Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for TECT All Terrain Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
33 Valid Reviews
The TECT All Terrain Park experience has a total of 33 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 33 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 33 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the TECT All Terrain Park valid reviews is 89.39% and is based on 33 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Marion & Leonie||9/10||167 days||95.58||100%|
|Rikke Hessellund, Denmark||8/10||504 days||59.75||61%|
|Keith Salway||10/10||543 days||63.93||65%|
|Kyra Trouw||10/10||580 days||47.03||47%|
|Annina Jarvinen||5/10||586 days||46.05||46%|
|Claudie MieZech||10/10||616 days||41.36||40%|
|Christoper Crowhurst||10/10||663 days||34.57||33%|
|Greta Ross||8/10||678 days||32.55||31%|
|Greg Smith||9/10||725 days||26.69||24%|
|Nathan Lal||9/10||736 days||25.42||23%|
|Daryl Fletcher||10/10||761 days||22.68||20%|
|Blossom Yoshida||9/10||778 days||20.92||18%|
|Lucile Gendre||9/10||826 days||16.47||13%|
|Nicholas Tranchant||9/10||833 days||15.88||13%|
|Jana Welsch||10/10||847 days||14.75||11%|
|Sky Pardoe Davies||8/10||852 days||14.36||11%|
|Christine Allgaier||10/10||879 days||12.39||9%|
|Alison Gonscak||10/10||880 days||12.32||9%|
|Jose Verli||10/10||1007 days||6.23||2%|
|Philipp Jahn||8/10||1028 days||5.71||1%|
|Aidan Byrne||7/10||1037 days||5.53||1%|
|Eric Pollard||10/10||1055 days||5.25||1%|
|Thomas Nix||9/10||1154 days||4.92||0%|
|Peter Barker||10/10||1212 days||4.84||0%|
|Sandra Hamilton||9/10||1224 days||4.82||0%|
|George Bellwood||9/10||1225 days||5.79||1%|
|Philippa and Adam||10/10||1226 days||4.82||0%|
|Nina Jensen||10/10||1272 days||4.76||0%|
|Tomas Soldat||8/10||1293 days||4.73||0%|
|Ahmed Mohsen Aly||8/10||1354 days||4.65||0%|
|Niall Crosby||6/10||1478 days||4.48||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. TECT All Terrain Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.