Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Red Carpet Tours.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Red Carpet Tours

Valid Reviews

31 Valid Reviews

The Red Carpet Tours experience has a total of 31 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 31
9/10 0
8/10 0
7/10 0
6/10 0
5/10 0
4/10 0
3/10 0
2/10 0
1/10 0

100.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Red Carpet Tours valid reviews is 100.00% and is based on 31 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Schnieselchen 10/10 2304 days 100%
JayJay5 10/10 2396 days 96%
biinfc 10/10 2518 days 91%
belleferret 10/10 2518 days 91%
Nazgul3 10/10 2518 days 91%
DeannaC 10/10 2669 days 85%
Rivendell_lh 10/10 2700 days 84%
Colin007 10/10 2883 days 76%
judymcc 10/10 2883 days 76%
Cathy 10/10 3034 days 70%
cogit8tor 10/10 3065 days 69%
Ben Perchik 10/10 3095 days 68%
Bradley 10/10 3279 days 60%
Brian Ostering 10/10 3283 days 60%
Amanda Williams 10/10 3288 days 60%
honeybunny 10/10 3296 days 59%
Susi 10/10 3299 days 59%
fangornlady 10/10 3300 days 59%
rachel_b 10/10 3300 days 59%
Michele Ray 10/10 3301 days 59%
Michael Rush 10/10 3301 days 59%
Jason Ray 10/10 3301 days 59%
chris rounce 10/10 3302 days 59%
Jean Gibney 10/10 3302 days 59%
Alicia 10/10 3302 days 59%
marymac896 10/10 3399 days 55%
Thomas 10/10 3949 days 33%
jen nolan 10/10 4375 days 15%
Alais_Longthought 10/10 4403 days 14%
meledhel2003 10/10 4526 days 9%
goofy284 10/10 4860 days 0%


Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Red Carpet Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-7.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Red Carpet Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.

The Red Carpet Tours experience has been adjusted for 364 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
361 -7.22%
362 -7.24%
363 -7.26%
364 -7.28%
365 -7.30%
366 -7.32%
367 -7.34%

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.