Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rangitata Rafts Ltd.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rangitata Rafts Ltd
Valid Reviews
78 Valid Reviews
The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has a total of 78 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 78 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 55 |
|
71% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
94.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitata Rafts Ltd valid reviews is 94.87% and is based on 78 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
33 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 78 valid reviews, the experience has 33 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 33 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
52% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitata Rafts Ltd face-to-face reviews is 93.03% and is based on 33 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.08%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liam Elferins | 9/10 | 1258 days |  |
4.68 | 100% |
| Marjolen Klomphaler | 10/10 | 1281 days | |
4.64 | 99% |
| Sabrina Kulikar | 10/10 | 1318 days | |
4.56 | 97% |
| sanneke tangel | 8/10 | 1675 days | |
3.67 | 78% |
| Maria Schober | 8/10 | 1976 days | |
3.11 | 66% |
| kevin george | 10/10 | 2445 days | 2.36 | 50% | |
| Stu Murray | 10/10 | 2690 days | |
1.88 | 40% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 10/10 | 2711 days | |
1.84 | 39% |
| John | 9/10 | 2773 days | |
1.72 | 37% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 2796 days | |
1.67 | 36% |
| wtyson | 1/10 | 2871 days | 1.11 | 24% | |
| Chris Marsh | 10/10 | 3081 days | |
1.11 | 24% |
| budge69 | 10/10 | 3084 days | 1.11 | 24% | |
| CHOW | 10/10 | 3207 days | 0.87 | 19% | |
| Marinathebraveone | 10/10 | 3421 days | 0.45 | 10% | |
| louisemartensson | 10/10 | 3421 days | 0.45 | 10% | |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 3435 days | |
0.42 | 9% |
| NicoleM | 8/10 | 3449 days | 0.37 | 8% | |
| Richie | 9/10 | 3449 days | 0.39 | 8% | |
| chels144 | 10/10 | 3480 days | 0.33 | 7% | |
| mandiholtz | 10/10 | 3511 days | 0.27 | 6% | |
| Shanel | 10/10 | 3541 days | 0.21 | 5% | |
| LouiseVicente | 10/10 | 3725 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| SteveMcPeace | 10/10 | 3755 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Nicola | 10/10 | 3786 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Frances Hay | 10/10 | 3813 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David Roque | 10/10 | 3814 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Claudia Wälti | 10/10 | 3814 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| grobster | 10/10 | 3814 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| shannahan | 9/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| ChristinaO | 9/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| marianne petersen | 10/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Becca | 10/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Harry Gates | 10/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Shooter | 10/10 | 3845 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| godin | 10/10 | 3876 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Gareth Jones | 10/10 | 3876 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Gina Swindells | 10/10 | 3887 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ric Lee | 10/10 | 3937 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Louise Humphreys | 10/10 | 3937 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| racheldonn | 10/10 | 3937 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Sharon Heimeier | 9/10 | 3967 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| AoamC | 9/10 | 4122 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nicola | 10/10 | 4123 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 4123 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 4123 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helen Josten | 10/10 | 4130 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Birgitte Weitemeyer | 10/10 | 4135 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Greg18 | 8/10 | 4151 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| RobC1 | 9/10 | 4155 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| RichardB1 | 10/10 | 4155 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JoT | 10/10 | 4155 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| RobH | 10/10 | 4156 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Steve Sayers | 10/10 | 4157 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| mash | 10/10 | 4166 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| renanf | 10/10 | 4171 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Bronte Koop | 10/10 | 4176 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Kasumi | 10/10 | 4179 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 4188 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paul Moisy | 10/10 | 4190 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Andrew | 9/10 | 4196 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| BenD | 7/10 | 4210 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Julia Klingberg | 10/10 | 4224 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Chris Hertz | 10/10 | 4238 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| jon c | 10/10 | 4241 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Sue Stevens | 10/10 | 4266 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Dal Piggott | 10/10 | 4285 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Sam Prior | 10/10 | 4335 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 4485 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Renske Tehurne | 9/10 | 4511 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Janne | 10/10 | 4524 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| John | 8/10 | 4534 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Matt Walker | 10/10 | 4534 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sandra Gustafson | 10/10 | 4562 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Brynn | 9/10 | 4806 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David | 9/10 | 4856 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| NeilYeoman | 10/10 | 4857 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Deirdre | 8/10 | 4898 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.00% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -1.97% |
| 198 | -1.98% |
| 199 | -1.99% |
| 200 | -2.00% |
| 201 | -2.01% |
| 202 | -2.02% |
| 203 | -2.03% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.