Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kahu Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
223 Valid Reviews
The Kahu Kayaks experience has a total of 224 reviews. There are 223 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 223 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 112 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 62 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks valid reviews is 91.93% and is based on 223 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
174 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 223 valid reviews, the experience has 174 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 74 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 55 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 33 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 90.57% and is based on 174 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.10%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kara | 10/10 | 1379 days | 100% |
| Seaghan & Dune | 10/10 | 1469 days | 75% |
| Pat Burns | 10/10 | 2506 days | 22% |
| Sabine Gauss | 9/10 | 3229 days | 14% |
| Rashi Birla | 10/10 | 3249 days | 13% |
| Alex Patteron | 10/10 | 3289 days | 13% |
| Marcel Felder | 10/10 | 3325 days | 13% |
| Tom Rogers | 8/10 | 3328 days | 12% |
| Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 3328 days | 12% |
| Lieke vol Velde | 9/10 | 3328 days | 12% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 3333 days | 12% |
| Eurard Achille | 8/10 | 3341 days | 12% |
| Nickolas Jonkergouw | 9/10 | 3357 days | 12% |
| Miriam Gamble | 9/10 | 3372 days | 12% |
| Michelle O'Regen | 10/10 | 3569 days | 10% |
| Dahlia Ahmed | 9/10 | 3592 days | 9% |
| Lee Sandberg | 10/10 | 3619 days | 9% |
| Tina Rust | 10/10 | 3620 days | 9% |
| Alice and James | 7/10 | 3638 days | 8% |
| Chloe Guerillot | 6/10 | 3643 days | 8% |
| Christopher Rotsch | 8/10 | 3677 days | 8% |
| Tarillon Family | 7/10 | 3957 days | 5% |
| Charles Aubry | 9/10 | 3989 days | 5% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 3999 days | 4% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 4006 days | 4% |
| David and Stephan | 10/10 | 4036 days | 4% |
| Devan Sheppard | 9/10 | 4054 days | 4% |
| Christina | 7/10 | 4314 days | 1% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 10/10 | 4314 days | 1% |
| Erik Nestlez | 10/10 | 4315 days | 1% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4330 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 9/10 | 4330 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Marinette | 8/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Luca Scheuemeier | 10/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Volker | 8/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| jonas meier | 9/10 | 4396 days | 6% |
| Romina Bolz | 8/10 | 4396 days | 6% |
| Paul Balfour | 8/10 | 4401 days | 6% |
| Eric and Nienke | 9/10 | 4422 days | 6% |
| Julie Hatch | 10/10 | 4483 days | 6% |
| Rampon | 9/10 | 4684 days | 6% |
| Debiesse | 10/10 | 4685 days | 6% |
| Hendrik Rother | 10/10 | 4688 days | 6% |
| Claire | 8/10 | 4697 days | 6% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4699 days | 6% |
| Fabian Koitka | 9/10 | 4717 days | 6% |
| Michal Maly | 8/10 | 4723 days | 6% |
| JohnHyde | 10/10 | 4756 days | 6% |
| Aurelie Morin | 7/10 | 4778 days | 6% |
| Natalie Nubler | 10/10 | 4779 days | 6% |
| Anne Sutkowi | 7/10 | 4787 days | 6% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 9/10 | 4787 days | 6% |
| Erik Funk | 9/10 | 4794 days | 6% |
| Harald Prinz | 8/10 | 4798 days | 6% |
| James Darren Tennant | 10/10 | 4799 days | 6% |
| scoopy | 10/10 | 5031 days | 6% |
| Goran Backlund | 9/10 | 5047 days | 6% |
| Tinne Cis | 6/10 | 5059 days | 5% |
| Richard and Janet | 10/10 | 5065 days | 6% |
| Michael Jefferies | 10/10 | 5065 days | 6% |
| Harald | 10/10 | 5071 days | 6% |
| Anne King | 9/10 | 5071 days | 6% |
| Matt Kelley | 9/10 | 5071 days | 6% |
| Lotte Zwail | 9/10 | 5071 days | 6% |
| Hannah Bean | 8/10 | 5073 days | 6% |
| Mike & Jennie | 9/10 | 5073 days | 6% |
| Mike & Mandy | 8/10 | 5073 days | 6% |
| pamr | 8/10 | 5075 days | 6% |
| Villa | 9/10 | 5076 days | 6% |
| Richard Spandonk | 8/10 | 5079 days | 6% |
| Franziska & Katrin | 10/10 | 5083 days | 6% |
| Clemens | 10/10 | 5084 days | 6% |
| Devon Urlacher | 8/10 | 5085 days | 6% |
| Thomas Krause | 8/10 | 5085 days | 6% |
| Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir | 7/10 | 5090 days | 6% |
| Remy van Heugten | 8/10 | 5090 days | 6% |
| Keith_W | 10/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
| Annika | 10/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
| ToGy | 8/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
| Alfred & Henrike | 10/10 | 5116 days | 6% |
| Barbsldh | 10/10 | 5122 days | 6% |
| Deirdre Hayes | 8/10 | 5159 days | 6% |
| Cornelia & Josef | 9/10 | 5165 days | 6% |
| Fran & Roger | 10/10 | 5170 days | 6% |
| Mark Bakker | 8/10 | 5170 days | 6% |
| Gert | 9/10 | 5183 days | 6% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 5244 days | 6% |
| Martin Potter | 9/10 | 5395 days | 6% |
| Anezka Hlavacova | 9/10 | 5411 days | 6% |
| Dave Jones | 9/10 | 5412 days | 6% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 5419 days | 6% |
| Wouter Moui | 9/10 | 5420 days | 6% |
| Canada | 10/10 | 5420 days | 6% |
| Michael Long | 10/10 | 5421 days | 6% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 5422 days | 6% |
| Jacob Nube | 9/10 | 5424 days | 6% |
| Andy Cameron-Daniels | 10/10 | 5426 days | 6% |
| khs | 9/10 | 5428 days | 6% |
| Ann Parry | 10/10 | 5432 days | 6% |
| Adam Hayley | 7/10 | 5440 days | 6% |
| Katie Nicol | 10/10 | 5441 days | 6% |
| Darren Bruestle | 9/10 | 5443 days | 6% |
| Tom | 9/10 | 5446 days | 6% |
| Russell Stevens | 8/10 | 5446 days | 6% |
| Philipp Rau | 9/10 | 5447 days | 6% |
| Luc Marchand | 10/10 | 5448 days | 6% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 5448 days | 6% |
| Leslie Aldridge | 10/10 | 5449 days | 6% |
| Jorgen vahl Rasmussen | 9/10 | 5449 days | 6% |
| pjfranke | 10/10 | 5456 days | 6% |
| Beate Godsk | 9/10 | 5456 days | 6% |
| Bunthorne | 10/10 | 5487 days | 6% |
| emthekiwi | 10/10 | 5579 days | 6% |
| Demmers | 10/10 | 5671 days | 6% |
| Phineas Smith-Fox | 9/10 | 5729 days | 6% |
| wilsoneng | 10/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 5762 days | 6% |
| Tim Smith | 10/10 | 5784 days | 6% |
| BenH | 10/10 | 5793 days | 6% |
| Flora | 10/10 | 5795 days | 6% |
| Vera Van Schie | 10/10 | 5801 days | 6% |
| Thomas K | 9/10 | 5802 days | 6% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 10/10 | 5803 days | 6% |
| Helen B | 9/10 | 5803 days | 6% |
| Ferth | 10/10 | 5807 days | 6% |
| Roos | 9/10 | 5807 days | 6% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 5807 days | 6% |
| Hannah Clark | 10/10 | 5814 days | 6% |
| Ingrid Overes | 10/10 | 5820 days | 6% |
| Tracey Buschl | 10/10 | 5821 days | 6% |
| Mitchell Mapletree | 10/10 | 5837 days | 6% |
| Maki | 10/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
| nigelwaterhouse | 9/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
| Ed | 10/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
| Dogmatix | 10/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5867 days | 6% |
| biene | 10/10 | 5867 days | 6% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5887 days | 6% |
| Karen Raven | 8/10 | 5890 days | 6% |
| Eimear Doyle | 10/10 | 5895 days | 6% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5895 days | 6% |
| amzbellz | 10/10 | 5944 days | 6% |
| Kurt Smudzinski | 10/10 | 5974 days | 6% |
| bertel | 10/10 | 6010 days | 6% |
| desl | 10/10 | 6127 days | 6% |
| martinat | 10/10 | 6127 days | 6% |
| Van Lent | 8/10 | 6128 days | 6% |
| S Schlesinger | 10/10 | 6131 days | 6% |
| Andrew Smith | 9/10 | 6133 days | 6% |
| BevanLisa | 9/10 | 6144 days | 6% |
| Barry Smith | 9/10 | 6147 days | 6% |
| Mia | 10/10 | 6148 days | 6% |
| Soeren Rasmussen | 10/10 | 6150 days | 6% |
| eatc | 10/10 | 6158 days | 6% |
| A | 9/10 | 6158 days | 6% |
| Charles | 8/10 | 6159 days | 6% |
| Dalibor | 10/10 | 6161 days | 6% |
| ChristopherD | 8/10 | 6161 days | 6% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 6161 days | 6% |
| Emma Louise | 9/10 | 6170 days | 6% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 6175 days | 6% |
| Rachel | 10/10 | 6176 days | 6% |
| AlastairP | 10/10 | 6184 days | 6% |
| mike smith | 10/10 | 6184 days | 6% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 6184 days | 6% |
| Busson | 8/10 | 6189 days | 6% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 6191 days | 6% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 6191 days | 6% |
| Tanja | 10/10 | 6191 days | 6% |
| Dianne | 9/10 | 6195 days | 6% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6197 days | 6% |
| AndreM | 10/10 | 6197 days | 6% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6197 days | 6% |
| Bernd | 10/10 | 6198 days | 6% |
| KTinga | 9/10 | 6198 days | 6% |
| Lucas | 10/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| Josefine | 10/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| alex | 10/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| Richard Rodd | 10/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| rar | 10/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| Melanie | 10/10 | 6207 days | 6% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6232 days | 6% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 6239 days | 6% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6247 days | 6% |
| Maureen | 10/10 | 6247 days | 6% |
| lming60 | 10/10 | 6252 days | 6% |
| peter_lowles | 10/10 | 6257 days | 6% |
| mike brett | 8/10 | 6261 days | 6% |
| RhysandSteffi | 10/10 | 6277 days | 6% |
| Paula Semmens | 9/10 | 6285 days | 6% |
| StephR | 10/10 | 6286 days | 6% |
| Rudolf Meredith | 10/10 | 6287 days | 6% |
| Max | 9/10 | 6362 days | 6% |
| Rhea | 9/10 | 6435 days | 6% |
| annemarie_and_markus | 10/10 | 6478 days | 6% |
| charlotte | 9/10 | 6500 days | 6% |
| jahirst | 10/10 | 6509 days | 6% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 6510 days | 6% |
| Barnie | 10/10 | 6513 days | 6% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6513 days | 6% |
| Kolacny | 10/10 | 6513 days | 6% |
| Mie Toft Pedersen | 9/10 | 6523 days | 6% |
| Emily Houston | 10/10 | 6524 days | 6% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 6526 days | 6% |
| Ian Ridgeway | 10/10 | 6528 days | 6% |
| Loodle | 9/10 | 6538 days | 6% |
| Zurcher Marco | 3/10 | 6554 days | 3% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6567 days | 6% |
| Hugh McCarthy | 6/10 | 6574 days | 5% |
| Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6574 days | 6% |
| Anneli | 8/10 | 6575 days | 6% |
| holly parker | 10/10 | 6585 days | 6% |
| Vince | 10/10 | 6595 days | 6% |
| Lena | 10/10 | 6605 days | 6% |
| Carolr | 9/10 | 6616 days | 6% |
| MarkReid | 10/10 | 6817 days | 6% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 6851 days | 6% |
| Magnus | 8/10 | 6857 days | 6% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6860 days | 6% |
| Heather | 10/10 | 6864 days | 6% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6871 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kahu Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Kahu Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kahu Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
1.13% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.