Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Renwick Domain Carpark.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Renwick Domain Carpark

Valid Reviews

33 Valid Reviews

The Renwick Domain Carpark experience has a total of 36 reviews. There are 33 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 33 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 6
18%
9/10 6
18%
8/10 9
27%
7/10 4
12%
6/10 3
9%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
3%
2/10 1
3%
1/10 3
9%

72.73% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Renwick Domain Carpark valid reviews is 72.73% and is based on 33 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

84.97%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Silja 8/10 39 days 99%
Kiara Hamis 9/10 39 days 100%
Clement 8/10 98 days 99%
Moha 10/10 190 days 99%
Rory M 6/10 190 days 85%
Domi 7/10 251 days 91%
McLean 8/10 463 days 87%
Mike 10/10 494 days 87%
Dina 9/10 525 days 84%
EI 10/10 555 days 83%
Stu 10/10 616 days 79%
Caron 9/10 800 days 63%
Linda 7/10 829 days 57%
Walli 9/10 829 days 60%
HJR 8/10 1105 days 33%
Heidi Maurice 8/10 1286 days 20%
Leyna H. 2/10 1470 days 5%
Gem 10/10 1651 days 6%
Jose 1/10 1955 days 1%
Cape Crusaders 8/10 2139 days 3%
OveckaOve 10/10 2200 days 3%
Mitchell 8/10 2747 days 2%
Paola Moraca 1/10 2747 days 0%
Tonya 1/10 2931 days 0%
Florian 9/10 2992 days 2%
Arnaud 9/10 3095 days 1%
Antoine Pastor 3/10 3099 days 0%
Joe Trigg 8/10 3114 days 1%
Jo Dawson 8/10 3245 days 1%
Julia Kurtz 6/10 3323 days 1%
David Coyle 7/10 3436 days 1%
Andrik 6/10 3688 days 0%
Axel Teich 7/10 3733 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Renwick Domain Carpark does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.83% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.