Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rangitata Rafts Ltd.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Rangitata Rafts Ltd
Valid Reviews
78 Valid Reviews
The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has a total of 78 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 78 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 55 |
|
71% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
94.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitata Rafts Ltd valid reviews is 94.87% and is based on 78 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
33 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 78 valid reviews, the experience has 33 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 33 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
52% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitata Rafts Ltd face-to-face reviews is 93.03% and is based on 33 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.01%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liam Elferins | 9/10 | 566 days |  |
59.21 | 100% |
| Marjolen Klomphaler | 10/10 | 589 days | |
54.69 | 92% |
| Sabrina Kulikar | 10/10 | 626 days | |
47.83 | 80% |
| sanneke tangel | 8/10 | 983 days | |
8.39 | 13% |
| Maria Schober | 8/10 | 1284 days | |
5.69 | 8% |
| kevin george | 10/10 | 1753 days | 4.1 | 6% | |
| Stu Murray | 10/10 | 1998 days | |
4.52 | 6% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 10/10 | 2019 days | |
4.48 | 6% |
| John | 9/10 | 2081 days | |
4.38 | 6% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 2104 days | |
4.34 | 6% |
| wtyson | 1/10 | 2179 days | 2.99 | 4% | |
| Chris Marsh | 10/10 | 2389 days | |
3.87 | 5% |
| budge69 | 10/10 | 2392 days | 3.22 | 4% | |
| CHOW | 10/10 | 2515 days | 3.05 | 4% | |
| Marinathebraveone | 10/10 | 2729 days | 2.76 | 3% | |
| louisemartensson | 10/10 | 2729 days | 2.76 | 3% | |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 2743 days | |
3.29 | 4% |
| NicoleM | 8/10 | 2757 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| Richie | 9/10 | 2757 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| chels144 | 10/10 | 2788 days | 2.68 | 3% | |
| mandiholtz | 10/10 | 2819 days | 2.64 | 3% | |
| Shanel | 10/10 | 2849 days | 2.6 | 3% | |
| LouiseVicente | 10/10 | 3033 days | 2.35 | 3% | |
| SteveMcPeace | 10/10 | 3063 days | 2.3 | 2% | |
| Nicola | 10/10 | 3094 days | 2.26 | 2% | |
| Frances Hay | 10/10 | 3121 days | |
2.67 | 3% |
| David Roque | 10/10 | 3122 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| Claudia Wälti | 10/10 | 3122 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| grobster | 10/10 | 3122 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| shannahan | 9/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| ChristinaO | 9/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| marianne petersen | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| Becca | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| Harry Gates | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| Shooter | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| godin | 10/10 | 3184 days | 2.14 | 2% | |
| Gareth Jones | 10/10 | 3184 days | 2.14 | 2% | |
| Gina Swindells | 10/10 | 3195 days | |
2.55 | 3% |
| Ric Lee | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2.05 | 2% | |
| Louise Humphreys | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2.05 | 2% | |
| racheldonn | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2.05 | 2% | |
| Sharon Heimeier | 9/10 | 3275 days | 2.01 | 2% | |
| AoamC | 9/10 | 3430 days | |
2.16 | 2% |
| Nicola | 10/10 | 3431 days | |
2.16 | 2% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 3431 days | |
2.16 | 2% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 3431 days | |
2.16 | 2% |
| Helen Josten | 10/10 | 3438 days | 1.79 | 2% | |
| Birgitte Weitemeyer | 10/10 | 3443 days | 1.78 | 2% | |
| Greg18 | 8/10 | 3459 days | 1.76 | 2% | |
| RobC1 | 9/10 | 3463 days | |
2.11 | 2% |
| RichardB1 | 10/10 | 3463 days | |
2.11 | 2% |
| JoT | 10/10 | 3463 days | |
2.11 | 2% |
| RobH | 10/10 | 3464 days | |
2.11 | 2% |
| Steve Sayers | 10/10 | 3465 days | 1.75 | 1% | |
| mash | 10/10 | 3474 days | 1.74 | 1% | |
| renanf | 10/10 | 3479 days | 1.73 | 1% | |
| Bronte Koop | 10/10 | 3484 days | 1.73 | 1% | |
| Kasumi | 10/10 | 3487 days | 1.72 | 1% | |
| De Kievit | 8/10 | 3496 days | |
2.05 | 2% |
| Paul Moisy | 10/10 | 3498 days | 1.71 | 1% | |
| Andrew | 9/10 | 3504 days | |
2.04 | 2% |
| BenD | 7/10 | 3518 days | |
2.02 | 2% |
| Julia Klingberg | 10/10 | 3532 days | 1.66 | 1% | |
| Chris Hertz | 10/10 | 3546 days | 1.64 | 1% | |
| jon c | 10/10 | 3549 days | 1.64 | 1% | |
| Sue Stevens | 10/10 | 3574 days | 1.6 | 1% | |
| Dal Piggott | 10/10 | 3593 days | 1.58 | 1% | |
| Sam Prior | 10/10 | 3643 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 3793 days | 1.3 | 1% | |
| Renske Tehurne | 9/10 | 3819 days | |
1.52 | 1% |
| Janne | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1.25 | 1% | |
| John | 8/10 | 3842 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Matt Walker | 10/10 | 3842 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Sandra Gustafson | 10/10 | 3870 days | |
1.44 | 1% |
| Brynn | 9/10 | 4114 days | |
1.04 | 0% |
| David | 9/10 | 4164 days | |
0.96 | 0% |
| NeilYeoman | 10/10 | 4165 days | |
0.95 | 0% |
| Deirdre | 8/10 | 4206 days | |
0.89 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-7.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Rangitata Rafts Ltd experience has been adjusted for 364 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 361 | -7.22% |
| 362 | -7.24% |
| 363 | -7.26% |
| 364 | -7.28% |
| 365 | -7.30% |
| 366 | -7.32% |
| 367 | -7.34% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.