Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kapiti Island Nature Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has a total of 174 reviews. There are 173 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 111 |
|
64% |
| 9/10 | 48 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours valid reviews is 95.26% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours face-to-face reviews is 93.33% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
98.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celia & John Barnao | 10/10 | 180 days | 100% |
| Nath | 10/10 | 180 days | 100% |
| Bec Nightingale | 10/10 | 242 days | 98% |
| Richard Hamilton | 10/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| DJ | 9/10 | 3894 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Rob Pinney | 9/10 | 4108 days | 0% |
| Catherine Grace | 10/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Miranda Krestovnikoff | 10/10 | 4228 days | 0% |
| Amanda Morrison | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Daniel Tawhai | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Jim Maguire | 10/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
| Margaret Jeune | 8/10 | 4535 days | 1% |
| George Dickson | 10/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
| Jude Parrett | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Janeen Gillies | 9/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| birderdavid | 10/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
| Teknik151 | 10/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| TJamesH | 9/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
| susan_gavinklee | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| Mudgie | 9/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| HarryH | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| conggra1 | 10/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
| Storm | 9/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
| hakim76 | 10/10 | 5081 days | 1% |
| abbots | 9/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| batzi | 8/10 | 5204 days | 1% |
| Dolphin | 10/10 | 5204 days | 1% |
| Calder | 9/10 | 5234 days | 1% |
| Ole Klothrop | 9/10 | 5288 days | 0% |
| SJMcCarthy | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| decado | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| janreid | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| bwcp | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| EdIsaac | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| ryan_0091 | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| stephenwilliam_d | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| tpakai | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Green | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Peetr | 7/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| kapitigirl | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| bonzer | 8/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| ericjo | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| kjbaker | 10/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| GreenSpot | 9/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| Hendrik1 | 10/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| DayleMary | 10/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| jungle | 9/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 9/10 | 5628 days | 0% |
| llaing | 10/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| Win | 8/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| Tauhei | 10/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| marydinniss | 9/10 | 5631 days | 1% |
| daleringham | 10/10 | 5659 days | 1% |
| Sofianna | 10/10 | 5659 days | 1% |
| cruisecritique | 9/10 | 5721 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| raven123 | 9/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| molly77 | 9/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| windypoint | 8/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| ScorpioMichael | 8/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| tonyw | 10/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| ROBYN12 | 9/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| JimW | 10/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
| Jaredputt | 10/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Boscombe74 | 9/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Patricia_B6 | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| karenpa | 9/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| John Maz | 10/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Kim Everett | 10/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| airbornejase | 9/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| patrickr | 10/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| Emma Brooks | 10/10 | 5965 days | 1% |
| cassowary | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| JoAnnaMichaelJonoStefan | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Marguerita Harris | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Rob Wickham | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Chris Lloyd | 9/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 5996 days | 1% |
| Joanne Clarke | 9/10 | 6018 days | 0% |
| Sylvia Bagnall | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Radha Sahar | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Liz Roberts | 7/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Chris Brown | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| paula | 9/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Annette Friskopp | 9/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Sid & Rod | 9/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| marea tawa | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| GrahamSandy | 8/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Marlene Levine | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| Bruce54617 | 10/10 | 6024 days | 1% |
| aiakar | 4/10 | 6055 days | 0% |
| Marama Parore | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Lydia Leimer | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Jamie Bull | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| ray_jb | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| catch | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| janets | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| Heather Peters | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| Nick675 | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| angus | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| billy | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
| msfandg | 10/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
| ursula hazell | 10/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
| Barb | 10/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
| barbara nef | 10/10 | 6208 days | 1% |
| julie_thomas | 10/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| George Parry | 9/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| LeeRA | 10/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| caroltackett | 8/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| hariata hema | 9/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| pattie | 9/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| fmelston | 10/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Duncan Watson | 10/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Bernd Eichhorn | 10/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Michael Coup | 10/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| jeremy buchanan | 8/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Naomi_and_Brett | 9/10 | 6330 days | 1% |
| Natalie Hopkirk | 9/10 | 6334 days | 1% |
| Kate Barton | 9/10 | 6336 days | 1% |
| Fiona Saones | 9/10 | 6336 days | 1% |
| Ray Findlay | 9/10 | 6336 days | 1% |
| Bernie Muollo | 10/10 | 6337 days | 1% |
| MMc | 10/10 | 6338 days | 1% |
| DerrekS | 10/10 | 6349 days | 0% |
| Allie | 10/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| Paul Cumberland | 10/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| Paekak | 10/10 | 6351 days | 1% |
| kama | 10/10 | 6354 days | 1% |
| canada1 | 10/10 | 6355 days | 1% |
| Valerie Stirling | 9/10 | 6356 days | 1% |
| Stewart | 10/10 | 6361 days | 1% |
| Catherine Nalty | 10/10 | 6361 days | 1% |
| mwoolever | 9/10 | 6361 days | 1% |
| Geoff Norman | 10/10 | 6367 days | 1% |
| Amanda Eike | 10/10 | 6372 days | 1% |
| Mark Peterson | 10/10 | 6379 days | 1% |
| amanda yarrall | 8/10 | 6379 days | 1% |
| Cliff | 10/10 | 6386 days | 0% |
| Kirsten Flansmose | 10/10 | 6389 days | 1% |
| Claes | 10/10 | 6389 days | 1% |
| Vida Strahl | 10/10 | 6398 days | 1% |
| Ann Lewis | 10/10 | 6400 days | 1% |
| teresad | 10/10 | 6402 days | 1% |
| paul_and_anna | 10/10 | 6409 days | 1% |
| Katherine Corich | 10/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Mill | 9/10 | 6413 days | 1% |
| 12_frame | 9/10 | 6418 days | 1% |
| Philip Griffin | 10/10 | 6420 days | 1% |
| Jo Violet | 9/10 | 6423 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Archambault | 10/10 | 6432 days | 1% |
| Paul Knight | 10/10 | 6434 days | 1% |
| Chris Willsher | 9/10 | 6443 days | 1% |
| revans | 10/10 | 6449 days | 1% |
| Birte | 10/10 | 6450 days | 1% |
| Megan Farr | 10/10 | 6467 days | 1% |
| Aira Ani | 10/10 | 6470 days | 1% |
| Rochelle Gardiner | 10/10 | 6470 days | 1% |
| h_atawa | 10/10 | 6472 days | 1% |
| Gael | 9/10 | 6482 days | 1% |
| Richard Johnstone | 9/10 | 6507 days | 1% |
| coops | 9/10 | 6524 days | 1% |
| Galen | 8/10 | 6696 days | 0% |
| Monica Black | 9/10 | 6696 days | 0% |
| traveller_f8d02a95 | 10/10 | 6786 days | 1% |
| GaryC | 10/10 | 6970 days | 1% |
| Rosemary | 10/10 | 7060 days | 0% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 7060 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.72% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has been adjusted for 164 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 161 | -1.69% |
| 162 | -1.70% |
| 163 | -1.71% |
| 164 | -1.72% |
| 165 | -1.73% |
| 166 | -1.74% |
| 167 | -1.75% |
| … | … |
0.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.