Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kapiti Island Nature Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has a total of 174 reviews. There are 173 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 111 |
|
64% |
| 9/10 | 48 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours valid reviews is 95.26% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours face-to-face reviews is 93.33% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
98.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celia & John Barnao | 10/10 | 139 days | 100% |
| Nath | 10/10 | 139 days | 100% |
| Bec Nightingale | 10/10 | 201 days | 99% |
| Richard Hamilton | 10/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| DJ | 9/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Rob Pinney | 9/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Catherine Grace | 10/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
| Miranda Krestovnikoff | 10/10 | 4188 days | 0% |
| Amanda Morrison | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Daniel Tawhai | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Jim Maguire | 10/10 | 4494 days | 1% |
| Margaret Jeune | 8/10 | 4494 days | 1% |
| George Dickson | 10/10 | 4553 days | 1% |
| Jude Parrett | 9/10 | 4614 days | 1% |
| Janeen Gillies | 9/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
| birderdavid | 10/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Teknik151 | 10/10 | 4918 days | 1% |
| TJamesH | 9/10 | 4949 days | 1% |
| susan_gavinklee | 10/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| Mudgie | 9/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| HarryH | 10/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
| conggra1 | 10/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| Storm | 9/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| hakim76 | 10/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
| abbots | 9/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
| batzi | 8/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
| Dolphin | 10/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
| Calder | 9/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| Ole Klothrop | 9/10 | 5247 days | 0% |
| SJMcCarthy | 10/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
| decado | 10/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
| janreid | 10/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| bwcp | 9/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| EdIsaac | 9/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| ryan_0091 | 10/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| stephenwilliam_d | 9/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| tpakai | 10/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| Green | 10/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| Peetr | 7/10 | 5345 days | 1% |
| kapitigirl | 10/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| bonzer | 8/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| ericjo | 10/10 | 5376 days | 1% |
| kjbaker | 10/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| GreenSpot | 9/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Hendrik1 | 10/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| DayleMary | 10/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| jungle | 9/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 9/10 | 5587 days | 0% |
| llaing | 10/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| Win | 8/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| Tauhei | 10/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| marydinniss | 9/10 | 5590 days | 1% |
| daleringham | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
| Sofianna | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
| cruisecritique | 9/10 | 5680 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 5710 days | 1% |
| raven123 | 9/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| molly77 | 9/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| windypoint | 8/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| ScorpioMichael | 8/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| tonyw | 10/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| ROBYN12 | 9/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| JimW | 10/10 | 5771 days | 1% |
| Jaredputt | 10/10 | 5802 days | 1% |
| Boscombe74 | 9/10 | 5894 days | 1% |
| Patricia_B6 | 10/10 | 5894 days | 1% |
| karenpa | 9/10 | 5894 days | 1% |
| John Maz | 10/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| Kim Everett | 10/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| airbornejase | 9/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| patrickr | 10/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| Emma Brooks | 10/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| cassowary | 10/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| JoAnnaMichaelJonoStefan | 10/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Marguerita Harris | 10/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Rob Wickham | 10/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Chris Lloyd | 9/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Joanne Clarke | 9/10 | 5977 days | 0% |
| Sylvia Bagnall | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Radha Sahar | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Liz Roberts | 7/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Chris Brown | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| paula | 9/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Annette Friskopp | 9/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Sid & Rod | 9/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| marea tawa | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| GrahamSandy | 8/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Marlene Levine | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| Bruce54617 | 10/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| aiakar | 4/10 | 6014 days | 0% |
| Marama Parore | 10/10 | 6014 days | 1% |
| Lydia Leimer | 10/10 | 6014 days | 1% |
| Jamie Bull | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| ray_jb | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| catch | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| janets | 10/10 | 6045 days | 1% |
| Heather Peters | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| Nick675 | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| angus | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| billy | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 6106 days | 1% |
| msfandg | 10/10 | 6106 days | 1% |
| ursula hazell | 10/10 | 6106 days | 1% |
| Barb | 10/10 | 6106 days | 1% |
| barbara nef | 10/10 | 6167 days | 1% |
| julie_thomas | 10/10 | 6259 days | 1% |
| George Parry | 9/10 | 6259 days | 1% |
| LeeRA | 10/10 | 6259 days | 1% |
| caroltackett | 8/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| hariata hema | 9/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| pattie | 9/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| fmelston | 10/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Duncan Watson | 10/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Bernd Eichhorn | 10/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Michael Coup | 10/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| jeremy buchanan | 8/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Naomi_and_Brett | 9/10 | 6289 days | 1% |
| Natalie Hopkirk | 9/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
| Kate Barton | 9/10 | 6296 days | 1% |
| Fiona Saones | 9/10 | 6296 days | 1% |
| Ray Findlay | 9/10 | 6296 days | 1% |
| Bernie Muollo | 10/10 | 6297 days | 1% |
| MMc | 10/10 | 6298 days | 1% |
| DerrekS | 10/10 | 6308 days | 0% |
| Allie | 10/10 | 6310 days | 1% |
| Paul Cumberland | 10/10 | 6310 days | 1% |
| Paekak | 10/10 | 6311 days | 1% |
| kama | 10/10 | 6314 days | 1% |
| canada1 | 10/10 | 6315 days | 1% |
| Valerie Stirling | 9/10 | 6316 days | 1% |
| Stewart | 10/10 | 6320 days | 1% |
| Catherine Nalty | 10/10 | 6320 days | 1% |
| mwoolever | 9/10 | 6320 days | 1% |
| Geoff Norman | 10/10 | 6327 days | 1% |
| Amanda Eike | 10/10 | 6332 days | 1% |
| Mark Peterson | 10/10 | 6339 days | 1% |
| amanda yarrall | 8/10 | 6339 days | 1% |
| Cliff | 10/10 | 6346 days | 0% |
| Kirsten Flansmose | 10/10 | 6348 days | 1% |
| Claes | 10/10 | 6348 days | 1% |
| Vida Strahl | 10/10 | 6358 days | 1% |
| Ann Lewis | 10/10 | 6360 days | 1% |
| teresad | 10/10 | 6361 days | 1% |
| paul_and_anna | 10/10 | 6369 days | 1% |
| Katherine Corich | 10/10 | 6370 days | 1% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 6371 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Mill | 9/10 | 6373 days | 1% |
| 12_frame | 9/10 | 6378 days | 1% |
| Philip Griffin | 10/10 | 6379 days | 1% |
| Jo Violet | 9/10 | 6383 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Archambault | 10/10 | 6392 days | 1% |
| Paul Knight | 10/10 | 6394 days | 1% |
| Chris Willsher | 9/10 | 6403 days | 1% |
| revans | 10/10 | 6409 days | 1% |
| Birte | 10/10 | 6410 days | 1% |
| Megan Farr | 10/10 | 6427 days | 1% |
| Aira Ani | 10/10 | 6429 days | 1% |
| Rochelle Gardiner | 10/10 | 6430 days | 1% |
| h_atawa | 10/10 | 6432 days | 1% |
| Gael | 9/10 | 6442 days | 1% |
| Richard Johnstone | 9/10 | 6467 days | 1% |
| coops | 9/10 | 6484 days | 1% |
| Galen | 8/10 | 6655 days | 0% |
| Monica Black | 9/10 | 6655 days | 0% |
| traveller_f8d02a95 | 10/10 | 6745 days | 1% |
| GaryC | 10/10 | 6929 days | 1% |
| Rosemary | 10/10 | 7019 days | 0% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 7019 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.33% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has been adjusted for 124 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 121 | -1.30% |
| 122 | -1.31% |
| 123 | -1.32% |
| 124 | -1.33% |
| 125 | -1.34% |
| 126 | -1.36% |
| 127 | -1.37% |
| … | … |
0.25% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.