Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rankers Booking Service.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rankers Booking Service
Valid Reviews
85 Valid Reviews
The Rankers Booking Service experience has a total of 86 reviews. There are 85 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 85 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 58 |
|
68% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
95.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rankers Booking Service valid reviews is 95.41% and is based on 85 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
95.96%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Anne | 10/10 | 1130 days | 100% |
| BACHAND Alain | 9/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
| anja Grigori-Roth | 10/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
| Jranette Billings | 9/10 | 2134 days | 4% |
| Steven Miller | 10/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| René van der Molen | 10/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| John Ehrlich | 10/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Erica Chisholm | 10/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Paola La Rocca | 9/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Mike Bromfield | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| paul white | 9/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| Alois Markart | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| VERNET ALEXANDRA | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| Amandine Darnet | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| herve duflot | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| David | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| DESIDERIO MOLERO | 9/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Piotr Lubowicki | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Christopher Anker | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Michael Rovinsky | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Kirsty Gillett | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Paul Stevens | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Sabrina Maier | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| M FAIZAL JABAR | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Bree Lawlor | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Nusyana Cham Pi | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Benjamin Bakk | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Robert Dugyik | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Loïc Clerc | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Joe Culbertson | 9/10 | 2257 days | 3% |
| Alechia Crown | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Irene Lanser | 8/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Susan S | 8/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Sarah Peres | 10/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Brian Webber | 10/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Henry Schenker | 10/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| bat a | 9/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Judy Holt | 8/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Taher Hasanali | 10/10 | 2287 days | 3% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 2318 days | 3% |
| jeffrey goebel | 9/10 | 2318 days | 3% |
| Charlotte Amouret | 10/10 | 2318 days | 3% |
| Sophie ROUX | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Heather McDonald | 9/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Debra Tolic | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Chee Kuan Lim | 9/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| G Visser | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| DEBBIE LAMBERT | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Gina DAVIS | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Paul Mullooly | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Lucie PHILIPPE | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Emily Joyce | 9/10 | 2379 days | 3% |
| Sergio Meana Martinez | 10/10 | 2379 days | 3% |
| Evelyn Toh | 10/10 | 2379 days | 3% |
| Jean-Luc Brocard | 9/10 | 2379 days | 3% |
| Deborah Vitali | 8/10 | 2410 days | 2% |
| Jeramy Janoski | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Daniel Benjamin | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Sarah Bailey | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Michael Jost | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Van Weigel | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Lizzie Lacey-Brennan | 10/10 | 2410 days | 3% |
| Chia Shen Cheng | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Gilbert Deveaux | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Kathryn Conrad | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Fannie Bernier | 9/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| hannah murray | 8/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Whitney Bak | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Sandra Cabrera | 9/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Wendy Leung | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Adrian Trumper | 9/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Marcos Tosto | 7/10 | 2440 days | 1% |
| John van Herk | 9/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Teun Steur | 9/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| JOSY ANANTA WIJAYA | 10/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| Citra Lestari | 10/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| wendy legge | 10/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| ALEX RIVERO | 9/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| David Caravati | 10/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| F B | 8/10 | 2499 days | 2% |
| MERVYN ADAMS | 6/10 | 2530 days | 0% |
| Chan Hoe Yip | 8/10 | 2561 days | 1% |
| Ana Segota | 10/10 | 2591 days | 1% |
| Mark Lechner | 10/10 | 2591 days | 1% |
| Richard Tallack | 10/10 | 2622 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rankers Booking Service experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Rankers Booking Service experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rankers Booking Service experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.