Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre

Valid Reviews

28 Valid Reviews

The Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre experience has a total of 28 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 28 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
18%
9/10 7
25%
8/10 5
18%
7/10 5
18%
6/10 2
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 3
11%
3/10 1
4%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

76.79% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre valid reviews is 76.79% and is based on 28 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

22 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 28 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 3
14%
9/10 7
32%
8/10 5
23%
7/10 3
14%
6/10 2
9%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 2
9%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

79.09% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre face-to-face reviews is 79.09% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

85.09%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Takeru Yonahr 9/10 1417 days 100%
Kolar 8/10 1715 days 82%
Helna Saumanova 10/10 1715 days 86%
Aparna Gula 9/10 2020 days 72%
Aaron McCartie 9/10 2020 days 72%
Eva 9/10 2060 days 70%
Sabina Roubickova 9/10 2070 days 70%
joergilmaz 10/10 2487 days 50%
Hubert 10/10 2495 days 50%
GN100 8/10 2788 days 34%
Mike and Caroline 7/10 3096 days 19%
Cymen Crick 4/10 3186 days 13%
Ralph and Leonie 6/10 3209 days 13%
Anne and John 9/10 3216 days 16%
ORfam 10/10 3217 days 16%
Petra & Rolf 6/10 3504 days 1%
Stefan 4/10 3506 days 1%
_mel_ 7/10 3552 days 0%
damaca 3/10 3674 days 14%
Michael Eck 9/10 3879 days 20%
David Milner 7/10 4229 days 18%
M and H Lunn 10/10 4232 days 20%
Colin S 4/10 4321 days 15%
SSheil 8/10 4545 days 18%
RubyJ 8/10 4549 days 18%
StefanieA 8/10 4559 days 18%
TommyP1 7/10 4612 days 18%
KarinB1 7/10 4612 days 18%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Pūkaha National Wildlife Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.