Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaiteriteri Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has a total of 173 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
153 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 153 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 85.29% and is based on 153 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.41%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Voland | 10/10 | 2343 days | 100% |
| Renault Margaux | 10/10 | 2372 days | 98% |
| Christian Chalupny | 10/10 | 2433 days | 95% |
| Regina85 | 10/10 | 2464 days | 93% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 9/10 | 2737 days | 75% |
| S Weslake | 9/10 | 3074 days | 55% |
| Martina Winkel | 10/10 | 3074 days | 56% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 9/10 | 3517 days | 28% |
| Gordon Todan | 8/10 | 3566 days | 25% |
| Carlos Castro | 10/10 | 3619 days | 23% |
| Jorge Anderson | 8/10 | 3777 days | 12% |
| Adele Jacques | 8/10 | 3788 days | 12% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3850 days | 8% |
| Aline Jimenez | 9/10 | 3890 days | 6% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4537 days | 7% |
| Michael Steimel | 9/10 | 4545 days | 7% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 9/10 | 4545 days | 7% |
| Max Meternich | 9/10 | 4549 days | 7% |
| Shay S | 9/10 | 4563 days | 7% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4580 days | 7% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4594 days | 7% |
| Sharron Berry | 9/10 | 4959 days | 7% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 4972 days | 7% |
| Alison Langley | 9/10 | 4972 days | 7% |
| Ingrid | 10/10 | 4972 days | 7% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 5001 days | 7% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 5001 days | 7% |
| David Prendergast | 8/10 | 5246 days | 7% |
| Green UK | 8/10 | 5246 days | 7% |
| Carly Braddock | 8/10 | 5254 days | 7% |
| Sandra Dirk | 9/10 | 5257 days | 7% |
| Peter Adams | 8/10 | 5259 days | 7% |
| Def Fem | 8/10 | 5260 days | 7% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5261 days | 7% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5267 days | 7% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 5270 days | 7% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5275 days | 7% |
| Andrea Bircher | 7/10 | 5279 days | 5% |
| Andreas Kofod-Hansen | 9/10 | 5279 days | 7% |
| Astrid Boon | 8/10 | 5279 days | 7% |
| Judith Fowler | 8/10 | 5280 days | 7% |
| M Neuman | 6/10 | 5286 days | 3% |
| Bethany Hamilton | 8/10 | 5293 days | 7% |
| Mark & Beth Kaufman | 9/10 | 5360 days | 7% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5363 days | 7% |
| Christoph | 9/10 | 5365 days | 7% |
| Natascha & Greg | 10/10 | 5368 days | 7% |
| Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5581 days | 7% |
| Florian Miller | 10/10 | 5614 days | 7% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5617 days | 7% |
| Johannes Klein | 10/10 | 5623 days | 7% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5624 days | 5% |
| K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5624 days | 7% |
| Jade & Henry | 10/10 | 5629 days | 7% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 5631 days | 7% |
| Jarrett King | 9/10 | 5632 days | 7% |
| Marco Schoeggl | 7/10 | 5633 days | 5% |
| Ross Salisbury | 10/10 | 5633 days | 7% |
| Tamara Clark | 7/10 | 5634 days | 5% |
| Callum Sibbald | 8/10 | 5635 days | 7% |
| Daniel Hammersley | 10/10 | 5636 days | 7% |
| Manuela Manns | 8/10 | 5644 days | 7% |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 5645 days | 7% |
| Dave and Emma | 8/10 | 5647 days | 7% |
| David and Wendy Lucas | 10/10 | 5648 days | 7% |
| Jessie Currie | 9/10 | 5650 days | 7% |
| Mark Roelofs | 7/10 | 5650 days | 5% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5651 days | 7% |
| Christina Fischer | 10/10 | 5654 days | 7% |
| Jensen | 9/10 | 5656 days | 7% |
| Isbabel | 10/10 | 5657 days | 7% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5973 days | 7% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5977 days | 7% |
| Family_Thomsen | 9/10 | 5978 days | 7% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5982 days | 7% |
| Andy & Louise Dutton | 9/10 | 5983 days | 7% |
| Margo Alaska | 9/10 | 5987 days | 7% |
| Matilda Hansson | 8/10 | 5987 days | 7% |
| Teresa Gizzi | 8/10 | 5989 days | 7% |
| Brian_Val | 8/10 | 5999 days | 7% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 5999 days | 5% |
| Mike Brunt | 9/10 | 6004 days | 7% |
| Lousie Hug | 5/10 | 6010 days | 0% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6012 days | 5% |
| Radek Hoferek | 10/10 | 6020 days | 7% |
| Wagner | 8/10 | 6021 days | 7% |
| Lisa Huet | 9/10 | 6055 days | 7% |
| Katie Morrow | 9/10 | 6055 days | 7% |
| rowan bryant | 8/10 | 6069 days | 7% |
| stevnba | 8/10 | 6071 days | 7% |
| stefanz | 10/10 | 6071 days | 7% |
| carmenk | 7/10 | 6072 days | 5% |
| andres | 10/10 | 6078 days | 7% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 6078 days | 7% |
| selinab | 8/10 | 6079 days | 7% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 9/10 | 6088 days | 7% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 6090 days | 7% |
| Kirsty McGrath | 7/10 | 6090 days | 5% |
| Dan Mair | 7/10 | 6097 days | 5% |
| Bart en Mirjam | 8/10 | 6098 days | 7% |
| Ritag | 9/10 | 6202 days | 7% |
| Russ C | 9/10 | 6330 days | 7% |
| jenniferk | 8/10 | 6330 days | 7% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 6335 days | 7% |
| AnjaN | 10/10 | 6337 days | 7% |
| ClodaghM | 9/10 | 6347 days | 7% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 6347 days | 7% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6347 days | 7% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6350 days | 7% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6353 days | 5% |
| Wouter Muller | 8/10 | 6353 days | 7% |
| Krapels | 7/10 | 6354 days | 5% |
| Sam Marshall | 7/10 | 6358 days | 5% |
| Johannes Kerner | 6/10 | 6361 days | 3% |
| lannie | 8/10 | 6363 days | 7% |
| VictoriaH | 7/10 | 6365 days | 5% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6365 days | 7% |
| GaryW | 7/10 | 6365 days | 5% |
| Carmel | 6/10 | 6370 days | 3% |
| Raphaelle | 10/10 | 6373 days | 7% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6394 days | 7% |
| Nick Wilkinson | 9/10 | 6413 days | 7% |
| Jeanpierre | 10/10 | 6443 days | 7% |
| Pieter | 9/10 | 6451 days | 7% |
| Brent | 9/10 | 6520 days | 7% |
| Trina | 8/10 | 6554 days | 7% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 6562 days | 7% |
| Gorka Rojas | 6/10 | 6602 days | 3% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 6707 days | 7% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6707 days | 7% |
| Jason Page | 7/10 | 6710 days | 5% |
| Beate Sinn | 10/10 | 6714 days | 7% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6722 days | 7% |
| Ortved | 8/10 | 6727 days | 7% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6729 days | 7% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 10/10 | 6735 days | 7% |
| Celine | 8/10 | 6739 days | 7% |
| Timothy | 10/10 | 6776 days | 7% |
| Kara Della Groce | 10/10 | 6776 days | 7% |
| Christian Arnot | 8/10 | 6799 days | 7% |
| Anita | 9/10 | 6799 days | 7% |
| Stu Cutler | 9/10 | 6805 days | 7% |
| Ewen Maclean | 10/10 | 6805 days | 7% |
| Hendrich | 8/10 | 6805 days | 7% |
| Neil Cooke | 7/10 | 6812 days | 5% |
| ElasticLink | 9/10 | 6827 days | 7% |
| Nick Bailey | 8/10 | 6897 days | 7% |
| ranker_43 | 10/10 | 6932 days | 7% |
| Alan | 9/10 | 7041 days | 7% |
| jonas | 9/10 | 7056 days | 7% |
| MrsWesley | 8/10 | 7057 days | 7% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 7058 days | 7% |
| Uri | 9/10 | 7060 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 7066 days | 7% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 7067 days | 7% |
| M Bekker | 8/10 | 7072 days | 7% |
| ErikVanDam | 8/10 | 7086 days | 7% |
| Sharon | 10/10 | 7089 days | 7% |
| Bill | 9/10 | 7093 days | 7% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 7095 days | 7% |
| John | 6/10 | 7095 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Michael | 9/10 | 7096 days | 7% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 7106 days | 7% |
| Camilla | 8/10 | 7106 days | 7% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 7108 days | 7% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 7108 days | 7% |
| ErikSmith | 8/10 | 7108 days | 7% |
| KikiNelissen | 9/10 | 7108 days | 7% |
| Lyndsey | 7/10 | 7108 days | 5% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 7113 days | 7% |
| AmyBarnett | 8/10 | 7119 days | 7% |
| ranker_428 | 7/10 | 7119 days | 5% |
| mishasan | 10/10 | 8643 days | 7% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.06% |
| 198 | -2.07% |
| 199 | -2.08% |
| 200 | -2.09% |
| 201 | -2.10% |
| 202 | -2.12% |
| 203 | -2.13% |
| … | … |
1.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.