Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lumsden Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lumsden Information Centre

Valid Reviews

136 Valid Reviews

The Lumsden Information Centre experience has a total of 141 reviews. There are 136 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 136 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 136 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 92
68%
9/10 26
19%
8/10 9
7%
7/10 6
4%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 2
1%

93.82% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lumsden Information Centre valid reviews is 93.82% and is based on 136 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

97.96%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Kunaoona 10/10 59 days 100%
Fine 10/10 90 days 100%
Borrmaschine 10/10 90 days 100%
Jakub 10/10 241 days 97%
Masen 10/10 241 days 97%
Andy 10/10 271 days 96%
Manon 10/10 271 days 96%
Jenda 10/10 363 days 93%
Laurie 10/10 363 days 93%
Nicholas Turner 10/10 424 days 90%
Dan 9/10 455 days 87%
Derek Gillard 10/10 483 days 87%
Patrick 10/10 545 days 83%
Berdien 10/10 545 days 83%
Mladen Savov 10/10 545 days 83%
Fritz 9/10 575 days 80%
Laura 10/10 636 days 77%
parisonchloe@gmail.com 10/10 698 days 72%
Holly 10/10 759 days 67%
Caron 10/10 789 days 64%
Tommy 10/10 789 days 64%
Myrthe Venema 10/10 820 days 61%
Hugo 9/10 820 days 61%
Ana Capucho 10/10 880 days 55%
Lili 10/10 911 days 52%
Danielle Rubio 10/10 911 days 52%
Joe 10/10 941 days 49%
Nina 10/10 941 days 49%
Cholly 9/10 972 days 46%
Marie Perret 8/10 1002 days 42%
Sara 10/10 1033 days 40%
Anaïs 10/10 1094 days 35%
Basil 10/10 1125 days 32%
Etoile Rose 10/10 1125 days 32%
Tim Mitterer 10/10 1155 days 30%
Simon Wiinberg 10/10 1214 days 26%
Simon Möller 9/10 1214 days 25%
Sandrina 10/10 1245 days 23%
Vish 10/10 1245 days 23%
Tom 10/10 1245 days 23%
Amanda Moreira 10/10 1245 days 23%
Julia 9/10 1276 days 21%
Chris 10/10 1306 days 20%
Chonky Bell 10/10 1306 days 20%
Adrian 10/10 1306 days 20%
Christine 10/10 1337 days 18%
Lara 9/10 1337 days 18%
Broke 8/10 1398 days 14%
Jineesh D 10/10 1490 days 10%
Caroline LEFEVRE 10/10 1490 days 10%
Alicia 10/10 1579 days 8%
EvaBelle 10/10 1641 days 6%
chel 10/10 1763 days 4%
Jeannine Davis 10/10 1794 days 4%
JT & MJ 10/10 1855 days 4%
Valg 10/10 1916 days 4%
Fiona Taylor 7/10 1916 days 3%
Maureen Tate 9/10 1916 days 4%
The Gillies 8/10 1916 days 4%
Jenny 10/10 1944 days 4%
Rey 10/10 2006 days 4%
Teesh K 10/10 2036 days 4%
Rebecca 10/10 2036 days 4%
Sandy 10/10 2159 days 3%
Kate in NZ 10/10 2159 days 3%
Ricardo 10/10 2281 days 3%
Marianna 10/10 2310 days 3%
Jane Lawrence 9/10 2310 days 3%
Linda 8/10 2310 days 3%
Niven 10/10 2310 days 3%
Lee 10/10 2341 days 3%
Dan 10/10 2341 days 3%
Katie 9/10 2372 days 3%
GM 7/10 2372 days 3%
Devin 10/10 2402 days 3%
Anni Heltti 10/10 2424 days 1%
Javier.G 10/10 2433 days 3%
Tania Baird 9/10 2463 days 3%
Keith & Kay Finlayson 10/10 2494 days 3%
braddo 10/10 2494 days 3%
Meri 10/10 2525 days 3%
Jhade 10/10 2525 days 3%
Felix 10/10 2616 days 2%
OA 10/10 2647 days 2%
Kathryn Torkington 1/10 2647 days 0%
Brice 7/10 2647 days 2%
QueeenBeee 10/10 2675 days 2%
Megan Belanger 10/10 2675 days 2%
Franz 10/10 2706 days 2%
Inna 10/10 2706 days 2%
Ashton 9/10 2706 days 2%
Boris Clémençon 10/10 2706 days 2%
JT 10/10 2706 days 2%
Phil 10/10 2737 days 2%
Marilli 10/10 2737 days 2%
Thatdudejosh 10/10 2767 days 2%
Indy 10/10 2767 days 2%
Karo 10/10 2767 days 2%
Jonas R. 10/10 2798 days 2%
Joseph 8/10 2920 days 2%
Florian 10/10 2981 days 2%
Sarah 8/10 2981 days 2%
Jayling 10/10 3012 days 2%
Laura 9/10 3040 days 2%
Clobby 8/10 3040 days 2%
Katharina Pisarew 9/10 3046 days 1%
Luis Vigil Vidal 10/10 3054 days 1%
Dennis Hesse 10/10 3058 days 2%
Tori De 1/10 3071 days 0%
Marketa Weisserová 10/10 3084 days 2%
Yanzhi Cheng 10/10 3146 days 1%
Joe Trigg 9/10 3150 days 1%
Jenny Jaye 10/10 3166 days 1%
Victoria Smith 10/10 3217 days 1%
Poppy Ritchie 10/10 3246 days 1%
Judy Aspinall 9/10 3331 days 1%
Rosanna Leeming 7/10 3392 days 1%
Matt Downey 7/10 3403 days 1%
Frankie Winsor 9/10 3419 days 1%
Lisa Al Agam 10/10 3431 days 1%
Thomas Jan Geelen 6/10 3445 days 1%
Audrey Zarlenga 10/10 3476 days 1%
Theo Mallais 10/10 3518 days 1%
Puneet Mishra 10/10 3521 days 1%
Derek Drost 7/10 3532 days 1%
Simon Liehout 9/10 3558 days 1%
Debbie 9/10 3558 days 1%
Philippa Buchanan 9/10 3613 days 0%
Rita Ashby 8/10 3650 days 0%
Connie Hopper 9/10 3692 days 0%
Tatiana Rochereau 9/10 3701 days 0%
Andre Evers 9/10 3704 days 0%
David Elliott 8/10 3711 days 0%
Goldfinger 9/10 3742 days 0%
Bernadette Arnet 9/10 3748 days 0%
Zdenda Barvinek 9/10 3794 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lumsden Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.17% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

98%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.