Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaiteriteri Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has a total of 173 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
153 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 153 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 85.29% and is based on 153 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.37%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Voland | 10/10 | 2403 days | 100% |
| Renault Margaux | 10/10 | 2432 days | 98% |
| Christian Chalupny | 10/10 | 2494 days | 94% |
| Regina85 | 10/10 | 2524 days | 92% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 9/10 | 2797 days | 74% |
| S Weslake | 9/10 | 3134 days | 53% |
| Martina Winkel | 10/10 | 3134 days | 54% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 9/10 | 3577 days | 26% |
| Gordon Todan | 8/10 | 3626 days | 22% |
| Carlos Castro | 10/10 | 3680 days | 20% |
| Jorge Anderson | 8/10 | 3837 days | 9% |
| Adele Jacques | 8/10 | 3848 days | 8% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3910 days | 4% |
| Aline Jimenez | 9/10 | 3950 days | 2% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4597 days | 7% |
| Michael Steimel | 9/10 | 4605 days | 7% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 9/10 | 4605 days | 7% |
| Max Meternich | 9/10 | 4609 days | 7% |
| Shay S | 9/10 | 4623 days | 7% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4640 days | 7% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4654 days | 8% |
| Sharron Berry | 9/10 | 5019 days | 7% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 5032 days | 7% |
| Alison Langley | 9/10 | 5032 days | 7% |
| Ingrid | 10/10 | 5032 days | 8% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 5061 days | 7% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 5061 days | 7% |
| David Prendergast | 8/10 | 5306 days | 7% |
| Green UK | 8/10 | 5306 days | 7% |
| Carly Braddock | 8/10 | 5314 days | 7% |
| Sandra Dirk | 9/10 | 5317 days | 7% |
| Peter Adams | 8/10 | 5319 days | 7% |
| Def Fem | 8/10 | 5320 days | 7% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5321 days | 7% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5327 days | 8% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 5330 days | 7% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5335 days | 8% |
| Andrea Bircher | 7/10 | 5339 days | 5% |
| Andreas Kofod-Hansen | 9/10 | 5339 days | 7% |
| Astrid Boon | 8/10 | 5339 days | 7% |
| Judith Fowler | 8/10 | 5340 days | 7% |
| M Neuman | 6/10 | 5346 days | 3% |
| Bethany Hamilton | 8/10 | 5353 days | 7% |
| Mark & Beth Kaufman | 9/10 | 5420 days | 7% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5423 days | 7% |
| Christoph | 9/10 | 5425 days | 7% |
| Natascha & Greg | 10/10 | 5428 days | 8% |
| Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5641 days | 7% |
| Florian Miller | 10/10 | 5674 days | 8% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5677 days | 7% |
| Johannes Klein | 10/10 | 5683 days | 8% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5684 days | 5% |
| K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5684 days | 8% |
| Jade & Henry | 10/10 | 5689 days | 8% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 5691 days | 8% |
| Jarrett King | 9/10 | 5692 days | 7% |
| Marco Schoeggl | 7/10 | 5693 days | 5% |
| Ross Salisbury | 10/10 | 5693 days | 8% |
| Tamara Clark | 7/10 | 5694 days | 5% |
| Callum Sibbald | 8/10 | 5695 days | 7% |
| Daniel Hammersley | 10/10 | 5696 days | 8% |
| Manuela Manns | 8/10 | 5704 days | 7% |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 5705 days | 7% |
| Dave and Emma | 8/10 | 5707 days | 7% |
| David and Wendy Lucas | 10/10 | 5708 days | 8% |
| Jessie Currie | 9/10 | 5710 days | 7% |
| Mark Roelofs | 7/10 | 5710 days | 5% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5711 days | 8% |
| Christina Fischer | 10/10 | 5714 days | 8% |
| Jensen | 9/10 | 5716 days | 7% |
| Isbabel | 10/10 | 5717 days | 8% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 6033 days | 7% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 6037 days | 8% |
| Family_Thomsen | 9/10 | 6038 days | 7% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 6042 days | 8% |
| Andy & Louise Dutton | 9/10 | 6043 days | 7% |
| Margo Alaska | 9/10 | 6047 days | 7% |
| Matilda Hansson | 8/10 | 6047 days | 7% |
| Teresa Gizzi | 8/10 | 6049 days | 7% |
| Brian_Val | 8/10 | 6059 days | 7% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 6059 days | 5% |
| Mike Brunt | 9/10 | 6064 days | 7% |
| Lousie Hug | 5/10 | 6070 days | 0% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6072 days | 5% |
| Radek Hoferek | 10/10 | 6080 days | 8% |
| Wagner | 8/10 | 6081 days | 7% |
| Lisa Huet | 9/10 | 6115 days | 7% |
| Katie Morrow | 9/10 | 6115 days | 7% |
| rowan bryant | 8/10 | 6129 days | 7% |
| stevnba | 8/10 | 6131 days | 7% |
| stefanz | 10/10 | 6131 days | 8% |
| carmenk | 7/10 | 6132 days | 5% |
| andres | 10/10 | 6138 days | 8% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6138 days | 7% |
| selinab | 8/10 | 6139 days | 7% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 9/10 | 6148 days | 7% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 6150 days | 8% |
| Kirsty McGrath | 7/10 | 6150 days | 5% |
| Dan Mair | 7/10 | 6157 days | 5% |
| Bart en Mirjam | 8/10 | 6158 days | 7% |
| Ritag | 9/10 | 6262 days | 7% |
| Russ C | 9/10 | 6390 days | 7% |
| jenniferk | 8/10 | 6390 days | 7% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 6395 days | 7% |
| AnjaN | 10/10 | 6397 days | 8% |
| ClodaghM | 9/10 | 6407 days | 7% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 6407 days | 7% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6407 days | 7% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6410 days | 7% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6413 days | 5% |
| Wouter Muller | 8/10 | 6413 days | 7% |
| Krapels | 7/10 | 6414 days | 5% |
| Sam Marshall | 7/10 | 6418 days | 5% |
| Johannes Kerner | 6/10 | 6421 days | 3% |
| lannie | 8/10 | 6423 days | 7% |
| VictoriaH | 7/10 | 6425 days | 5% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6425 days | 7% |
| GaryW | 7/10 | 6425 days | 5% |
| Carmel | 6/10 | 6430 days | 3% |
| Raphaelle | 10/10 | 6433 days | 8% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6454 days | 7% |
| Nick Wilkinson | 9/10 | 6474 days | 7% |
| Jeanpierre | 10/10 | 6503 days | 8% |
| Pieter | 9/10 | 6511 days | 7% |
| Brent | 9/10 | 6580 days | 7% |
| Trina | 8/10 | 6614 days | 7% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 6622 days | 8% |
| Gorka Rojas | 6/10 | 6662 days | 3% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 6767 days | 7% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6767 days | 7% |
| Jason Page | 7/10 | 6770 days | 5% |
| Beate Sinn | 10/10 | 6774 days | 8% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6782 days | 7% |
| Ortved | 8/10 | 6787 days | 7% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6789 days | 8% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 10/10 | 6795 days | 8% |
| Celine | 8/10 | 6799 days | 7% |
| Timothy | 10/10 | 6836 days | 8% |
| Kara Della Groce | 10/10 | 6836 days | 8% |
| Christian Arnot | 8/10 | 6859 days | 7% |
| Anita | 9/10 | 6859 days | 7% |
| Stu Cutler | 9/10 | 6865 days | 7% |
| Ewen Maclean | 10/10 | 6865 days | 8% |
| Hendrich | 8/10 | 6865 days | 7% |
| Neil Cooke | 7/10 | 6872 days | 5% |
| ElasticLink | 9/10 | 6887 days | 7% |
| Nick Bailey | 8/10 | 6957 days | 7% |
| ranker_43 | 10/10 | 6992 days | 8% |
| Alan | 9/10 | 7101 days | 7% |
| jonas | 9/10 | 7116 days | 7% |
| MrsWesley | 8/10 | 7117 days | 7% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 7118 days | 7% |
| Uri | 9/10 | 7120 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 7126 days | 7% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 7127 days | 7% |
| M Bekker | 8/10 | 7132 days | 7% |
| ErikVanDam | 8/10 | 7146 days | 7% |
| Sharon | 10/10 | 7149 days | 8% |
| Bill | 9/10 | 7153 days | 7% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 7155 days | 8% |
| John | 6/10 | 7155 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Michael | 9/10 | 7156 days | 7% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 7166 days | 7% |
| Camilla | 8/10 | 7166 days | 7% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 7168 days | 7% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 7168 days | 8% |
| ErikSmith | 8/10 | 7168 days | 7% |
| KikiNelissen | 9/10 | 7168 days | 7% |
| Lyndsey | 7/10 | 7168 days | 5% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 7173 days | 7% |
| AmyBarnett | 8/10 | 7179 days | 7% |
| ranker_428 | 7/10 | 7179 days | 5% |
| mishasan | 10/10 | 8703 days | 8% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.23% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.18% |
| 198 | -3.20% |
| 199 | -3.21% |
| 200 | -3.23% |
| 201 | -3.25% |
| 202 | -3.26% |
| 203 | -3.28% |
| … | … |
2.00% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.