Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lumsden Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lumsden Information Centre

Valid Reviews

137 Valid Reviews

The Lumsden Information Centre experience has a total of 142 reviews. There are 137 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 137 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 137 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 92
67%
9/10 26
19%
8/10 9
7%
7/10 7
5%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 2
1%

93.65% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lumsden Information Centre valid reviews is 93.65% and is based on 137 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

97.09%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Aubery 7/10 69 days 94%
Kunaoona 10/10 160 days 100%
Fine 10/10 191 days 99%
Borrmaschine 10/10 191 days 99%
Jakub 10/10 342 days 95%
Masen 10/10 342 days 95%
Andy 10/10 372 days 93%
Manon 10/10 372 days 93%
Jenda 10/10 464 days 89%
Laurie 10/10 464 days 89%
Nicholas Turner 10/10 525 days 85%
Dan 9/10 556 days 83%
Derek Gillard 10/10 584 days 82%
Patrick 10/10 646 days 77%
Berdien 10/10 646 days 77%
Mladen Savov 10/10 646 days 77%
Fritz 9/10 676 days 74%
Laura 10/10 737 days 70%
parisonchloe@gmail.com 10/10 799 days 64%
Holly 10/10 860 days 58%
Caron 10/10 890 days 55%
Tommy 10/10 890 days 55%
Myrthe Venema 10/10 921 days 52%
Hugo 9/10 921 days 51%
Ana Capucho 10/10 981 days 46%
Lili 10/10 1012 days 43%
Danielle Rubio 10/10 1012 days 43%
Joe 10/10 1042 days 40%
Nina 10/10 1042 days 40%
Cholly 9/10 1073 days 37%
Marie Perret 8/10 1103 days 34%
Sara 10/10 1134 days 32%
Anaïs 10/10 1195 days 27%
Basil 10/10 1226 days 25%
Etoile Rose 10/10 1226 days 25%
Tim Mitterer 10/10 1256 days 23%
Simon Wiinberg 10/10 1315 days 19%
Simon Möller 9/10 1315 days 19%
Sandrina 10/10 1346 days 18%
Vish 10/10 1346 days 18%
Tom 10/10 1346 days 18%
Amanda Moreira 10/10 1346 days 18%
Julia 9/10 1377 days 16%
Chris 10/10 1407 days 14%
Chonky Bell 10/10 1407 days 14%
Adrian 10/10 1407 days 14%
Christine 10/10 1438 days 13%
Lara 9/10 1438 days 13%
Broke 8/10 1499 days 10%
Jineesh D 10/10 1591 days 7%
Caroline LEFEVRE 10/10 1591 days 7%
Alicia 10/10 1680 days 5%
EvaBelle 10/10 1742 days 5%
chel 10/10 1864 days 4%
Jeannine Davis 10/10 1895 days 4%
JT & MJ 10/10 1956 days 4%
Valg 10/10 2017 days 4%
Fiona Taylor 7/10 2017 days 3%
Maureen Tate 9/10 2017 days 4%
The Gillies 8/10 2017 days 4%
Jenny 10/10 2045 days 4%
Rey 10/10 2107 days 4%
Teesh K 10/10 2137 days 4%
Rebecca 10/10 2137 days 4%
Sandy 10/10 2260 days 3%
Kate in NZ 10/10 2260 days 3%
Ricardo 10/10 2382 days 3%
Marianna 10/10 2411 days 3%
Jane Lawrence 9/10 2411 days 3%
Linda 8/10 2411 days 3%
Niven 10/10 2411 days 3%
Lee 10/10 2442 days 3%
Dan 10/10 2442 days 3%
Katie 9/10 2473 days 3%
GM 7/10 2473 days 3%
Devin 10/10 2503 days 3%
Anni Heltti 10/10 2525 days 1%
Javier.G 10/10 2534 days 3%
Tania Baird 9/10 2564 days 3%
Keith & Kay Finlayson 10/10 2595 days 3%
braddo 10/10 2595 days 3%
Meri 10/10 2626 days 3%
Jhade 10/10 2626 days 3%
Felix 10/10 2717 days 2%
OA 10/10 2748 days 2%
Kathryn Torkington 1/10 2748 days 0%
Brice 7/10 2748 days 2%
QueeenBeee 10/10 2776 days 2%
Megan Belanger 10/10 2776 days 2%
Franz 10/10 2807 days 2%
Inna 10/10 2807 days 2%
Ashton 9/10 2807 days 2%
Boris Clémençon 10/10 2807 days 2%
JT 10/10 2807 days 2%
Phil 10/10 2838 days 2%
Marilli 10/10 2838 days 2%
Thatdudejosh 10/10 2868 days 2%
Indy 10/10 2868 days 2%
Karo 10/10 2868 days 2%
Jonas R. 10/10 2899 days 2%
Joseph 8/10 3021 days 2%
Florian 10/10 3082 days 2%
Sarah 8/10 3082 days 2%
Jayling 10/10 3113 days 2%
Laura 9/10 3141 days 1%
Clobby 8/10 3141 days 1%
Katharina Pisarew 9/10 3147 days 1%
Luis Vigil Vidal 10/10 3155 days 1%
Dennis Hesse 10/10 3159 days 1%
Tori De 1/10 3172 days 0%
Marketa Weisserová 10/10 3185 days 1%
Yanzhi Cheng 10/10 3247 days 1%
Joe Trigg 9/10 3251 days 1%
Jenny Jaye 10/10 3267 days 1%
Victoria Smith 10/10 3318 days 1%
Poppy Ritchie 10/10 3347 days 1%
Judy Aspinall 9/10 3432 days 1%
Rosanna Leeming 7/10 3493 days 1%
Matt Downey 7/10 3504 days 1%
Frankie Winsor 9/10 3520 days 1%
Lisa Al Agam 10/10 3532 days 1%
Thomas Jan Geelen 6/10 3546 days 0%
Audrey Zarlenga 10/10 3577 days 1%
Theo Mallais 10/10 3619 days 1%
Puneet Mishra 10/10 3622 days 1%
Derek Drost 7/10 3633 days 0%
Simon Liehout 9/10 3659 days 0%
Debbie 9/10 3659 days 0%
Philippa Buchanan 9/10 3714 days 0%
Rita Ashby 8/10 3751 days 0%
Connie Hopper 9/10 3793 days 0%
Tatiana Rochereau 9/10 3802 days 0%
Andre Evers 9/10 3805 days 0%
David Elliott 8/10 3812 days 0%
Goldfinger 9/10 3843 days 0%
Bernadette Arnet 9/10 3849 days 0%
Zdenda Barvinek 9/10 3895 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lumsden Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.24% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

97%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.