Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lumsden Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
137 Valid Reviews
The Lumsden Information Centre experience has a total of 142 reviews. There are 137 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 137 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 137 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 92 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 26 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
7% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
93.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lumsden Information Centre valid reviews is 93.65% and is based on 137 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
97.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aubery | 7/10 | 69 days | 94% |
| Kunaoona | 10/10 | 160 days | 100% |
| Fine | 10/10 | 191 days | 99% |
| Borrmaschine | 10/10 | 191 days | 99% |
| Jakub | 10/10 | 342 days | 95% |
| Masen | 10/10 | 342 days | 95% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 372 days | 93% |
| Manon | 10/10 | 372 days | 93% |
| Jenda | 10/10 | 464 days | 89% |
| Laurie | 10/10 | 464 days | 89% |
| Nicholas Turner | 10/10 | 525 days | 85% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 556 days | 83% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 584 days | 82% |
| Patrick | 10/10 | 646 days | 77% |
| Berdien | 10/10 | 646 days | 77% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 646 days | 77% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 737 days | 70% |
| parisonchloe@gmail.com | 10/10 | 799 days | 64% |
| Holly | 10/10 | 860 days | 58% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 890 days | 55% |
| Tommy | 10/10 | 890 days | 55% |
| Myrthe Venema | 10/10 | 921 days | 52% |
| Hugo | 9/10 | 921 days | 51% |
| Ana Capucho | 10/10 | 981 days | 46% |
| Lili | 10/10 | 1012 days | 43% |
| Danielle Rubio | 10/10 | 1012 days | 43% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 1042 days | 40% |
| Nina | 10/10 | 1042 days | 40% |
| Cholly | 9/10 | 1073 days | 37% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 1103 days | 34% |
| Sara | 10/10 | 1134 days | 32% |
| Anaïs | 10/10 | 1195 days | 27% |
| Basil | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Etoile Rose | 10/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Tim Mitterer | 10/10 | 1256 days | 23% |
| Simon Wiinberg | 10/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Simon Möller | 9/10 | 1315 days | 19% |
| Sandrina | 10/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Vish | 10/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Amanda Moreira | 10/10 | 1346 days | 18% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 1377 days | 16% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 1407 days | 14% |
| Chonky Bell | 10/10 | 1407 days | 14% |
| Adrian | 10/10 | 1407 days | 14% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 1438 days | 13% |
| Lara | 9/10 | 1438 days | 13% |
| Broke | 8/10 | 1499 days | 10% |
| Jineesh D | 10/10 | 1591 days | 7% |
| Caroline LEFEVRE | 10/10 | 1591 days | 7% |
| Alicia | 10/10 | 1680 days | 5% |
| EvaBelle | 10/10 | 1742 days | 5% |
| chel | 10/10 | 1864 days | 4% |
| Jeannine Davis | 10/10 | 1895 days | 4% |
| JT & MJ | 10/10 | 1956 days | 4% |
| Valg | 10/10 | 2017 days | 4% |
| Fiona Taylor | 7/10 | 2017 days | 3% |
| Maureen Tate | 9/10 | 2017 days | 4% |
| The Gillies | 8/10 | 2017 days | 4% |
| Jenny | 10/10 | 2045 days | 4% |
| Rey | 10/10 | 2107 days | 4% |
| Teesh K | 10/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 2260 days | 3% |
| Kate in NZ | 10/10 | 2260 days | 3% |
| Ricardo | 10/10 | 2382 days | 3% |
| Marianna | 10/10 | 2411 days | 3% |
| Jane Lawrence | 9/10 | 2411 days | 3% |
| Linda | 8/10 | 2411 days | 3% |
| Niven | 10/10 | 2411 days | 3% |
| Lee | 10/10 | 2442 days | 3% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 2442 days | 3% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 2473 days | 3% |
| GM | 7/10 | 2473 days | 3% |
| Devin | 10/10 | 2503 days | 3% |
| Anni Heltti | 10/10 | 2525 days | 1% |
| Javier.G | 10/10 | 2534 days | 3% |
| Tania Baird | 9/10 | 2564 days | 3% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
| braddo | 10/10 | 2595 days | 3% |
| Meri | 10/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Jhade | 10/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2717 days | 2% |
| OA | 10/10 | 2748 days | 2% |
| Kathryn Torkington | 1/10 | 2748 days | 0% |
| Brice | 7/10 | 2748 days | 2% |
| QueeenBeee | 10/10 | 2776 days | 2% |
| Megan Belanger | 10/10 | 2776 days | 2% |
| Franz | 10/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Inna | 10/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Ashton | 9/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| JT | 10/10 | 2807 days | 2% |
| Phil | 10/10 | 2838 days | 2% |
| Marilli | 10/10 | 2838 days | 2% |
| Thatdudejosh | 10/10 | 2868 days | 2% |
| Indy | 10/10 | 2868 days | 2% |
| Karo | 10/10 | 2868 days | 2% |
| Jonas R. | 10/10 | 2899 days | 2% |
| Joseph | 8/10 | 3021 days | 2% |
| Florian | 10/10 | 3082 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 3082 days | 2% |
| Jayling | 10/10 | 3113 days | 2% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 3141 days | 1% |
| Clobby | 8/10 | 3141 days | 1% |
| Katharina Pisarew | 9/10 | 3147 days | 1% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 3155 days | 1% |
| Dennis Hesse | 10/10 | 3159 days | 1% |
| Tori De | 1/10 | 3172 days | 0% |
| Marketa Weisserová | 10/10 | 3185 days | 1% |
| Yanzhi Cheng | 10/10 | 3247 days | 1% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 3251 days | 1% |
| Jenny Jaye | 10/10 | 3267 days | 1% |
| Victoria Smith | 10/10 | 3318 days | 1% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 10/10 | 3347 days | 1% |
| Judy Aspinall | 9/10 | 3432 days | 1% |
| Rosanna Leeming | 7/10 | 3493 days | 1% |
| Matt Downey | 7/10 | 3504 days | 1% |
| Frankie Winsor | 9/10 | 3520 days | 1% |
| Lisa Al Agam | 10/10 | 3532 days | 1% |
| Thomas Jan Geelen | 6/10 | 3546 days | 0% |
| Audrey Zarlenga | 10/10 | 3577 days | 1% |
| Theo Mallais | 10/10 | 3619 days | 1% |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Derek Drost | 7/10 | 3633 days | 0% |
| Simon Liehout | 9/10 | 3659 days | 0% |
| Debbie | 9/10 | 3659 days | 0% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 9/10 | 3714 days | 0% |
| Rita Ashby | 8/10 | 3751 days | 0% |
| Connie Hopper | 9/10 | 3793 days | 0% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 9/10 | 3802 days | 0% |
| Andre Evers | 9/10 | 3805 days | 0% |
| David Elliott | 8/10 | 3812 days | 0% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3843 days | 0% |
| Bernadette Arnet | 9/10 | 3849 days | 0% |
| Zdenda Barvinek | 9/10 | 3895 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lumsden Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.