Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for TECT All Terrain Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

TECT All Terrain Park

Valid Reviews

40 Valid Reviews

The TECT All Terrain Park experience has a total of 40 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 40 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 17
43%
9/10 13
33%
8/10 7
18%
7/10 1
3%
6/10 1
3%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.25% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the TECT All Terrain Park valid reviews is 90.25% and is based on 40 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

92.36%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Fran 9/10 26 days 99.89 100%
Remon 10/10 87 days 98.8 99%
Martin Hansen 10/10 118 days 97.79 98%
Bakers 9/10 148 days 96.53 97%
Shane Howe 10/10 148 days 96.53 97%
Kiwi kamper 8/10 210 days 88.36 88%
Michelle Strydom 10/10 301 days 85.64 85%
Marion & Leonie 9/10 360 days 79.46 79%
Courtney 9/10 360 days 79.46 79%
jcastl 9/10 452 days 67.63 67%
Rikke Hessellund, Denmark 8/10 697 days 28.6 26%
Keith Salway 10/10 736 days true 25.42 23%
Kyra Trouw 10/10 773 days 21.43 19%
Annina Jarvinen 5/10 779 days 16.87 14%
Claudie MieZech 10/10 809 days 17.96 15%
Christoper Crowhurst 10/10 856 days 14.05 11%
Greta Ross 8/10 871 days 12.3 9%
Greg Smith 9/10 918 days 9.96 7%
Nathan Lal 9/10 929 days 9.37 6%
Daryl Fletcher 10/10 954 days 8.15 5%
Blossom Yoshida 9/10 971 days 7.44 4%
Lucile Gendre 9/10 1019 days 5.92 3%
Nicholas Tranchant 9/10 1026 days 5.75 3%
Jana Welsch 10/10 1040 days 5.48 2%
Sky Pardoe Davies 8/10 1045 days 5.13 2%
Christine Allgaier 10/10 1072 days 5.08 2%
Alison Gonscak 10/10 1073 days 5.08 2%
Jose Verli 10/10 1200 days 4.79 2%
Philipp Jahn 8/10 1221 days 4.52 1%
Aidan Byrne 7/10 1230 days 4.31 1%
Eric Pollard 10/10 1248 days 4.7 2%
Thomas Nix 9/10 1347 days 4.51 1%
Peter Barker 10/10 1405 days 4.39 1%
Sandra Hamilton 9/10 1417 days 4.37 1%
George Bellwood 9/10 1418 days true 4.37 1%
Philippa and Adam 10/10 1419 days 4.37 1%
Nina Jensen 10/10 1465 days 4.28 1%
Tomas Soldat 8/10 1486 days 4.02 1%
Ahmed Mohsen Aly 8/10 1547 days 3.91 1%
Niall Crosby 6/10 1670 days 3.22 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. TECT All Terrain Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.