Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Evans Bay Marina Carpark.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
76 Valid Reviews
The Evans Bay Marina Carpark experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 76 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 76 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Evans Bay Marina Carpark valid reviews is 75.53% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Smith||7/10||95 days||89.7||98%|
|Louise Cochrane||1/10||156 days||70.18||76%|
|Dennis Rijbroek||7/10||217 days||84.21||92%|
|Andy and Julia||9/10||370 days||78.31||85%|
|Glen Marshall UK||7/10||429 days||64.46||70%|
|Mike Fricker||9/10||552 days||51.72||55%|
|Tamara & Brittany||6/10||552 days||42.93||45%|
|Ingrid Peters||7/10||552 days||47.07||50%|
|Joe and Angie||8/10||613 days||39.72||42%|
|Zella Mahoney||6/10||674 days||27.46||28%|
|Bex & Jake||7/10||705 days||26.48||27%|
|Michael Stützle||10/10||735 days||25.54||26%|
|Spike Thorne||7/10||747 days||22.01||22%|
|Simon Springett||7/10||788 days||18.14||17%|
|Katharina Pisarew||8/10||791 days||18.66||18%|
|Jackie & Kevin||8/10||794 days||18.39||18%|
|UK 50-something couple||7/10||794 days||17.61||17%|
|Maggie Konstanski||6/10||857 days||11.6||10%|
|Nadene Wheatley||6/10||882 days||10.12||8%|
|Colin Chong||8/10||898 days||10.59||9%|
|Jasmine Andrew||8/10||901 days||10.42||9%|
|Wen Xin Tan||10/10||967 days||7.6||5%|
|Guillem Planells||7/10||979 days||6.49||4%|
|Jessy Tscherrig||9/10||1024 days||5.8||3%|
|Jo Dawson||8/10||1031 days||5.37||3%|
|Judy Aspinall||9/10||1085 days||5.02||2%|
|Denise Hall||9/10||1113 days||4.96||2%|
|Dana Nunes||8/10||1141 days||4.66||2%|
|Erich Brueggermann||3/10||1188 days||3.71||1%|
|Alba Mateos||8/10||1190 days||4.57||2%|
|Verena Fendt||9/10||1204 days||4.79||2%|
|Nicola Barlow||8/10||1216 days||4.53||2%|
|Greg MacFire||8/10||1227 days||4.5||2%|
|Christine Hurring||8/10||1265 days||4.43||2%|
|Aidan Byrne||6/10||1299 days||3.82||1%|
|Beth Goodrich||8/10||1355 days||4.27||2%|
|Rosemary Roche||7/10||1374 days||4.05||1%|
|Clara Bertomeu||7/10||1447 days||3.92||1%|
|Connie Hopper||8/10||1452 days||4.09||1%|
|Jon Puttick||10/10||1480 days||4.25||2%|
|Sandra Hamilton||6/10||1486 days||3.51||1%|
|Liz Barnett||8/10||1496 days||4.0||1%|
|Sean Stevens||8/10||1497 days||4.0||1%|
|Timm Urschinger||7/10||1499 days||3.83||1%|
|Phillippa McLernon||7/10||1512 days||3.81||1%|
|Hake Dolce||8/10||1517 days||3.97||1%|
|renee verwey||8/10||1519 days||3.96||1%|
|Kristen Leal||8/10||1525 days||3.95||1%|
|Jeremy Little||10/10||1590 days||4.03||1%|
|Bob Carreau||8/10||1649 days||3.72||1%|
|Yanick Desautels||8/10||1791 days||3.46||1%|
|James Webster||10/10||1841 days||3.54||1%|
|Mike Merrick||6/10||1882 days||2.87||0%|
|Cymen Crick||7/10||1921 days||3.08||0%|
|Adrien Leboeuf||7/10||1960 days||3.01||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Evans Bay Marina Carpark does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.