Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Akaroa Dolphins.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
79 Valid Reviews
The Akaroa Dolphins experience has a total of 80 reviews. There are 79 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 79 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 26 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Akaroa Dolphins valid reviews is 90.25% and is based on 79 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
59 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 79 valid reviews, the experience has 59 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Akaroa Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 88.31% and is based on 59 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
90.84%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucy C | 9/10 | 1926 days | 100% |
| Christine | 9/10 | 1985 days | 97% |
| Tracey Cron | 9/10 | 2016 days | 96% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 10/10 | 2716 days | 66% |
| Freddrick Weiser | 9/10 | 3053 days | 50% |
| Mike Dw | 9/10 | 3169 days | 45% |
| Nolwen | 9/10 | 3529 days | 29% |
| The Beans | 10/10 | 3537 days | 29% |
| Ross D | 10/10 | 3543 days | 29% |
| Peter Passlack | 10/10 | 3546 days | 29% |
| Chea Hao Wong | 10/10 | 3598 days | 27% |
| Caroline Shaw | 10/10 | 3768 days | 19% |
| Pierre Mathis | 10/10 | 3779 days | 19% |
| Brenda Oomen | 10/10 | 3782 days | 19% |
| Estelle Daniel | 10/10 | 3786 days | 18% |
| Kim-Lara | 8/10 | 3801 days | 17% |
| Tamara | 10/10 | 3815 days | 17% |
| Sandra P | 10/10 | 3842 days | 16% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 4170 days | 1% |
| Angie Cairns | 10/10 | 4200 days | 0% |
| Jimmy Shaw | 10/10 | 4453 days | 15% |
| Wendy Hawkins | 8/10 | 4874 days | 14% |
| Roger Hawkins | 9/10 | 4874 days | 14% |
| Tanja Schlagermann | 10/10 | 4881 days | 15% |
| Alexander Mukasa | 10/10 | 4881 days | 15% |
| Erik Muchembled | 10/10 | 4883 days | 15% |
| Andrea Lang | 8/10 | 4885 days | 14% |
| Xtian_P | 10/10 | 4969 days | 15% |
| michellephil | 10/10 | 5030 days | 15% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 5244 days | 15% |
| mandd | 10/10 | 5244 days | 15% |
| Orlando | 9/10 | 5256 days | 14% |
| Uwe Herrdum | 9/10 | 5260 days | 14% |
| Francis Corrigan | 9/10 | 5274 days | 14% |
| John & Vicki | 9/10 | 5351 days | 14% |
| G Tulloch | 9/10 | 5573 days | 14% |
| Edward Marhi | 8/10 | 5576 days | 14% |
| Robin Adair | 9/10 | 5597 days | 14% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5604 days | 14% |
| Derek Puplett | 9/10 | 5614 days | 14% |
| Martin Current | 9/10 | 5625 days | 14% |
| Hartmut Vogt | 10/10 | 5626 days | 15% |
| allesca | 9/10 | 5730 days | 14% |
| Mary Van | 8/10 | 5791 days | 14% |
| penz | 9/10 | 5853 days | 14% |
| victoriauk | 8/10 | 5883 days | 14% |
| Susanne Strassmann | 6/10 | 5981 days | 12% |
| M Sicard | 9/10 | 5985 days | 14% |
| Lasse Olesen | 9/10 | 5996 days | 14% |
| Keith Wilde | 8/10 | 5998 days | 14% |
| Sarah Goeckener | 9/10 | 6075 days | 14% |
| katharina | 10/10 | 6075 days | 15% |
| Katrin Wennin | 8/10 | 6076 days | 14% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 6077 days | 14% |
| Roma | 10/10 | 6088 days | 15% |
| HairyHaggis | 10/10 | 6095 days | 15% |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 6314 days | 12% |
| ChristinaV | 10/10 | 6318 days | 15% |
| JudithLehr | 6/10 | 6321 days | 12% |
| Steven | 10/10 | 6325 days | 15% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6326 days | 14% |
| FramiskaH | 8/10 | 6327 days | 14% |
| StefanGermany1 | 8/10 | 6327 days | 14% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 6327 days | 15% |
| Tatjane | 9/10 | 6340 days | 14% |
| XaviG | 9/10 | 6343 days | 14% |
| JesusB | 7/10 | 6343 days | 13% |
| Denk | 8/10 | 6371 days | 14% |
| Katie Mitchell | 10/10 | 6460 days | 15% |
| Ben Ackland | 8/10 | 6696 days | 14% |
| Tessa McCormick | 8/10 | 6706 days | 14% |
| John Beirne | 10/10 | 7063 days | 15% |
| ranker_110 | 7/10 | 7067 days | 13% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 7072 days | 15% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 7074 days | 14% |
| John | 7/10 | 7074 days | 13% |
| Reggie | 10/10 | 7075 days | 15% |
| Dave | 9/10 | 7086 days | 14% |
| Beate | 8/10 | 7087 days | 14% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Akaroa Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.00% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Akaroa Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Akaroa Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -1.97% |
| 198 | -1.98% |
| 199 | -1.99% |
| 200 | -2.00% |
| 201 | -2.01% |
| 202 | -2.02% |
| 203 | -2.03% |
| … | … |
1.16% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.