Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Evans Bay Marina Carpark.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
76 Valid Reviews
The Evans Bay Marina Carpark experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 76 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 76 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Evans Bay Marina Carpark valid reviews is 75.53% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Smith||7/10||196 days||85.46||100%|
|Louise Cochrane||1/10||257 days||65.36||76%|
|Dennis Rijbroek||7/10||318 days||76.42||89%|
|Andy and Julia||9/10||471 days||64.85||75%|
|Glen Marshall UK||7/10||530 days||50.49||58%|
|Mike Fricker||9/10||653 days||35.96||40%|
|Tamara & Brittany||6/10||653 days||29.84||33%|
|Ingrid Peters||7/10||653 days||32.72||36%|
|Joe and Angie||8/10||714 days||26.6||29%|
|Zella Mahoney||6/10||775 days||17.62||18%|
|Bex & Jake||7/10||806 days||16.59||17%|
|Michael Stützle||10/10||836 days||15.63||16%|
|Spike Thorne||7/10||848 days||13.35||13%|
|Simon Springett||7/10||889 days||10.67||10%|
|Katharina Pisarew||8/10||892 days||10.95||10%|
|Jackie & Kevin||8/10||895 days||10.77||10%|
|UK 50-something couple||7/10||895 days||10.32||9%|
|Maggie Konstanski||6/10||958 days||6.62||5%|
|Nadene Wheatley||6/10||983 days||5.8||4%|
|Colin Chong||8/10||999 days||6.14||4%|
|Jasmine Andrew||8/10||1002 days||6.05||4%|
|Wen Xin Tan||10/10||1068 days||5.12||3%|
|Guillem Planells||7/10||1080 days||4.58||2%|
|Jessy Tscherrig||9/10||1125 days||4.94||3%|
|Jo Dawson||8/10||1132 days||4.68||2%|
|Judy Aspinall||9/10||1186 days||4.82||3%|
|Denise Hall||9/10||1214 days||4.77||2%|
|Dana Nunes||8/10||1242 days||4.48||2%|
|Erich Brueggermann||3/10||1289 days||3.56||1%|
|Alba Mateos||8/10||1291 days||4.39||2%|
|Verena Fendt||9/10||1305 days||4.59||2%|
|Nicola Barlow||8/10||1317 days||4.34||2%|
|Greg MacFire||8/10||1328 days||4.32||2%|
|Christine Hurring||8/10||1366 days||4.25||2%|
|Aidan Byrne||6/10||1400 days||3.65||1%|
|Beth Goodrich||8/10||1456 days||4.08||2%|
|Rosemary Roche||7/10||1475 days||3.87||1%|
|Clara Bertomeu||7/10||1548 days||3.74||1%|
|Connie Hopper||8/10||1553 days||3.9||1%|
|Jon Puttick||10/10||1581 days||4.05||2%|
|Sandra Hamilton||6/10||1587 days||3.35||1%|
|Liz Barnett||8/10||1597 days||3.82||1%|
|Sean Stevens||8/10||1598 days||3.81||1%|
|Timm Urschinger||7/10||1600 days||3.65||1%|
|Phillippa McLernon||7/10||1613 days||3.63||1%|
|Hake Dolce||8/10||1618 days||3.78||1%|
|renee verwey||8/10||1620 days||3.77||1%|
|Kristen Leal||8/10||1626 days||3.76||1%|
|Jeremy Little||10/10||1691 days||3.83||1%|
|Bob Carreau||8/10||1750 days||3.53||1%|
|Yanick Desautels||8/10||1892 days||3.27||1%|
|James Webster||10/10||1942 days||3.34||1%|
|Mike Merrick||6/10||1983 days||2.71||0%|
|Cymen Crick||7/10||2022 days||2.9||0%|
|Adrien Leboeuf||7/10||2061 days||2.83||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Evans Bay Marina Carpark does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.