Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Akaroa Dolphins.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Akaroa Dolphins
Valid Reviews
76 Valid Reviews
The Akaroa Dolphins experience has a total of 77 reviews. There are 76 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 32 |
|
42% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Akaroa Dolphins valid reviews is 90.26% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
59 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 76 valid reviews, the experience has 59 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 20 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Akaroa Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 88.31% and is based on 59 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
96.98%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inga Hoffmann | 10/10 | 559 days | 50.53 | 100% | |
| Freddrick Weiser | 9/10 | 896 days | 11.28 | 22% | |
| Mike Dw | 9/10 | 1012 days |  |
6.09 | 12% |
| Nolwen | 9/10 | 1372 days | |
4.46 | 9% |
| The Beans | 10/10 | 1381 days | 4.44 | 9% | |
| Ross D | 10/10 | 1386 days | |
4.43 | 9% |
| Peter Passlack | 10/10 | 1389 days | 4.42 | 9% | |
| Chea Hao Wong | 10/10 | 1442 days | 4.32 | 9% | |
| Caroline Shaw | 10/10 | 1611 days | |
3.99 | 8% |
| Pierre Mathis | 10/10 | 1622 days | |
3.97 | 8% |
| Brenda Oomen | 10/10 | 1625 days | |
3.96 | 8% |
| Estelle Daniel | 10/10 | 1629 days | 3.95 | 8% | |
| Kim-Lara | 8/10 | 1644 days | |
3.73 | 7% |
| Tamara | 10/10 | 1658 days | |
3.9 | 8% |
| Sandra P | 10/10 | 1686 days | 3.84 | 8% | |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 2013 days | |
3.2 | 6% |
| Angie Cairns | 10/10 | 2043 days | |
3.14 | 6% |
| Jimmy Shaw | 10/10 | 2296 days | 2.65 | 5% | |
| Wendy Hawkins | 8/10 | 2717 days | |
1.73 | 3% |
| Roger Hawkins | 9/10 | 2717 days | |
1.83 | 4% |
| Tanja Schlagermann | 10/10 | 2724 days | |
1.81 | 4% |
| Alexander Mukasa | 10/10 | 2724 days | |
1.81 | 4% |
| Erik Muchembled | 10/10 | 2726 days | |
1.81 | 4% |
| Andrea Lang | 8/10 | 2728 days | |
1.71 | 3% |
| Xtian_P | 10/10 | 2812 days | 1.64 | 3% | |
| michellephil | 10/10 | 2873 days | 1.52 | 3% | |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 3087 days | 1.1 | 2% | |
| mandd | 10/10 | 3087 days | 1.1 | 2% | |
| Orlando | 9/10 | 3099 days | |
1.08 | 2% |
| Uwe Herrdum | 9/10 | 3103 days | |
1.07 | 2% |
| Francis Corrigan | 9/10 | 3117 days | |
1.04 | 2% |
| John & Vicki | 9/10 | 3194 days | |
0.89 | 2% |
| G Tulloch | 9/10 | 3416 days | |
0.46 | 1% |
| Edward Marhi | 8/10 | 3419 days | |
0.43 | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 9/10 | 3440 days | |
0.41 | 1% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 3447 days | |
0.4 | 1% |
| Derek Puplett | 9/10 | 3457 days | |
0.38 | 1% |
| Martin Current | 9/10 | 3468 days | |
0.36 | 1% |
| Hartmut Vogt | 10/10 | 3469 days | |
0.35 | 1% |
| allesca | 9/10 | 3573 days | 0.15 | 0% | |
| Mary Van | 8/10 | 3634 days | 0.03 | 0% | |
| penz | 9/10 | 3696 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| victoriauk | 8/10 | 3726 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Susanne Strassmann | 6/10 | 3824 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| M Sicard | 9/10 | 3828 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lasse Olesen | 9/10 | 3839 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Keith Wilde | 8/10 | 3841 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah Goeckener | 9/10 | 3918 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| katharina | 10/10 | 3918 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Katrin Wennin | 8/10 | 3919 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 3920 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Roma | 10/10 | 3931 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| HairyHaggis | 10/10 | 3938 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Ronny | 6/10 | 4157 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ChristinaV | 10/10 | 4162 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JudithLehr | 6/10 | 4164 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Steven | 10/10 | 4169 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 4169 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| FramiskaH | 8/10 | 4170 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| StefanGermany1 | 8/10 | 4170 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 4170 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tatjane | 9/10 | 4184 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| XaviG | 9/10 | 4186 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JesusB | 7/10 | 4186 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Denk | 8/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Katie Mitchell | 10/10 | 4303 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Ben Ackland | 8/10 | 4539 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tessa McCormick | 8/10 | 4549 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John Beirne | 10/10 | 4906 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ranker_110 | 7/10 | 4910 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 4915 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 4917 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John | 7/10 | 4917 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Reggie | 10/10 | 4918 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dave | 9/10 | 4929 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Beate | 8/10 | 4930 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Akaroa Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 115 days. However the Akaroa Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Akaroa Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.24% |
| 198 | -2.26% |
| 199 | -2.27% |
| 200 | -2.28% |
| 201 | -2.29% |
| 202 | -2.30% |
| 203 | -2.31% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.