Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Evans Bay Marina Carpark.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
77 Valid Reviews
The Evans Bay Marina Carpark experience has a total of 83 reviews. There are 77 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 77 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Evans Bay Marina Carpark valid reviews is 75.84% and is based on 77 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Smith||7/10||263 days||81.03||81%|
|Louise Cochrane||1/10||324 days||60.86||60%|
|Dennis Rijbroek||7/10||385 days||69.63||69%|
|Andy and Julia||9/10||538 days||54.13||53%|
|Glen Marshall UK||7/10||597 days||40.31||39%|
|Mike Fricker||9/10||720 days||27.28||25%|
|Tamara & Brittany||6/10||720 days||22.65||21%|
|Ingrid Peters||7/10||720 days||24.83||23%|
|Joe and Angie||8/10||781 days||19.59||18%|
|Zella Mahoney||6/10||842 days||12.57||10%|
|Bex & Jake||7/10||873 days||11.66||9%|
|Michael Stützle||10/10||903 days||10.84||8%|
|Spike Thorne||7/10||915 days||9.22||7%|
|Simon Springett||7/10||956 days||7.34||5%|
|Katharina Pisarew||8/10||959 days||7.53||5%|
|Jackie & Kevin||8/10||962 days||7.41||5%|
|UK 50-something couple||7/10||962 days||7.1||5%|
|Maggie Konstanski||6/10||1025 days||4.79||2%|
|Nadene Wheatley||6/10||1050 days||4.42||2%|
|Colin Chong||8/10||1066 days||4.88||2%|
|Jasmine Andrew||8/10||1069 days||4.85||2%|
|Wen Xin Tan||10/10||1135 days||4.92||2%|
|Guillem Planells||7/10||1147 days||4.46||2%|
|Jessy Tscherrig||9/10||1192 days||4.81||2%|
|Jo Dawson||8/10||1199 days||4.56||2%|
|Judy Aspinall||9/10||1253 days||4.69||2%|
|Denise Hall||9/10||1281 days||4.64||2%|
|Dana Nunes||8/10||1309 days||4.35||2%|
|Erich Brueggermann||3/10||1356 days||3.46||1%|
|Alba Mateos||8/10||1357 days||4.26||2%|
|Verena Fendt||9/10||1372 days||4.46||2%|
|Nicola Barlow||8/10||1384 days||4.21||2%|
|Greg MacFire||8/10||1395 days||4.19||2%|
|Christine Hurring||8/10||1433 days||4.12||2%|
|Aidan Byrne||6/10||1467 days||3.55||1%|
|Beth Goodrich||8/10||1523 days||3.95||1%|
|Rosemary Roche||7/10||1541 days||3.76||1%|
|Clara Bertomeu||7/10||1615 days||3.62||1%|
|Connie Hopper||8/10||1620 days||3.77||1%|
|Jon Puttick||10/10||1648 days||3.92||1%|
|Sandra Hamilton||6/10||1654 days||3.24||1%|
|Liz Barnett||8/10||1663 days||3.69||1%|
|Sean Stevens||8/10||1665 days||3.69||1%|
|Timm Urschinger||7/10||1667 days||3.53||1%|
|Phillippa McLernon||7/10||1680 days||3.51||1%|
|Hake Dolce||8/10||1685 days||3.65||1%|
|renee verwey||8/10||1687 days||3.65||1%|
|Kristen Leal||8/10||1692 days||3.64||1%|
|Jeremy Little||10/10||1758 days||3.7||1%|
|Bob Carreau||8/10||1817 days||3.41||1%|
|Yanick Desautels||8/10||1959 days||3.14||1%|
|James Webster||10/10||2009 days||3.21||1%|
|Mike Merrick||6/10||2050 days||2.6||0%|
|Cymen Crick||7/10||2088 days||2.78||0%|
|Adrien Leboeuf||7/10||2128 days||2.71||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Evans Bay Marina Carpark does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.