 days | 95% |
| Regina85 | 10/10 | 2322 days | 93% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 9/10 | 2595 days | 77% |
| S Weslake | 9/10 | 2932 days | 58% |
| Martina Winkel | 10/10 | 2932 days | 59% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 9/10 | 3375 days | 34% |
| Gordon Todan | 8/10 | 3424 days | 31% |
| Carlos Castro | 10/10 | 3477 days | 29% |
| Jorge Anderson | 8/10 | 3635 days | 19% |
| Adele Jacques | 8/10 | 3646 days | 18% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3708 days | 15% |
| Aline Jimenez | 9/10 | 3748 days | 13% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4395 days | 6% |
| Michael Steimel | 9/10 | 4403 days | 7% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 9/10 | 4403 days | 7% |
| Max Meternich | 9/10 | 4407 days | 7% |
| Shay S | 9/10 | 4421 days | 7% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4438 days | 6% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4452 days | 7% |
| Sharron Berry | 9/10 | 4817 days | 7% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 4830 days | 7% |
| Alison Langley | 9/10 | 4830 days | 7% |
| Ingrid | 10/10 | 4830 days | 7% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 4859 days | 6% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 4859 days | 6% |
| David Prendergast | 8/10 | 5104 days | 6% |
| Green UK | 8/10 | 5104 days | 6% |
| Carly Braddock | 8/10 | 5112 days | 6% |
| Sandra Dirk | 9/10 | 5115 days | 7% |
| Peter Adams | 8/10 | 5117 days | 6% |
| Def Fem | 8/10 | 5118 days | 6% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5119 days | 6% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5125 days | 7% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 5128 days | 6% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5133 days | 7% |
| Andrea Bircher | 7/10 | 5137 days | 5% |
| Andreas Kofod-Hansen | 9/10 | 5137 days | 7% |
| Astrid Boon | 8/10 | 5137 days | 6% |
| Judith Fowler | 8/10 | 5138 days | 6% |
| M Neuman | 6/10 | 5144 days | 3% |
| Bethany Hamilton | 8/10 | 5151 days | 6% |
| Mark & Beth Kaufman | 9/10 | 5218 days | 7% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5221 days | 6% |
| Christoph | 9/10 | 5223 days | 7% |
| Natascha & Greg | 10/10 | 5226 days | 7% |
| Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5439 days | 7% |
| Florian Miller | 10/10 | 5472 days | 7% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5475 days | 7% |
| Johannes Klein | 10/10 | 5481 days | 7% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5482 days | 5% |
| K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5482 days | 7% |
| Jade & Henry | 10/10 | 5487 days | 7% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 5489 days | 7% |
| Jarrett King | 9/10 | 5490 days | 7% |
| Marco Schoeggl | 7/10 | 5491 days | 5% |
| Ross Salisbury | 10/10 | 5491 days | 7% |
| Tamara Clark | 7/10 | 5492 days | 5% |
| Callum Sibbald | 8/10 | 5493 days | 6% |
| Daniel Hammersley | 10/10 | 5494 days | 7% |
| Manuela Manns | 8/10 | 5502 days | 6% |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 5503 days | 7% |
| Dave and Emma | 8/10 | 5505 days | 6% |
| David and Wendy Lucas | 10/10 | 5506 days | 7% |
| Jessie Currie | 9/10 | 5508 days | 7% |
| Mark Roelofs | 7/10 | 5508 days | 5% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5509 days | 7% |
| Christina Fischer | 10/10 | 5512 days | 7% |
| Jensen | 9/10 | 5514 days | 7% |
| Isbabel | 10/10 | 5515 days | 7% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5831 days | 6% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5835 days | 7% |
| Family_Thomsen | 9/10 | 5836 days | 7% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5840 days | 7% |
| Andy & Louise Dutton | 9/10 | 5841 days | 7% |
| Margo Alaska | 9/10 | 5845 days | 7% |
| Matilda Hansson | 8/10 | 5845 days | 6% |
| Teresa Gizzi | 8/10 | 5847 days | 6% |
| Brian_Val | 8/10 | 5857 days | 6% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 5857 days | 5% |
| Mike Brunt | 9/10 | 5862 days | 7% |
| Lousie Hug | 5/10 | 5868 days | 0% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 5870 days | 5% |
| Radek Hoferek | 10/10 | 5878 days | 7% |
| Wagner | 8/10 | 5879 days | 6% |
| Lisa Huet | 9/10 | 5913 days | 7% |
| Katie Morrow | 9/10 | 5913 days | 7% |
| rowan bryant | 8/10 | 5927 days | 6% |
| stevnba | 8/10 | 5929 days | 6% |
| stefanz | 10/10 | 5929 days | 7% |
| carmenk | 7/10 | 5930 days | 5% |
| andres | 10/10 | 5936 days | 7% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5936 days | 6% |
| selinab | 8/10 | 5937 days | 6% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 9/10 | 5946 days | 7% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 5948 days | 7% |
| Kirsty McGrath | 7/10 | 5948 days | 5% |
| Dan Mair | 7/10 | 5955 days | 5% |
| Bart en Mirjam | 8/10 | 5956 days | 6% |
| Ritag | 9/10 | 6060 days | 7% |
| Russ C | 9/10 | 6188 days | 7% |
| jenniferk | 8/10 | 6188 days | 6% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 6193 days | 6% |
| AnjaN | 10/10 | 6195 days | 7% |
| ClodaghM | 9/10 | 6205 days | 7% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6205 days | 7% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6208 days | 6% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6211 days | 5% |
| Wouter Muller | 8/10 | 6211 days | 6% |
| Krapels | 7/10 | 6212 days | 5% |
| Sam Marshall | 7/10 | 6216 days | 5% |
| Johannes Kerner | 6/10 | 6219 days | 3% |
| lannie | 8/10 | 6221 days | 6% |
| VictoriaH | 7/10 | 6223 days | 5% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6223 days | 6% |
| GaryW | 7/10 | 6223 days | 5% |
| Carmel | 6/10 | 6228 days | 3% |
| Raphaelle | 10/10 | 6231 days | 7% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6252 days | 7% |
| Nick Wilkinson | 9/10 | 6271 days | 7% |
| Jeanpierre | 10/10 | 6301 days | 7% |
| Pieter | 9/10 | 6309 days | 7% |
| Brent | 9/10 | 6378 days | 7% |
| Trina | 8/10 | 6412 days | 6% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 6420 days | 7% |
| Gorka Rojas | 6/10 | 6460 days | 3% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 6565 days | 6% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6565 days | 6% |
| Jason Page | 7/10 | 6568 days | 5% |
| Beate Sinn | 10/10 | 6572 days | 7% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6580 days | 7% |
| Ortved | 8/10 | 6585 days | 6% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6587 days | 7% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 10/10 | 6593 days | 7% |
| Celine | 8/10 | 6597 days | 6% |
| Timothy | 10/10 | 6634 days | 7% |
| Kara Della Groce | 10/10 | 6634 days | 7% |
| Christian Arnot | 8/10 | 6657 days | 6% |
| Anita | 9/10 | 6657 days | 7% |
| Stu Cutler | 9/10 | 6663 days | 7% |
| Ewen Maclean | 10/10 | 6663 days | 7% |
| Hendrich | 8/10 | 6663 days | 6% |
| Neil Cooke | 7/10 | 6670 days | 5% |
| ElasticLink | 9/10 | 6685 days | 7% |
| Nick Bailey | 8/10 | 6755 days | 6% |
| ranker_43 | 10/10 | 6790 days | 7% |
| Alan | 9/10 | 6899 days | 7% |
| jonas | 9/10 | 6914 days | 7% |
| MrsWesley | 8/10 | 6915 days | 6% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 6916 days | 7% |
| Uri | 9/10 | 6918 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 6924 days | 7% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 6925 days | 7% |
| M Bekker | 8/10 | 6930 days | 6% |
| ErikVanDam | 8/10 | 6944 days | 6% |
| Sharon | 10/10 | 6947 days | 7% |
| Bill | 9/10 | 6951 days | 7% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 6953 days | 7% |
| John | 6/10 | 6953 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Michael | 9/10 | 6954 days | 7% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 6964 days | 6% |
| Camilla | 8/10 | 6964 days | 6% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 6966 days | 7% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6966 days | 7% |
| ErikSmith | 8/10 | 6966 days | 6% |
| KikiNelissen | 9/10 | 6966 days | 7% |
| Lyndsey | 7/10 | 6966 days | 5% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6971 days | 7% |
| AmyBarnett | 8/10 | 6977 days | 6% |
| ranker_428 | 7/10 | 6977 days | 5% |
| mishasan | 10/10 | 8501 days | 7% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.97% |
| 198 | -3.99% |
| 199 | -4.01% |
| 200 | -4.03% |
| 201 | -4.05% |
| 202 | -4.07% |
| 203 | -4.09% |
| … | … |
2.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.