Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kapiti Island Nature Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has a total of 174 reviews. There are 173 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 111 |
|
64% |
| 9/10 | 48 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours valid reviews is 95.26% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kapiti Island Nature Tours face-to-face reviews is 93.33% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
98.35%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celia & John Barnao | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Nath | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Bec Nightingale | 10/10 | 101 days | 100% |
| Richard Hamilton | 10/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
| DJ | 9/10 | 3753 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Rob Pinney | 9/10 | 3967 days | 1% |
| Catherine Grace | 10/10 | 4028 days | 1% |
| Miranda Krestovnikoff | 10/10 | 4087 days | 0% |
| Amanda Morrison | 10/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Daniel Tawhai | 10/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Jim Maguire | 10/10 | 4394 days | 1% |
| Margaret Jeune | 8/10 | 4394 days | 1% |
| George Dickson | 10/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| Jude Parrett | 9/10 | 4514 days | 1% |
| Janeen Gillies | 9/10 | 4545 days | 1% |
| birderdavid | 10/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
| Teknik151 | 10/10 | 4818 days | 1% |
| TJamesH | 9/10 | 4849 days | 1% |
| susan_gavinklee | 10/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
| Mudgie | 9/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
| HarryH | 10/10 | 4879 days | 1% |
| conggra1 | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
| Storm | 9/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
| hakim76 | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
| abbots | 9/10 | 4971 days | 1% |
| batzi | 8/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Dolphin | 10/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Calder | 9/10 | 5093 days | 1% |
| Ole Klothrop | 9/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| SJMcCarthy | 10/10 | 5215 days | 1% |
| decado | 10/10 | 5215 days | 1% |
| janreid | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| bwcp | 9/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| EdIsaac | 9/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| ryan_0091 | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| stephenwilliam_d | 9/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| tpakai | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| Green | 10/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| Peetr | 7/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| kapitigirl | 10/10 | 5276 days | 1% |
| bonzer | 8/10 | 5276 days | 1% |
| ericjo | 10/10 | 5276 days | 1% |
| kjbaker | 10/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| GreenSpot | 9/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| Hendrik1 | 10/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| DayleMary | 10/10 | 5306 days | 1% |
| jungle | 9/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
| Roman & Esther | 9/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| llaing | 10/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
| Win | 8/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
| Tauhei | 10/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
| marydinniss | 9/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
| daleringham | 10/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
| Sofianna | 10/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
| cruisecritique | 9/10 | 5580 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
| raven123 | 9/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| molly77 | 9/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| windypoint | 8/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| ScorpioMichael | 8/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| tonyw | 10/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| ROBYN12 | 9/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| JimW | 10/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| Jaredputt | 10/10 | 5702 days | 1% |
| Boscombe74 | 9/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| Patricia_B6 | 10/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| karenpa | 9/10 | 5794 days | 1% |
| John Maz | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| Kim Everett | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| airbornejase | 9/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| patrickr | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| Emma Brooks | 10/10 | 5824 days | 1% |
| cassowary | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| JoAnnaMichaelJonoStefan | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Marguerita Harris | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Rob Wickham | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Chris Lloyd | 9/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Fabienne | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Joanne Clarke | 9/10 | 5877 days | 1% |
| Sylvia Bagnall | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Radha Sahar | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Liz Roberts | 7/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Chris Brown | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| paula | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Annette Friskopp | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Sid & Rod | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Mariano | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| marea tawa | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| GrahamSandy | 8/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Marlene Levine | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Bruce54617 | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| aiakar | 4/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
| Marama Parore | 10/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
| Lydia Leimer | 10/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
| Jamie Bull | 10/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| ray_jb | 10/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| catch | 10/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| janets | 10/10 | 5945 days | 1% |
| Heather Peters | 10/10 | 5975 days | 1% |
| Nick675 | 10/10 | 5975 days | 1% |
| angus | 10/10 | 5975 days | 1% |
| Dorothy | 10/10 | 5975 days | 1% |
| billy | 10/10 | 5975 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 6006 days | 1% |
| msfandg | 10/10 | 6006 days | 1% |
| ursula hazell | 10/10 | 6006 days | 1% |
| Barb | 10/10 | 6006 days | 1% |
| barbara nef | 10/10 | 6067 days | 1% |
| julie_thomas | 10/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| George Parry | 9/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| LeeRA | 10/10 | 6159 days | 1% |
| caroltackett | 8/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| hariata hema | 9/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| pattie | 9/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| fmelston | 10/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Duncan Watson | 10/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Bernd Eichhorn | 10/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Michael Coup | 10/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| jeremy buchanan | 8/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Naomi_and_Brett | 9/10 | 6189 days | 1% |
| Natalie Hopkirk | 9/10 | 6193 days | 1% |
| Kate Barton | 9/10 | 6195 days | 1% |
| Fiona Saones | 9/10 | 6195 days | 1% |
| Ray Findlay | 9/10 | 6195 days | 1% |
| Bernie Muollo | 10/10 | 6196 days | 1% |
| MMc | 10/10 | 6197 days | 1% |
| DerrekS | 10/10 | 6208 days | 1% |
| Allie | 10/10 | 6209 days | 1% |
| Paul Cumberland | 10/10 | 6209 days | 1% |
| Paekak | 10/10 | 6210 days | 1% |
| kama | 10/10 | 6213 days | 1% |
| canada1 | 10/10 | 6214 days | 1% |
| Valerie Stirling | 9/10 | 6215 days | 1% |
| Stewart | 10/10 | 6220 days | 1% |
| Catherine Nalty | 10/10 | 6220 days | 1% |
| mwoolever | 9/10 | 6220 days | 1% |
| Geoff Norman | 10/10 | 6226 days | 1% |
| Amanda Eike | 10/10 | 6231 days | 1% |
| Mark Peterson | 10/10 | 6238 days | 1% |
| amanda yarrall | 8/10 | 6238 days | 1% |
| Cliff | 10/10 | 6245 days | 1% |
| Kirsten Flansmose | 10/10 | 6248 days | 1% |
| Claes | 10/10 | 6248 days | 1% |
| Vida Strahl | 10/10 | 6257 days | 1% |
| Ann Lewis | 10/10 | 6259 days | 1% |
| teresad | 10/10 | 6261 days | 1% |
| paul_and_anna | 10/10 | 6268 days | 1% |
| Katherine Corich | 10/10 | 6270 days | 1% |
| Rachel | 9/10 | 6270 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Mill | 9/10 | 6272 days | 1% |
| 12_frame | 9/10 | 6277 days | 1% |
| Philip Griffin | 10/10 | 6279 days | 1% |
| Jo Violet | 9/10 | 6282 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Archambault | 10/10 | 6291 days | 1% |
| Paul Knight | 10/10 | 6293 days | 1% |
| Chris Willsher | 9/10 | 6302 days | 1% |
| revans | 10/10 | 6308 days | 1% |
| Birte | 10/10 | 6309 days | 1% |
| Megan Farr | 10/10 | 6326 days | 1% |
| Aira Ani | 10/10 | 6329 days | 1% |
| Rochelle Gardiner | 10/10 | 6329 days | 1% |
| h_atawa | 10/10 | 6331 days | 1% |
| Gael | 9/10 | 6341 days | 1% |
| Richard Johnstone | 9/10 | 6366 days | 1% |
| coops | 9/10 | 6383 days | 1% |
| Galen | 8/10 | 6555 days | 0% |
| Monica Black | 9/10 | 6555 days | 1% |
| traveller_f8d02a95 | 10/10 | 6645 days | 1% |
| GaryC | 10/10 | 6829 days | 1% |
| Rosemary | 10/10 | 6919 days | 1% |
| Peter | 10/10 | 6919 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.46% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kapiti Island Nature Tours experience has been adjusted for 23 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 20 | -0.40% |
| 21 | -0.42% |
| 22 | -0.44% |
| 23 | -0.46% |
| 24 | -0.48% |
| 25 | -0.50% |
| 26 | -0.52% |
| … | … |
0.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
98%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.