G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kahu Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
223 Valid Reviews
The Kahu Kayaks experience has a total of 224 reviews. There are 223 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 223 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 112 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 62 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks valid reviews is 91.93% and is based on 223 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
174 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 223 valid reviews, the experience has 174 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 74 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 55 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 33 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 90.57% and is based on 174 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kara | 10/10 | 1354 days | 100% |
| Seaghan & Dune | 10/10 | 1444 days | 75% |
| Pat Burns | 10/10 | 2481 days | 21% |
| Sabine Gauss | 9/10 | 3204 days | 13% |
| Rashi Birla | 10/10 | 3224 days | 13% |
| Alex Patteron | 10/10 | 3264 days | 12% |
| Marcel Felder | 10/10 | 3300 days | 12% |
| Tom Rogers | 8/10 | 3303 days | 12% |
| Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 3303 days | 12% |
| Lieke vol Velde | 9/10 | 3303 days | 12% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 3308 days | 12% |
| Eurard Achille | 8/10 | 3316 days | 12% |
| Nickolas Jonkergouw | 9/10 | 3332 days | 11% |
| Miriam Gamble | 9/10 | 3347 days | 11% |
| Michelle O'Regen | 10/10 | 3544 days | 9% |
| Dahlia Ahmed | 9/10 | 3567 days | 9% |
| Lee Sandberg | 10/10 | 3594 days | 9% |
| Tina Rust | 10/10 | 3595 days | 9% |
| Alice and James | 7/10 | 3613 days | 8% |
| Chloe Guerillot | 6/10 | 3618 days | 7% |
| Christopher Rotsch | 8/10 | 3652 days | 8% |
| Tarillon Family | 7/10 | 3932 days | 5% |
| Charles Aubry | 9/10 | 3964 days | 5% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 3974 days | 4% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 3981 days | 4% |
| David and Stephan | 10/10 | 4011 days | 4% |
| Devan Sheppard | 9/10 | 4029 days | 4% |
| Christina | 7/10 | 4289 days | 1% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 10/10 | 4289 days | 1% |
| Erik Nestlez | 10/10 | 4290 days | 1% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4305 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 9/10 | 4305 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 4319 days | 1% |
| Marinette | 8/10 | 4319 days | 1% |
| Luca Scheuemeier | 10/10 | 4319 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Volker | 8/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| jonas meier | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Romina Bolz | 8/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Paul Balfour | 8/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Eric and Nienke | 9/10 | 4397 days | 6% |
| Julie Hatch | 10/10 | 4458 days | 6% |
| Rampon | 9/10 | 4659 days | 6% |
| Debiesse | 10/10 | 4660 days | 6% |
| Hendrik Rother | 10/10 | 4663 days | 6% |
| Claire | 8/10 | 4672 days | 6% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4674 days | 6% |
| Fabian Koitka | 9/10 | 4692 days | 6% |
| Michal Maly | 8/10 | 4698 days | 6% |
| JohnHyde | 10/10 | 4731 days | 6% |
| Aurelie Morin | 7/10 | 4753 days | 5% |
| Natalie Nubler | 10/10 | 4754 days | 6% |
| Anne Sutkowi | 7/10 | 4762 days | 5% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 9/10 | 4762 days | 6% |
| Erik Funk | 9/10 | 4769 days | 6% |
| Harald Prinz | 8/10 | 4773 days | 6% |
| James Darren Tennant | 10/10 | 4774 days | 6% |
| scoopy | 10/10 | 5006 days | 6% |
| Goran Backlund | 9/10 | 5022 days | 6% |
| Tinne Cis | 6/10 | 5034 days | 5% |
| Richard and Janet | 10/10 | 5040 days | 6% |
| Michael Jefferies | 10/10 | 5040 days | 6% |
| Harald | 10/10 | 5046 days | 6% |
| Anne King | 9/10 | 5046 days | 6% |
| Matt Kelley | 9/10 | 5046 days | 6% |
| Lotte Zwail | 9/10 | 5046 days | 6% |
| Hannah Bean | 8/10 | 5048 days | 6% |
| Mike & Jennie | 9/10 | 5048 days | 6% |
| Mike & Mandy | 8/10 | 5048 days | 6% |
| pamr | 8/10 | 5050 days | 6% |
| Villa | 9/10 | 5051 days | 6% |
| Richard Spandonk | 8/10 | 5054 days | 6% |
| Franziska & Katrin | 10/10 | 5058 days | 6% |
| Clemens | 10/10 | 5059 days | 6% |
| Devon Urlacher | 8/10 | 5060 days | 6% |
| Thomas Krause | 8/10 | 5060 days | 6% |
| Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir | 7/10 | 5065 days | 5% |
| Remy van Heugten | 8/10 | 5065 days | 6% |
| Keith_W | 10/10 | 5066 days | 6% |
| Annika | 10/10 | 5066 days | 6% |
| ToGy | 8/10 | 5066 days | 6% |
| Alfred & Henrike | 10/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
| Barbsldh | 10/10 | 5097 days | 6% |
| Deirdre Hayes | 8/10 | 5134 days | 6% |
| Cornelia & Josef | 9/10 | 5140 days | 6% |
| Fran & Roger | 10/10 | 5145 days | 6% |
| Mark Bakker | 8/10 | 5145 days | 6% |
| Gert | 9/10 | 5158 days | 6% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 5219 days | 6% |
| Martin Potter | 9/10 | 5370 days | 6% |
| Anezka Hlavacova | 9/10 | 5386 days | 6% |
| Dave Jones | 9/10 | 5387 days | 6% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 5394 days | 6% |
| Wouter Moui | 9/10 | 5395 days | 6% |
| Canada | 10/10 | 5395 days | 6% |
| Michael Long | 10/10 | 5396 days | 6% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 5397 days | 6% |
| Jacob Nube | 9/10 | 5399 days | 6% |
| Andy Cameron-Daniels | 10/10 | 5401 days | 6% |
| khs | 9/10 | 5403 days | 6% |
| Ann Parry | 10/10 | 5407 days | 6% |
| Adam Hayley | 7/10 | 5415 days | 5% |
| Katie Nicol | 10/10 | 5416 days | 6% |
| Darren Bruestle | 9/10 | 5418 days | 6% |
| Tom | 9/10 | 5421 days | 6% |
| Russell Stevens | 8/10 | 5421 days | 6% |
| Philipp Rau | 9/10 | 5422 days | 6% |
| Luc Marchand | 10/10 | 5423 days | 6% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 5423 days | 6% |
| Leslie Aldridge | 10/10 | 5424 days | 6% |
| Jorgen vahl Rasmussen | 9/10 | 5424 days | 6% |
| pjfranke | 10/10 | 5431 days | 6% |
| Beate Godsk | 9/10 | 5431 days | 6% |
| Bunthorne | 10/10 | 5462 days | 6% |
| emthekiwi | 10/10 | 5554 days | 6% |
| Demmers | 10/10 | 5646 days | 6% |
| Phineas Smith-Fox | 9/10 | 5704 days | 6% |
| wilsoneng | 10/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
| Tim Smith | 10/10 | 5759 days | 6% |
| BenH | 10/10 | 5768 days | 6% |
| Flora | 10/10 | 5770 days | 6% |
| Vera Van Schie | 10/10 | 5776 days | 6% |
| Thomas K | 9/10 | 5777 days | 6% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 10/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
| Helen B | 9/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
| Ferth | 10/10 | 5782 days | 6% |
| Roos | 9/10 | 5782 days | 6% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 5782 days | 6% |
| Hannah Clark | 10/10 | 5789 days | 6% |
| Ingrid Overes | 10/10 | 5795 days | 6% |
| Tracey Buschl | 10/10 | 5796 days | 6% |
| Mitchell Mapletree | 10/10 | 5812 days | 6% |
| Maki | 10/10 | 5827 days | 6% |
| nigelwaterhouse | 9/10 | 5827 days | 6% |
| Ed | 10/10 | 5827 days | 6% |
| Dogmatix | 10/10 | 5827 days | 6% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5842 days | 6% |
| biene | 10/10 | 5842 days | 6% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5862 days | 6% |
| Karen Raven | 8/10 | 5865 days | 6% |
| Eimear Doyle | 10/10 | 5870 days | 6% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5870 days | 6% |
| amzbellz | 10/10 | 5919 days | 6% |
| Kurt Smudzinski | 10/10 | 5949 days | 6% |
| bertel | 10/10 | 5985 days | 6% |
| desl | 10/10 | 6102 days | 6% |
| martinat | 10/10 | 6102 days | 6% |
| Van Lent | 8/10 | 6103 days | 6% |
| S Schlesinger | 10/10 | 6106 days | 6% |
| Andrew Smith | 9/10 | 6108 days | 6% |
| BevanLisa | 9/10 | 6119 days | 6% |
| Barry Smith | 9/10 | 6122 days | 6% |
| Mia | 10/10 | 6123 days | 6% |
| Soeren Rasmussen | 10/10 | 6124 days | 6% |
| eatc | 10/10 | 6133 days | 6% |
| A | 9/10 | 6133 days | 6% |
| Charles | 8/10 | 6134 days | 6% |
| Dalibor | 10/10 | 6136 days | 6% |
| ChristopherD | 8/10 | 6136 days | 6% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 6136 days | 6% |
| Emma Louise | 9/10 | 6145 days | 6% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 6150 days | 6% |
| Rachel | 10/10 | 6151 days | 6% |
| AlastairP | 10/10 | 6159 days | 6% |
| mike smith | 10/10 | 6159 days | 6% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 6159 days | 6% |
| Busson | 8/10 | 6164 days | 6% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 6166 days | 5% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 6166 days | 6% |
| Tanja | 10/10 | 6166 days | 6% |
| Dianne | 9/10 | 6170 days | 6% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6172 days | 6% |
| AndreM | 10/10 | 6172 days | 6% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6172 days | 5% |
| Bernd | 10/10 | 6172 days | 6% |
| KTinga | 9/10 | 6173 days | 6% |
| Lucas | 10/10 | 6174 days | 6% |
| Josefine | 10/10 | 6174 days | 6% |
| alex | 10/10 | 6174 days | 6% |
| Richard Rodd | 10/10 | 6180 days | 6% |
| rar | 10/10 | 6180 days | 6% |
| Melanie | 10/10 | 6182 days | 6% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6206 days | 6% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 6214 days | 6% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6222 days | 6% |
| Maureen | 10/10 | 6222 days | 6% |
| lming60 | 10/10 | 6227 days | 6% |
| peter_lowles | 10/10 | 6232 days | 6% |
| mike brett | 8/10 | 6236 days | 6% |
| RhysandSteffi | 10/10 | 6252 days | 6% |
| Paula Semmens | 9/10 | 6260 days | 6% |
| StephR | 10/10 | 6261 days | 6% |
| Rudolf Meredith | 10/10 | 6262 days | 6% |
| Max | 9/10 | 6337 days | 6% |
| Rhea | 9/10 | 6410 days | 6% |
| annemarie_and_markus | 10/10 | 6453 days | 6% |
| charlotte | 9/10 | 6474 days | 6% |
| jahirst | 10/10 | 6484 days | 6% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 6485 days | 6% |
| Barnie | 10/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
| Kolacny | 10/10 | 6488 days | 6% |
| Mie Toft Pedersen | 9/10 | 6498 days | 6% |
| Emily Houston | 10/10 | 6499 days | 6% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 6501 days | 6% |
| Ian Ridgeway | 10/10 | 6503 days | 6% |
| Loodle | 9/10 | 6513 days | 6% |
| Zurcher Marco | 3/10 | 6529 days | 3% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6542 days | 6% |
| Hugh McCarthy | 6/10 | 6549 days | 5% |
| Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6549 days | 6% |
| Anneli | 8/10 | 6550 days | 6% |
| holly parker | 10/10 | 6560 days | 6% |
| Vince | 10/10 | 6569 days | 6% |
| Lena | 10/10 | 6580 days | 6% |
| Carolr | 9/10 | 6591 days | 6% |
| MarkReid | 10/10 | 6792 days | 6% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 6826 days | 6% |
| Magnus | 8/10 | 6832 days | 6% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6835 days | 6% |
| Heather | 10/10 | 6839 days | 6% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6846 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kahu Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Kahu Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kahu Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
1.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.