G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Paringa.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Paringa

Valid Reviews

37 Valid Reviews

The Paringa experience has a total of 39 reviews. There are 37 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
24%
9/10 6
16%
8/10 10
27%
7/10 4
11%
6/10 4
11%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 1
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 2
5%
1/10 0
0%

78.11% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Paringa valid reviews is 78.11% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

86.26%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
SK 8/10 80 days 98%
Anne Joly 2/10 111 days 44%
Kunaoona 10/10 111 days 100%
Denise 10/10 139 days 100%
Amy kono 10/10 170 days 99%
Joaie 7/10 170 days 92%
Masen 10/10 262 days 97%
Laurie 9/10 323 days 94%
Kyra De rooy 10/10 323 days 95%
HayleyW 10/10 415 days 91%
Laura 10/10 445 days 89%
Marion 8/10 504 days 84%
Dora 10/10 535 days 84%
Ena Fischer 6/10 566 days 70%
Mladen Savov 9/10 566 days 81%
Sarah 10/10 810 days 62%
Valg 6/10 810 days 53%
Mike Fricker 9/10 810 days 61%
Rosie 8/10 841 days 58%
Ann 9/10 870 days 55%
Maren 8/10 932 days 48%
Marie Perret 7/10 993 days 40%
Pia 9/10 1115 days 32%
Matthew 9/10 1115 days 32%
#holi_ontour 8/10 1176 days 26%
Alexandra 2/10 1266 days 8%
Tina Czaja 4/10 1297 days 11%
JON GIDLEY 8/10 1327 days 16%
Jrod 6/10 1541 days 6%
Jenna 8/10 1662 days 4%
Patricia 8/10 1965 days 2%
Tracy 7/10 2088 days 1%
Felix 6/10 2149 days 1%
Olli 8/10 2362 days 1%
Susanne 5/10 2423 days 0%
Jan 8/10 2607 days 0%
Rebecca 7/10 2637 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Paringa does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.59% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.