Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
84 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures experience has a total of 84 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures valid reviews is 84.76% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
76 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 76 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
36% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures face-to-face reviews is 83.95% and is based on 76 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
85.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Earle | 9/10 | 2058 days | 100% |
| Shay S | 8/10 | 4643 days | 8% |
| Jon Barratt | 9/10 | 5076 days | 9% |
| Rolf Zwahlen | 9/10 | 5077 days | 9% |
| Janse | 8/10 | 5361 days | 8% |
| Richard Maddock | 8/10 | 5362 days | 8% |
| Ute Rogawski | 4/10 | 5366 days | 0% |
| John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 5445 days | 9% |
| Mary Banks | 10/10 | 5704 days | 9% |
| Lenny Appel | 9/10 | 5712 days | 9% |
| Nadja | 9/10 | 5726 days | 9% |
| Hannah Watts | 7/10 | 5726 days | 7% |
| Jayne | 9/10 | 5726 days | 9% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 5730 days | 9% |
| Heike Toepelt | 8/10 | 5731 days | 8% |
| Jason Hernandez | 8/10 | 5732 days | 8% |
| Petersen | 10/10 | 5732 days | 9% |
| Georgina Davey | 10/10 | 5736 days | 9% |
| Angela | 9/10 | 5997 days | 9% |
| joycevanb | 8/10 | 6015 days | 8% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 6078 days | 9% |
| Johan | 8/10 | 6078 days | 8% |
| Belinda Godhard | 9/10 | 6101 days | 9% |
| liddellfiona | 10/10 | 6135 days | 9% |
| paulj | 10/10 | 6151 days | 9% |
| richelle | 9/10 | 6159 days | 9% |
| Cat Payne | 9/10 | 6323 days | 9% |
| Nikki Turner | 8/10 | 6331 days | 8% |
| AndreaT | 9/10 | 6406 days | 9% |
| TaraD | 8/10 | 6408 days | 8% |
| BiancaA | 8/10 | 6408 days | 8% |
| suet | 9/10 | 6410 days | 9% |
| rosil | 9/10 | 6410 days | 9% |
| Martina Bumiller | 8/10 | 6415 days | 8% |
| DennisK | 7/10 | 6422 days | 7% |
| Torsten | 8/10 | 6429 days | 8% |
| Steve Piluke | 10/10 | 6449 days | 9% |
| Brian | 6/10 | 6450 days | 5% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 6453 days | 8% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 6458 days | 9% |
| Linda Coles | 10/10 | 6469 days | 9% |
| Tasha-Moana Archibald | 10/10 | 6469 days | 9% |
| Freja | 10/10 | 6482 days | 9% |
| Sonja | 7/10 | 6515 days | 7% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 6528 days | 9% |
| Chris Hertz | 9/10 | 6528 days | 9% |
| Abby | 8/10 | 6775 days | 8% |
| Naoko | 9/10 | 6776 days | 9% |
| Jennifer Baulch | 9/10 | 6786 days | 9% |
| Marion | 5/10 | 6790 days | 3% |
| Christian | 8/10 | 6797 days | 8% |
| Steve Burke | 7/10 | 6797 days | 7% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 6801 days | 9% |
| Greg & Lynette | 10/10 | 6803 days | 9% |
| Roger Repolusk | 8/10 | 6807 days | 8% |
| Simon Mills | 9/10 | 6807 days | 9% |
| Christian Schwerdt | 8/10 | 6811 days | 8% |
| Wanda | 9/10 | 6811 days | 9% |
| Knol | 9/10 | 6811 days | 9% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 6823 days | 8% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 6824 days | 9% |
| Tamzin | 10/10 | 6824 days | 9% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 6846 days | 9% |
| Swen Schroder | 5/10 | 6850 days | 3% |
| Jann Anderssen | 10/10 | 6850 days | 9% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 6852 days | 9% |
| Mette de Graap | 7/10 | 6852 days | 7% |
| Thierry Berdah | 10/10 | 6853 days | 9% |
| Helena | 7/10 | 6853 days | 7% |
| Peter Katafey | 7/10 | 6853 days | 7% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 9/10 | 6853 days | 9% |
| Bronwyn Gaby | 8/10 | 6856 days | 8% |
| Gail | 9/10 | 6856 days | 9% |
| Willemien | 9/10 | 6902 days | 9% |
| Richard Kindgren | 7/10 | 6902 days | 7% |
| silja tans | 9/10 | 6902 days | 9% |
| David | 5/10 | 7131 days | 3% |
| Heather | 9/10 | 7147 days | 9% |
| Jossy | 8/10 | 7179 days | 8% |
| Italy | 9/10 | 7182 days | 9% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 7182 days | 8% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 7182 days | 8% |
| Colin | 6/10 | 7184 days | 5% |
| Didier | 8/10 | 7184 days | 8% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.64% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Sailing Adventures experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.59% |
| 198 | -3.60% |
| 199 | -3.62% |
| 200 | -3.64% |
| 201 | -3.66% |
| 202 | -3.68% |
| 203 | -3.70% |
| … | … |
2.48% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.