Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaiteriteri Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has a total of 173 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
153 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 153 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 85.29% and is based on 153 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Voland | 10/10 | 2302 days | 100% |
| Renault Margaux | 10/10 | 2331 days | 98% |
| Christian Chalupny | 10/10 | 2392 days | 95% |
| Regina85 | 10/10 | 2423 days | 93% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 9/10 | 2696 days | 76% |
| S Weslake | 9/10 | 3033 days | 56% |
| Martina Winkel | 10/10 | 3033 days | 57% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 9/10 | 3476 days | 30% |
| Gordon Todan | 8/10 | 3525 days | 27% |
| Carlos Castro | 10/10 | 3578 days | 24% |
| Jorge Anderson | 8/10 | 3736 days | 14% |
| Adele Jacques | 8/10 | 3747 days | 14% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3809 days | 10% |
| Aline Jimenez | 9/10 | 3849 days | 8% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4496 days | 7% |
| Michael Steimel | 9/10 | 4504 days | 7% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 9/10 | 4504 days | 7% |
| Max Meternich | 9/10 | 4508 days | 7% |
| Shay S | 9/10 | 4522 days | 7% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4539 days | 7% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4553 days | 7% |
| Sharron Berry | 9/10 | 4918 days | 7% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 4931 days | 7% |
| Alison Langley | 9/10 | 4931 days | 7% |
| Ingrid | 10/10 | 4931 days | 7% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 4960 days | 7% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 4960 days | 7% |
| David Prendergast | 8/10 | 5205 days | 7% |
| Green UK | 8/10 | 5205 days | 7% |
| Carly Braddock | 8/10 | 5213 days | 7% |
| Sandra Dirk | 9/10 | 5216 days | 7% |
| Peter Adams | 8/10 | 5218 days | 7% |
| Def Fem | 8/10 | 5219 days | 7% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5220 days | 7% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5226 days | 7% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 5229 days | 7% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5234 days | 7% |
| Andrea Bircher | 7/10 | 5238 days | 5% |
| Andreas Kofod-Hansen | 9/10 | 5238 days | 7% |
| Astrid Boon | 8/10 | 5238 days | 7% |
| Judith Fowler | 8/10 | 5239 days | 7% |
| M Neuman | 6/10 | 5245 days | 3% |
| Bethany Hamilton | 8/10 | 5252 days | 7% |
| Mark & Beth Kaufman | 9/10 | 5319 days | 7% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5322 days | 7% |
| Christoph | 9/10 | 5324 days | 7% |
| Natascha & Greg | 10/10 | 5327 days | 7% |
| Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5540 days | 7% |
| Florian Miller | 10/10 | 5573 days | 7% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5576 days | 7% |
| Johannes Klein | 10/10 | 5582 days | 7% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5583 days | 5% |
| K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5583 days | 7% |
| Jade & Henry | 10/10 | 5588 days | 7% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 5590 days | 7% |
| Jarrett King | 9/10 | 5591 days | 7% |
| Marco Schoeggl | 7/10 | 5592 days | 5% |
| Ross Salisbury | 10/10 | 5592 days | 7% |
| Tamara Clark | 7/10 | 5593 days | 5% |
| Callum Sibbald | 8/10 | 5594 days | 7% |
| Daniel Hammersley | 10/10 | 5595 days | 7% |
| Manuela Manns | 8/10 | 5603 days | 7% |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 5604 days | 7% |
| Dave and Emma | 8/10 | 5606 days | 7% |
| David and Wendy Lucas | 10/10 | 5607 days | 7% |
| Jessie Currie | 9/10 | 5609 days | 7% |
| Mark Roelofs | 7/10 | 5609 days | 5% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5610 days | 7% |
| Christina Fischer | 10/10 | 5613 days | 7% |
| Jensen | 9/10 | 5615 days | 7% |
| Isbabel | 10/10 | 5616 days | 7% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5932 days | 7% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5936 days | 7% |
| Family_Thomsen | 9/10 | 5937 days | 7% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5941 days | 7% |
| Andy & Louise Dutton | 9/10 | 5942 days | 7% |
| Margo Alaska | 9/10 | 5946 days | 7% |
| Matilda Hansson | 8/10 | 5946 days | 7% |
| Teresa Gizzi | 8/10 | 5948 days | 7% |
| Brian_Val | 8/10 | 5958 days | 7% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 5958 days | 5% |
| Mike Brunt | 9/10 | 5963 days | 7% |
| Lousie Hug | 5/10 | 5969 days | 0% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 5971 days | 5% |
| Radek Hoferek | 10/10 | 5979 days | 7% |
| Wagner | 8/10 | 5980 days | 7% |
| Lisa Huet | 9/10 | 6014 days | 7% |
| Katie Morrow | 9/10 | 6014 days | 7% |
| rowan bryant | 8/10 | 6028 days | 7% |
| stevnba | 8/10 | 6030 days | 7% |
| stefanz | 10/10 | 6030 days | 7% |
| carmenk | 7/10 | 6031 days | 5% |
| andres | 10/10 | 6037 days | 7% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6037 days | 7% |
| selinab | 8/10 | 6038 days | 7% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 9/10 | 6047 days | 7% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 6049 days | 7% |
| Kirsty McGrath | 7/10 | 6049 days | 5% |
| Dan Mair | 7/10 | 6056 days | 5% |
| Bart en Mirjam | 8/10 | 6057 days | 7% |
| Ritag | 9/10 | 6161 days | 7% |
| Russ C | 9/10 | 6289 days | 7% |
| jenniferk | 8/10 | 6289 days | 7% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 6294 days | 7% |
| AnjaN | 10/10 | 6296 days | 7% |
| ClodaghM | 9/10 | 6306 days | 7% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 6306 days | 7% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6306 days | 7% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6309 days | 7% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6312 days | 5% |
| Wouter Muller | 8/10 | 6312 days | 7% |
| Krapels | 7/10 | 6313 days | 5% |
| Sam Marshall | 7/10 | 6317 days | 5% |
| Johannes Kerner | 6/10 | 6320 days | 3% |
| lannie | 8/10 | 6322 days | 7% |
| VictoriaH | 7/10 | 6324 days | 5% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6324 days | 7% |
| GaryW | 7/10 | 6324 days | 5% |
| Carmel | 6/10 | 6329 days | 3% |
| Raphaelle | 10/10 | 6332 days | 7% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6353 days | 7% |
| Nick Wilkinson | 9/10 | 6373 days | 7% |
| Jeanpierre | 10/10 | 6402 days | 7% |
| Pieter | 9/10 | 6410 days | 7% |
| Brent | 9/10 | 6479 days | 7% |
| Trina | 8/10 | 6513 days | 7% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 6521 days | 7% |
| Gorka Rojas | 6/10 | 6561 days | 3% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 6666 days | 7% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6666 days | 7% |
| Jason Page | 7/10 | 6669 days | 5% |
| Beate Sinn | 10/10 | 6673 days | 7% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6681 days | 7% |
| Ortved | 8/10 | 6686 days | 7% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6688 days | 7% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 10/10 | 6694 days | 7% |
| Celine | 8/10 | 6698 days | 7% |
| Timothy | 10/10 | 6735 days | 7% |
| Kara Della Groce | 10/10 | 6735 days | 7% |
| Christian Arnot | 8/10 | 6758 days | 7% |
| Anita | 9/10 | 6758 days | 7% |
| Stu Cutler | 9/10 | 6764 days | 7% |
| Ewen Maclean | 10/10 | 6764 days | 7% |
| Hendrich | 8/10 | 6764 days | 7% |
| Neil Cooke | 7/10 | 6771 days | 5% |
| ElasticLink | 9/10 | 6786 days | 7% |
| Nick Bailey | 8/10 | 6856 days | 7% |
| ranker_43 | 10/10 | 6891 days | 7% |
| Alan | 9/10 | 7000 days | 7% |
| jonas | 9/10 | 7015 days | 7% |
| MrsWesley | 8/10 | 7016 days | 7% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 7017 days | 7% |
| Uri | 9/10 | 7019 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 7025 days | 7% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 7026 days | 7% |
| M Bekker | 8/10 | 7031 days | 7% |
| ErikVanDam | 8/10 | 7045 days | 7% |
| Sharon | 10/10 | 7048 days | 7% |
| Bill | 9/10 | 7052 days | 7% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 7054 days | 7% |
| John | 6/10 | 7054 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Michael | 9/10 | 7055 days | 7% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 7065 days | 7% |
| Camilla | 8/10 | 7065 days | 7% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 7067 days | 7% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 7067 days | 7% |
| ErikSmith | 8/10 | 7067 days | 7% |
| KikiNelissen | 9/10 | 7067 days | 7% |
| Lyndsey | 7/10 | 7067 days | 5% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 7072 days | 7% |
| AmyBarnett | 8/10 | 7078 days | 7% |
| ranker_428 | 7/10 | 7078 days | 5% |
| mishasan | 10/10 | 8602 days | 7% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.12% |
| 198 | -2.13% |
| 199 | -2.14% |
| 200 | -2.15% |
| 201 | -2.16% |
| 202 | -2.17% |
| 203 | -2.18% |
| … | … |
1.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.