Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Koha Experience.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
30 Valid Reviews
The Koha Experience experience has a total of 31 reviews. There are 30 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 30 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Koha Experience valid reviews is 100.00% and is based on 30 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Liz Wade||10/10||839 days||100%|
|Richard & Chris, UK||10/10||871 days||81%|
|Tanja Rombey||10/10||902 days||65%|
|Emilee & Chris||10/10||1116 days||19%|
|Roselyn Cugliari||10/10||1146 days||19%|
|Pat Burns||10/10||1177 days||18%|
|Emma and Ray||10/10||1205 days||18%|
|Pieter & Inge||10/10||1236 days||17%|
|Geertje and Rein||10/10||1236 days||17%|
|ian kennedy||10/10||1297 days||16%|
|Charlie and Michelle||10/10||1358 days||15%|
|Jill McGrath||10/10||1565 days||-1%|
|Patricia, Norbert, Sam and Jo||10/10||1570 days||12%|
|Adrian Trumper||10/10||1570 days||12%|
|Sjoerd Tolsma||10/10||1885 days||7%|
|Dirk Wolf||10/10||1896 days||7%|
|Laura Brown||10/10||1905 days||7%|
|Tobias Hollerith||10/10||1911 days||7%|
|Yoana Gospodinova||10/10||1966 days||6%|
|Chadd Holland||10/10||2243 days||2%|
|Peter Kozlik||10/10||2258 days||2%|
|magdalena gomez haedo||10/10||2298 days||1%|
|Amala Martin||10/10||2298 days||1%|
|Steve Newton||10/10||2301 days||1%|
|Frederik Lambrecht||10/10||2318 days||1%|
|Stefanie Giese||10/10||2321 days||1%|
|Matthew Hallowell||10/10||2329 days||1%|
|Chalie Dotesek||10/10||2351 days||0%|
|Jitka Hruskova||10/10||2363 days||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Koha Experience experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 96 days. However the Koha Experience experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Koha Experience experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.