Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kapiti Island Nature Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has a total of 174 reviews. There are 173 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 111 |
|
64% |
| 9/10 | 48 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours valid reviews is 95.26% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours face-to-face reviews is 93.33% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
98.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celia & John Barnao | 10/10 | 119 days | 100% |
| Nath | 10/10 | 119 days | 100% |
| Bec Nightingale | 10/10 | 181 days | 99% |
| Richard Hamilton | 10/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| DJ | 9/10 | 3834 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 3864 days | 1% |
| Rob Pinney | 9/10 | 4048 days | 0% |
| Catherine Grace | 10/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Miranda Krestovnikoff | 10/10 | 4168 days | 0% |
| Amanda Morrison | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Daniel Tawhai | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Jim Maguire | 10/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Margaret Jeune | 8/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| George Dickson | 10/10 | 4533 days | 1% |
| Jude Parrett | 9/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
| Janeen Gillies | 9/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
| birderdavid | 10/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Teknik151 | 10/10 | 4898 days | 1% |
| TJamesH | 9/10 | 4929 days | 1% |
| susan_gavinklee | 10/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| Mudgie | 9/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| HarryH | 10/10 | 4959 days | 1% |
| conggra1 | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| Storm | 9/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| hakim76 | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| abbots | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| batzi | 8/10 | 5143 days | 1% |
| Dolphin | 10/10 | 5143 days | 1% |
| Calder | 9/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
| Ole Klothrop | 9/10 | 5227 days | 0% |
| SJMcCarthy | 10/10 | 5295 days | 1% |
| decado | 10/10 | 5295 days | 1% |
| janreid | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| bwcp | 9/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| EdIsaac | 9/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| ryan_0091 | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| stephenwilliam_d | 9/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| tpakai | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| Green | 10/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| Peetr | 7/10 | 5325 days | 1% |
| kapitigirl | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| bonzer | 8/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| ericjo | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
| kjbaker | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| GreenSpot | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Hendrik1 | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| DayleMary | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| jungle | 9/10 | 5539 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 9/10 | 5567 days | 0% |
| llaing | 10/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Win | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Tauhei | 10/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| marydinniss | 9/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| daleringham | 10/10 | 5598 days | 1% |
| Sofianna | 10/10 | 5598 days | 1% |
| cruisecritique | 9/10 | 5660 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| raven123 | 9/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| molly77 | 9/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| windypoint | 8/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| ScorpioMichael | 8/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| tonyw | 10/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| ROBYN12 | 9/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| JimW | 10/10 | 5751 days | 1% |
| Jaredputt | 10/10 | 5782 days | 1% |
| Boscombe74 | 9/10 | 5874 days | 1% |
| Patricia_B6 | 10/10 | 5874 days | 1% |
| karenpa | 9/10 | 5874 days | 1% |
| John Maz | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| Kim Everett | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| airbornejase | 9/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| patrickr | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| Emma Brooks | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| cassowary | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| JoAnnaMichaelJonoStefan | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Marguerita Harris | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Rob Wickham | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Chris Lloyd | 9/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 5935 days | 1% |
| Joanne Clarke | 9/10 | 5957 days | 0% |
| Sylvia Bagnall | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Radha Sahar | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Liz Roberts | 7/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Chris Brown | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| paula | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Annette Friskopp | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Sid & Rod | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| marea tawa | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| GrahamSandy | 8/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Marlene Levine | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Bruce54617 | 10/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| aiakar | 4/10 | 5994 days | 0% |
| Marama Parore | 10/10 | 5994 days | 1% |
| Lydia Leimer | 10/10 | 5994 days | 1% |
| Jamie Bull | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| ray_jb | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| catch | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| janets | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| Heather Peters | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Nick675 | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| angus | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| billy | 10/10 | 6055 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| msfandg | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| ursula hazell | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| Barb | 10/10 | 6086 days | 1% |
| barbara nef | 10/10 | 6147 days | 1% |
| julie_thomas | 10/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| George Parry | 9/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| LeeRA | 10/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| caroltackett | 8/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| hariata hema | 9/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| pattie | 9/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| fmelston | 10/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Duncan Watson | 10/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Bernd Eichhorn | 10/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Michael Coup | 10/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| jeremy buchanan | 8/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Naomi_and_Brett | 9/10 | 6269 days | 1% |
| Natalie Hopkirk | 9/10 | 6273 days | 1% |
| Kate Barton | 9/10 | 6275 days | 1% |
| Fiona Saones | 9/10 | 6275 days | 1% |
| Ray Findlay | 9/10 | 6276 days | 1% |
| Bernie Muollo | 10/10 | 6276 days | 1% |
| MMc | 10/10 | 6278 days | 1% |
| DerrekS | 10/10 | 6288 days | 0% |
| Allie | 10/10 | 6290 days | 1% |
| Paul Cumberland | 10/10 | 6290 days | 1% |
| Paekak | 10/10 | 6291 days | 1% |
| kama | 10/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
| canada1 | 10/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
| Valerie Stirling | 9/10 | 6296 days | 1% |
| Stewart | 10/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| Catherine Nalty | 10/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| mwoolever | 9/10 | 6300 days | 1% |
| Geoff Norman | 10/10 | 6307 days | 1% |
| Amanda Eike | 10/10 | 6312 days | 1% |
| Mark Peterson | 10/10 | 6318 days | 1% |
| amanda yarrall | 8/10 | 6319 days | 1% |
| Cliff | 10/10 | 6326 days | 0% |
| Kirsten Flansmose | 10/10 | 6328 days | 1% |
| Claes | 10/10 | 6328 days | 1% |
| Vida Strahl | 10/10 | 6338 days | 1% |
| Ann Lewis | 10/10 | 6340 days | 1% |
| teresad | 10/10 | 6341 days | 1% |
| paul_and_anna | 10/10 | 6348 days | 1% |
| Katherine Corich | 10/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 6351 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Mill | 9/10 | 6353 days | 1% |
| 12_frame | 9/10 | 6358 days | 1% |
| Philip Griffin | 10/10 | 6359 days | 1% |
| Jo Violet | 9/10 | 6362 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Archambault | 10/10 | 6371 days | 1% |
| Paul Knight | 10/10 | 6374 days | 1% |
| Chris Willsher | 9/10 | 6383 days | 1% |
| revans | 10/10 | 6389 days | 1% |
| Birte | 10/10 | 6390 days | 1% |
| Megan Farr | 10/10 | 6407 days | 1% |
| Aira Ani | 10/10 | 6409 days | 1% |
| Rochelle Gardiner | 10/10 | 6410 days | 1% |
| h_atawa | 10/10 | 6411 days | 1% |
| Gael | 9/10 | 6422 days | 1% |
| Richard Johnstone | 9/10 | 6447 days | 1% |
| coops | 9/10 | 6464 days | 1% |
| Galen | 8/10 | 6635 days | 0% |
| Monica Black | 9/10 | 6635 days | 0% |
| traveller_f8d02a95 | 10/10 | 6725 days | 1% |
| GaryC | 10/10 | 6909 days | 1% |
| Rosemary | 10/10 | 6999 days | 0% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 6999 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.27% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 105 days. However the Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has been adjusted for 103 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 100 | -1.24% |
| 101 | -1.25% |
| 102 | -1.26% |
| 103 | -1.27% |
| 104 | -1.28% |
| 105 | -1.30% |
| 106 | -1.31% |
| … | … |
0.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.